scholarly journals Proses Berpikir Kreatif Proses Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMP Bergaya Kognitif Impulsif dan Reflektif dalam mengajukan masalah matematika

MATHEdunesa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-477
Author(s):  
Syifaul Qulub

Problem posing can be used to see creative thinking skills. In posing a problem, each student has a different way of thinking, because the way students process the information they receive is different. This difference is known as cognitive style. Cognitive styles that are based on time differences and students' accuracy in responding to something can be divided into two, namely impulsive and reflective cognitive styles. The purpose of this research is to describe the creative thinking process of junior high school students with impulsive and reflective cognitive style in posing mathematical problems. The method used is descriptive method with a qualitative approach. Based on the results of the MFFT test and the TPM test, two research subjects were obtained, namely one impulsive cognitive style subject and one reflective cognitive style subject. The results showed that the creative thinking process of students with impulsive cognitive style in posing mathematical problems, namely: the stage of synthesizing ideas, the subject reads information, concludes the problem then remembers the experience of working on relevant questions, the subject does not require a long time at this stage; in the idea building stage, the subject relates the experience of working on a problem with the information on the test so that the subject can create an idea; in planning the implementation stage, the subject makes a question framework based on the ideas obtained, namely the purchase of goods in packages; the stage of implementing the idea, the subject applies the idea that has been obtained. The subject re-checks the questions and solutions to check whether they are correct. The subject believes that the problems and solutions made are correct. The creative thinking process of the subject in a reflective cognitive style in posing a mathematical problem, namely: the stage of synthesizing an idea, the subject repeatedly reads the test to understand the information then remembers the experience of working on the relevant questions, the subject takes quite a long time at this stage; the idea building stage, the subject associates the experience he has with the information on the test so that the subject can make more than one idea; the stage of planning the implementation, the subject chooses an idea that he feels can solve it, the subject uses a textbook as a reference in making questions, the subject makes questions about purchasing items that are separate from the package; the stage of applying the idea, the subject applies the idea that has been selected, the subject can make two questions. The subject re-checks the questions and solutions made to check whether they are correct. The subject believes that both the problems and the solutions made are correct.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Talib

This research is a qualitative research with descriptive method. This study aims to describe the ability to think creatively based on the type of student personality, the type of choleric personality in solving mathematical problems. The research subjects were students in the odd semester of class XII IPA 1 SMA Negeri 22 Makassar, the 2019/2020 school year. This subject was chosen by giving a personality questionnaire to students. The data was collected using a mathematical problem solving test instrument on the number sequence material and interviews. The validity of the data was checked by using the triangulation method. The results showed: Students with choleric personality in solving mathematical problems. In question number 1, the subject had difficulty in finding the formula for the nth term. But the subject kept trying and the spirit of trying until finally found the correct formula for the nth term. The subject of the choleric personality type is also said to be able to fulfill the three indicators of creative thinking, namely fluency, flexibility, and novelty. In question number 2, the subject had difficulty finding many ways to solve the problem and only met one indicator of creative thinking, namely fluency.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Wanda Ika Narianti ◽  
Masriyah Masriyah

