scholarly journals Analisis Pengajuan Soal Matematika Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Fast Accurate dan Slow in Accurate

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 89
Author(s):  
Ana Rahmawati
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Verbal Information ◽  
School Students ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Medium Level ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Data Credibility

<span>this research is a descriptive research with qualitative approach as it is meant to describe question submission of Junior High School students seen from cognitive style, namely; fast-accurate style cognitive style and slow-inaccurate style. The data collection method used in this research are test and interview. The data credibility is then tested through triangulation of time. the result shows that the description of question submission submitted by subject of fast-accurate are; most of the questions submitted are mathematical questions except few of them are not, the questions submitted by the subject are varied, most of the questions submitted are from visual information, all questions submitted can be solved, the questions submitted by the fast-accurate subject are balance between medium and high difficulty, the solution of all questions submitted are correct. The submission of questions done by slow-inaccurate group are: most of the questions submitted by slow-inaccurate group are mathematical questions except one, the questions submitted are varied, the questions submitted from visual and verbal information are balance where 6 questions are from visual and the other 6 are from verbal, most of the questions can be solved except one, most of the questions are in medium level of difficulty, most of the questions can be solved correctly except question number 9 which can be solved as the information given are not enough to solve the problem.</span>

scholarly journals Proses Berpikir Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 706
Author(s):  
Rizki Virtaria Rahman ◽  
I Nengah Parta ◽  
Hery Susanto
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Thought Process ◽  
School Students ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Mathematical Problems ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Thinking Process

<p><strong>Abstract:</strong> The purpose of this article is to describe the thinking process of junior high school students in solving mathematical problems. The thought process that will be disclosed in this study includes receiving, processing, storing, and calling information. In this research, it refers to problem solving according to Polya. This type of research is descriptive research and uses a qualitative approach. The subjects chosen consisted of one person from class VIII. The conclusion of this study is that the subject understands the problem by receiving information from repeatedly reading the problem so that it correctly mentions the thing that is known and asked. The subject makes a completion plan by linking the selected formulas. In completing the subject using the plan he has made by linking the known, asked, and the formula he has chosen. The subject also rechecked the problem solving stage.</p><strong>Abstrak:</strong><em> </em>Tujuan dari artikel ini adalah mendeskripsikan proses berpikir siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah matematika. Proses berpikir yang akan diungkapkan penelitian ini mencakup penerimaan, pengolahan, penyimpanan, dan pemanggilan suatu informasi. Dalam penelitian ini merujuk kepada pemecahan masalah menurut Polya. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif dan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Subjek yang dipilih berjumlah satu orang dari kelas VIII. Kesimpulan penelitian ini adalah subjek memahami masalah dengan menerima informasi dari membaca berulang kali soal sehingga dengan benar menyebutkan hal yang diketahui dan ditanyakan. Subjek membuat rencana penyelesaian dengan mengaitkan rumus-rumus yang dipilih. Dalam melakukan penyelesaian subjek menggunakan rencana yang telah ia buat dengan mengaitkan yang diketahui, ditanyakan, dan rumus yang telah ia pilih. Subjek juga melakukan pengecekan ulang pada tahap penyelesaian masalah.

scholarly journals PROFIL KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 6 SURABAYA

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 1057
Author(s):  
Fedela Leta Maliki ◽  
Wahono Widodo ◽  
Raharjo Raharjo
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Creative Thinking ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Thinking Skill ◽  
School Students ◽  
Model Learning ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Medium Level ◽  
Creative Thinking Skill

