scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF USE MODEL MAKE A MATCH & PICTURE AND PICTURE AND STUDY LEARNING STYLE ON LEARNING RESULTS OF SOCIAL KNOWLEDGE CLASS II CLUSTER XI CIBINONG-BOGOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-49
Author(s):  
Ajat Sudrajat ◽  
Marfuah Darojat

This research is a quantitative research that aims to know the difference of learning result of Social Knowledge learners using learning model make a match and picture and picture; Differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles; And the influence of interaction between cooperative learning model and student learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. The research was conducted in Cibinong District XI Cluster with sample of students of class II of SDN Ciriung 02 ( Public School Ciriung 2) which amounted to 78 students. Instrument used in this research is questionnaire and test result of learning. Data analysis techniques in this study using Saphiro Wilk Test to test the normality of data and Bartlett Test to test the homogeneity of data. After that, two way analysis of variance (ANOVA) Test was done to test the difference of mean value between groups followed by Tukey HSD test to see group interaction with reference to significant level α = 0,05. The results showed that there was a difference between learning outcomes of IPS learners using cooperative learning model make a match and picture and picture with significance of 0,000; There are differences in learning outcomes of Social Knowledge learners who have a tendency of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles with significance of 0,001; And there is no direct interaction effect between the use of cooperative learning model and the learner's learning style tendency toward Social Knowledge learning result. This is indicated by a significance of 0,535.Keywords : Make a Match, Picture and Picture, learning style, Social Science learning result.

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi daripada kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan pragmatis. (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi 180 orang, dengan cluster random sampling berjumlah 80 orang yang terdiri dari 40 orang kelas A dan B. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen, desain faktorial 2 x 2. Uji statistik dengan statistik deskriptif, dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Sebelumnya dilakukan uji persyaratan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Hipotesis ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tepat dari pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa, dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis akan memperoleh hasil yang lebih baik dari pada mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis pembelajaran yang tepat digunakan adalah strategi pembelajaran Direct Instructional.            Kata Kunci: pengantar bisnis, kooperatif tipe TST, NHT, gaya belajar Abstract: The purpose of this study is to find out: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than that of the NHT cooperative type. (2) introductory student learning outcomes that have theoretical and pragmatic learning styles. (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. The research was conducted at Methodist University in Indonesia. A population of 180 people, with a cluster random sampling of 80 people consisting of 40 people class A and B. Quasi-experimental research methods, factorial design 2 x 2. Statistical tests with descriptive statistics, followed by inferential statistics two-way ANOVA with a significant level α = 0.05 continued with the Scheffe test. Previously performed requirements testing. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type were higher than that of the NHT type of cooperative; (2) the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have higher theoretical learning styles than pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. This hypothesis shows that the TSTS type of cooperative learning model is more appropriate than the NHT type of cooperative learning model in improving student business introductory learning outcomes, and students who have a theoretical learning style will get better results than students who have appropriate pragmatic learning styles of learning used is the Direct Instructional learning strategy. Keywords: business introduction, cooperative TST type, NHT, learning style


Author(s):  
Lili Nur Indah Sari ◽  
Abdul Muin Sibuea ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung

This study aims (1) to determine the differences in social studies learning outcomes taught by the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model which is higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model. (2) To find out the differences in social studies learning outcomes of students who have a higher visual learning style than the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style. (3) To determine the interaction between learning models and student learning styles in influencing the social studies learning outcomes of private students, Ar Rahman Percut. The population of this study was 122 students of class VII-A and VII-B of Ar Rahman Percut Private Middle School. Samples were taken by cluster rondom sampling. The sample used in this study was 63 students. The selected sample is classVII-A and class VII-B. The instrument used was a multiple choice test, amounting to 30 items and a learning style questionnaire. The data were analyzed at the significant level = 0.05, followed by the Scheffe further test after the normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that, (1) There are differences in social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes with the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model are higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model with Fcount 8,70> Ftable 4.00, (2) There are differences in student social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style from the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style with Fcount 5.01> Ftable 4.00, (3) There is an interaction between the learning model and the learning style of the students' social studies learning outcomes Fcount 5.20> Ftable 4.00


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 744
Author(s):  
Zainur Zainur

This research was motivated by the low learning outcomes of grade IX SMP Muhammadiyah Padang LuasKecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. This study aims to improve learning outcomes in mathematicslearning through STAD type cooperative learning with the RME approach in class IX SMP MuhammadiyahPadang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar. The subjects of this study were all classes IX in SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar totaling 26 people. The form ofresearch is classroom action research. This research instrument consists of performance instruments and datacollection instruments in the form of teacher activity observation sheets and activities. The results of the studystated that there were significant differences between students' mathematics learning outcomes before applyingthe STAD type cooperative learning model with the RME approach with after applying the STAD typecooperative learning model with the RME approach. The difference shows student learning outcomes after theaction is better than before the action with completeness reaching 80.77% or 21 completed. Based on the resultsof the study and discussion it can be concluded that the application of STAD type learning model with RealisticMathematic Education (RME) approach can improve the learning outcomes of grade IX students of SMPMuhammadiyah Padang Luas Kecamatan Tambang Kabupaten Kampar on statistical material.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 452
Author(s):  
Nurhikma Ramadhana ◽  
Muslimin Ibrahim ◽  
Rudiana Agustini

