scholarly journals Anti-anemia drugs shorten survival for some cancer patients (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-251
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Cochrane Database

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Bohlius J, Schmidlin K, Brillant C, Schwarzer G, Trelle S, Seidenfeld J, Zwahlen M, Clarke MJ, Weingart O, Kluge S, Piper M, Napoli M, Rades D, Steensma D, Djulbegovic B, Fey MF, Ray-Coquard I, Moebus V, Thomas G, Untch M, Schumacher M, Egger M, Engert A. Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007303. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007303.pub2

scholarly journals Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-252
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Cochrane Database

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Tonia T, Mettler A, Robert N, Schwarzer G, Seidenfeld J, Weingart O, Hyde C, Engert A, Bohlius J. Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD003407. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub5

scholarly journals Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-456
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Cochrane Database

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Ream E, Hughes AE, Cox A, Skarparis K, Richardson A, Pedersen VH, Wiseman T, Forbes A, Bryant A. Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD007568. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2

scholarly journals Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-46
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Cochrane Database

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Kahale LA, Hakoum MB, Tsolakian IG, Matar CF, Barba M, Yosuico VED, Terrenato I, Sperati F, Schnemann H, Akl EA. Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD006466. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006466.pub6

scholarly journals Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-44
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Cutaneous Melanoma ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Systemic Treatments

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Pasquali S, Hadjinicolaou AV, Chiarion Sileni V, Rossi CR, Mocellin S. Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD011123. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2

scholarly journals Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-42
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Cochrane Database

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Mocellin S, Baretta Z, Roqu i Figuls M, Sol I, Martin-Richard M, Hallum S, Bonfill Cosp X. Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006875. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006875.pub3.

scholarly journals Erythropoietin as an adjuvant treatment with (chemo) radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-250
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Cochrane Database

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Lambin P, Ramaekers BLT, van Mastrigt GAPG, Van den Ende P, de Jong J, De Ruysscher DKM, Pijls-Johannesma M. Erythropoietin as an adjuvant treatment with (chemo) radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006158. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006158.pub2

scholarly journals Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis in Spine Surgery—How Good Are They in Methodological Quality? A Systematic Review

2020 ◽  
pp. 219256822090681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muthu Sathish ◽  
Ramakrishnan Eswar
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Spine Surgery ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Critical Flaw ◽  
Meta Analyses

Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery over the past 2 decades. Materials and Methods: We conducted independent and in duplicate systematic review of the published systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 2000 and 2019 from PubMed Central and Cochrane Database pertaining to spine surgery involving surgical intervention. We searched bibliographies to identify additional relevant studies. Methodological quality was evaluated with AMSTAR score and graded with AMSTAR 2 criteria. Results: A total of 96 reviews met the eligibility criteria, with mean AMSTAR score of 7.51 (SD = 1.98). Based on AMSTAR 2 criteria, 13.5% (n = 13) and 18.7% (n = 18) of the studies had high and moderate level of confidence of results, respectively, without any critical flaws. A total of 29.1% (n = 28) of the studies had at least 1 critical flaw and 38.5% (n = 37) of the studies had more than 1 critical flaw, so that their results have low and critically low confidence, respectively. Failure to analyze the conflict of interest of authors of primary studies included in review and lack of list of excluded studies with justification were the most common critical flaw. Regression analysis demonstrated that studies with funding and studies published in recent years were significantly associated with higher methodological quality. Conclusion: Despite improvement in methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in spine surgery in current decade, a substantial proportion continue to show critical flaws. With increasing number of review articles in spine surgery, stringent measures must be taken to adhere to methodological quality by following PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines to attain higher standards of evidence in published literature.

scholarly journals Buteyko method for people with asthma: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e049213
Author(s):  
Karla Morganna Pereira Pinto de Mendonça ◽  
Sean Collins ◽  
Tácito ZM Santos ◽  
Gabriela Chaves ◽  
Sarah Leite ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Meta Analyses

IntroductionButeyko method is recommended as a non-pharmacological treatment for people with asthma. Although the worldwide interest in the Buteyko method, there is a paucity of studies gathering evidence to support its use. Therefore, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of the Buteyko method in children and adults with asthma.Methods and analysisWe will search on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for studies focusing on the Buteyko method for children and adults with asthma. The searches will be carried out in September 2021 from database’s inception to the present. We will include randomised controlled trials comparing Buteyko method alone with asthma education or inactive control intervention. There will be no restriction on language. Primary outcomes include quality of life, asthma symptoms and adverse events/side effects. Two review authors will independently screen the studies for inclusion and extract data. We will assess the quality of the included studies using the ‘Risk of Bias’ tool. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using the GRADE approach. Data synthesis will be conducted using Review Manager software. Reporting of the review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.Ethics and disseminationThis study will assess and provide evidence for the use of the Buteyko method in people with asthma. We will analyse secondary data and this does not require ethics approval. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals, at relevant conferences and will be shared in plain language in social media. Moreover, the findings of this review could guide the direction of healthcare practice and research.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020193132.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Acupuncture in Subpopulations with Constipation: A protocol for a Systematic Review and Individual Patient data Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Chen ◽  
Baoyan Liu ◽  
Liyun He ◽  
Xiaoying Lv ◽  
Shengnan Guo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Individual Patient Data ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Patient Data ◽  
Data Management System ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Clinical Trial Registries

Abstract Background: Several systematic reviews have suggested that acupuncture is effective against constipation, but the factors predicting the effect of acupuncture in subpopulations with constipation are still unknown.Methods: We will search six major English and Chinese electronic databases and two clinical trial registries from inception for randomized controlled trials that evaluate acupuncture for constipation. Two authors will independently identify the relevant studies, extract the information from the papers, and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. We will contact the primary researchers of the eligible trials for individual patient data (IPD). IPD from four trials are available from the China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences CliniRsearch Data Management System. The primary outcomes are the change in weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements. IPD from the researchers will be standardized and harmonized. A one-stage approach will be used to synthesize the IPD. Our primary analysis will examine the efficacy of acupuncture in subpopulations with constipation using a general linear mixed model.Discussion: This review will provide an IPD meta-analysis of acupuncture in constipation and demonstrate how the benefits of acupuncture may vary among subgroups of patients with constipation.Systematic review registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Number: CRD42020188366)

scholarly journals Physical activity interventions for disease‐related physical and mental health during and following treatment in people with non‐advanced colorectal cancer (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-454
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Physical Activity ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Russian Translation ◽  
Plain Language ◽  
Physical And Mental Health ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Physical Activity Interventions ◽  
Cochrane Database

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: McGettigan M, Cardwell CR, Cantwell MM, Tully MA. Physical activity interventions for disease‐related physical and mental health during and following treatment in people with non‐advanced colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD012864. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012864.pub2

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document