Risk Management for Visitors at Tourism Market: a Study at Beringharjo Tourism Market Yogyakarta)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-36
Author(s):  
Faizah Januarti ◽  
Helfi Agustin ◽  
Muchamad Rifai

Abstract Background: Visitors activities and the environment on the market have potential hazards that pose safety and health risk. Some market visitors lack awareness and often ignored potential hazard and risks due to lack of knowledge. This study aims to analyze the potential hazards and determine the hazard control efforts that have been made by the manager. Met This research is a qualitative study, by an observational approach. Research informants selected by purposive,  they were head of the staffing subdivision, security officers, traders/seller, and porter at the Beringharjo Market. The instruments used were checklist and interview guidance. Risks were analyzed with the AS / NZS 4360 standard. Results: The results of the study contained 40 types of potential hazards and 48 types of potential risks. The risk of market fires due to electricity installation failures and gas usage has an extreme rating. Low Back Pain (LBP) risk to the porter and injured by a coconut grater machine included in the high-risk rating. Control efforts undertaken were replacing the gas stoves to charcoal for cooking, forbidding smoking and the use of matches, training when lifting weights, disposing of garbage regularly, using seat belts and hooks when working at height. Conclusion: Market Managers have made several control efforts but inadequate and uncomfortable for. Advised to provide seat facilities for visitors to rest, safety talk to educate visitors about fires and training traders to use a fire extinguisher, activating the Occupational Health and Safety efforts organized by the community in the informal sector, making Standard Operational Procedure for each trading activity. Keywords: Hazard identification, risk assessment, hazard control, market, tourism   Abstrak Latar belakang : Kegiatan pengunjung dan lingkungan di pasar memiliki potensi bahaya yang menimbulkan risiko keselamatan dan kesehatan. Kebanyakan pengunjung pasar memiliki kesadaran yang rendah dan sering mengabaikan potensi bahaya karena kurangnya pengetahuan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potensi bahaya dan mendapat gambaran upaya pengendalian bahaya yang telah dilakukan oleh manajer Pasar Beringharjo di Yogyakarta. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif, pendekatan observasional. Informan dipilih secara purposive, yaitu kepala bagian Kepegawaian, petugas keamanan, pedagang, dan buruh gendong di Pasar Beringharjo. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah checklist dan panduan wawancara. Risiko dianalisis dengan  standar AS/NZS 4360 Hasil: terdapat 40 jenis potensi bahaya dan 48 jenis potensi risiko. Risiko kebakaran pasar akibat kegagalan instalasi listrik dan penggunaan gas memiliki peringkat risiko yang sangat tinggi (Extreme).  Risiko Low Back Pain (LBP) pada aktivitas buruh gendong dan terluka oleh mesin pemarut kelapa yang termasuk dalam peringkat risiko tinggi (High). Upaya pengendalian yang telah dilakukan adalah mengganti penggunaan kompor gas dengan arang untuk memasak, melarang merokok dan penggunaan korek kecuali untuk memasak, pelatihan tentang beban kerja dan postur tubuh yang benar saat mengangkat beban, membuang sampah secara teratur, menutup makanan yang dijajakan, menggunakan sabuk pengaman dan tali pengait saat bekerja di ketinggian. Kesimpulan: Pengelola Pasar sudah melakukan beberapa upaya pengendalian, namun belum memadai dan belum memberikan kenyamanan pada pengunjung, disarankan menyediakan fasilitas kursi untuk beristirahat pengunjung, edukasi melalui safety talk kepada pengunjung mengenai kebakaran dan pelatihan penggunaan APAR kepada pedagang, mengaktifkan pos Usaha Kesehatan Kerja untuk mengelola kegiatan K3 pasar, pembuatan SOP bagi setiap aktifitas perdagangan. Kata kunci: Identifikasi bahaya, Penilaian risiko, Pengendalian bahaya, Pasar, Wisata.          

