scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF NHT DAN STAD TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGETAHUAN BIOLOGI SISWA SMA NEGERI 2 GERUNG

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. M. R. Aryana ◽  
Agil Al Idrus ◽  
Ahmad Harjono

This study aims to determine differences of knowledge biology student learning outcomes between groups of students who receive NHT cooperative learning model and STAD cooperative learning model treatment for digestive system. This research was conducted at SMAN 2 Gerung in class of XI. This study is a quasi-experimental research using modified of Type Between Group Design with Pre-posttest design. The number of population was 44 students that using simple random sampling in order to obtain two classes of experiments. Data were analyzed using inferential statistical analysis and hypothesis was tested using t-test analysis with SPSS version 20 for Windows. The results showed: First, there was no significant difference about knowledge learning outcome between the group the of students using NHT cooperative learning model and group of students using STAD cooperative learning model in the substance of Food, Food Healthy Menu, Structure and Function of Cells Network of Human Digestive System, Network Structure System of Ruminant Digestion, and Digestive Disorders Bioprocess Systems that gained tcount ≤ ttable (p> 0.05). Second, a group of students using STAD cooperative learning model has an average value of knowledge learning outcome that is significantly higher than the group of students that use NHT cooperative learning model for Body Mass Index (BMI) and Basal Metallic Rate (BMR) that gained value ttable < tcount (p ≤ 0.05).Keyword: NHT cooperative learning model, STAD cooperative learning model, student’s knowledge learning outcome of biology

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. M. R. Aryana ◽  
Agil Al Idrus ◽  
Ahmad Harjono

ABSTRAK: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar sikap siswa antara kelompok siswa yang mendapatkan perlakuan model pembelajaran kooperatif NHT dan model pembelajaran kooperatif STAD pada pembelajaran biologi sistem pencernaan. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di SMA Negeri 2 Gerung pada siswa kelas XI jurusan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam semester genap tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan menggunakan rancangan Type Between Group Design dengan Posttest Only Design. Populasi penelitian berjumlah 44 siswa terdiri atas dua kelas, dimana keseluruhan populasi dijadikan sebagai sampel penelitian. Melalui teknik simple random sampling ditentukan dua kelas eksperimen. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan analisis statistik deskriptif yaitu dengan menghitung rata-rata dari jawaban yang diberikan kemudian dinyatakan dalam bentuk angka persentase dari setiap pernyataan. Angka persentase yang menggambarkan sikap pada indikator: rasa ingintahu, tanggungjawab, dan disiplin diuji hipotesisnya menggunakan analisis uji-t dengan bantuan program SPSS versi 20 for Windows. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan hasil belajar sikap yang signifikan antara kelompok siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran kooperatif NHT dan model pembelajaran kooperatif STAD dimana diperoleh nilai thitung ≤ ttabel (p>0.05) pada setiap indikator sikap. Kata kunci:      Model pembelajaran kooperatif NHT, STAD, hasil belajar sikap siswa.      ABSTRACT: This study aims to determine differences of student’s attitude learning outcomes between groups of students who receive NHT cooperative learning model and STAD cooperative learning model treatment for biology digestive system learning. This research was conducted at SMAN 2 Gerung in class of XI. This study is a quasi-experimental research using Type Between Group Design with Posttest Only Design. The number of population was 44 students consit of two classes, and all member of population used to sample study. By using simple random sampling obtained two classes of experiments. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical and than with count the average of data, obtained scaling data and than hypothesis was tested using t-test analysis with SPSS version 20 for Windows. The results showed there was no significant difference about attitude learning outcome between the group the of students using NHT cooperative learning model and group of students using STAD cooperative learning model in all indicators of attitude that gained tcount ≤ ttable (p> 0.05). Key words:          NHT cooperative learning model, STAD, model, student’s attitude, learning outcome.


