scholarly journals Comparison of efficacy of Misoprostol 4 hourly with Misoprostol 6 hour for Medical termination of pregnancy in second trimester.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 46-51
Author(s):  
Shamas un Nisa ◽  
Farzana Razaq ◽  
Sadaf un Nisa
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Fetal Loss ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Termination of Pregnancy (TOP), in our country is carried out only when considerable danger to a fetus due to congenital abnormalities, intrauterine fetal loss or when maternal life is under threat. The principle concerns in providing second trimester termination include safety, efficacy, simplicity, low-cost, and fast acting with minimal side effects. Objectives: To compare the efficacy in term of complete abortion within 48 hours between protocol-I (200 µg misoprostol 4 hourly) versus protocol-II (200 µg misoprostol 6 hourly) for second trimester (14-24 weeks) medical termination of pregnancy. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Gynecology & obstetrics unit-II, Bahawal Victoria Hospital (BVH) Bahawalpur. Period: From 1st July 2017 to 30th June 2018. Material & Method: A total of 182 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in study. Ninety one patients were included in group-A and 91 patients were included in group-B.  Women allocated to group-A was given misoprostol 200µg every 4 hour. Similar drug and dose were administered to women of group-B intra-vaginally, 6 hourly. Patients in both groups were monitored up to 48. If abortion occurred within 48 hours of induction, it was labeled as effective abortion otherwise it was regarded as failed abortion. Results: The mean age in group-A was 26.71 years 25.49 years in Group-B. In group-A, 89 (97.8%) patients showed efficacy (abortion within 48 hours) and in group-B, 74 (81.32%) patients showed efficacy to misoprostol. Conclusion: The regimen of using 200μg of vaginal misoprostol 4 hourly is more efficacious and quick for 2nd trimester TOP with fewer side effects when compared to 200μg of vaginal misoprostol 6 hourly.

scholarly journals Role of misoprostol 4 hourly versus 6 hourly in medical termination of pregnancy in 2nd trimester.

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. 1645-1649
Author(s):  
Komal Devi ◽  
Shazia Aftab ◽  
Reena ◽  
Huma Baloch ◽  
Devi Kumari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Ethical Review ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine efficacy of misoprostol given in 4 hourly versus 6 hourly intervals in second trimester for termination of pregnancy. Study Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Study was conducted at the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Jinnah Medical and Dental College Karachi Allied Hospital. Period: March to August 2020. Material & Methods: Pregnant ladies in second trimester, requiring abortion due to medical reasons, were planned for termination of pregnancy. Two groups were made. Patients in Group-A were given misoprostol 4 hourly and those in Group-B were given misoprostol 6 hourly. Similar dose of drug (200ug) was given in both groups and monitoring was done. If abortion done in 48 hours, it was considered effective abortion and if not happened in 48 hours, it was considered a failed abortion. Consent was taken from all ladies in study group. Ethical approval was taken from ethical review committee. Results: Total 140 cases were studied, 70 cases in each group, A & B. Age range of cases was 16-40 years with mean age of 26.4±3.5 years. Most of the cases were having age between 20-30 years (63.5%). Group-A (N=70) was given misoprostol 4 hourly, where abortion was done in 94.3% cases while abortion failed in 5.7% cases. In Group-B (N=70) misoprostol was given 6 hourly, induced abortion in 82.8% and failed in 17.1% cases. Conclusion: Misoprostol dose of 20ug given via vaginal route is much effective drug for medical termination of pregnancy when given 4 hourly instead 6 hourly, with low failure rate.

scholarly journals SECOND TRIMESTER MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY. CHALLENGES OF IMPLEMENTATION

2017 ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
S. V. Apresyan ◽  
V. I. Dimitrova ◽  
O. A. Slyusareva
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Late Complications ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Economic Feasibility ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Low Incidence

The article describes the specific features of termination of progressive uterine pregnancy in the II trimester. It was found that the efficacy of medical abortion in the II trimester of pregnancy is 94–98%. High efficacy, low incidence of side effects or early and late complications and economic feasibility demonstrate that the method is promising and safe; therefore, it can be recommended as a priority when choosing a method for medical termination of pregnancy in the II trimester.

