scholarly journals PENGARUH CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DAN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN

Author(s):  
Wendy Salim Saputra

<p><em>Maximizing the interests of shareholders through increasing company value is one of the goals the company wants to achieve. To achieve these objectives, the company must pay attention to several things including implementing good corporate governance, paying attention to social and environmental interests so as not to intersect and improve the ability of its human resources.</em></p><p><em>This study focuses on the implementation of corporate governance proxied by the proportion of independent board of commissioners and the number of audit committees, disclosure of corporate social responsibility and intellectual capital as well as examining its effect on firm value in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2016</em></p><p><em>The statistical method in this study uses multiple regression analysis, where the independent variable is the proportion of independent commissioners, the number of audit committees, coporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) and intellectual capital proxied by value added intellectual capital (VAIC). Whereas the dependent variable is the value of the company proxied by Tobin's Q</em></p><p><em>The results of this study indicate that the audit committee affects the value of the company while the proportion of independent board of directors, coporate social responsibility disclosure and value added intellectual capital does not have an influence on the value of the company.</em></p><em>Keywords: Corporate Value, Proportion of Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee, Corporate Social Responsibility, Intellectual Capital</em>

Author(s):  
Ruri Rahayu ◽  
Gugus Irianto ◽  
Arum Prastiwi

This study aims to determine and analyze the effect of earnings management and media exposure on corporate social responsibility disclosure moderated by corporate governance. This study uses secondary data on manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for a five-year period from 2016 to 2020. The sample selection used the purposive sampling method so that a total of 67 observations met the specified criteria. This study was tested using multiple linear regression and Moderated Regression Analysis. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that earnings management and media exposure have a positive effect on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Corporate governance with the proxies of the board of commissioners, independent commissioners and audit committees in weakening the influence of earnings management on corporate social responsibility disclosures each shows insignificant results. Meanwhile, corporate governance with the proxies of the board of commissioners and the audit committee was found to be able to strengthen the influence of media exposure on corporate social responsibility disclosure. However, independent commissioners cannot strengthen the influence of media exposure on corporate social responsibility disclosure.


KEBERLANJUTAN ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 498
Author(s):  
Budi - Setyawan

Abstract This study aims to analyze the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance (independent commissioner, number of directors and number of audit committees) on the value of the company in the mining issuer in Indonesia Stock Exchange. Research samples of 20 companies and years of research that is 2011 - 2015. The data collected is processed by simple and multiple regression. The result of research shows that there is no influence of Corporate Social Responsibility to Corporate Value. The effect of independent commissioners on corporate value is insignificant. The effect of the number of directors on firm value is significant. The influence of audit committees on corporate value is not significant. Simultaneously CSR, independent commissioner, number of directors and number of audit committee have an effect on signifikan to Company Value. The magnitude of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance (Independent Commissioner, Number of Directors and Audit Committee) to the dependent variable of Corporate Value has a coefficient of determination of 0.049 indicating that the contribution of Corporate Social Responsibility and Good Corporate Governance of Independent Commissioners, Number of Directors, and Audit Committee) together against Corporate Value is 4.9%, the rest is caused by other factors. Keywords :  Corporate Social Responsibility, Good Corporate Governance, Corporate Value


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Jacobus Widiatmoko

This study aims to empirically examine the effect of corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on corporate value using agency perspectives and stakeholder theory. Corporate governance is measured using an independent commissioner, a board of directors, and an audit committee. The research data were obtained from manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The test results using multiple linear regression indicate that corporate governance as measured by the board of directors and audit committee has a positive effect on company value. Meanwhile, the existence of independent commissioners in the sample companies did not have an impact on increasing the value of the company. The same result also occurs for CSR variables, which have not been proven to affect the firm's value. The results of the sensitivity analysis show that the research model is robust, both by measuring PBV or Tobin's Q for the dependent variable. Keywords: independent commissioner, board of directors, audit committe, corporate social responsibility, firm value


Author(s):  
Nadia Azalia Putri ◽  
Tatang Ary Gumanti ◽  
Isti Fadah ◽  
Supriyadi Supriyadi

