scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Pulsed Dye Laser in Management of Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Dye Laser ◽  
Pulsed Dye Laser ◽  
Control Group ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Background: Acne vulgaris is one of the most prevalent skin diseases, affecting up to 85% of teenagers and young adults. Multiple treatment options including topical, systemic or physical therapies. However, the effects of conventional therapies are limited due to antibi-otic resistance and adverse effects such as irritation and teratogenicity of isotretinoin. Light-based therapy is an alternative and/or adjuvant therapy in patients who cannot tolerate or unresponsive to conventional therapies that may provide fewer side effects, patient com-fort, fast onset of action, and with equal or greater effectiveness. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of using Pulsed Dye Laser as a treatment option for acne vulgaris. A systemat-ic Review and Meta-analysis was peformed of randomized clinical trials assessing the ef-fectiveness of Pulsed Dye Laser in management of acne vulgaris. Methods: Medline Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane library, the reference list, conference pro-ceedings, researchers in field of eligible studies were searched. Eight studies (n=275 sub-jects) were included in qualitative analysis of which six studies (n=190 subjects) were in-cluded in meta-analysis. The mean age of the participant was 21,94 years old. Intervention using application of Pulsed dye laser as monotherapy or combination in acne vulgaris pa-tients with follow-up at least 12 weeks. and the outcomes is a decrease mean of acne vul-garis lesions counts after received pulsed dye laser therapy. Results: Pooling of data using random effects model showed that the group that received PDL therapy alone or in combination had a lower number of acne lesions than the control group with the mean difference was -0.593 (95% CI = -1.290 to 0.104), the z value was -1.668 with p = 0.095. This shows that the number of lesions in the group that received sin-gle or combined PDL therapy was lower than the control group. However the difference is insignificant. Conclusion. From the results of the systematic review conducted, it can be concluded that in the group given Pulsed Dye Laser therapy there was a decrease in the total number of acne vulgaris lesions compared to before treatment, and the decrease, which was indicated by the difference in the mean number of acne lesions, was significantly greater compared to the control who was only given placebo. Pulsed Dye Laser therapy can be an alternative treatment option for acne vulgaris in patients who are unresponsive to previous treatment or conditions where there are contraindications to systemic therapy.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Microneedling Therapy on The Severity of Acne Scars According to Goodman and Baron: A Systematic review and meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Skin Damage ◽  
Acne Scar ◽  
Acne Scars ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Acne Scarring ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Z Value

Background: The emergence of acne scars due to skin damage in the acne healing process and causes psychological effects. The management of acne scars can be done in several methods. Microneedling is a very simple, safe, effective, and minimally invasive therapeutic technique compared to other therapeutic modalities in acne scars. The resulting wound is micro-sized, and promotes the growth of growth factors and collagen production. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of using microneedling as an acne scar treatment option. A systematic review and meta-analysis were qualitatively and quantitatively conducted from RCTs, assessing the effectiveness of microneedling in reducing the severity of acne scars according to Goodman and Baron in the treatment of acne scars. Methods: Medline Pubmed, PMC, Scopus, Google Scholar, and JDC library, eligible search. Ten studies (n=514) were analyzed qualitatively with 2 studies (n=53 subjects) and quantitatively analyzed by 2 studies (n=90 subjects). Both analyzes were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age of the participants was 40.5 years. The application of microneedling intervention as monotherapy or a combination in patients with acne scarring was followed for at least 16 weeks, the results obtained were the mean reduction in the degree of acne scarring after microneedling. Result: The combination of microneedling treatment obtained a qualitative decrease in the degree of acne scars according to Goodman and Baron with a Z value (-4.299) and P=<0.001 lower than the control (PRP) with a significant difference. The quantitative decrease in the degree of acne scars according to Goodman and Baron obtained a Z value (-4.681) and P=<0.001 lower than the control (PRP) with a significant difference. Quantitative reduction in the degree of acne scars according to Goodman and Baron on single therapy between treatment and control with a value of Z (-3.536) and P=<0.001 lower than control (fractional CO2) with a significant difference. The results of the degree of acne scars in the group treated with microneedling alone or in combination were lower than the control group. The mean before and after therapy compared to the control there was a significant difference. Conclusion. The results of a systematic review, concluded that the group treated with microneedling had a decrease in the degree of acne scarring according to Goodman and Baron with P=<0.001 compared to before treatment. The decrease was shown in the difference in Z values, which was significantly greater than the control given other therapies. Microneedling therapy can be an alternative therapy option for acne scar patients who are unresponsive to previous therapy or in conditions where there are contraindications to other therapies.

