The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Volume With Special Reference to the Banking Industry in Sri Lanka

Author(s):  
A. G. N. K. Fernando
Author(s):  
Nidhi

This paper is the study about the Corporate Social Responsibilities of the banking industry in India. Social Responsibility of business refers to what a business does over and above the statutory requirement for the benefit of the society. The word “responsibility” emphasizes that the business has some moral obligations towards the society. Corporate Social Responsibility also called Corporate Conscience or Responsible Business is a form of corporate self-regulation integrated into a business model. The paper is based on secondary data. Now-a-days CSR has been assuming greater importance in the corporate world including financial institutions and banking sector. Banks and other financial institutions start promoting environment friendly and socially responsible lending and investment practices. The paper consists of key areas of 6 banks and a case study on HDFC Bank.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 207
Author(s):  
Rafika Melani ◽  
Idrianita Anis

<em>The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of corporate social responsibility disclosure, the effectiveness of the board of commissioners, institutional ownership and implementation of SFAS 60 (revised 2010) on the enterprise risk management disclosure. The data used in this research is secondary data, , obtained the annual report of the banking industry company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The population of this research is the banking industry companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange during the years 2009-2015, amounting to 161 companies. The collection of samples using purposive sampling method by selecting predefined criteria. This study uses multiple regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that not all independent variables showed a significant effect on the dependent variable. CSR disclosure and effectiveness of the board of commissioners has a positive effect on enterprise risk management disclosure. Meanwhile, institutional ownership has no effect on the enterprise risk management disclosure and the application of SFAS 60 (Revised 2010) has no effect on the enterprise risk management disclosure</em>


2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (8) ◽  
pp. 1111-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cooper ◽  
Christopher Henderson ◽  
Andrew Kish

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the banking industry using Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) as an experimental backdrop. Design/methodology/approach The authors match banks that received TARP with CSR data on publicly available firms. Using this data set, the authors are able to perform both univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the impact of CSR on bank management behavior. Findings The authors find evidence that supports stakeholder theory as applied to a sample of large financial institutions. The authors show that banks increased their CSR involvement and intensity following TARP, evidence that CSR is not merely transitory in nature but structural and an important aspect of firm value. The authors also find that capital ratios increase to a greater degree in banks whose CSR ratings were stronger prior to TARP. Finally, while all banks in the sample repaid Treasury, it took strong CSR banks a longer time to repay than banks with weaker CSR. The authors show how CEO compensation played a role in this relationship. Research limitations/implications The findings are limited to large banks. Practical implications Practically speaking, this study helps to discern the motivations and actions of large financial institutions. This is especially important from a regulator perspective, whose function is to maintain overall national financial stability. Originality/value This is the first study to link TARP and CSR literatures. Overall, there are a limited number of studies on CSR in the banking industry, and this paper adds to this burgeoning area. It is important and valuable to managers and policymakers to understand implications of CSR in the financial sector.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Gangi ◽  
Mario Mustilli ◽  
Nicola Varrone

PurposeAssuming that corporate social responsibility (CSR) is “a process of accumulating knowledge and experience” (Tang et al., 2012, p. 1298), this paper aims to investigate whether and how CSR knowledge (Asif et al., 2013; Kim, 2017) affects financial performance in the European banking industry.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical research analyses a panel of 72 banks from 20 European countries over seven years (2009-2015). The hypotheses were tested using fixed effects regression analysis and the two-stage Heckman model (1976) to address endogeneity bias.FindingsThe findings of this work are twofold. First, consistent with the concept of knowledge absorptive capacity (Cohen and Levinthal, 1990), the internal CSR of banks (Kim et al., 2010) positively affects citizenship performance (Peterson, 2004a). Second, in line with the reputational effect of CSR (Margolis et al., 2009; Bushman and Wittenberg-Moerman, 2012), citizenship performance is a positive predictor of a bank’s financial performance.Practical implicationsFrom a knowledge-based perspective, the analysis shows that accrued internal CSR knowledge plays a key role in implementing effective CSR programs for external stakeholders. Moreover, this study shows how CSR engagement in external initiatives can improve a bank’s competitiveness because of the relationship between citizenship performance and the positive reputation of a bank.Social implicationsThe management of CSR initiatives may favor the sharing of knowledge and creation of trust relationships among banks and internal and external stakeholders. CSR knowledge contributes to expanded value creation for both society and banks.Originality/valueThe knowledge management perspective of CSR provides new insights into the sustainability of banks’ business models and contributes to advancing the debate on the governance modes and effects of CSR. Moreover, the CSR perspective offers additional opportunities for addressing the challenges associated with sharing tacit knowledge within and outside of organizations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document