scholarly journals Discussion on “One Belt One Road” Construction and International Financial Cooperation

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Miao ◽  
Christian Asmussen

Under the grand economic vision of opening up and cooperation among countries, the world economy is gradually recovering, and economic and trade exchanges between countries are increasing, which is an important sign of sound economic development. At the same time, we need the joint efforts of all countries to move towards the goal of mutual benefit and common development.We should fully develop one of the "one belt one road" in the economic construction. At the same time, we need to deepen economic cooperation, improve the investment and financing system and credit system, and China International Finance is particularly important. International financial cooperation is one of the difficulties things and “One belt one road” is the same. The financial market's influence on the economic outflow of funds is not to be ignored. Based on this background, one will take the "one belt one road" as the starting point to explore the problems of international financial cooperation.

2020 ◽  
pp. 42-49
Author(s):  
Gelvig Svetlana

China and Kazakhstan are long-term partners, which economic relations have reached a new level of the strategic partnership. The “One Belt, One Road” initiative brings new opportunities and challenges for the development of bilateral economic interactions and for the entire Central Asia region. The author made an original analysis of the main components of economic cooperation between the two countries, including energy cooperation, current trade infrastructure and identifying the prospects for implementation of the “One Belt, One Road” initiative. Based on the long-term relationship, strategic partnership and trade cooperation between China and Kazakhstan, construction and combining of the Chinese “One Belt One Road” initiative and Kazakhstan “Bright Road Plan” is the new era for China-Kazakhstan economic development. According to the current research, the construction of this infrastructure will have a direct impact on flows of foreign investments, production development and transport infrastructure. In addition, the construction of the “One Belt, One Road” plan has a great importance for promoting the development of Chinese-Kazakh economic relations and solving difficulties in economic exchanges.


2021 ◽  
Vol 235 ◽  
pp. 02061
Author(s):  
Meili Zhu

The “One Belt, One Road” strategy and the development of China’s game industry have an intrinsic link that complements each other. First of all, the implementation of the “One Belt, One Road” strategy has pointed out the direction for Chinese games to “go global” and provided rich cultural resources and policy support. Secondly, Chinese games can actively promote the economic development of the “Belt and Road” construction, improve the ability of Chinese culture to publicize, and enhance the sense of crosscultural identity. However, the “going global” of Chinese games has the following dilemmas: lack of highquality goods and outstanding homogeneity; lack of professional game talents; insufficient sustainable competitiveness of enterprises; lack of self-awareness and market prediction; lack of Chinese characteristics. Based on the above issues, the following suggestions are put forward: develop advanced production technology and adopt a boutique strategy; cultivate professional talents to enhance the quality of practitioners; enhance innovation capabilities and enhance brand awareness; know yourself and the enemy and implement policies in accordance with the city; games and cultural integration development.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Gao Wei ◽  
Wang Lin ◽  
Yan Jingdong ◽  
Wu Yanxiong

The Chinese economy is changing its development model from invest/export-led growth to consumption/growth driven by domestic demand. In the recent domestic-oriented growth phases of China's opening-up policy, what role is expected to play? Not only is this a way to acquire foreign exchange and technology, but it is also an economic powerhouse for China that strengthens its position in global governance. General Secretary Xi Jinping's proposed the "Belt and Road" initiative in 2013, which is considered an excellent strategy for China's new round of opening-up policy. This research paper aims to bring the BRI inside China's open-up policy and focuses on its increasingly important role in controlling major global economic regimes. The study also shows the importance of establishing systems of mutual aid/funding for the countries participating in BRI. The first section of the paper looks at China's reactions to major economic regimes. Section two reflects the design and the implementation of the opening-up strategy for China from the BRI perspective. Section three of the research addresses Chinese development aid/funding in the BRI and its relation to foreign regimes. The fourth part addresses the BRI's trade relationship with the participating countries, using the gravity model from a global commercial perspective. The study concluded that cross-border financial cooperation between government and business participants is vital for the development of a successful investment and funding system for the BRI. It reiterated the importance of using foreign and regional financial centers to develop a regional structure within the BRI's investment and financing system.


Author(s):  
Weichzhen` Gao

The basic principles of SCS implementation are as follows: Formation of sustainable social structure and its operational management; Monitoring and correction of social transformations and behavior of the general population: transparency as a major factor in the life of an innovative society; Stimulating competition as a motivation for success. Due to the transparency of social life, different patterns of behavior in different conditions are published in the information space of the society. Accordingly, actionable life scenarios are made available to the general public, which is fulfilling an educational mission regarding adaptation mechanisms in an innovative society; the SCS system is a significant component of the national strategy of integration and consolidation of the Chinese innovation society; carrying out softpolicy foreign policy: The positive experience of the Chinese innovation society in implementing SCS is a prerequisite for expanding its area of application in Asian, African and Latin American countries, especially the countries participating in the One Belt One Road project. SCS covers all spheres of social life of the modern Chinese citizen, forms a sustainable form of accountability to the society for the content and flow of their daily activities, aspirations and preferences.


2021 ◽  
pp. 053901842199894
Author(s):  
Frank Adloff ◽  
Iris Hilbrich

Possible trajectories of sustainability are based on different concepts of nature. The article starts out from three trajectories of sustainability (modernization, transformation and control) and reconstructs one characteristic practice for each path with its specific conceptions of nature. The notion that nature provides human societies with relevant ecosystem services is typical of the path of modernization. Nature is reified and monetarized here, with regard to its utility for human societies. Practices of transformation, in contrast, emphasize the intrinsic ethical value of nature. This becomes particularly apparent in discourses on the rights of nature, whose starting point can be found in Latin American indigenous discourses, among others. Control practices such as geoengineering are based on earth-systemic conceptions of nature, in which no distinction is made between natural and social systems. The aim is to control the earth system as a whole in order for human societies to remain viable. Practices of sustainability thus show different ontological understandings of nature (dualistic or monistic) on the one hand and (implicit) ethics and sacralizations (anthropocentric or biocentric) on the other. The three reconstructed natures/cultures have different ontological and ethical affinities and conflict with each other. They are linked to very different knowledge cultures and life-worlds, which answer very differently to the question of what is of value in a society and in nature and how these values ought to be protected.


2004 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-58
Author(s):  
Jeffrey S. Galko ◽  

The ontological question of what there is, from the perspective of common sense, is intricately bound to what can be perceived. The above observation, when combined with the fact that nouns within language can be divided between nouns that admit counting, such as ‘pen’ or ‘human’, and those that do not, such as ‘water’ or ‘gold’, provides the starting point for the following investigation into the foundations of our linguistic and conceptual phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to claim that such phenomena are facilitated by, on the one hand, an intricate cognitive capacity, and on the other by the complex environment within which we live. We are, in a sense, cognitively equipped to perceive discrete instances of matter such as bodies of water. This equipment is related to, but also differs from, that devoted to the perception of objects such as this computer. Behind this difference in cognitive equipment underlies a rich ontology, the beginnings of which lies in the distinction between matter and objects. The following paper is an attempt to make explicit the relationship between matter and objects and also provide a window to our cognition of such entities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document