scholarly journals Pulsed dye laser therapy for infantile hemangiomas: a systemic review and meta-analysis

QJM ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
pp. 473-480 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Shen ◽  
G. Zhou ◽  
J. Zhao ◽  
P. Li ◽  
Q. Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laser Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dye Laser ◽  
Pulsed Dye Laser ◽  
Systemic Review

scholarly journals Whether stoma support rods have application value in loop enterostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Du ◽  
Jiajie Zhou ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Dongliang Li ◽  
Guifan Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Total Incidence ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Effect Of Support ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Purpose The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the application value of the stoma support rods in loop enterostomy. Methods The studies on the application of stoma rods in loop enterostomy published from January 2000 to January 2020 were searched in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Clinical trials. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that observed the value of stoma rods were included according to inclusion criteria. The RevMan5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. Results A total of 1131 patients with loop enterostomy in six studies were included in this study; there were 569 cases in the experimental group and 562 cases in the control group. All six studies analyzed the effect of support rods on the incidence of stoma retraction; the meta-analysis showed that in a total of 32 patients, stoma retraction occurred, with a total incidence of about 2.8% in 1131 patients. The incidence of stoma retraction in the rod group was not significantly lower than that in the non-rod group, and the difference was not statistically significant (OR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.32~1.32, I2 = 0%, P = 0.23), and the studies were homogeneous. The incidences of stoma necrosis (OR = 6.41, 95% CI 2.22~18.55, I2 = 0%, P = 0.0006), peristomal dermatitis (OR = 2.93, 95% CI 2.01~4.27, I2 = 0%, P < 0.00001), and mucocutaneous separation (OR = 2.14, 95% CI 1.03~4.47, I2 = 0%, P = 0.04) were significantly increased in the rod group. Conclusions It is not recommended to routinely use stoma support rods in the clinical practice.

Low Glycemic Load or Index Diet in Association with Acne Vulgaris: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roya Sakhaei ◽  
Mohammad Ali Mohsenpour
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Glycemic Load ◽  
Dietary Factors ◽  
Dietary Habit ◽  
The Mean

Background: Social life can be affected by skin condition. Acne Vulgaris (AV) is a multi-factorial skin disorder that affects many people. Several dietary factors are associated with AV. Objectives: Different findings on glycemic indices led us to investigate the effect of the dietary glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) on AV by a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Observational studies and clinical trials were extracted from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The mean ± Standard division (SD) for acne grading in clinical trials and the mean ± SD GI or GL of the diet for observational studies were used for meta-analysis. Results: We found that nine out of 15 studies were eligible for systematic review clinical trials (N = 3) and observational studies (N = 6) designs. The meta-analysis of three studies clinically assessed the effect of GI/GL on acne and showed that a diet with lower GI/GL reduced the acne severity (Hedges’g = -0.91, 95% CI: -1.57, -0.25, P = 0.007). The analysis of six observational studies showed that dietary habit with higher GI might not affect the acne severity in patients with AV (Hedges’g = 0.07, 95%CI: -0.23, 0.38, P = 0.636), but individuals with higher acne severity had a diet with higher GL (Hedges’g = 0.64, 95%CI: 0.01, 1.26, P = 0.045). Conclusions: Diet, as a part of life style, is associated with AV. Adherence to lower GL diet may reduce the severity of AV. Further well-designed clinical trials are required to confirm these results.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Hormone Based Therapies (Spironolactone and Combined Oral Contraceptives in the Management of Acne Vulgaris in Women: A Systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 42
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Contraceptives ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acne Vulgaris ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Combined Oral Contraceptives ◽  
Female Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Control Therapy

