scholarly journals A review on steps involved in drug utilization review

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 4095-4098
Author(s):  
Philip Jacob ◽  
Arul Balasubramanian ◽  
Kothai Ramalingam

Drug Utilization is also known as Drug Utilization Review, is an arrangement of persistent, orderly, criteria based medication assessment that guarantees the proper usage of drugs. Drug use/ utilization evaluation and medication utilization evaluations are the same as drug utilization review. It is a technique for acquiring data to recognize the problems related to the usage of drugs and if appropriately created, it also gives a method for revising the issue and in this way, it becomes a factor in reasonable drug usage. Evaluation of use can survey the real procedure of medication administration or dispensing of proper medication and furthermore the results of treatment. Drug utilization review services include corrective actions, prescriber reviews and further evaluations as a quality assurance mechanism. This article reviews the drug utilization pattern and evaluation of the process of drug utilization. The evaluation pattern can be classified into several categories such as prospective, concurrent and retrospective. The drug utilization evaluation process is a continuous cycle and its maximum effect is attained when it is conducted as a cycle rather than conducting in steps. This evidence-based approach with utilization of the medication is intended to depend on the best accessible clinical evidence to create explicit rules for a particular illness or utilization of a particular medication.

1981 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 789-792
Author(s):  
Stephen L. Huber ◽  
Roland A. Patry

The comparison of drug usage data gathered from different institutions would be easier if standardized criteria were employed. There are, however, major difficulties encountered in gaining approval of such criteria from different physician groups. To facilitate the criteria approval process, “internal standards” were developed. These internal standards reflected the acceptable deviations from the standardized criteria, hence, permitting flexibility for innovation in drug therapy. A retrospective drug utilization review was conducted in two hospitals. The internal standards assigned were very similar to the 0 percent-100 percent standards recommended by InterQuar® except for the criteria on monitoring parameters and duration of therapy. It would appear from these preliminary results that the assignment of internal standards enhances the use of standardized criteria which, in turn, will allow comparisons of data.


2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-270
Author(s):  
김태희 ◽  
윤은형 ◽  
Jong Hee Ko ◽  
손은선 ◽  
김성은 ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 520-525
Author(s):  
Vasudha Gupta ◽  
Jamie Woodyard ◽  
Kimberley Begley ◽  
Stacey Curtis ◽  
Deanna Tran

1994 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Petit ◽  
J. -P. Delporte ◽  
M. Ansseau ◽  
A. Albert ◽  
F. Jeusette

2004 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R. Fulda ◽  
Ted Collins ◽  
Julie Kuhle ◽  
Debra S. Devereaux ◽  
Ilene H. Zuckerman

DICP ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 82-86
Author(s):  
William F. Mcghan ◽  
J. Lyle Bootman ◽  
Raymond J. Townsend ◽  
Morton P. Goldman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document