scholarly journals On Implicit Knowledge Learning Model in Multi-modal Listening Class

Author(s):  
Xin Zuo ◽  
Limin Wang
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Ajat Sudrajat ◽  
Marfuah Darojat

This research is a quantitative research that aims to know the difference of learning result of Social Knowledge learners using learning model make a match and picture and picture; Differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles; And the influence of interaction between cooperative learning model and student learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. The research was conducted in Cibinong District XI Cluster with sample of students of class II of SDN Ciriung 02 ( Public School Ciriung 2) which amounted to 78 students. Instrument used in this research is questionnaire and test result of learning. Data analysis techniques in this study using Saphiro Wilk Test to test the normality of data and Bartlett Test to test the homogeneity of data. After that, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Test was done to test the difference of mean value between groups followed by Tukey HSD test to see group interaction with reference to significant level α = 0,05. The results showed that there was a difference between learning outcomes of IPS learners using cooperative learning model make a match and picture and picture with significance of 0,000; There are differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles with significance of 0,001; And there is no direct interaction effect between the use of cooperative learning model and the learner's learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. This is indicated by a significance of 0,535.Keywords : Make a Match, Picture and Picture, learning style, Social Science learning result.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Imayati Imayati

AbstractMathematical understanding and mathematical disposition is a very important ability possessed by every learner in mathematics learning. To improve this capability, the need for an effort to model the learning that allows learners to observe and explore in order to build their own knowledge. Learning discovery learning  is one of the alternative learning that can be applied in class to improve the ability. This paper discusses theories about learning discovery learning  model and role in improving mathematical understanding and mathematical disposition of learners. Keywords: mathematical understanding, mathematical disposition, discovery learning  AbstrakPemahaman matematis dan disposisi matematis merupakan kemampuan yang sangat penting dimiliki oleh setiap peserta didik dalam pembelajaran matematika. Untuk meningkatkan kemampuan ini, perlu adanya upaya dalam pembelajaran yang memungkinkan peserta didik melakukan observasi dan eksplorasi agar dapat membangun pengetahuannya sendiri. Pembelajaran discovery learning  merupakan salah satu alternatif pembelajaran yang dapat diterapkan di kelas untuk meningkatkan kemampuan tersebut. Makalah ini membahas teori tentang model pembelajaran discovery learning  dan peranannya dalam meningkatkan pemahaman matematis dan disposisi matematis peserta didik. Kata kunci:  pemahaman matematis, disposisi matematis, pembelajaran discovery learning


2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. M. R. Aryana ◽  
Agil Al Idrus ◽  
Ahmad Harjono

This study aims to determine differences of knowledge biology student learning outcomes between groups of students who receive NHT cooperative learning model and STAD cooperative learning model treatment for digestive system. This research was conducted at SMAN 2 Gerung in class of XI. This study is a quasi-experimental research using modified of Type Between Group Design with Pre-posttest design. The number of population was 44 students that using simple random sampling in order to obtain two classes of experiments. Data were analyzed using inferential statistical analysis and hypothesis was tested using t-test analysis with SPSS version 20 for Windows. The results showed: First, there was no significant difference about knowledge learning outcome between the group the of students using NHT cooperative learning model and group of students using STAD cooperative learning model in the substance of Food, Food Healthy Menu, Structure and Function of Cells Network of Human Digestive System, Network Structure System of Ruminant Digestion, and Digestive Disorders Bioprocess Systems that gained tcount ≤ ttable (p> 0.05). Second, a group of students using STAD cooperative learning model has an average value of knowledge learning outcome that is significantly higher than the group of students that use NHT cooperative learning model for Body Mass Index (BMI) and Basal Metallic Rate (BMR) that gained value ttable < tcount (p ≤ 0.05).Keyword: NHT cooperative learning model, STAD cooperative learning model, student’s knowledge learning outcome of biology


2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Yordanova ◽  
Rolf Verleger ◽  
Ullrich Wagner ◽  
Vasil Kolev

The objective of the present study was to evaluate patterns of implicit processing in a task where the acquisition of explicit and implicit knowledge occurs simultaneously. The number reduction task (NRT) was used as having two levels of organization, overt and covert, where the covert level of processing is associated with implicit associative and implicit procedural learning. One aim was to compare these two types of implicit processes in the NRT when sleep was or was not introduced between initial formation of task representations and subsequent NRT processing. To assess the effects of different sleep stages, two sleep groups (early- and late-night groups) were used where initial training of the task was separated from subsequent retest by 3 h full of predominantly slow wave sleep (SWS) or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. In two no-sleep groups, no interval was introduced between initial and subsequent NRT performance. A second aim was to evaluate the interaction between procedural and associative implicit learning in the NRT. Implicit associative learning was measured by the difference between the speed of responses that could or could not be predicted by the covert abstract regularity of the task. Implicit procedural on-line learning was measured by the practice-based increased speed of performance with time on task. Major results indicated that late-night sleep produced a substantial facilitation of implicit associations without modifying individual ability for explicit knowledge generation or for procedural on-line learning. This was evidenced by the higher rate of subjects who gained implicit knowledge of abstract task structure in the late-night group relative to the early-night and no-sleep groups. Independently of sleep, gain of implicit associative knowledge was accompanied by a relative slowing of responses to unpredictable items suggesting reciprocal interactions between associative and motor procedural processes within the implicit system. These observations provide evidence for the separability and interactions of different patterns of processing within implicit memory.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Engel ◽  
Sebastian Kaiser ◽  
Richard Keiner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document