Author(s):  
Eddy Noviana ◽  
Cindy Triwulan Desta

This study aims to determine differences in student learning outcomes learned through cooperative learning model type of talking stick with students who are taught conventional learning model. This research uses quasi experimental method with nonequivalent control group design. This research was conducted at 62 students in third class elementary school. The result of the research is before implemntation cooperative type learning model talking stick type in the experimental class and conventional model learning in the control class is obtained tcount<ttabel that is -0.430 <2.000 which means there is no significant difference civic education learning outcome. In the experimental class and control class after treatment obtained tcount<ttabel is 0.676 <2.000 which also means there is no difference civic education learning outcome. Thus, it can be conclude that cooperative learning model with talking stick can enhance elementary students’ achivement in civic education.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurul Wahida Wahida ◽  
Jonny H. Panggabean

ABSTRACT   The purpose of this research is to know the effect of  Cooperative Learning Model through GI type using animation media in increasing the physics learning outcome of student MAN 3 Medan in the material fluid dynamic class XI Academic Year 2014/2015, the type of research is quasi experimental research. The population were all the student of class XI MAN 3 Medan academic year 2014/2015, consist of 5 class. Two class is selected random cluster sampling as sample. One class as experimental class was treatment by Cooperative Learning Model through GI type using animation media and another class as control class was treatment by conventional learning. Instrument that used as learning result test, namely objective test as the amount is twenty items that contains of five options and already valid.  To test the hypothesis, used the t test after normality and homogeneous test.After test it was obtained the are significant difference between the physics learning outcomes of student in experimental class and in the control class. Because of the difference it means there are significant effect of cooperative learning model through GI type using animation media in increasing the physics learning outcome of student MAN 3 Medan class XI Academic Year 2014/2015 in higher learning outcomes than conventional learning. Keywords: cooperative learning model, group investigation (GI), animation,


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 297
Author(s):  
Sari’ah Sari’ah ◽  
Saiful Prayogi ◽  
Sukainil Ahzan

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation type against scince generic skills of students. This research was a quasi-experimental. The population in the study was a grade VIII MTS Nurul Falah NW Lajut with 36 students. Sampling was derived by random sampling where the 16 students of VIII A as on experimental class and VIII B as a control class with 20 students.Based on pretest data analysis, obtained an average value of 31,25 experimental class and control class was 42,2.Posttest analysis showed an average grade of 65,75 experimental and control class was 61,6.  The data analysis technique was t-test. It show t- test= 5,80 and t-table = 1,67. Because of  t-count is greater than the  t- table, it can be concluded that there were the effect of cooperative learning model of group investigation generic against science skills of student.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-27
Author(s):  
Lasmi Lasmi ◽  
Masri Masri

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui perbedaan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa antara model discovery learning dan jigsaw. Jenis penelitian adalah eksperimen semu. Tempat penelitian diaksanakan di SMP Negeri 18 Kota Bengkulu. Populasi pada penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VII. Sampel penelitian dipilih secara acak sederhana yaitu kelas VII.1 sebagai kelas eksperimen 1, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model discovery learning, kelas VII.5 sebagai kelas eksperimen 2, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw, dan kelas VII.3 sebagai kelas kontrol, pembelajaran dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kelas eksperimen 1 memperoleh nilai rata-rata tes akhir (post-test) kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yaitu 12,13, nilai rata-rata eksperimen 2 yaitu 11,45, dan nilai rata-rata kelas kontrol yaitu 9,26. Berdasarkan hasil analisis uji anava satu jalur, dengan signifikan 0,05 diperoleh 𝐹ℎ𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑔 = 𝐹𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑒𝑙 = 0,34, maka H0 ditolak. Artinya ada perbedaan signifikan rata-rata kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa pada kelas eksperimen 1, kelas eksperimen 2, dan kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan uji beda nyata (BNT) menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran yang memberikan hasil penalaran matematis yang berbeda adalah model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan konvensional, dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw dengan konvensional. Sedangkan pembelajaran dengan model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw tidak memberikan hasil kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang berbeda. Model discovery learning dan model kooperatif tipe jigsaw memberikan hasil lebih baik bila dibandingkan dengan model konvensional.Kata kunci: kemampuan penalaran matematis, model discovery learning, model Jigsaw AbstractThe purpose of this study was to determine students' mathematical reasoning abilities with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models. This type of research is quasi-experimental research. The population in this study were all students of class VII SMP Negeri 18 Bengkulu City in the   academic year 2019/2020. The sample of this study was selected by simple random sampling, namely class VII.1 as experimental class 1 using the discovery learning models, class VII.5 as experimental class 2 using the jigsaw type cooperative learning models, and class VII.3 as control class using conventional learning models. Data were collected by means of tests of students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Based on the results of the one-way ANOVA test, there are significant differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the experimental class 1, experiment class 2 and the control class. The results          of the real difference test (BNT) show that learning that gives different results is the discovery learning models with conventional learning models, and the jigsaw type cooperative learning model with conventional learning models. Meanwhile, learning with discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models does not give different results for students' mathematical reasoning abilities. Discovery learning models and jigsaw type cooperative learning models give better results when compared to conventional learning.Keywords: mathematical   reasoning   ability,   discovery   learning   model,   Jigsaw   model