2019 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 339-348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki Iwakiri ◽  
Masaya Takahashi ◽  
Midori Sotoyama ◽  
Xinxin Liu ◽  
Shigeki Koda

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S290-S291
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki IWAKIRI ◽  
Masaya TAKAHASHI ◽  
Midori SOTOYAMA ◽  
Xinxin LIU ◽  
Shigeki KODA

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
Amal Mukhtad

Lower back pain (LBP) is recognized as a cause of morbidity in developed nations in different occupational situations. Health care workers (HCWs), in particular nurses, are especially vulnerable to LBP. About 60–80% of the general people suffer from LBP at some time during their lives. However, there is not enough care about workplace health and safety problems facing the health care workforce in developing nations, such as Libya. Thus, this study aimed to find out the status of low back pain and factors affecting pain among the nurses in Benghazi Medical Centre (BMC), Libya. Cross-sectional study was conducted on BMC in 2018. The data was collected by a self-administered questionnaire. Chi-square was used to determine the association between associated risk factors and LBP prevalence (p<0.05). There is a high prevalence (79%) of low back pain among nurses in BMC. Individual and work-related factors were found as risk factors for LBP. In Libya, nurses are considered as a critical health and safety concern, as a result of the weakness of policies in healthcare organizations. Consequently, a proper no weight lifting policy should be considered. If not, proper manual lifting must be implemented.


Author(s):  
Denny Nurkertamanda ◽  
I Nyoman Adiputra ◽  
Ketut Tirtayasa ◽  
I Putu Gede Adiatmika

One of the manual matrial handling jobs is the derivative work from the top of the truck. In working the workers use a tool that enggrong which is a short-handed shovel. Due to the use of employee enggrong work with stooped posture. This work posture raises the potential for low back pain in workers. This study is a cross sectional study with a sample of 9 participants. The purpose of research is to find potential risks of low back pain based on angle trunk when workers work sent down the sand by enggrong. Angle trunk which is predicted covering: 1 angle trunk flexion, 2) angle trunk bending, and 3) angle trunk twisting. Work posture data was taken using Microsoft KinectTM 3D camera and analyzed by using Siemen Jack 3D Static Strength Prediction Program (3DSSPP) software to predict angle trunk. The result of the analysis of the 6 work postures showed that worker's frequently employed posture had the average angle trunk flexion of 61.10 ± 10.090, angle trunk bending of 19.80 ± 6.740 and angle trunk twisting of 20.00 ± 9.030. The average angle trunk flexion at 87.28% of maximal angle is a major cause risk low back pain. So that it can be summed up the potential for low back pain on sand workers. Intervention ergonomics need to prevent and reduce potential risks happened low back pain on sand workers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S106-S107
Author(s):  
Kazuyuki IWAKIRI ◽  
Masaya TAKAHASHI ◽  
Midori SOTOYAMA ◽  
Xinxin LIU ◽  
Shigeki KODA

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Iwan M. Ramdan ◽  
Abd. Rahman

Perawat merupakan petugas kesehatan dengan presentasi terbesar dan memegang peranan penting dalam pemberian pelayanan kesehatan. Dalam menjalankan tugasnya perawat berisiko mengalami gangguan kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja (K3). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis risiko K3 pada perawat di instalasi gawat darurat (IGD) Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah dr. H. Soemarmo Sosroatmodjo dalam rangka mencari upaya pengendalian risiko yang tepat sehingga perawat terhindar dari kecelakaan kerja dan penyakit akibat kerja. Penelitian mixed method telah dilakukan pada seluruh perawat di IGD yang berjumlah 20 orang (total sampling), penilaian risiko mengacu pada standar AS/NZS 4360:2004 tentang Risk Management. Untuk mengkaji likelihood, exposure, dan consequence digunakan pedoman wawancara dan job hazard analysis form. Penilaian tingkat risiko mengacu pada rumus dan tabel “William Fine”. Disimpulkan, bahaya level terbesar diperoleh pada tindakan memasang infus berupa risiko tertusuk jarum suntik, terpapar darah pasien, posisi tubuh yang salah, terpapar virus hepatitis, dan low back pain. Nilai Consequences (C), Exposure (E), dan Likelihood (L) pada tindakan ini adalah C:5, E:6, dan L:6. Rumah sakit disarankan untuk melakukan upaya pengendalian lebih lanjut sesuai dengan hirarki pengendalian K3.Kata kunci: Analisis risiko, instalasi gawat darurat, kesehatan dan keselamatan kerja, perawat. Health and Safety Risk Analysis of NursesAbstractNurses are health care workers with the largest presentation and plays an important role in the health services. In performing its duties, nurses are at risk for health and safety disturbances. This study aimed to analyse the risk of health and safety of nurses in the emergency room (ER) of dr. H. Soemarmo Sosroatmodjo Hospital, in order to find appropriate risk control so that nurses avoid to work accidents and occupational diseases. Mixed method research has been done on all nurses in ER which amounted to 20 nurses (total sampling). Risk assessment refers to the standard of AS/NZS 4360:2004 on Risk Management, interview guide and job hazard analysis form was used to assess the “likelihood”, “exposure”, and “consequence”. Assessment of risk level refers to the formulas and tables of “William Fine”. It is concluded that the greatest danger level obtained on the actions of an intra venous drip, consists of the risk of needlestick injuries, exposure to the patient’s blood, wrong body position, exposed to viral hepatitis, and low back pain. The values of consequences (C), exposure (E), and likelihood (L) in this action are C:5, E:6, and L:6. Hospitals are advised to make further control efforts in accordance with health and safety control hierarchy.Keywords: Emergency room, health and safety, nurses, risk analysis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 149
Author(s):  
Denny Nurkertamanda

