QUBEKit: Automating the Derivation of Force Field Parameters from Quantum Mechanics

Author(s):  
Joshua Horton ◽  
Alice Allen ◽  
Leela Dodda ◽  
Daniel Cole

<div><div><div><p>Modern molecular mechanics force fields are widely used for modelling the dynamics and interactions of small organic molecules using libraries of transferable force field parameters. For molecules outside the training set, parameters may be missing or inaccurate, and in these cases, it may be preferable to derive molecule-specific parameters. Here we present an intuitive parameter derivation toolkit, QUBEKit (QUantum mechanical BEspoke Kit), which enables the automated generation of system-specific small molecule force field parameters directly from quantum mechanics. QUBEKit is written in python and combines the latest QM parameter derivation methodologies with a novel method for deriving the positions and charges of off-center virtual sites. As a proof of concept, we have re-derived a complete set of parameters for 109 small organic molecules, and assessed the accuracy by comparing computed liquid properties with experiment. QUBEKit gives highly competitive results when compared to standard transferable force fields, with mean unsigned errors of 0.024 g/cm3, 0.79 kcal/mol and 1.17 kcal/mol for the liquid density, heat of vaporization and free energy of hydration respectively. This indicates that the derived parameters are suitable for molecular modelling applications, including computer-aided drug design.</p></div></div></div>

Author(s):  
Joshua Horton ◽  
Alice Allen ◽  
Leela Dodda ◽  
Daniel Cole

<div><div><div><p>Modern molecular mechanics force fields are widely used for modelling the dynamics and interactions of small organic molecules using libraries of transferable force field parameters. For molecules outside the training set, parameters may be missing or inaccurate, and in these cases, it may be preferable to derive molecule-specific parameters. Here we present an intuitive parameter derivation toolkit, QUBEKit (QUantum mechanical BEspoke Kit), which enables the automated generation of system-specific small molecule force field parameters directly from quantum mechanics. QUBEKit is written in python and combines the latest QM parameter derivation methodologies with a novel method for deriving the positions and charges of off-center virtual sites. As a proof of concept, we have re-derived a complete set of parameters for 109 small organic molecules, and assessed the accuracy by comparing computed liquid properties with experiment. QUBEKit gives highly competitive results when compared to standard transferable force fields, with mean unsigned errors of 0.024 g/cm3, 0.79 kcal/mol and 1.17 kcal/mol for the liquid density, heat of vaporization and free energy of hydration respectively. This indicates that the derived parameters are suitable for molecular modelling applications, including computer-aided drug design.</p></div></div></div>


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Horton ◽  
Alice Allen ◽  
Leela Dodda ◽  
Daniel Cole

<div><div><div><p>Modern molecular mechanics force fields are widely used for modelling the dynamics and interactions of small organic molecules using libraries of transferable force field parameters. For molecules outside the training set, parameters may be missing or inaccurate, and in these cases, it may be preferable to derive molecule-specific parameters. Here we present an intuitive parameter derivation toolkit, QUBEKit (QUantum mechanical BEspoke Kit), which enables the automated generation of system-specific small molecule force field parameters directly from quantum mechanics. QUBEKit is written in python and combines the latest QM parameter derivation methodologies with a novel method for deriving the positions and charges of off-center virtual sites. As a proof of concept, we have re-derived a complete set of parameters for 109 small organic molecules, and assessed the accuracy by comparing computed liquid properties with experiment. QUBEKit gives highly competitive results when compared to standard transferable force fields, with mean unsigned errors of 0.024 g/cm3, 0.79 kcal/mol and 1.17 kcal/mol for the liquid density, heat of vaporization and free energy of hydration respectively. This indicates that the derived parameters are suitable for molecular modelling applications, including computer-aided drug design.</p></div></div></div>


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 2703-2714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo B. Kato ◽  
Frederico T. Silva ◽  
Gisele L. Pappa ◽  
Jadson C. Belchior

We report the use of genetic algorithms (GA) as a method to refine force field parameters in order to determine RNA energy.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maximiliano Riquelme ◽  
Alejandro Lara ◽  
David L. Mobley ◽  
Toon Vestraelen ◽  
Adelio R Matamala ◽  
...  

<div>Computer simulations of bio-molecular systems often use force fields, which are combinations of simple empirical atom-based functions to describe the molecular interactions. Even though polarizable force fields give a more detailed description of intermolecular interactions, nonpolarizable force fields, developed several decades ago, are often still preferred because of their reduced computation cost. Electrostatic interactions play a major role in bio-molecular systems and are therein described by atomic point charges.</div><div>In this work, we address the performance of different atomic charges to reproduce experimental hydration free energies in the FreeSolv database in combination with the GAFF force field. Atomic charges were calculated by two atoms-in-molecules approaches, Hirshfeld-I and Minimal Basis Iterative Stockholder (MBIS). To account for polarization effects, the charges were derived from the solute's electron density computed with an implicit solvent model and the energy required to polarize the solute was added to the free energy cycle. The calculated hydration free energies were analyzed with an error model, revealing systematic errors associated with specific functional groups or chemical elements. The best agreement with the experimental data is observed for the MBIS atomic charge method, including the solvent polarization, with a root mean square error of 2.0 kcal mol<sup>-1</sup> for the 613 organic molecules studied. The largest deviation was observed for phosphor-containing molecules and the molecules with amide, ester and amine functional groups.</div>


1999 ◽  
Vol 103 (33) ◽  
pp. 6998-7014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl S. Ewig ◽  
Thomas S. Thacher ◽  
Arnold T. Hagler

2004 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 339-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOSHITAKE SAKAE ◽  
YUKO OKAMOTO

We optimized five existing sets of force-field parameters for protein systems by our recently proposed method. The five force fields are AMBER parm94, AMBER parm96, AMBER parm99, CHARMM version 22, and OPLS-AA. The method consists of minimizing the sum of the square of the force acting on each atom in the proteins with the structures from the Protein Data Bank (PDB). We selected the partial-charge and backbone torsion-energy parameters for this optimization, and 100 molecules from the PDB were used. We gave detailed comparisons of the optimized force fields and found that there is a tendency of convergence towards the same function for the torsion-energy term.


2004 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 359-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOSHITAKE SAKAE ◽  
YUKO OKAMOTO

In Paper I of this series, the formulations of the optimization method of existing force-field parameters for protein systems have been presented. We then applied it to five sets of force-field parameters, namely, AMBER parm94, AMBER parm96, AMBER parm99, CHARMM version 22, and OPLS-AA. In order to test the validity of these force fields, the folding simulations of α-helical and β-hairpin peptides have been performed with each of the original and optimized force-field parameters. We found that all five modified force-field parameters gave both α-helical and β-hairpin structures more consistent with the experimental implications than the original force fields.


2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (3) ◽  
pp. 142a
Author(s):  
Chetan Rupakheti ◽  
Alexander D. MacKerell ◽  
Benoit Roux

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document