scholarly journals SANKSI PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA MENURUT HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yandi Maryandi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Trade Secrets ◽  
Indonesian Population ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
The Face ◽  
Protecting Intellectual Property

AbstrakSecara hakiki segala yang diam dan bergerak di muka bumi baik daratan maupun lautan memang milik Allah. Kalau secara hakiki ini diterapkan dalam keseharian, kehidupan mendadak chaos karena siapa saja merasa khalifatullah. Namun, secara majazi hak milik Allah bisa diidhofahkan kepada siapa saja agar kehidupan jadi terang dan terus berjalan. Hak atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) merupakan salah satu hak yang telah mendapatkan perlindungan secara hukum di Indonesia, ada beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang hak-hak yang termasuk dalam ruang lingkup kekayan intelektual seperti hak cipta, hak paten, hak merek, hak rahasia dagang dan sebagainya. Yang perlu diketahui lebih mendalam adalah bagaimana hak cipta dalam perspektif hukum Pidana Islam karena Indonesia sebagai negara terbesar menganut agama Islam akan sangat mempengaruhi pemahaman dan kesadaran penduduk Indonesia akan pentingnya perlindungan terhadap hak atas kekayaan intelektual.Kata kunci: Hak Cipta, Hukum, Pidana IslamAbstractBasically everything that is stationary and moves on the face of the earth, both land and sea, indeed belongs to God. If it is essentially applied in daily life, life suddenly chaos because anyone feels khalifatullah. However, by virtue of God's property can be transferred to anyone so that life will be bright and keep going. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is one of the rights that has been legally protected in Indonesia, there are several laws and regulations governing rights that are included in the scope of intellectual property such as copyright, patent rights, trademark rights, rights trade secrets and so on. What needs to be known more deeply is how copyright in the perspective of Islamic Criminal law because Indonesia as the largest country adheres to Islam will greatly affect the understanding and awareness of the Indonesian population on the importance of protecting intellectual property rights.Keywords: Copyright, Law, Islamic Criminal

scholarly journals Realizacja konstytucyjnej zasady nullum crimen sine lege certa w świetle art. 115 ust. 3 u stawy o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 125-139
Author(s):  
Anna Grzywacz
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Final Conclusion ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Constitutional Tribunal ◽  
Secondary Issue

Realization of a nullum crimen sine lege certa principle in light of Article 115 Paragraph 3 of a Polish Copyright ActThe aim of the article is to analyze the content of Article 115 Paragraph 3 of the Polish Copyright Act and to examine the constitutionality of the provision based on the nullum crimen sine lege certa principle expressed in Article 42 of the Constitution. The basis for the allegation of the unconstitutionality of the provision is the Article’s use of the phrase: “Who […] otherwise violates”, which is, in the opinion of the doctrine, imprecise and contrary to the principle of legal certainty in matters of criminal law. Basing on the quoted regulations and the practice the author tries to answer a question whether the content of Article 115 Paragraph 3 of the Polish Copyright Act is constitutional and subjects the issue of using such clauses to the polemics. The article presents arguments for the rightness of such regulation as well as opposing views and the final conclusion based on the judgment of February 17, 2015, in which the Constitutional Tribunal adjudicated on the conformity of the regulation with the Constitution. Despite the approving position of the Constitutional Tribunal the issue of the constitutionality of the provision is still controversial and causes problems in the classification of acts as prohibited under the Copyright Act. Nevertheless, the use of complementary clauses in particular containing the phrase: “Who […] otherwise violates” seems to be unavoidable due to the dynamic development of technology and law. The principle of legal certainty can be implemented using a pro-constitutional interpretation in order to maximize the alignment of legal norms with the objectives and values expressed in the Constitution. This paper will also examine the secondary issue of criminal law protection of intellectual property rights with an emphasis on copyright law.

The implementation of the intellectual property rights of the convicts in the institutions and bodies of criminal executive system

2020 ◽  
pp. 170-176
Author(s):  
Оксана Алексеевна Владимирова
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
Human Creativity ◽  
Executive System

Статья посвящена анализу организационно-правовых аспектов реализации прав интеллектуальной собственности лиц, осужденных к лишению свободы. Рассмотрен сложившийся опыт, особое внимание уделяется проблемным вопросам реализации осужденными личных неимущественных и исключительных интеллектуальных прав: связанным с приобретением права интеллектуальной собственности, затруднениям осуществления интеллектуальных прав, вызванным режимными требованиями. Творческая деятельность человека - одно из самых эффективных средств исправления, по мнению автора, поскольку именно она является высшей сознательной деятельностью. Поэтому необходимо поощрять и развивать в исправительных учреждениях данный вид деятельности, всемерно содействовать ее реализации. Предлагается создавать в исправительных учреждениях кроме уже имеющихся ресурсов специальные лаборатории, мастерские и т. п. центры для реализации творческой, в том числе научно-творческой потребности осужденных. При необходимости всячески содействовать осужденным при реализации процедуры получения патента. Кроме того, в рамках правового просвещения осужденных необходимо информировать о возможностях реализации авторского или патентного права в рамках имущественных отношений. This article is devoted to analysis of legal aspects of implementation of intellectual property rights of persons sentenced to deprivation of liberty. Abstract: the experience, a special attention is paid to the problematic issues of implementation of convicted persons of exceptional moral and intellectual rights: associated with the acquisition of intellectual property rights, difficulties in the implementation of intellectual property rights, caused by the regime requirements. Human creativity is one of the most effective means of correction, in the author's opinion, as it is the higher conscious activity. It is therefore necessary to promote and develop in correctional institutions this activity, to contribute fully to its implementation. It is proposed to establish in correctional institutions in addition to the existing resources of the special laboratories, workshops, etc. centers for the implementation of creative, including research and creative needs of prisoners. If necessary to fully support the convict in the implementation of the procedure of obtaining a patent. In addition, the legal education of prisoners should be informed about the possibilities of implementation of copyright or patent rights in the framework of property relations.