Abstrak — Kemampuan berpikir kritis adalah kecakapan memecahkan masalah yang dilakukan seseorang secara sistematis dan reflektif dalam mengolah informasi yang diperoleh ketika dihadapkan pada suatu masalah. Melalui berpikir kritis, siswa dapat mengambil keputusan secara tepat untuk memecahkan masalah tersebut. Akan tetapi dalam pembelajaran matematika, kemampuan berpikir kritis kurang mendapat perhatian karena seringkali siswa mendapatkan soal yang dalam proses mengerjakannya menggunakan prosedur rutin. Selain itu, juga perlu memperhatikan gaya kognitif siswa karena setiap siswa memiliki karateristik yang berbeda dalam waktu yang diperlukan untuk menjawab soal dan kesalahan jawaban yang dihasilkan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif, yang bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMP yang bergaya kognitif reflektif, impulsif, fast accurate, dan slow inaccurate dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Subjek dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa SMP kelas VIII yang bergaya kognitif reflektif, impulsif, fast accurate, dan slow inaccurate masing-masing sebanyak 1 siswa. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan tes gaya kognitif MFFT (matching familiar figure test), tes kemampuan matematika, tes pemecahan masalah matematika, dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data berdasarkan indikator kemampuan berpikir kritis yang meliputi klarifikasi, asesmen, inferensi, dan strategi pada setiap langkah pemecahan masalah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa, siswa bergaya kognitif reflektif mampu melakukan klarifikasi, asesmen, dan inferensi. Siswa bergaya kognitif impulsif mampu melakukan strategi. Siswa bergaya kognitif fast accurate tidak mampu melakukan klarifikasi, asesmen, inferensi, dan strategi. Siswa bergaya kognitif slow inaccurate mampu melakukan asesmen.Kata kunci: Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Memecahkan Masalah, Gaya Kognitif Abstract — Critical thinking abilities is the ability to solve problems by someone systematically and reflectively in processing information obtained when faced with a problem. Through critical thinking, students can make appropriate decisions to solve these problems. However, in learning mathematics, critical thinking abilities receive less attention because students often get questions that in solved by using routine procedures. In addition to paying attention the critical thinking abilities, it is also necessary to pay attention to students' cognitive styles because each student has different characteristics in the time needed to answer questions and the resulting answer errors. This research is a qualitative descriptive study, which aims to describe the critical thinking abilities of junior high school students who have reflective, impulsive, fast accurate, and slow inaccurate cognitive styles in solving mathematical problems. The subjects in this study were eighth-grade junior high school students who had reflective, impulsive, fast accurate, and slow inaccurate cognitive styles of 1 student each. Data collection techniques in this study used the MFFT cognitive style test (matching familiar figure test), mathematics ability test, mathematical problems solving test and interviews. Data analysis techniques are based on indicators of critical thinking abilities that include clarification, assessment, inference, and strategy at each step of problems solving. The results showed that reflective cognitive style students were able to clarification, assessment, and inference. Impulsive cognitive style students can do the strategy. Fast accurate cognitive style students are not able to clarification, assessment, inference, and strategy. Slow inaccurate cognitive style students can do assessment.Keywords: Critical Thinking Abilities, Problem Solving, Cognitive Style


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 706
Author(s):  
Rizki Virtaria Rahman ◽  
I Nengah Parta ◽  
Hery Susanto

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> The purpose of this article is to describe the thinking process of junior high school students in solving mathematical problems. The thought process that will be disclosed in this study includes receiving, processing, storing, and calling information. In this research, it refers to problem solving according to Polya. This type of research is descriptive research and uses a qualitative approach. The subjects chosen consisted of one person from class VIII. The conclusion of this study is that the subject understands the problem by receiving information from repeatedly reading the problem so that it correctly mentions the thing that is known and asked. The subject makes a completion plan by linking the selected formulas. In completing the subject using the plan he has made by linking the known, asked, and the formula he has chosen. The subject also rechecked the problem solving stage.</p><strong>Abstrak:</strong><em> </em>Tujuan dari artikel ini adalah mendeskripsikan proses berpikir siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Proses berpikir yang akan diungkapkan penelitian ini mencakup penerimaan, pengolahan, penyimpanan, dan pemanggilan suatu informasi. Dalam penelitian ini merujuk kepada pemecahan masalah menurut Polya. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Subjek yang dipilih berjumlah satu orang dari kelas VIII. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah subjek memahami masalah dengan menerima informasi dari membaca berulang kali soal sehingga dengan benar menyebutkan hal yang diketahui dan ditanyakan. Subjek membuat rencana penyelesaian dengan mengaitkan rumus-rumus yang dipilih. Dalam melakukan penyelesaian subjek menggunakan rencana yang telah ia buat dengan mengaitkan yang diketahui, ditanyakan, dan rumus yang telah ia pilih. Subjek juga melakukan pengecekan ulang pada tahap penyelesaian masalah.