The study aims at examming 1) the difference of cognitive leraning outcomes between students  who were taught by using cooperative learning model of Make a Match type and the ones taught by using The Power of Two type, 2) the difference of affective learning outcomes between students who were taught by using cooperative learning model of Make a Match type and the ones taught by using the Power of Two type 3) the difference of psychomotor learning outcomes between students who were taught by using cooperative learning model Make a Match type and the ones taught by using The Power of Two type of grade XI students at SMAN 1 Sungguminasa Makassar. The study was a quasi-experiment research which employed the static group pretest posttest design. The study used the experiment group I by implementing cooperative learning model of Make a Match type and the experiment group II by implementing cooperative learning model of The Power of Two type. The instruments of the study were the test of learning outcomes to measure the cognitive learning outcomes, observation sheet to measure affective and psychomotor learning outcomes of the students. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistic analysis and inferential statistic analysis (uji t α = 0,05 ) supported by SPSS 17.0 for windows program. that the result using The Power of Two was higher than the one using The Power of Two.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar kognitif siswa dengan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dengan kooperatif tipe The Power of Two pada siswa kelas XI SMAN. 1 Sungguminasa Makassar 2) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar afektif siswa dengan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dengan kooperatif tipe The Power of Two pada siswa kelas XI SMAN 1 Sungguminasa Makassar 3) Mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar psikomotorik siswa dengan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match dengan The Power of Two pada siswa kelas XI SMAN 1 Sungguminasa Makassar. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan The static Group Pretest Posttest Design. Instrumen penelitian berupa Tes Hasil Belajar (THB) untuk mengukur hasil belajar kognitif, dan lembar observasi untuk mengukur hasil belajar afektif dan psikomotorik siswa. Data dianalisis statistik deskriptif dan inferensial (Uji t α = 0,05) dengan bantuan program SPSS 17.0 for windows. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa 1) Hasil belajar kognitif siswa dengan penerapan model pembelajaran The Power of Two lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Make a Match 2) Hasil belajar afektif siswa dengan penerapan model pembelajaran tipe Make a Match lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe The Power of Two 3) Hasil belajar psikomotorik siswa dengan penerapan model pembelajaran tipe Make a Match lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe The Power of Two.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Robi’atul Adawiyah ◽  
Mohammad Taufiq ◽  
Sri Hartatik ◽  
Akhawani

This study aims to analyze the application of the cooperative learning model of the Student Team Achivment Division type in improving the learning outcomes of elementary school students and to find out the difference in the increase in learning outcomes obtained by students when using the Cooperative learning model of the Student Team Achivment Division type. The difference in the improvement of learning outcomes obtained from 10 relevant journals was caused by the subjects selected by different researchers such as different research sites, different abilities possessed by each selected subject, and different years of research. This type of research is quantitative research using the meta-analysis method. The research begins with formulating research, looking for relevant journals available in electronic media. Based on the analysis of the cooperative learning model, the Student Team Achivment Division type can improve student learning outcomes by an average of 78.59 from the previous 53.53. Based on this research, the application of the cooperative learning model type Student Team Achivment Division can be used as a suggestion to be applied in elementary schools.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiva Marthaulina Lestari Siahaan ◽  
E. Elvis Napitupulu

The purpose of this research was to know there was any difference in student’s mathematical communication ability in cooperative learning Think TalkWrite (TTW) type and Numbered Head Together (NHT) type. The population was all students at SMP Negeri 1 Lubuk Pakam. The sample was two classes which each consist of 36 students, VII A as experimental class I which taught by TTW and VII B as experimental class II which taught by NHT. The sample was taken by cluster random sampling. Collecting data technique of this research was mathematical comunication ability essay test that was given in the end of learning either in experimental class I or experimental class II. From the data analysis of each of experimental class were obtained that the average of posttest score in TTW classroom was higher than in NHT classroom. It was also obtained that score of mathematical communication indicators in TTW classroom was higher than in NHT classroom. From the data analysis of posttest score by using t-test with significance level α = 0.05, it was obtained that tcount = 4.687 and ttable = 1.667. It means that tcount > ttable then H0 was rejected and Ha was accepted. So, it can be concluded that there was difference of student’s mathematical communication ability who taught by cooperative learning model type TTW with NHT at SMP Negeri 1 Lubuk Pakam.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rima Zakirah Sirait ◽  
Julaga Situmorang

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah: (1) Untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar ekonomi melalui pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw berbeda dari siswa yang diajar dengan pembelajaran kooperatif Think Pair Share; (2) Untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar ekonomi antara siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan interpersonal dengan siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan intrapersonal; (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan kecerdasan ganda yaitu kecerdasan interpersonal dan intrapersonal dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar ekonomi siswa kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Medang Deras. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) siswa yang diajarkan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw lebih tinggi dari diajarkan dengan pembelajaran kooperatif TPS; (2) siswa yang memiliki kecerdasan Interpersonal lebih tinggi dari yang memiliki kecerdasan Intrapersonal; (3) Terdapat Interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan kecerdasan ganda (interpersonal dan intrapersonal) dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Ekonomi Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, kecerdasan ganda, belajar ekonomi Abstract: The purpose of this study are: (1) To determine differences in learning outcomes of the economy through different jigsaw cooperative learning of students taught by cooperative learning Think Pair Share; (2) To know the difference between the results of the economic study of students who have interpersonal intelligence with students who have intrapersonal intelligence; (3) To understand the interaction between cooperative learning model with multiple intelligences namely interpersonal and intrapersonal intelligence in influencing learning outcomes of economic class X SMA Negeri 1 Medang Deras. The results of this study indicate that: (1) students taught by cooperative learning jigsaw higher than taught by cooperative learning TPS; (2) students who have Interpersonal intelligence is higher than that have intrapersonal intelligence; (3) There is interaction between cooperative learning model with multiple intelligence (interpersonal and intrapersonal) in influencing learning outcomes Economy Keywords: cooperative learning, multiple intelligences, learning economics


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document