scholarly journals Comparative study between sequential use of Foley catheter with vaginal misoprostol versus sequential use of oral mifepristone with vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 4545
Author(s):  
Michelle N. Fonseca ◽  
Vernica Sah
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Sequential Administration ◽  
Group A ◽  
Low Incidence ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Abortions are one of the most commonly performed procedures in gynaecological departments worldwide. They are still a major problem in developing countries contributing to a significant percentage of maternal morbidity and mortality. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficacy, side effects and acceptability of intracervical Foley and oral Mifepristone both followed with sequential administration of vaginal misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion.Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial of 36 healthy women opting for termination of pregnancy with ultrasound confirmed intrauterine gestation between 12 to 20 completed weeks. Intracervical Foley catheter with administration of misoprostol (200µg) vaginally was done for Group A. Mifepristone 200mg was administered on day one followed by misoprostol (200µg) vaginally, 48 hours later, to Group B. Both groups received misoprostol (200µg) vaginally at 4 hourly intervals. Completeness of abortion was assessed, and surgical evacuation was performed, if abortion was found to be incomplete.Results: The two groups were comparable with respect to age, parity and gestational age. 83-89% of the women in both the groups had complete abortion. The mean induction abortion interval was 20.11 hours in Group A and 54.77 hours in Group B, which was statistically significant. Side effect profile was comparable in both groups however the intensity and the duration of persistence of pain was greater among patients from Group A.Conclusions: Authors conclude that medical abortions with both methods were found to be safe, effective, inexpensive and acceptable methods. Whereas a shorter induction abortion interval was observed in the Foley induction group, induction with mifepristone was the preferred regimen in second trimester abortion because of its high efficacy, low incidence of side effects, better tolerance by the patients and due to lower dose of misoprostol required following mifepristone administration.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of evidence based regimen for medical abortion over conventional methods

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 881
Author(s):  
Anitha K. Gopal ◽  
Sajini B. Sajini B. ◽  
Ganamurali S. ◽  
Beena Kumari R.
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Experimental Group

Background: Medical abortion is a means of medical termination of pregnancy by drugs alone. This can be done upto 63 days using mifepristone and misoprostol tablets. For the conventional method, patient has to come to the hospital 3 times. In our study we reduced the interval between the drugs there by reducing the number of hospital visits. The objectives were to study the reduction of induction abortion interval following administration of evidence based regimen and to compare the proportion of patients developing complications in both the groups.Methods: It was a comparative study conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Govermnent MedicalCollege Kottayam, Kerala, India from May 2015 to November 2015.Results: The mean induction abortion interval in experimental group was 14.3 hours and in control group, it was 60.4 hours which was found to be statistically significant. Only 3 patients (7%) of experimental group had side effects whereas 12 patients. (17.4%) had side effects in the control group. Major side effects encountered were severe abdominal pain and severe bleeding per vaginum. Evidence based  regimen consist of administration of mifepristone 200mg and vaginal misoprostol 600µg 6 hours later for termination of pregnancy up to 63 days could reduce the induction abortion interval by 46 hours and had less side effects.Conclusions: As it reduces the induction abortion Interval and complications we feel that the evidence based regimen for Medical Termination of Pregnancy is superior to the FDA approved regimen.

scholarly journals Randomized comparison of vaginal and sublingual misoprostol with mifepristone priming in termination of second trimester pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3869
Author(s):  
Shrikrushna Vasant Chavan ◽  
Niraj Nilkanth Mahajan ◽  
Arundhati Gundu Tilve
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Pregnancy Termination ◽  
Medical Abortion ◽  
P Value ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Sublingual Misoprostol ◽  
Group A ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol ◽  
Group B