Author(s):  
Moh Syukron Maftuh ◽  
Nur Fathonah ◽  
Ina Nur Roihah

The purpose of this study was to describe the critical thinking process of junior high school students with choleric personalities in solving mathematical problems. This research is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach. The subjects in this study were two students of MTs Hasanuddin Sidoarjo class VIII who had choleric personalities obtained from the results of personality tests. The research stages used by the researchers consisted of three stages, namely the preparation stage, the implementation stage, and the analysis stage. The data collection technique in this research is the technique of giving the Mathematical Problem Solving Test (TPMM) and interviews later to obtain valid and credible data, researchers use source triangulation. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that the choleric subject in solving mathematical problems shows the criteria for critical thinking: focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, overview at the stage of understanding the problem. At the stage of making a plan for the completion of the choleric subject, it fulfills the criteria for critical thinking, focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, overview. Likewise, at the stage of implementing the completion plan, the choleric subject meets the criteria for critical thinking, focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, overview. Meanwhile, at the stage of re-examining the completion plan, the choleric subject only met the criteria for critical thinking, focus, reason, inference, situation, clarity, did not meet the criteria for critical thinking overview. Keywords: Critical Thinking, Mathematical Problem Solving, Choleric Personality


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 132-140
Author(s):  
Peni Anggareni ◽  
Akhmad Faisal Hidayat

Berpikir kreatif merupakan salah satu aspek penting dalam matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi tahapan proses berpikir kreatif siswa SMP dalam aktivitas pengajuan masalah matematika. Tahapan tersebut didasarkan pada hasil Tugas Pengajuan Masalah Matematika (TPMM) dan wawancara. Penelitian ini dilakukan di salah satu SMP Negeri di Kota Jambi. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 2 siswa SMP Kelas IX dengan kriteria kreatif, dengan alat pengumpul data berupa TPMM dan pedoman wawancara. Analisis data TPMM dilakukan dengan menganalisis soal yang dapat diselesaikan, kemudian dilihat berdasarkan indikator berpikir kreatif yaitu kelancaran (fluency), keluwesan (flexibility) dan kebaruan (novelty). Wawancara dilakukan berdasarkan 4 tahap proses berpikir kreatif yaitu persiapan, inkubasi, iluminasi, dan verifikasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa kreatif melewati empat tahap proses berpikir kreatif, yaitu persiapan, inkubasi, iluminasi, dan verifikasi. Pada tahap persiapan siswa berusaha mendapatkan wawasan dalam menghadapi masalah yang diberikan; tahap inkubasi siswa mencari ide; tahap iluminasi siswa memunculkan ide; dan tahap verifikasi siswa menguji ide yang dihasilkan.Creative thinking is one of the important aspects in mathematics. This study aims to identify the stages of the creative thinking process of junior high school students in the activity of submitting mathematical problems. These stages are based on the results of the Task for Submission of Mathematical Problems (TPMM) and interviews. This research was conducted at one of the Public Middle Schools in Jambi City. The subject of this study were 2 junior high school students of Class IX with creative criteria, with data collection tools in the form of TPMM and interview guidelines. TPMM data analysis is done by analyzing the questions that can be solved, then seen based on creative thinking indicators, namely fluency, flexibility and novelty. Interviews were conducted based on 4 stages of the creative thinking process, namely preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. The results showed that creative students passed the four stages of the creative thinking process, namely preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification. In the preparation stage students try to gain insight in dealing with problems given; incubation stage students look for ideas; the student's illumination stage raises ideas; and the verification stage students test the idea produced.


