Locally advanced laryngeal cancer. Larynx preservation strategies

ORL ro ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (35) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Ciprian Enăchescu ◽  
Corina Pitiu ◽  
Sena Yossi ◽  
Elife Eker ◽  
Ionela Caraivan
ORL ro ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38
Author(s):  
Corina Pitiu ◽  
Ciprian Enăchescu ◽  
Sena Yossi ◽  
Gianina Elena Crismariu

According to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC)/ American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), staging system for the locally advanced laryngeal cancer generally denotes stage III or IV, stage III being represented by T3 or N1 tumors and the non-metastatic stage IV including N2-N3 or T4 tumors. The main therapeutic goals are local control and survival, but also the functional organ preservation (speech, swallowing and airway patency), if possible. To achieve these objectives, the management should be established by a multidisciplinary tumor board, based on the analysis of patient-specific factors (age, performance status, comorbidities, and psychosocial support), cancer topography and staging, but also the physician expertise and the availability of rehabilitation services. Regarding the larynx preservation, there are two major therapeutic strategies: total laryngectomy (associated with adjuvant radio- and chemotherapy) and larynx preservation strategy, which includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by exclusive radiotherapy or concurrent radio-chemotherapy or radio-biotherapy. Total laryngectomy can be performed by open surgery or, in order to avoid a wide surgical field and reduce the local morbidity, by transoral techniques. After laryngectomy, the recurrence can be local, at the resection site, nodal, at cervical lymph nodes, or distal, the lung being the most common site of recurrence as a distant metastasis. To improve locoregional control and survival, adjuvant treatments are proposed, including radiotherapy, chemo- and biotherapy.  


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 1143-1169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene A. Forastiere ◽  
Nofisat Ismaila ◽  
Jan S. Lewin ◽  
Cherie Ann Nathan ◽  
David J. Adelstein ◽  
...  

Purpose To update the guideline recommendations on the use of larynx-preservation strategies in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Methods An Expert Panel updated the systematic review of the literature for the period from January 2005 to May 2017. Results The panel confirmed that the use of a larynx-preservation approach for appropriately selected patients does not compromise survival. No larynx-preservation approach offered a survival advantage compared with total laryngectomy and adjuvant therapy as indicated. Changes were supported for the use of endoscopic surgical resection in patients with limited disease (T1, T2) and for initial total laryngectomy in patients with T4a disease or with severe pretreatment laryngeal dysfunction. New recommendations for positron emission tomography imaging for the evaluation of regional nodes after treatment and best measures for evaluating voice and swallowing function were added. Recommendations Patients with T1, T2 laryngeal cancer should be treated initially with intent to preserve the larynx by using endoscopic resection or radiation therapy, with either leading to similar outcomes. For patients with locally advanced (T3, T4) disease, organ-preservation surgery, combined chemotherapy and radiation, or radiation alone offer the potential for larynx preservation without compromising overall survival. For selected patients with extensive T3 or large T4a lesions and/or poor pretreatment laryngeal function, better survival rates and quality of life may be achieved with total laryngectomy. Patients with clinically involved regional cervical nodes (N+) who have a complete clinical and radiologic imaging response after chemoradiation do not require elective neck dissection. All patients should undergo a pretreatment baseline assessment of voice and swallowing function and receive counseling with regard to the potential impact of treatment options on voice, swallowing, and quality of life. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .


Oral Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Brendan Zhen Yang Law ◽  
Kim Ah-See ◽  
Muhammad Shakeel ◽  
Akhtar Hussain ◽  
David Hurman ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 153-160
Author(s):  
Arif Jamshed ◽  
Raza Hussain ◽  
Sarah Jamshed ◽  
Aamir Ali Syed ◽  
Asif Loya ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Despite the acceptance of concomitant chemoradiation (CRT) as an alternative to total laryngectomy (TL) in locally advanced laryngeal cancer (LALC), laryngeal preservation is sparingly recommended in developing countries. We report on prognostic factors and survival in T3/T4 laryngeal cancer treated with concomitant CRT at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Center (SKMCH and RC) to provide comparison with other geographic locations. Material and Methods During the period November 2003-April 2009, 101 patients with biopsy proven untreated LALC underwent concurrent CRT treatment at SKMCH and RC. According to AJCC staging system (6th edition) 41 had T3 and 60 patients had T4 disease. Radiation dose to the larynx was 70 Gy in 35 fractions with concomitant cisplatin. Induction chemotherapy was given to 42 patients. Thirty-one patients required tracheotomy either before or during concomitant CRT. Results Actuarial overall survival and laryngectomy free survival (LFS) for the whole group at 5 years were 54% (95% CI; 48-60) and 47% (95% CI; 42-52) respectively. Median LFS was 4.17 years. On univariate analysis patients with T4 tumors (p = 0.04), positive neck nodal disease (p = 0.02), supraglottic site (p = 0.02) and tracheotomy (0.009) had a significantly inferior LFS. Multivariate analysis showed tracheotomy to be the only factor significantly (p = 0.03) related to a higher risk of failure for LFS. Conclusion Survival rates for LALC treated with concomitant CRT in our institution are acceptable. Our study supports the use of TL in patients with compromised airways that require tracheotomy as outcome with concomitant CRT is poor.


Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Karabajakian ◽  
Max Gau ◽  
Thibault Reverdy ◽  
Eve-Marie Neidhardt ◽  
Jérôme Fayette

Induction chemotherapy (IC) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA HNSCC) has been used for decades. However, its role is yet to be clearly defined outside of larynx preservation. Patients with high risk of distant failure might potentially benefit from sequential treatment. It is now widely accepted that TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil) is the standard IC regimen. Essays that have compared this approach with the standard of care, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), are mostly inconclusive. Radiotherapy (RT) can be used in the post-IC setting and be sensitized by chemotherapy or cetuximab. Again, no consensus exists but there seems to be trend in favor of potentiation by cisplatin. Less toxic schemes of IC are tested as toxicity is a major issue with TPF. IC might have an interesting role in human papilloma virus (HPV)-related LA HNSCC and lead to CCRT de-escalation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document