2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 33
Author(s):  
Rappel Situmorang

This study aims to determine the differences in physics learningoutcomes using cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together Sheet-assisted Student Activity with direct instruction model in the subjectmatter Geometric Optics in Class X Semester 2 SMAN 7 T.P. 2012/2013. The population in this study were all students of class X consists of 9 parallelclasses. The study sample comprised 2 classes taken by cluster randomsampling is a class X-3 as a class experiment given cooperative learningmodel Numbered Heads Together Student Activity Sheet assisted and X-9 asa control class with direct instructional model, each of which consists of 40students. Pretest data obtained average value is the experimental class andcontrol class 34.90 is 37.10. After being given a different treatment to thesecond class, the average values obtained posttest for the experimental classwas 73.20 and 66.80 control class. The results of testing hypotheses obtainedt-test = 2.78 and t-table = 1.99 at  significance level α = 0.05 and df = 78, ttest>t-table. It showed no significant difference in the learning outcomes of students using cooperative learning model Numbered Heads Together Sheet assisted Student Activity with learning model directly in the subject matterOptical Geometry in class X Semester 2 SMAN 7 T.P. 2012/2013.


Author(s):  
Lenta N Simbolon ◽  
Ine Arini

Background: The success of the learning process requires the motivation in the students themselves to be able to encourage them to do activities in the learning activities. In the implementation, appropriate learning model is needed that can generate student motivation to learn. The use of the right teaching model is to use the Mind Mapping learning model. Method: The type of research used in this study is a quasi-experimental study or Quasi experiment. The design of this study is non-equivalent pretest-posttest consisting of mind mapping class and conventional class. The population in this study is all students of grade X SMA Negeri Waeputih, which consists of 3 classes of 72 students. The sample in this study were students of class X-1 and X-3 with each student 21 people. Sampling is done randomly. Result: The result of the research used the learning model of Mind Mapping and Conventional average student value in Mind Mapping class 100% higher than the average value of conventional class of 80%. Conclusion: There is a difference of students' learning outcomes proven on the result of t-test analysis where thitung 5.14> ttabel 1.01. Keywords: Mind Mapping Learning Model, Learning Outcomes, Biodiversity


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Syafrial Syafrial

This study aims to know the students’ learning achievement after studying under Lesson Study learning model at MAN 1 Konawe Selatan, under cooperative learning model type STAD and to investigate the significant difference between Lesson Study learning model and cooperative learning model type STAD.  The subject of the study is the students of MAN 1 Konawe Selatan class XI IPA. This study is a quasi experimental research which means that it is not a real experimental research because it included the basic steps of experiment but exclude the control class. The result indicates that there is different students’ physics learning achievement between using Lesson Study learning model and coopertive learning model type STAD. The students learning under lesson study model obtained 87 as their average score, while those with cooperative model type STAD obtained 67.3. In other words, learning by lesson plan model contributes more positively to students’ learning achievement than STAD model. This indicates that there are differences in physiscs learning achievement between lesson study learning model and cooperative learning model type STAD at students class XI-Science MAN 1 South of Konawe


