scholarly journals Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer (Russian Translation of Cochrane Plain Language Summary – PLS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-456

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Ream E, Hughes AE, Cox A, Skarparis K, Richardson A, Pedersen VH, Wiseman T, Forbes A, Bryant A. Telephone interventions for symptom management in adults with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD007568. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007568.pub2

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-251

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Bohlius J, Schmidlin K, Brillant C, Schwarzer G, Trelle S, Seidenfeld J, Zwahlen M, Clarke MJ, Weingart O, Kluge S, Piper M, Napoli M, Rades D, Steensma D, Djulbegovic B, Fey MF, Ray-Coquard I, Moebus V, Thomas G, Untch M, Schumacher M, Egger M, Engert A. Erythropoietin or Darbepoetin for patients with cancer meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD007303. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007303.pub2


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 45-46

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Kahale LA, Hakoum MB, Tsolakian IG, Matar CF, Barba M, Yosuico VED, Terrenato I, Sperati F, Schnemann H, Akl EA. Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD006466. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006466.pub6


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-252

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Tonia T, Mettler A, Robert N, Schwarzer G, Seidenfeld J, Weingart O, Hyde C, Engert A, Bohlius J. Erythropoietin or darbepoetin for patients with cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2021, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD003407. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003407.pub5


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-44

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Pasquali S, Hadjinicolaou AV, Chiarion Sileni V, Rossi CR, Mocellin S. Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD011123. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-42

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Mocellin S, Baretta Z, Roqu i Figuls M, Sol I, Martin-Richard M, Hallum S, Bonfill Cosp X. Second-line systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006875. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006875.pub3.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-250

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Lambin P, Ramaekers BLT, van Mastrigt GAPG, Van den Ende P, de Jong J, De Ruysscher DKM, Pijls-Johannesma M. Erythropoietin as an adjuvant treatment with (chemo) radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD006158. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006158.pub2


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-454

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: McGettigan M, Cardwell CR, Cantwell MM, Tully MA. Physical activity interventions for disease‐related physical and mental health during and following treatment in people with non‐advanced colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2020, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD012864. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012864.pub2


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 454-455

This publication is the Russian translation of the Plain Language Summary (PLS) of the Cochrane Systematic Review: Ospina PA, McComb A, Pritchard-Wiart LE, Eisenstat DD, McNeely ML. Physical therapy interventions, other than general physical exercise interventions, in children and adolescents before, during and following treatment for cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3 August 2021. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012924.pub2


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. e044472
Author(s):  
Saar Hommes ◽  
Ruben Vromans ◽  
Felix Clouth ◽  
Xander Verbeek ◽  
Ignace de Hingh ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo assess the communicative quality of colorectal cancer patient decision aids (DAs) about treatment options, the current systematic review was conducted.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesDAs (published between 2006 and 2019) were identified through academic literature (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO) and online sources.Eligibility criteriaDAs were only included if they supported the decision-making process of patients with colon, rectal or colorectal cancer in stages I–III.Data extraction and synthesisAfter the search strategy was adapted from similar systematic reviews and checked by a colorectal cancer surgeon, two independent reviewers screened and selected the articles. After initial screening, disagreements were resolved with a third reviewer. The review was conducted in concordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. DAs were assessed using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) and Communicative Aspects (CA) checklist.ResultsIn total, 18 DAs were selected. Both the IPDAS and CA checklist revealed that there was a lot of variation in the (communicative) quality of DAs. The findings highlight that (1) personalisation of treatment information in DAs is lacking, (2) outcome probability information is mostly communicated verbally and (3) information in DAs is generally biased towards a specific treatment. Additionally, (4) DAs about colorectal cancer are lengthy and (5) many DAs are not written in plain language.ConclusionsBoth instruments (IPDAS and CA) revealed great variation in the (communicative) quality of colorectal cancer DAs. Developers of patient DAs should focus on personalisation techniques and could use both the IPDAS and CA checklist in the developmental process to ensure personalised health communication and facilitate shared decision making in clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document