scholarly journals First results of the Russian database of international prospective observational registry variability of blood pressure in patients with hypertension

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 9-16
Author(s):  
O D Ostroumova

The article presents the results of an analysis of the Russian part of the international registry of variability in blood pressure. It is shown that in a real clinical practice antihypertensive therapy reduces inter-visit variability of systolic and diastolic blood pressure. It has been found that the fixed combination of perindopril arginine / amlodipine has antihypertensive effect and its impact on the variability of systolic blood pressure exceeds that for other modes of antihypertensive therapy. Revealed patterns are characteristic also for subgroups of patients with a combination of hypertension and coronary heart disease, hypertension and diabetes.

2020 ◽  
Vol 96 (7) ◽  
pp. 503-507
Author(s):  
N. Yu. Borovkova

The review is devoted to introducing a wide range of internists to the new fixed combination of ramipril and indapamide (Concealar-D24), created by Russian scientists. This is the first original domestic development for the treatment of arterial hypertension, which is successfully produced by the first Russian resident of the special economic zone, the pharmaceutical plant «VERTEX» in St. Petersburg. The advantage of Concealar-D24 is a rational combination of two drugs that have not only antihypertensive and organoprotective effects, but also a large convincing base of research on their impact on the prognosis of life in patients with cardiovascular diseases: arterial hypertension, coronary heart disease, heart failure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 791-799
Author(s):  
M. M. Dolzhenko ◽  
S. A. Bondarchuk

The aim of the work – to analyze the effectiveness of a fixed combination of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor (lisinopril) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (valsartan) in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), post-infarction cardiosclerosis (PIC), arterial hypertension (AH) regarding the blood pressure (BP) control and impact on a composite endpoint. Materials and methods. General clinical examination of 108 patients with PIC and AH was done at the Cardiology Department of Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine within 12 months. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group patients (n = 50) were assigned to receive a fixed combination of valsartan and amlodipine (160 mg and 5 mg, respectively), and the second group patients (n = 58) were treated with a fixed combination of lisinopril and amlodipine (10 mg and 5 mg, respectively). Patients were followed-up for 12 months, including general clinical examination, office BP measurements, 24-hour BP monitoring, echodopplerography, monitoring of the composite endpoint. Exclusion criteria were hemodynamically significant heart valve lesions, permanent or temporary cardiac pacing, acute heart failure and implanted cardioverter-defibrillator, permanent form of atrial fibrillation, acute cerebrovascular disorder, decompensation of severe somatic pathology. Statistical analysis of the data obtained was performed using Microsoft Excel, IBM SPSS Statistics v. 23. Descriptive data were presented as arithmetic mean ± standard deviation (M ± SD) in the case of normal distribution of variables, data with distribution other than normal were presented in Me format (Q25; Q75), where Me was the median, Q25, Q75 – lower and upper quartiles (Q25; Q75), or as a percentage for categorical values with Pearson’s Chi-square (χ2) calculation. Differences in mean values were considered statistically significant at a level of Р < 0.05. Results. According to all statistical criteria, BP indicators did not differ in both patient groups. Systolic office BP in the first group was 133.00 (123.00; 140.25) mm Hg., in the second group – 130.00 (122.00; 140.00) mm Hg. In the first group, diastolic office BP was 81.00 (79.50; 81.00) mm Hg and in the second group – 80.00 (75.00; 86.00) mm Hg. No statistically significant differen­ces were found in the study groups when assessing mean BP levels during the 24-hour monitoring. In the assessment of index values, systolic BP load was higher than normal in 58 % of patients in the first group and in 56.9 % of patients in the second group (χ2 = 0.01; P = 0.53). The assessment of diastolic BP load indices revealed increased diastolic BP index in 72 % of patient in the first group and in 75.9 % – in the second group (χ2 = 0.2; P = 0.4). The number of patients with BP higher or less than 130/80 mm Hg was compared. Systolic BP was above and below 130 mm Hg in 56 % and 44 %, respectively, of the first group patients; the distribution was 37.9 % and 62.1 % in the second group. Therefore, the percentage of patients with target systolic BP was higher in the second group (χ2 = 3.52; P = 0.046). Analyzing the composite endpoint, a statistically significant difference in the Kaplan–Meier curves via the statistical criterion using a log-rank test (P = 0.007) was detected. Conclusions. No statistically significant differences were found in the analysis of office blood pressure and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring between amlodipine with lisinopril and amlodipine with valsartan groups. The detailed analysis revealed a greater percentage of patients with target blood pressure below 130/80 mm Hg among those under 65 years of age receiving amlodipine with lisinopril (χ2 = 3.52; P = 0.046). The better prognostic value of the fixed combination of amlodipine with lisinopril compared to the combination of amlodipine with valsartan (P = 0.007) was demonstrated by the endpoint analysis.