Background: Acne vulgaris (AV) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pilosebaceous follicular unit that often occurs. Acne is a skin disorder that is not life-threatening but is mostly complained of because it is aesthetically disruptive, which can cause significant psychological problems for sufferers. The management of acne vulgaris in female patients has its challenges. There are many histories of failed therapy using conventional therapy, such as with antibiotics or isotretinoin, and female patients have a predisposition to the condition of androgen excess. Also, the increasing awareness about limiting the use of antibiotics to prevent resistance in dermatological cases, including acne vulgaris, encourages other treatment options in the female patient population, one of which is hormone-based therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of randomized clinical trials assessing the effects of Hormone Based Therapies (Spironolactone and Combined Oral Contraceptives) in the management of Acne Vulgaris in Women. Methods: Medline Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the reference list, conference proceedings, researchers in the field of eligible studies were searched. Ten studies (n=1906 sub-jects) were included in qualitative analysis, of which two studies (n=1842 subjects) were included in the meta-analysis. The age of the participant was greater than 14 years old. Intervention using combined oral contraceptives (n=8) or oral spironolactone (n=2). Duration of intervention (minimum six months for COC and three months for SL) and out-comes of mean difference number of acne vulgaris lesions before and after treatment. Results: Pooling of data using random-effects model found a significant difference in the mean difference in the number of lesions after treatment in the group receiving hormone-based therapy (spironolactone and combined oral contraceptives) and those receiving control therapy (p = 0.005). The overall mean difference was -0.890 ± 0.316. A negative value indicating the number of lesions after hormone-based therapy (spironolactone and combined oral contraceptives) was significantly lower than those receiving control therapy (p = 0.005). Conclusion: From the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis conducted, it can be concluded that in the group given hormone-based therapy (spironolactone and Combined Oral Contraceptives), there was a decrease in the total number of acne vulgaris lesions compared to before treatment, and the mean difference in the number of lesions was significantly lower after getting hormone-based therapy (spironolactone and combined oral contraceptives) compared with controls.

scholarly journals The best treatment option(s) for adult and elderly patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Koechlin ◽  
Ben Whalley ◽  
Nicky J. Welton ◽  
Cosima Locher
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Musculoskeletal Pain ◽  
Emotional Distress ◽  
Treatment Option ◽  
Functional Disability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Safety Outcomes

Abstract Background Chronic primary musculoskeletal pain (CPMP) is one subcategory of the new classification of chronic primary pain for the upcoming ICD-11, defined as chronic pain in the muscles, bones, joints, or tendons that persists or recurs for more than 3 months and is associated with significant emotional distress or functional disability. An array of pharmacological, psychological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions is available for CPMP, for which previous research has demonstrated varying effect sizes with regard to effectiveness in pain reduction and other main outcomes. This highlights the need for the synthesis of all available evidence. The proposed network meta-analysis will compare all available interventions for CPMP to determine the best treatment option(s) with a focus on efficacy and safety of interventions. Methods We are interested in comparing interventions of the following types: psychological, pharmacological, physical, complementary, and rehabilitative interventions. We will include all randomized controlled trials that compare one intervention with another, or with a control group, in the treatment of CPMP. Primary efficacy outcomes will be pain intensity, emotional distress, and functional disability. Safety outcomes extracted will include proportion of patients with treatment-emergent adverse events, unwanted events, or drop-out rates due to side effects. Published and unpublished trials will be sought through the search of all relevant databases and trial registries. At least two independent reviewers of the team will select the references and extract data independently. We will assess the risk of bias of each individual study using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. We will conduct a network meta-analysis to synthesize all evidence for each outcome. We will fit our model primarily within a Bayesian framework. Discussion CPMP is a disabling condition for which several interventions exist. To our knowledge, this is the first network meta-analysis to systematically compare all available evidence. This is required by national health institutions to inform their decisions about the best available treatment option(s) with regard to efficacy and safety outcomes. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018096114

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document