Background: Sublingual Misoprostol 200 ug 4 hrly is as effective or less effective than vaginal Misoprostol 200ug 4hrly with 200mg oral Mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy.To compare effectiveness, side-effects, and patient satisfaction of sublingual vs vaginal misoprostol administration.Methods: It was prospective randomized open label study. 60 women 13-20 weeks of gestation with a valid legal indication for termination of pregnancy as per MTP act in INDIA were enrolled for study, randomly divided into Group A- Sublingual (n=30) group B-Vaginal (n=30). For group A, 200 mg of Mifepristone was given, 48h later Misoprostol 200 µg was given sublingually 4hrly up to a maximum of 5 doses. If abortion does not occur, the pregnancy was terminated with vaginal misoprostol, in group A. Same procedure repeated in group B. If abortion fails to occur after 5 doses, then second course of vaginal misoprostol was given in group B. Failure of procedure was defined as failed expulsion of foetus at 48 hrs. Results: Mean induction-abortion interval in vaginal group was 12.8±4.38h and 11.47±4.42h in sublingual group was comparable with insignificant p value (p=0.136). All the side effects were comparable in both groups. The overall success rate was 93.3% in the sublingual group while it was 100% in the vaginal group.Conclusion: Vaginal misoprostol with oral mifepristone priming in second -trimester medical abortion has a shorter time to pregnancy termination compared with a sublingual regimen. However, both the routes are equally effective for induction of abortion.

scholarly journals Mifepristone and Misoprostol Vs Misoprostol Alone in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (213) ◽  
pp. 856-860
Author(s):  
Deepa Shah ◽  
Pappu Rijal ◽  
Achala Thakur ◽  
Rubina Rai
Keyword(s):  
Side Effects ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Second Trimester ◽  
Trimester Abortion ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Group A ◽  
Complete Failure ◽  
Second Trimester Abortion ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group B

Introduction: During the last decade, medical methods for second trimester abortion have considerably improved and become safe and more accessible. The combination of mifepristone and misoprostol is now an established and highly effective method for second trimester abortion. But where mifepristone is not available or affordable, misoprostol alone has also been shown to be effective. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of mifepristone with misoprostol and misoprostol alone for second trimester termination of pregnancy. Methods: It is a comparative study conducted on 60 patients from 13 to 18 weeks of gestation admitted for second trimester termination on legal indications. Results: Mean induction abortion interval was comparable in both the groups. Of the 30 cases in each group, nine cases in each Group A and six cases in Group B had incomplete/failed expulsion. Among these 15 cases, only nine required check curettage for complete evacuation while others received oxytocics only for completion. The distribution of these cases was also comparable in both the groups. Only one patient in Group B had complete failure of expulsion and underwent surgical evacuation. However, the difference in dosage of misoprostol required for complete expulsion and incidence of side effects were significantly higher in the group B. Conclusions: Mifepristone and misoprostol combined together is now an established, highly effective and safe method for medical method of second trimester termination. However, when mifepristone is not available or affordable, misoprostol alone can also be used effectively, although a higher total dose is needed and side effects are higher than with the combined regimen.

scholarly journals VAGINAL AND ORAL MISOPROSTOL FOLLOWING MIFEPRISTONE ADMINISTRATION IN MEDICAL TERMINATION OF PREGNANCY UP TO 49 DAYS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
DIVYA VARDAINI
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Vaginal Route ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Routes Of Administration ◽  
Medical Termination Of Pregnancy ◽  
Oral Misoprostol ◽  
Medical Termination ◽  
Gastrointestinal Side Effects ◽  
Vaginal Misoprostol

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy, safety, adverse effects, and patient compliance of vaginal versus oral misoprostol in medical termination of pregnancy after tablet misoprostol up to 49 days of gestation. Methods: A comparative study of 100 patients divided randomly assigned to two control groups. Results: The study showed that 200 mg mifepristone followed by 800 mcg vaginal misoprostol is more effective for medical termination in gestational age up to 49 days as compared to 200 mg mifepristone followed by 400 mcg oral misoprostol. Conclusion: While both routes of administration are safe, gastrointestinal side effects are more with oral misoprostol. The vaginal route is more acceptable to the patients enrolled in the study.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document