Audit of the Management of Constipation in Adult Palliative Care Patients at Galway University Hospital by the Palliative Care Team

Author(s):  
Leona Reilly
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuzana Kremenova ◽  
Jan Svancara ◽  
Petra Kralova ◽  
Martin Moravec ◽  
Katerina Hanouskova ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: More than 50% of patients worldwide die in hospitals. It is well known that end-of-life hospital care is costly.Our aims were to test whether the support of the palliative team can reduce end-of-life costs and to study the mechanisms of cost reduction.Methods: This was a one-centre descriptive retrospective case-control study. Big data from registries of routine visits were used for case-control matching. We included the expenses billed to the insurance company and added separately charged drugs and materials. We compared the groups over the duration of the terminal hospitalization, ICU days (ICU=intensive care unit), IV antibiotic use (IV=intravenous), MRI/CT scans (MRI/CR=magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography), oncologic treatment in the last month of life, and documentation of the dying phase.We searched for all in-hospital cases who died in the university hospital in Prague with the support of the hospital palliative team from January 2019 to April 2020 and matched them with similar controls. The controls were matched according to age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index and diagnosis recorded on the death certificate.Results: We identified 213 dyads. The average daily costs were three times lower in the palliative group (4,392.4 CZK per day=171.3 EUR) than in the non-palliative group (13,992.8 CZK per day=545.8 EUR), and the difference was caused by the shorter time spent in the ICU (16% vs 33% of hospital days). This was probably due to better documentation of the dying phase in the medical records.Conclusions: To date, there are sparse hospital data available on the economic aspects of end-of-life care. We showed that the integration of the palliative care team in the dying phase can be cost saving. The evidence that hospital palliative care can save a substantial amount of money can be used to support the integration of palliative care in hospitals in middle- and low-income countries. A multicentre study with the same design is planned in the future to increase the strength of the results.


2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. 795-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imke Strohscheer ◽  
Julijana Verebes ◽  
Hellmut Samonigg

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 192-192
Author(s):  
Benjamin Gronwald ◽  
Michael Wolff ◽  
Jan Gaertner ◽  
Patric Bialas ◽  
Marcus Niewald ◽  
...  

192 Background: Breathlessness is a common and distressing symptom, which increases in many diseases as they progress and is difficult to manage. It is widely accepted that opioids are safe and effective for treating dyspnea, although no single opioid has an authorization for the treatment of breathlessness. The aims of the study were to assess prevalence rates of breathlessness as well as the treatment approaches especially with respect to opioid therapy in all patients cared by a hospital palliative care team in a university hospital over a period of five years. Methods: A systematic review of all electronically available records of patients under palliative care service from April 2010 – April 2015 was performed. Results: Breathlessness was the third most common symptom in our patient group behind fatigue and pain. Furthermore it was classified as the utmost distressing symptom of all. Many patients suffering from breathlessness were opioid-naive before contact with our palliative care team. Many of these patients were put on prolonged-release opioids together with short-acting opioids (mucosal fentanyl) as rescue medication for breathlessness. Opioid therapy was judged to be very effective by the majority of patients suffering from breathlessness however caused (cancer-related or due to a benign disease e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Conclusions: In a large cohort of patients breathlessness is a major topic and is clearly positively influenceable by opioids. In our opinion it is longtime overdue to strive for an authorization for opioids against breathlessness.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. e0208564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg ◽  
Frederika E. Witkamp ◽  
Lia van Zuylen ◽  
Carin C. D. van der Rijt ◽  
Agnes van der Heide

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0201191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg ◽  
Frederika E. Witkamp ◽  
Lia van Zuylen ◽  
Carin C. D. van der Rijt ◽  
Agnes van der Heide

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ryo Sakamoto ◽  
Atsuko Koyama

Objectives: The study aim was to determine the association between patient performance status (PS) and the contents of a palliative care team (PCT) intervention. Identifying intervention requirements for differing PS may help to provide appropriate palliative care in under-resourced facilities. Materials and Methods: We collected data from medical records of inpatients (n = 496) admitted to PCT services at a centre for palliative care at Kindai University Hospital, Japan, from April 2017 to March 2019. We analysed the content of PCT activities according to each PS using Pearson’s Chi-square test. Results: The following PCT activities were provided in full regardless of PS: Gastrointestinal symptoms, depression, medical staff support, food and nutrition support and oral care. The following PCT responses were associated with PS: Pain, respiratory symptoms, fatigue, insomnia, anxiety, delirium, decision-making support, family support and rehabilitation. PS3 patients tended to receive those PCT interventions associated with PS, except for anxiety and fatigue. PS4 patients received PCT interventions for respiratory symptoms, delirium and family support. Patients with good PS (0–1) tended to receive PCT interventions for anxiety. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that there were different needs for different PS. The results may allow for efficient interventions even in facilities with limited resources.


2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-15
Author(s):  
Lorna Clemans ◽  
◽  
Timothy Cooksley ◽  
Mark Holland ◽  
◽  
...  

Introduction: Early and appropriate recognition of patients requiring palliative care is essential to delivering high quality management and Acute Medical Units have a pivotal role to play in ensuring its implementation. Aim: To identify the prevalence of patients admitted to Acute Medical Unit (AMU) who met palliative criteria, the overall prevalence of terminal diagnoses and the frequency of appropriate referrals to the units Palliative Care in reach team. Methods: An audit was performed at a University Hospital AMU to examine these issues. The NHS Supportive and Palliative Care Tool (SPCIT) was used to identify palliative patients. 409 patients were admitted to the AMU during the study period. Results: 66 (16.1%) of patients were identified as palliative. Two-thirds of these patients had a non-malignant diagnosis. 30% of palliative patients were referred to the palliative care team of which 85.4% had a diagnosis of cancer. 88% of patients that received ongoing palliative care review had a diagnosis of cancer. Conclusion: There is a high prevalence of patients with a terminal diagnosis presenting to the AMU reflecting an aging population and increasingly complex co-morbidities. Palliative patients with a non-cancer diagnosis are less likely to be referred to the palliative care team, which has the potential to disadvantage their care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document