Author(s):  
Endar Chrisdiyanto ◽  
Zudhy Nur Alfian ◽  
Aji Pangestu

The objective of this development research is to produce a mathematical problem-based learning tool on the topic of social arithmetic to improve the creative thinking skills of junior high school students. This research describes the quality of the learning tools developed in terms of three aspects, namely validity, practicality, and effectiveness. The development model employed in the development of this learning device is the ADDIE model. The ADDIE model consists of analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Learning devices meet the validity criteria indicated by the lesson plan score of 151 in the very good category. The assessment score of student's worksheet is 125 which is in a very good category. Teacher questionnaire responses obtain a score of 87 which is in the very practical category and the student response questionnaire obtains a score of 68.29 which is in the very practical category. The results of the analysis on the effectiveness show that the learning device meets the effectiveness criteria viewed from the percentage of completeness of 87%, the significance value of 0,000 <α (0.005), and the value of t count (6,604)> t table (1,645).


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Ana Rahmawati

<span>this research is a descriptive research with qualitative approach as it is meant to describe question submission of Junior High School students seen from cognitive style, namely; fast-accurate style cognitive style and slow-inaccurate style. The data collection method used in this research are test and interview. The data credibility is then tested through triangulation of time. the result shows that the description of question submission submitted by subject of fast-accurate are; most of the questions submitted are mathematical questions except few of them are not, the questions submitted by the subject are varied, most of the questions submitted are from visual information, all questions submitted can be solved, the questions submitted by the fast-accurate subject are balance between medium and high difficulty, the solution of all questions submitted are correct. The submission of questions done by slow-inaccurate group are: most of the questions submitted by slow-inaccurate group are mathematical questions except one, the questions submitted are varied, the questions submitted from visual and verbal information are balance where 6 questions are from visual and the other 6 are from verbal, most of the questions can be solved except one, most of the questions are in medium level of difficulty, most of the questions can be solved correctly except question number 9 which can be solved as the information given are not enough to solve the problem.</span>


MATHEdunesa ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 211-220
Author(s):  
NILA NURCAHYANING KUSUMAWARDANI ◽  
RADEN SULAIMAN

Critical thinking is a thinking process in processing information logically starti from understanding, analyzing, evaluating and making precise conclusions. Critical thinking indicators are clarification, assessment, inference, and strategy that referred to Jacob and Sam. Mathematics is designed to improve students' critical thinking in a solving problem. One of the factors that affect students' critical thinking in solving a problem is AQ. This research is descriptive study with qualitative approach. The aim is to describe critical thinking profile of climber, camper, and quitter students in solving mathematical problems. The subjects were three students of VIII grade junior high school who represented each AQ category and had good communication skills. The instrument used was the ARP questionnaire, mathematics problem solving tests, and interview guidelines. The results shows that students’ critical thinking profile in understanding the problem is climber and camper student do all indicators of critical thinking in the clarification phase. Quitter student is only able mentioning known and asked information. In devising a plan, climber student implements all indicators of assessment and strategy phase. Camper student implements all indicators in assessment phase, but do not discuss the possible steps in strategy phase. Quitter student does not do both assessment and strategy phase. In carrying out the plan, climber and camper students do all indicators of inference phase, while quitter student does not. In the step of looking back, only climber student who carries out evaluating steps that have been done. Keywords: Jacob and Sam’s critical thinking, mathematical problem solving, adversity quotient


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-243
Author(s):  
Lihar Raudina Izzati ◽  
Erlinda Rahma Dewi ◽  
Andika Wisnu

Problem-solving ability is a characteristic of mathematical activities and a major ability in developing mathematical understanding. Mathematical problem-solving ability can be seen from several dimensions, one of which is cognitive style. Cognitive style is a unique way for each individual to acquire, process, store, use the information to respond to tasks or situations, and build knowledge. FD and FI cognitive styles are one type of cognitive style that are categorized by general ways of thinking, solving problems, learning, and dealing with other people so that they have a relationship with problem-solving abilities. The subjects in this study involved 72 students (around the age of 13-14 years), namely 33 students with FD cognitive style and 39 students with FI cognitive style. The problem-solving ability test instrument in this study was a mathematical problem-solving ability test that had been validated by experts and tested for reliability. The cognitive style test instrument is the Group Embedded Figure Test (GEFT) item developed by Witkin. The problem-solving ability of junior high school students with FI cognitive style is better than FD students even though the difference is not much different.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document