Immunotherapy in cancer: mechanisms of immune response and their place in cancer treatments

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (38) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Lucia Stănculeanu ◽  
Carmen Ardeleanu ◽  
Daniela Zob ◽  
Raluca Ioana Mihăilă ◽  
Oana Cătălina Toma ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 5009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Barbari ◽  
Tyler Fontaine ◽  
Priyanka Parajuli ◽  
Narottam Lamichhane ◽  
Silvia Jakubski ◽  
...  

The advent of novel immunotherapies in the treatment of cancers has dramatically changed the landscape of the oncology field. Recent developments in checkpoint inhibition therapies, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, and cancer vaccines have shown immense promise for significant advancements in cancer treatments. Immunotherapies act on distinct steps of immune response to augment the body’s natural ability to recognize, target, and destroy cancerous cells. Combination treatments with immunotherapies and other modalities intend to activate immune response, decrease immunosuppression, and target signaling and resistance pathways to offer a more durable, long-lasting treatment compared to traditional therapies and immunotherapies as monotherapies for cancers. This review aims to briefly describe the rationale, mechanisms of action, and clinical efficacy of common immunotherapies and highlight promising combination strategies currently approved or under clinical development. Additionally, we will discuss the benefits and limitations of these immunotherapy approaches as monotherapies as well as in combination with other treatments.


2019 ◽  
Vol 244 (17) ◽  
pp. 1577-1583
Author(s):  
Sean M West ◽  
Xiaodi A Deng

With the emergence of immuno-oncology, new therapeutic agents that modulate immune activation and regulation are being used to treat cancer patients with durable response. It is well known that following T-cell receptor (TCR) activation, many co-receptors can augment or suppress the TCR signal, and therapeutically targeting these co-receptors has proven effective. The B7-CD28 family is comprised of such immune-regulatory receptors, and antibodies against its members programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) have revolutionized cancer treatment. These therapies promote an immune response against tumor cells, which demonstrated better long-term survival and tolerability compared to traditional cancer treatments. In this review we describe the history of the expanding B7-CD28 family, and by comparison of sequence and structure reveal that it is a non-traditional family. The family has grown to include proteins that share low sequence identity, generally grouped by regulation of immune response, which utilize the common immunoglobulin fold. This low level of commonality has provided additional challenges to the drug discovery process as the mechanisms and therapeutic potency between family members can vary greatly. Impact statement Immunotherapy as a field has dramatically expanded in the last decade in the area of oncology with efficacy demonstrated by PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 blockade. With all three “checkpoint blockade” receptors being in the B7-CD28 family, there has been increased interest in targeting other members in this family due to redundancy in immune regulation, i.e., the combination of therapeutic agents targeting multiple co-inhibitory receptors may yield additional antitumor efficacy. Therefore significant resources are being dedicated to developing additional B7-CD28 treatment options.


2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 292-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amir Mohamadi ◽  
Gilles Pagès ◽  
Mohammad S. Hashemzadeh

Oncolytic viruses (OV) are considered as promising tools in cancer treatment. In addition to direct cytolysis, the stimulation of both innate and adaptive immune responses is the most important mechanism in oncolytic virotherapy that finally leads to the long-standing tumor retardations in the advanced melanoma clinical trials. The OVs have become a worthy method in cancer treatment, due to their several biological advantages including (1) the selective replication in cancer cells without affecting normal cells; (2) the lack of resistance to the treatment; (3) cancer stem cell targeting; (4) the ability to be spread; and (5) the immune response induction against the tumors. Numerous types of viruses; for example, Herpes simplex viruses, Adenoviruses, Reoviruses, Poliovirus, and Newcastle disease virus have been studied as a possible cancer treatment strategy. Although some viruses have a natural orientation or tropism to cancer cells, several others need attenuation and genetic manipulation to increase the safety and tumor-specific replication activity. Two important mechanisms are involved in OV antitumor responses, which include the tumor cell death due to virus replication, and also induction of immunogenic cell death as a result of the immune system responses against the tumor cells. Furthermore, the high efficiency of OV on antitumor immune response stimulation can finally lead to a significant tumor shrinkage.


1999 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. R. Mignon ◽  
T. Leclipteux ◽  
CH. Focant ◽  
A. J. Nikkels ◽  
G. E. PIErard ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Merrell Magelli ◽  
Ronald Swerdloff ◽  
John Amory ◽  
Gregory Flippo ◽  
Wael Salameh ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Barbara Kronsteiner ◽  
Panjaporn Chaichana ◽  
Manutsanun Sumonwiriya ◽  
Kemajitra Jenjaroen ◽  
Fazle Rabbi Chowdhury ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 159-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Müller-Doblies ◽  
S. Baumann ◽  
P. Grob ◽  
A. Hülsmeier ◽  
U. Müller-Doblies ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Stevenson ◽  
Deborah Hodgson ◽  
Megan J. Oaten ◽  
Luba Sominsky ◽  
Mehmet Mahmut ◽  
...  

Abstract. Both disgust and disease-related images appear able to induce an innate immune response but it is unclear whether these effects are independent or rely upon a common shared factor (e.g., disgust or disease-related cognitions). In this study we directly compared these two inductions using specifically generated sets of images. One set was disease-related but evoked little disgust, while the other set was disgust evoking but with less disease-relatedness. These two image sets were then compared to a third set, a negative control condition. Using a wholly within-subject design, participants viewed one image set per week, and provided saliva samples, before and after each viewing occasion, which were later analyzed for innate immune markers. We found that both the disease related and disgust images, relative to the negative control images, were not able to generate an innate immune response. However, secondary analyses revealed innate immune responses in participants with greater propensity to feel disgust following exposure to disease-related and disgusting images. These findings suggest that disgust images relatively free of disease-related themes, and disease-related images relatively free of disgust may be suboptimal cues for generating an innate immune response. Not only may this explain why disgust propensity mediates these effects, it may also imply a common pathway.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document