2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 816-824
Author(s):  
M. M. Loukianov ◽  
S. Yu. Martsevich ◽  
Yu. V. Mareev ◽  
S. S. Yakushin ◽  
E. Yu. Andreenko ◽  
...  

Aim. To assess in clinical practice the structure of multimorbidity, cardiovascular pharmacotherapy and outcomes in patients with a combination of atrial fibrillation (AF) and chronic heart failure (CHF) based on prospective registries of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD).Materials and Methods. The data of 3795 patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were analyzed within the registries RECVASA (Ryazan), RECVASA FP (Moscow, Kursk, Tula, Yaroslavl), REGION-PO and REGION-LD (Ryazan), REGION-Moscow, REGATA (Ryazan). The comparison groups consisted of 3016 (79.5%) patients with AF in combination with CHF and 779 (29.5%) patients with AF without CHF. The duration of prospective observation is from 2 to 6 years.Results. Patients with a combination of AF and CHF (n=3016, age was 72.0±10.3 years; 41.8% of men) compared with patients with AF without CHF (n=779, age was 70.3±12.0 years; 43.5% of men) had a higher risk of thromboembolic complications (CHA2DS2-VASc – 4.68±1.59 and 3.10±1.50; p<0.001) and hemorrhagic complications (HAS-BLED – 1.59±0.77 and 1.33±0.76; p<0.05). Patients with a combination of AF and CHF significantly more often (p<0.001) than in the absence of CHF were diagnosed with arterial hypertension (93.9% and 83.8%), coronary heart disease (87.9% and 53,5%), myocardial infarction (28.4% and 14.0%), diabetes mellitus (22.4% and 7.7%), chronic kidney disease (24.8% and 16.2%), as well as respiratory diseases (20.1% and 15.3%; p=0.002). Patients with AF in the presence of CHF, compared with patients without CHF, were more often diagnosed with a permanent form of arrhythmia (49.3% and 32.9%; p<0.001) and less often paroxysmal (22.5% and 46.2%; p<0.001) form  of  arrhythmia.  Ejection  fraction  ≤40%  (9.3%  and  1.2%;  p<0.001),  heart  rate  ≥90/min  (23.7% and 19.3%; p=0.008) and blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg (59.9% and 52.2%; p<0.001) were recorded with AF in the presence of CHF more often than in the absence of CHF. The frequency of proper cardiovascular pharmacotherapy was higher, albeit insufficient, in the presence of CHF (64.9%) than in the absence of it (56.1%), but anticoagulants were prescribed less frequently when AF and CHF were combined (38.8% and  49, 0%; p<0.001). The frequency of unreasonable prescription of antiplatelet agents instead of anticoagulants was 52.5% and 33.3% (p<0.001) in the combination of AF, CHF and coronary heart disease, as well as in the combination of AF with coronary heart disease but without CHF. Patients with AF and CHF during the observation period compared with those without CHF had higher mortality from all causes (37.6% and 30.3%; p=0.001), the frequency of non-fatal cerebral stroke (8.2% and 5.4%; p=0.032) and myocardial infarction (4.7% and 2.5%; p=0.036), hospitalizations for CVD (22.8% and 15.5%; p<0.001).Conclusion. Patients with a combination of AF and CHF, compared with the group of patients with AF without CHF, were older, had a higher risk of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, they were more often diagnosed with other concomitant cardiovascular and chronic noncardiac diseases, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, tachysystole, failure to achieve the target blood pressure level in the presence of arterial hypertension. The frequency of prescribing proper cardiovascular pharmacotherapy was higher, albeit insufficient, in the presence of CHF, while the frequency of prescribing anticoagulants was less. The  incidence of mortality from all causes, the development of non-fatal myocardial infarction   and cerebral stroke, as well as the incidence of hospitalizations for CVDs were higher in AF associated with CHF.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. I. Lutai ◽  
I. P. Golikova