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy Alretni Mendrofa ◽  
Jonny H. Panggabean

ABSTRACT Aims of study to determine the effect of cooperative learning model of NHT type to learning outcomes of students in  subject matter  optical geometry in high school N 2 Lintongnihuta A.Y. 2014/2015.Kind of this research is quasi experimental. The population in this research were all students of class X Semester II SMA N 2 Lintongnihuta which consists of two classes. Sampling was done by purposive research by using two existing classes, namely class X Mia 2 were 26students as experimental class and the class X Mia 1 amounted to 30 students as the control class. The instrument used is a cognitive test in the form of multiple choice question number 20 and observation sheet of student’s activity. Experimental class was given treatment by cooperative learning model of  NHT type and grade control with conventional learning. Before being given different treatment performed pretest, which is the average value of the experimental class pretest 48.65 with a standard deviation  11.45 and the average value of the control class pretest 48.67 with a standard deviation 14.07. Second class pretest data testing showed that both classes of data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The test results obtained pretest tcount<ttable (0.0057 <2,14) then H0 is received, it means the ability of students' initial experimental class and control class alike. Then given treatment that is experimental class with cooperative learning model of NHT type and grade control with conventional learning models. During thelearning processinthe experimental classlearning activities of studentsincreased, the meetingI59.79%, 72.07%meetingIIandIIImeeting of75.30%.After the study was completed, given postest with an average 66.53 for experimental class with a standard deviation 11.64 and 48.66 with the control class standard deviation 14.07. On testing normality and homogeneity of data obtained postest that both classes of data were normally distributed and homogeneous. The data processing postest obtained that tcount= 5.1 and ttable = 2.14, so that t count > t table (5.1> 2.14) then Hareceived means there is influence of cooperative learning model of NHT type to students learning outcomes  in optic geometry material to X class SMA N 2 Lintongnihuta A.Y. 2014/2015. Keywords: Cooperative learning model of NHT type , animation, learning outcome, activity.


Author(s):  
Imanuel Alan Onibala ◽  
Parsaoran Tamba ◽  
Denny Maukkar

ABSTRAK. Media pendidikan sebagai salah satu sarana meningkatkan mutu pendidikan sangat penting dalam proses PBM. Penggunaan media pendidikan dapat memperbaiki PBM siswa yang pada gilirannya dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar yang dicapainya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) terhadap hasil siswa pada mata pelajaran Motor Bensin kelas XI di SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. Penelitian ini dikategorikan dalam penelitian Eksperimen Semu (quasi exsperimental). Desain penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah desain jenis pre-test dan post-test group design. Berdasarkan uji hipotesis diperoleh nilai t hitung sebesar 4,4360 dan nilai t tabel 1,6772 artinya  nilai t hitung lebih besar dari t tabel maka signifikan. Hasil tersebut menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan pada penggunaan model pembelajaran Kooperatif TAI (Team Assisted Individualization)  dan konvensional terhadap pencapaian hasil belajar siswa di SMK N 1 Motoling. Kata Kunci: Hasil Belajar, Team Assisted Individualization.   ABSTRACT. Educational media as a means of improving the quality of education is very important in the PBM process. The use of educational media can improve students' PBM which in turn can improve the learning outcomes they achieve. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) cooperative learning model on student outcomes in the XI class of gasoline motorbike subjects at SMK Negeri 1 Motoling. This research is categorized as a quasi-experimental research. The research design used in this study was a pre-test and post-test group design. Based on the hypothesis test, the t value is 4.4360 and the t table value is 1.6772, which means that the t value is greater than the t table, so it is significant. These results indicate that there is a significant difference in the use of the cooperative learning model TAI (Team Assisted Individualization) and conventional to the achievement of student learning outcomes at SMK N 1 Motoling. Keywods: Learning Outcomes, Team Assisted Individualization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document