The purpose of this research is to describe the profile of students creative thinking skill at VII grade in SMPN 6 Surabaya. This research is a descriptive research whose 30 subject. Data obtained from testing showed that the students’ creative thinking skill in design an experiment reached medium N-Gain level (0,56). The average N-Gain score of students’ creative thinking skill based on fluency (0,49); flexibility(0,70); quality (0,54), elaboration (0,63), and originality (0,51) in medium level for each aspect. Overall, it can be concluded that Learning Cycle 5E Model package is effective to increase junior high school students’ creative thinking skill. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan profil keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 6 Surabaya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan subjek 30 siswa. Data yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam merancang kegiatan penyelidikan mencapai N-Gain 0,56 atau termasuk kategori sedang. Rata-rata nilai gain keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa berdasarkan aspek fluency sebesar 0,49, quality sebesar 0,54, elaboration sebesar 0,63, dan originality sebesar 0,51 dengan kategori sedang pada masing-masing aspek, dan flexibility sebesar 0,70 dengan kategori tinggi. Dengan,demikian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa perangkat pembelajaran model Learning Cycle 5E ini efektif untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP.

scholarly journals Analisis Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Visualizer dan Verbalizer

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-110
Author(s):  
Habibi Habibi ◽  
Illah Winiati ◽  
Yeva Kurniawati
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematics Curriculum ◽  
School Students ◽  
Evaluation Stage ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Way

Abstrak Berpikir kritis matematis merupakan salah satu tujuan yang disebutkan dalam praktik kurikulum pembelajaran matematika di dalam kelas. Untuk mengetahui cara siswa berpikir kritis tentunya dihadapkan dengan soal penyelesaian masalah. Dalam menyelesaikan masalah setiap siswa memiliki strategi berbeda dan tidak lepas dari cara siswa menerima dan mengolah informasi yang didapatkan. Perbedaan strategi dalam hal ini dipengaruhi oleh gaya kognitif, yang berkaitan dengan perbedaan dalam penerimaan informasi secara visual maupun verbal biasa dikenal dengan nama gaya kognitif visualizer dan verbalizer. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan berpikir kritis matematis siswa SMP ditinjau dari gaya kognitif visualizer-verbalizer. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif yang medeskripsikan siswa visualizer dan verbalizer dalam berpikir kritis matematis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di sekolah MTs. Mamba’ul Ulum Bedanten dan subjek dari penelitian ini adalah 4 siswa dari siswa kelas IX. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah dari seluruh tahap berpikir kritis matematis, dapat dicapai oleh subjek visualizer, tetapi tidak mampu dicapai pada tahap evaluasi. Subjek verbalizer juga mampu mencapai seluruh indikator berpikir kritis matematis, tetapi tidak mampu pada tahap inferensi yaitu tidak mampu menemukan alternatif (cara) lain dari soal evaluasi.   Abstract The critical thinking mathematically is one of the objectives mentioned in the practice of learning Mathematics curriculum in the classroom. To know the way students think critically, surely faced with problem solving test. In solving the problem each student has a different strategy  and not separated from the way students receive and process the information obtained. The difference of strategy in this case is influenced by cognitive style, which relates to differences in visual or verbal information acceptance is commonly known as visualizer and verbalizer cognitive style. The purpose of this study is to describe the critical thinking of junior high school students, reviewed from the visualizer-verbalizer cognitive style. This research uses descriptive research method with a qualitative approach that describe students visualizer and verbalizer in critical thinking mathematically. This study was conducted at the MTs Mamba'ul Ulum Bedanten School and the subject of this diffuser were 4 students from nine grade students. The result of this research is from all stages of critical thinking mathematically, the subject visualizer is able to be achieved, but it’s not able to be achieved at the evaluation stage. Subject verbalizer is also able to reach all indicators of critical thinking mathematically, but it’s not able to the inference, is not able to find another alternative (way) of evaluation test.

scholarly journals PROFIL KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH OPEN-ENDED PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR SEGIEMPAT BAGI SISWA SMP

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Annisa Fatwa Thursina ◽  
Sutriyono Sutriyono
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
School Students ◽  
Purposive Sampling ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
The Subject