Salah satu pekerjaan angkat angkut adalah pekerjaan menurunkan pasir dari atas truk. Dalam bekerja, pekerja menggunakan alat bantu berupa enggrong yang merupakan sekop dengan gagang pendek. Akibat penggunaan enggrong, pekerja bekerja dengan postur tubuh membungkuk. Postur kerja ini menimbulkan potensi low back pain pada pekerja. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian cross sectional dengan jumlah sampel 9 partisipan. Tujuan dari penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui potensi risiko low back pain berdasarkan sudut kemiringan trunk ketika pekerja bekerja menurunkan pasir dengan enggrong. Sudut kemiringan trunk yang diprediksi meliputi: 1) sudut kemiringan trunk flexion, 2) sudut kemiringan trunk bending, dan 3) sudut kemiringan trunk twisting. Data postur kerja diambil dengan menggunakan kamera 3D Microsoft KinectTM dan dianalisis dengan menggunakan software Siemen Jack metode 3D Static Strength Prediction Program (3DSSPP) untuk memprediksi sudut kemiringan trunk. Hasil analisis dari ke-6 postur kerja menunjukkan postur-postur kerja yang sering dilakukan pekerja mempunyai rerata sudut kemiringan trunk flexion sebesar 61,10 ± 10,090, sudut kemiringan trunk bending sebesar 19,80 ± 6,740 dan sudut kemiringan trunk twisting sebesar 20,00 ± 9,030. Rerata sudut kemiringan trunk flexion yang mencapai 87,28 %  dari sudut kemiringan maksimal merupakan penyebab utama risiko low back pain. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan potensi terjadinya low back pain pada pekerja pasiran dapat terjadi. Perlu intervensi ergonomi untuk mencegah dan mengurangi potensi risiko terjadi low back pain pada pekerja pasiran. AbstractOne of the manual matrial handling jobs is the derivative work from the top of the truck. In working the workers use a tool that enggrong which is a short-handed shovel. Due to the use of employee enggrong work with stooped posture. This work posture raises the potential for low back pain in workers. This study is a cross sectional study with a sample of 9 participants. The purpose of research is to find potential risks of low back pain based on angle trunk when workers work sent down the sand by enggrong. Angle trunk which is predicted covering: 1 angle trunk flexion, 2) angle trunk bending, and 3) angle trunk twisting. Work posture data was taken using Microsoft KinectTM 3D camera and analyzed by using Siemen Jack 3D Static Strength Prediction Program (3DSSPP) software to predict angle trunk. The result of the analysis of the 6 work postures showed that worker's frequently employed posture had the average angle trunk flexion of 61.10 ± 10.090, angle trunk bending of 19.80 ± 6.740 and angle trunk twisting of 20.00 ± 9.030. The average angle trunk flexion at 87.28% of maximal angle is a major cause risk low back pain. So that it can be summed up the potential for low back pain on sand workers. Intervention ergonomics need to prevent and reduce potential risks happened low back pain on sand workers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document