scholarly journals DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY;

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (04) ◽  
pp. 554-559
Author(s):  
Muhammad Imran ◽  
Muhammad Usman Bashir ◽  
Ameena Nasir

Objectives: To compare serum uric acid levels in different stages of diabeticnephropathy. Study Design: Descriptive analytical study. Setting: University of Health ScienceLahore. Period: February 2010 to January 2011. Subjects and methods: A sample size of195 diabetic subjects. They were divided among normoalbuminuric, microalbuminuric andmacroalbuminuric groups, according to their daily urinary albumin excretion rate (AER), with65 patients in each group. Their glomerular filtration rate (GFR), daily AER and serum uricacid was evaluated by conducting tests on serum and urine samples. Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to observe differences of medians in differentgroups. P value less than 0.05 was taken statistically significant. Results: There was majority ofmales in microalbuminuric and macroalbuminuric groups while females were more in numberin normoalbuminuric group. Significant differences were found in serum urea concentration,serum creatinine concentration, serum uric acid concentration, glomerular filtration rate, urinarycreatinine concentration, urine flow rate, daily albumin excretion rate and urinary albuminconcentration among the three groups. Urinary creatinine concentration and glomerularfiltration rate were in the highest ranges in normoalbuminuric group and in the lowest rangesin macroalbuminuric group. While rest of the parameters (ie. age, duration of diabetes, serumurea concentration, serum creatinine concentration, urine flow rate, daily AER , urinary albuminconcentration and serum uric acid concentration) were in the lowest ranges in normoalbuminuricgroup and in the highest ranges in macroalbuminuric group. There was significant increaseserum uric acid levels in advancing stages of diabetic nephropathy. p <0.05 was takenstatistically significant. Conclusion: It is concluded that serum uric acid increases with theadvancing stages of diabetic nephropathy. Progressive decline in glomerular filtration rate andgradual rise in serum creatinine level occurs throughout the course of diabetic nephropathy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 1178-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aila J. Ahola ◽  
Niina Sandholm ◽  
Carol Forsblom ◽  
Valma Harjutsalo ◽  
Emma Dahlström ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 130 (5) ◽  
pp. 289-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Libório ◽  
Russian Uchoa ◽  
João Neto ◽  
Juan Valdivia ◽  
Elizabeth De Francesco Daher ◽  
...  

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Severe heart failure is highly associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Serum creatinine is a poor indicator of renal function and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimation is an accessible method for assessing renal function. The most popular formulas for GFR estimation are the Cockcroft-Gault (CG), the four-variable Simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (sMDRD) and the recently introduced CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI). The objective of the study was to analyze the correlation between these three equations for estimating GFR in patients with severe heart failure. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional observational study at a university reference center. METHODS: GFR was estimated in patients with severe heart failure who were awaiting heart transplantation, using the CG, sMDRD and CKD-EPI formulas. These estimates were analyzed using Pearson's correlation and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: This study included 157 patients, of whom 32 (20.3%) were female. Normal serum creatinine concentration was observed in 21.6%. The mean GFR according to CG, sMDRD and CKD-EPI was 70.1 ± 29.5, 70.7 ± 37.5 and 73.7 ± 30.1 ml/min/1.73 m²; P > 0.05. Pearson's coefficient demonstrated good correlations between all the formulas, as did Bland-Altman. However, the patients presented GFR < 60 ml/min more frequently with the sMDRD formula (54.1% versus 40.2% for CG and 43.2% for CKD-EPI; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Despite the good correlation and agreement between the three methods, the sMDRD formula classified more patients as presenting GFR less than 60 ml/min.


2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 3125-3127
Author(s):  
Leonardo Oliveira Reis ◽  
Marina Zamuner ◽  
Brunno C.F. Sanches ◽  
Osamu Ikari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document