scholarly journals MODEL OF INCREASING CORPORATE VALUE BASED ON GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN MANUFACTURING COMPANIES LISTED ON THE INDONESIA STOCK ExCHANGE In 2012-2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 332
Author(s):  
Alfiatul Wardah ◽  
Nunung Ghoniyah

This study aims to analyze the role of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) as a moderating variable in increasing corporate value in manufacturing companies with variables of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure, Profitability, Intellectual Capital (VAICTM) with moderating variables of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) proxied institutional ownership in manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange in 2012-2016. This study is included in a causative study. The population of this study is a manufacturing company listed on the Stock Exchange in 2012-2016 by using purposive sampling technique. There are 25 companies that meet the criteria as a sample so that the 110 data samples were tested using the eviews 10 student application. The results of this study state that the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has a significant positive effect on corporate value, profitability has a significant� positive effect on corporate value, Intellectual capital (VAICTM) has a positive and insignificant effect on the value of the company, the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure moderated by institutional ownership has a significant negative effect on the corporate value. With more than 50% institutional ownership, the possibility of a public response to CSR disclosure is low, profitability moderated by institutional ownership has no significant positive effect on corporate value, intellectual capital (VAICTM) moderated by negative institutional ownership are not significant. In the findings of this study, VAICTM did not have a significant effect on the corporate value so VAICTM was considered not important. The absence of additional performance due to the absence of standards for measuring intellectual capital in Indonesia. The market may appreciate other factors such as profit and other fundamental factors.Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), profitability, intellectual capital (VAICTM), Good Corporate Governance (GCG), Corporate Value.

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65
Author(s):  
Noriko Thasya ◽  
Lisah Lisah ◽  
Angeline Angeline ◽  
Natasyah Gozal ◽  
Veronica Veronica

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. The Data that used in this research are all form of annual reports published by companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange website. The population used is transportation sub Sector Company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2018 which amounted to 37 companies. Purposive sampling is used in this research to obtain 8 companies as research sample. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis using SPSS Version 25. The results of the research showed audit committee negatively influence on the corporate social responsibility, the board of commissioners has no influence on the corporate social responsibility, the institutional ownership negatively affected on the corporate social responsibility, and the independent commissioner no impact on the corporate social responsibility.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-114
Author(s):  
Felia Permatasari ◽  
Luky Patricia Widianingsih

The purpose of this studies is to know how the influence of CSRdisclosure on financial performance with GCG as a moderating variable.CSR disclosure is measured using CSRD Index based on GRI G4. The dependentvariable of this study is financial performance which is proxied byreturn on assets and return on equity. The GCG moderation variable isproxied by institutional ownership, the size of the board of commissionersand the independent board of commissioners. The sample used in this studyis a SOE’s company non-financial listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchangein the period 2014–2018. The results of this studies found that CSR disclosurehas a positive effect on financial performance (ROA) and CSR disclosurehas no effect on financial performance (ROE). GCG variables whichare proxied by institutional ownership is not able to moderate the effect ofCSR on financial performance (ROA and ROE), the size of the board ofcommissioners able to strengthen the effect of CSR on financial performance(ROA) and independent board of commissioners is not able to strengthenthe effect of CSR on financial performance (ROA), the size of the board ofcommissioners and independent board of commissioners is not able to moderatethe effect of CSR on financial performance (ROE).


Author(s):  
HAPIDZ ALWI

ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of profitability, firm size, and leverage proxied into corporate characteristics, managerial ownership and institutional ownership proxied into good corporate governance towards corporate social responsibility disclosure. The dependent variable is disclosure of corporate social responsibility. Independent variables are profitability, company size, leverage, managerial ownership and institutional ownership. This study uses secondary data from annual reports and sustainability reports on Listed Companies in KOMPAS 100 on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2017. Samples are 100 companies. This study uses a purposive sampling method and multiple linear regression as an analysis method. Before the regression test, it was tested using the classic assumption test. The results of this study indicate that company size and institutions do not have a significant effect on CSR disclosure while profitability, leverage, and managerial ownership 


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Guido S ◽  
Hexana Sri Lastanti ◽  
Murtanto Murtanto

<p>This research is done to know effects of financial performance toward corporate value by using the disclosure of Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility as a moderating variable. ROA, ROE, and Leverage as an indicator of financial performance is known as the independent variable. Company value measured by Tobin’s is known as the dependent variable. Good Corporate Governance(GCG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is moderating variable.</p><p>The companies that are in this research are manufacturing companies which are listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) starting from 2004 until 2007, published financial statements ending 31 December, and had complete data of Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility. The data is then processed by using statistical appliance that are called regression with interaction.</p><p>According to the research, the financial performance (ROA and leverage) has an effect on corporate value. Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) does not affect to financial performance (ROA and Leverage) toward the value of the company. Disclosure of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) affects the financial performance of relationship (ROA and Leverage) toward the value of the company.</p>