Abstrak: Penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif, yang bertujuan untuk mengetahui profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah open-ended pada materi bangun datar segiempat bagi siswa SMP . Subjek  dalam penelitian ini adalah 3 siswa kelas VIII H SMP N 8 Salatiga yang memiliki kemampuan tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Subjek  dalam penelitian ini diambil dengan teknik purposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa tes, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa subjek berkemampuan sedang dan subjek berkemampuan rendah belum mampu memahami masalah, menyusun rencana pemecahan masalah khususnya soal nomor satu. Subjek berkemampuan rendah belum mampu memeriksa kembali. Abstract: This is a qualitative descriptive research. The purpose of this research is to know  the profile of open-ended problem solving in rectangular geometric shape of junior high school students. The subject of this research is 3 students of class VIII SMP Negeri 8 Salatiga who have high, medium, and low skills. The subject of this research is taken by using purposive sampling technique. The data collection techniques used were a test, interview, and documentation. The result showed that subject capable of achieving and subject capable low have not been able to understand a problem, device a plan problem solving especially about number one. Subject capable low have not been able to l ooking back.

scholarly journals IDENTIFIKASI KESALAHAN MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP BERDASARKAN TAHAPAN KASTOLAN

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-100
Author(s):  
Antonia Dwi Raharti ◽  
Tri Nova Hasti Yunianta
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
School Students ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Technical Errors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

The study aims to identify kinds of high school students’ misrepresent in doing their tasks and to provide the appropriate scaffolding as a solution to help the students. This is a qualitative descriptive research. The research subject consists of three junior high school students who have different abilities in Mathematics. They were selected out of 92 students. This research studied the conceptual errors, procedural mistakes, and students’ technical mistakes in working on the problems based on the stages of Kastolan mistakes and the scaffoldings given. Furthermore, the data were collected by using the way of testing, interviewing and documenting techniques. The research data were guarantee validated with the triangulation method. The result of the research showed that there were some errors done by the students in doing the tasks. They were the conceptual errors, procedural mistakes, and technical errors. The scaffoldings given to help the students do the tasks for Level 1 (environmental provisions), Level 2 (explaining, reviewing dan restructuring), and Level 3 (developing conceptual thinking).

Metacognition of Junior High School Students in Mathematics Problem Solving Based on Cognitive Style

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Sutama ◽  
Sofyan Anif ◽  
Sabar Narimo ◽  
Djalal Fuadi ◽  
Diana Purwita Sari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Junior High School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Mathematics Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematics Problem

The main target of the current study is to explain the metacognition of junior high school students with Field Independent (FI) and Field Dependent (FD) cognitive styles in mathematics problem-solving. It should be noted that the statistical population of this study was all junior high school students in the Sragen regency in the 2018/2019 academic year. To reach the research purpose, different instruments such as the cognitive style tests, the problem-solving exercises, and the interview guidance were used. Data analysis was carried out by data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results indicated that the students who have field-independent cognitive style had high self-confidence that they were able to solve the problem correctly, able to do planning steps, able to make important decisions for themselves, so they can solve the problem properly. Students with FD cognitive style are completely confident that their answer is correct, but they have not yet clarified the steps they need to solve their problems and have not yet focused on their shortcomings in mathematics problem solving, so their task results in mathematics problem-solving incorrectness answer.   Keywords: Cognitive style; Mathematics problem solving; Metacognition

scholarly journals Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Respon Peralihan Matematik dari SMP ke SMA pada Materi SPLTV

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-238
Author(s):  
Siti Zakiyah ◽  
Wahyu Hidayat ◽  
Wahyu Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
School Students ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Open Questions ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive

AbstrakPemecahan masalah merupakan suatu kemampuan yang sangat kompleks di mata siswa. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa SMA kelas X dan respon peralihan matematika SMP ke SMA terhadap materi SPLTV. Penelitian ini berbentuk deskriptif kualitatif dengan objek penelitian siswa kelas X di salah satu SMA di Bandung Barat. Instrumen dalam penelitian ini adalah uji soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan angket kemampuan matematika siswa apabila ditinjau dari peralihan SMP ke SMA terhadap materi SPLTV. Jumlah soal yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak empat dari enam butir soal yang disediakan dengan angket yang berisikan sepuluh pertanyaan, yang terdiri dari empat pertanyaan tertutup dan enam pertanyaan terbuka. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan pada tanggal 10 September 2018 dan 8 Oktober 2018. Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik siswa kelas X di Bandung Barat terhadap materi SPLTV tergolong tinggi, dengan persentase sebesar 79,868%. Siswa yang memiliki latar belakang pemahaman SPLDV yang baik cenderung mudah memahami SPLTV dengan baik pula. Analysis of Problem Solving Ability and Respons of Transition from Junior to Senior High School in SPLTV MaterialAbstractProblem-solving is problem-solving in the eyes of students. The purpose of this study was to study and analyze the mathematical problem solving of high school students in class X and the response of the transition of junior high school to high school to SPLTV material. This research is in the form of qualitative descriptive research with class X objects in one of the high schools in West Bandung. The instruments in this study were problem-solving questions and mathematical ability questionnaires which were reviewed from the transition of junior high school to high school to SPLTV material. The number of questions used in this study amounted to four of the six items provided with a questionnaire containing questions, which consisted of four closed questions and six open questions. This research was conducted on September 10, 2018, and October 8, 2018. The ability to solve the problems of grade X students in West Bandung on SPLTV material was high, with a contribution of 79.868%. Students who have a background in understanding SPLDV can easily consider SPLTV well too.

scholarly journals The Common Science Misconceptions in Indonesia Junior High School Students

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24
Author(s):  
Putri Anjarsari
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
School Students ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Science Misconceptions ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship

Identifying and correcting the mistake that students make about science concept is very important. The main purpose of this article is to analyse some publications about common science misconceptions in some science topics in junior high schools. Misconceptions are erroneous perceptions of what is universally accepted. The misconception identification in this research is based on the descriptive research using some journal publications in Indonesia university which is held science education study program. Study found that : the concept of photosynthesis,  respirations, the relationship of photosynthesis and respirations, force (action and reaction forces) , and Newton laws are most frequently investigated as misconceptions of science. Students’ interest and learning environments are some reasons of students’ misconceptions.

scholarly journals ANALISIS BUKU MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP KURIKULUM 2013

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilham Rizkianto ◽  
Rusgianto Heri Santosa
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Junior High ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Junior High School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Mathematics Textbook ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Mathematics Book

AbstrakPenelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk memformulasikan masukan sebagai bahan pertimbangan dalam penyempurnaan buku matematika siswa SMP kurikulum 2013. Sehingga nantinya kesalahan-kesalahan yang ditemukan dalam buku matematika siswa SMP kurikulum 2013 dapat diminimalisisr dan layak dipakai oleh siswa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian deskriptif analitik, yakni suatu penelitian yang bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran tentang realitas pada objek yang diteliti secara objektif. Penelitian ini menekankan pada satu variabel yaitu kebenaran konsep pada buku matematika siswa SMP kurikulum 2013. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa dalam buku matematika siswa SMP kurikulum 2013 masih terdapat banyak kesalahan. Kesalahan ini berupa kesalahan dalam penulisan maupun dalam merumuskan konsep pembelajaran matematika.Kata Kunci: analisis buku, buku matematika siswa, kurikulum 2013, pembelajaran matematika.AbstractThe aim of this present study is to formulate suggestions as a consideration in improving junior high school students’ mathematics book 2013 curriculum. Later on, the mistakes found in the book can be minimalize and suitable to be used by students. The sort of this study is a analitic descriptive research, namely a research that intends to give representations about reality towards objects that have been studied objectively. This research study stresses in one variable, namely the truth concept in junior high school students’ mathematics book 2013 curriculum. The result of the analysis shows that in Junior High School students’ mathematics textbook 2013 curriculum was found many mistakes. The mistakes includes wrong spelling in written the words and wrong formulation of mathematics learning concepts.Keyword: book analysis, students’ mathematics book, 2013 curriculum, mathematics learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document