The aim – to evaluate the profile of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and concomitant arterial hypertension (AH) who were administered bisoprolol as part of previous therapy, but did not reach normal levels of heart rate and blood pressure; to estimate the percentage of getting to recommended levels of heart rate, blood pressure and treatment adherence in patients after 4 weeks of using the fixed-dose combination of bisoprolol/perindopril with a correction of doses. Materials and methods. The study involved 170 cardiologists from various regions of Ukraine. Each researcher selected 15 consecutive outpatients with coronary heart disease who came for a regular visit. Inclusion criteria: age over 18 years old, blood pressure above 140/90 mm Hg, heart rate above 60 bpm, bisoprolol as part of antihypertensive therapy in the last ≥ 3 months. The study included two visits. At each visit, the patient’s objective status was assessed; an individual questionnaire with office systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, ECG data, clinical manifestations of CHD, risk factors, lifestyle features, concomitant diseases, current therapy was filled out. Medication adherence was also evaluated, the therapy was corrected if necessary and the presence of side effects and adverse events was registered. Results and discussion. 2785 patient questionnaires were provided by doctors, 2394 (86 %) of them met the inclusion criteria. The mean age of the patients was 61.4 years, men – 57.1 %, women – 42.9 %. The diagnosis of coronary artery disease was based on: chest pain – 751 (31.7 %), a history of documented myocardial infarction – 1281 (53.5 %), coronary ventriculography (VHR) – 735 (30.7 %), revascularization (CABG/stenting) – 474 (19.8 %) patients. The use of a fixed combination of previously taken drugs (perindopril, bisoprolol) for 4 weeks allows to reduce heart rate and blood pressure effectively (heart rate ≤ 70 bpm reached 84.9 % of patients, blood pressure ≤ 140/90 mm Hg – 86.9 %), to reduce the number of angina attacks from 4.4 to 2.6 per week and the need for nitroglycerin from 4.8 to 2.7 tablets per week, to improve therapy adherence in 66.5 % of patients. Conclusions. The study demonstrated that the use of the fixed combination of bisoprolol and perindopril in patients with coronary artery disease and concomitant hypertension, including those who had myocardial revascularization and myocardial infarction in anamnesis, helps to improve treatment efficacy, to achieve recommended levels of blood pressure and heart rate, to increase adherence to therapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Pedersen ◽  
Beate Hennie Garcia ◽  
Kjell H. Halvorsen ◽  
Anne Elise Eggen ◽  
Henrik Schirmer ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for coronary heart disease (CHD) reduces morbidity, mortality and treatment costs. We aimed to describe and compare adherence to prescription guidelines for persons with CHD, and explore its association with treatment goal achievement. Method We included all participants reporting myocardial infarction, angina, percutaneous coronary intervention and/or coronary artery bypass surgery in the seventh wave of the Tromsø Study (2015–2016, n = 1483). Medication use and treatment goal measures (blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and HbA1c) were compared to clinical practice guidelines on secondary CHD prevention. Propensity score matched logistic regression was used to assess the association between the use of antihypertensive drugs and achievement of treatment goal for blood pressure, and the use of lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs) and achievement of treatment goal for LDL-cholesterol. Results The prevalence of pharmacological CHD treatment was 76% for LLDs, 72% for antihypertensive drugs and 66% for acetylsalicylic acid. The blood pressure goal (< 140/90 mmHg, < 140/80 mmHg if diabetic) was achieved by 58% and the LDL-cholesterol goal (< 1.8 mmol/l or < 70 mg/dL) by 9%. There was a strong association between using LLDs and achieving the treatment goal for LDL-cholesterol (OR 14.0, 95% CI 3.6–54.7), but not between using antihypertensive drugs and blood pressure goal achievement (OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7–2.7). Conclusion Treatment goal achievement of LDL-cholesterol and blood pressure was low, despite the relatively high use of LLDs and antihypertensive drugs. Further research is needed to find the proper actions to increase achievement of the treatment goals.


2009 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 116-120
Author(s):  
A. Panov

Combination antihypertensive therapy is supposed to be reasonable at first stages of the disease. The review summarizes the data on metoprolol succinate and felodipine effects as a combination medicine Logimax that due to its pharmacodynamics can be the used both in isolated hypertension and in concomitant coronary heart disease.


Kardiologiia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6_2015 ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.V. Panov Panov ◽  
M.Z. Alugishvili Alugishvili ◽  
I.T. Abesadze Abesadze ◽  
N.L. Lokhovinina Lokhovinina ◽  
K.V. Korzhenewskaya Korzhenewskaya ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document