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 286-304
Author(s):  
Syahrul Effendi

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance to the profitability of a company incorporated in sri kehati index in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011-2015. This research is a correlation regression testing as an article describing the phenomenon in the form of the relationship between variables. The research data was obtained from annual reports and financial sites Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). Samples used as many as 14 companies qualified financial reports, sustainability reports listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2011-2015. The sampling technique used literature. This study uses multiple regression analysis. Based on the analysis it can be concluded that the disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility positive effect on NPM. Good Corporate Governance (Size commissioners) positive effect on ROE, ROA. Good Corporate Governance (Independent Commissioner) no positive effect on ROA and NPM. Good Corporate Governance (Audit Committee) positive effect on ROA and ROE.


JURNAL PUNDI ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sari Octavera ◽  
Febri Rahadi

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) represents the role and concern of the company towards the social and environmental aspects related to the operations of the company that interacts with the environment and society and the efforts towards sustainable development. In addition, no less important in the company's operations and its relation in meeting stakeholder trust and stimulating investors to invest is the emphasis on Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms in achieving good corporate governance. Implementation of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Governance mechanism and corporate image, as seen from the company's value (Tobin's Q), Company Size (LnSIZE) and Leverage (DER) will help achieve the objectives of establishing the company and improve the welfare of its owner or shareholder by increasing stock return. The sample of this research is 10 oil palm plantation sub-sector period 2012-2014 period. Testing simultaneously shows CSR, Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Corporate Value, Size and Leverage effect on stock return of 24.4%. Partially, CSR, managerial ownership and corporate value have a negative effect while institutional ownership has a positive effect on stock return. However, these findings have not been shown to have a significant effect. Meanwhile, firm size and leverage proved to have a positive and significant effect on stock return. Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, Firm Value, Firm Size, Leverage, Stock Return. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-82
Author(s):  
Noriko Thasya ◽  
Lisah Lisah ◽  
Angeline Angeline ◽  
Natasyah Gozal ◽  
Veronica Veronica ◽  
...  

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The population used is the transportation sub-sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2014 - 2018, amounting to 37 companies. Purposive sampling was used to obtain 8 companies as research samples. Data used in the form of annual reports published by the companies, and analyzed using multiple linear regression. The results indicate that simultaneously, Audit Committee, the Board of Commissioners, Institutional Ownership and Independent Commissioners prove to have a significant effect on CSR. However, the results of statistical tests prove that partially, the Audit Committee and Institutional Ownership have a significant negative effect on CSR; The Board of Commissioners has positive and significant influence on CSR; and Independent Commissioners have a negative but not significant effect on CSR.    


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dian Yuni Damayanti

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is one of several corporate responsibilities for stakeholders. The Company will disclose its social responsibility practices so that the contributions they had can be recognized by the stakeholders. This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG), profitability, size, and liquidity to CSR disclosure. GCG is measured using independent commissioners, managerial ownership, and institutional ownership. This study uses a manufacturing company in Indonesia as the sample in the period 2012-2015. The sampling technique used is purposive sampling method. The analysis technique used is multiple regression analysis. The results showed that independent commissioners, managerial and liquidity ownership had no effect on CSR disclosure, while institutional ownership, profitability and firm size had a significant positive effect on CSR disclosure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Michael Anderson Sianipar ◽  
Susi Dwi Mulyani

<em>Firm Values of manufacturing company in Indonesia is influenced by various factors of financial and non-financial that can be measured using financial ratios, good governance, and social responsibility practices in the company. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of financial performance proxied by Profitability and Solvability, Good Corporate Governance (GCG), and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on the firm value,with Investment Opportunity set (IOS) as a moderating variable. The firm value in this study was proxied by Tobins’q.The population of this research is manufacturing companywith chemical industry subsectors listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2013-2015. The sampling method used is purposive sampling and acquired 31 companies in this sample. The analytical method used is moderating regression analysis.Based on the results of hypotheses testing, there wasSolvability and IOS had positive effect on firm value, while Profitability, GCG, and CSR had no effect on the firm value. The use of a moderating variable Investment Opportunity Set (IOS) is not able to strengthen the influence of profitability, solvability, GCG and CSR on the firm value.</em>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document