scholarly journals Pelindungan Hak Paten atas Pengetahuan Obat Tradisional Melalui Pasal 26 UU No. 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten (Protection of Patent Rights on Traditional Medicine Knowledge Through Article 26 of Law No. 13 of 2016 Concerning Patents)

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-65
Author(s):  
Trias Palupi Kurnianingrum
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Traditional Medicine ◽  
Traditional Knowledge ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Benefit Sharing ◽  
Traditional Medicines ◽  
Patent Rights

Patent as a branch of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) serves to protect inventions on the field of technology, one of them being medicine. The rise on the number of cases on the theft of genetic resources and traditional knowledge on the field of medicine for commercialization purposes shows that the protection of patent rights on traditional medicine knowledge is still not optimal. This article is the result of a normative juridical research which is supported by an empirical data, examines the protection of patent rights on traditional medicine knowledge and the implementation of Article 26 of Law No. 13 of 2016 on Patents (Patent Law year 2016). In the research results, it was mentioned that even though the TRIPs Agreement did not accommodate the traditional knowledge, the presence of Patent Law year 2016 complemented the Indonesian government's efforts to save the knowledge of traditional medicines from biopiracy and misappropriation. It is necessary to regulate the disclosure obligation in TRIPs agreement and further mechanism regarding benefit sharing and granting access to traditional medicines knowledge. AbstrakPaten merupakan salah satu cabang Hak Kekayaan Intelektual yang berfungsi untuk melindungi invensi di bidang teknologi, salah satunya obat-obatan. Maraknya kasus pencurian sumber daya genetik dan pengetahuan tradisional di bidang obat-obatan untuk tujuan komersialisasi menunjukkan bahwa pelindungan hak paten atas pengetahuan obat tradisional masih belum maksimal. Artikel ini merupakan hasil penelitian yuridis normatif yang didukung dengan data empiris, membahas mengenai pelindungan hak paten atas pengetahuan obat tradisional dan implementasi Pasal 26 Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 tentang Paten (UU Paten 2016). Di dalam hasil penelitian, disebutkan meskipun Perjanjian Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) belum mengakomodasi pengetahuan tradisional namun hadirnya UU Paten 2016 melengkapi usaha pemerintah Indonesia dalam menyelamatkan pengetahuan obat tradisional dari biopiracy dan misappropriation. Perlu pengaturan kewajiban disclosure di dalam Perjanjian TRIPs dan mekanisme lebih lanjut mengenai benefit sharing dan pemberian akses atas pengetahuan obat tradisional.

International Protection of Intellectual Property Rights: Special Refrence with Intangible Properties and Copyright Laws.

LAW REVIEW ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit P Singh ◽  
Shiv Kumar Tripathi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Public Interest ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
International Protection ◽  
The Public ◽  
Copyright Laws ◽  
Rapid Pace

In view of the rapid pace of technological, scientific and medical innovations in India and abroad, the intellectual property rights i.e., copyright, patent and other neighboring rights, have been recognized in Indian and foreign jurisdiction. Moreover, its scope and content have expanded pursuant to statutory amendments over the years. Growing recognisiont, expansion and protection of IPRs needs to harmonised with the public interest. Within this backdrop, copyright law, patent law etc. have made elaborate provisions and endeavours have also been made at international level to strike a balance between protection of individual’s IPRS and social interest. The present article tries to examine the contours of protection of IPRS at national and international levels with special reference to copyright law.

scholarly journals Crafting Intellectual Property Rights: Implications for Patent Assertion Entities, Litigation, and Innovation

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh Feng ◽  
Xavier Jaravel
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent System ◽  
Patent Office ◽  
Patent Value ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
Rational Ignorance ◽  
Patent Examination

We show that examiner-driven variation in patent rights leads to quantitatively large impacts on several patent outcomes, including patent value, citations, and litigation. Notably, Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs) overwhelmingly purchase patents granted by “lenient” examiners. These examiners issue patents that are more likely to be litigated by both PAEs and conventional companies, and that also have higher invalidity rates. PAEs leverage a specific friction in the patent system that stems from lenient examiners and affects litigation more broadly. These patterns indicate that there is much at stake during patent examination, contradicting the influential “rational ignorance” view of the patent office. (JEL K11, K41, O31, O34, O38)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document