Objective - The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of Intellectual Capital (IC), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure, and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on the value of mining companies (as measured by Tobin's Q) listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2011-2015. Methodology/Technique - Intellectual capital was measured by Value Added Capital Employed (VACA), Value Added Human Capital (VAHU), and Structural Capital Value Added (STVA). CSR disclosure was measured using Global Reporting Initiative index. GCG was proxied using independent commissioner, managerial ownership, audit committee, and institutional ownership. Empirical analysis was conducted using linear multiple regression analysis. The samples consisted 15 mining firms. Findings - The results showed that VACA, VAHU, and institutional ownership had a positive and significant effect on company value. STVA and independent commissioner have a positive but insignificant effect on company value. Audit committee and managerial ownership have a negative and insignificant effect on company value. Novelty - The study suggests managers to improve the company value by investing IC subcomponents; that is, physical capital and human capital and also add the number of shares held by institutions. Type of Paper: Empirical Keywords: Company Value; Corporate Social Responsibility; Good Corporate Governance; Intellectual Capital. JEL Classification: M14, M41, M51


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-36
Author(s):  
Novi Prasanti ◽  
Tatang Ary Gumanti ◽  
Lilik Farida

AbstractThis study aims to examine and analyze the effect of company size, audit committee, and institutional ownership on the level of Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure. The objects of this research are the manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange years 2015- 2017. The study employes multiple regression analysis to examine the effect of the independent variables on the dependent variable. The samples comprise a total of 93 companies that have met the predetermined criteria. The hypotheses were tested using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the study show that only company size has a positive and significant effect on the level of CSR disclosure. Meanwhile, audit committees and institutional ownership do not have significant effect on the level of CSR disclosure.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh ukuran perusahaan, komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap derajat pengungkapan tangung jawab social perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility = CSR). Objek penelitian ini adalah  perusahaan manufatur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015-2017. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda untuk menguji pengaruh variabel-variabel bebas terhadap variabel terikat. Sampel penelitian berjumlah 93 perusahaan yang memenuhi ketentuan kriteria. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi linier beganda.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hanya ukuran perusahaan berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR. Sedangkan, komite audit dan kepemilikan institusional tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap pengungkapan CSR.Kata Kunci: kepemilikan institusional; komite audit; pengungkapan csr; ukuran perusahaan


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Gangi ◽  
Dario Salerno ◽  
Antonio Meles ◽  
Lucia Daniele

Using a large sample of public firms in 51 countries during the period from 2010 to 2015 and a two-stage least squares (2SLS) regression with an instrumental variable (IV), this study investigates how corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate governance (CG) mechanisms interact to influence a firm’s intellectual capital (IC) efficiency. The empirical results reveal that CSR engagement and CG structures influence the firm efficiency in managing IC. This study contributes to managerial practice by demonstrating the causal effect of CSR on value-added intellectual capital (VAIC) measures and the positive impact of CG on both CSR engagement and the efficiency with which firms manage their IC. Furthermore, the current study provides an additional understanding of the relationship among CSR engagement, CG practices, and the determining factors of IC efficiency within a comprehensive framework.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 148
Author(s):  
Zainab Masitha ◽  
Djuminah

This study aims to find out empirical evidence about the influence of corporate governance on firm value through intellectual capital and corporate social responsibility. The sample used in this study amounted to 123 manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange continuously during the period 2015-2017 using purposive sampling technique. This study uses quantitative methods with secondary data obtained from annual reports that have been published by the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2015-2017, which can be accessed through www.idx.co.id. Data analysis in this study uses Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS 3.0 software.The results showed that the board of commissioners had a significant negative effect on intellectual capital and had a significant positive effect on corporate social responsibility. Board of Commissioners has a significant positive effect on intellectual capital and has a significant negative effect on corporate social responsibility. The board of commissioners, audit committees, intellectual capital and corporate social responsibility have a positive and significant effect on firm value. Intellectual capital is not able to mediate the relationship between the board of commissioners and firm value, as well as the relationship of the audit committee to firm value. CSR is not able to mediate the relationship between the board of commissioners and firm value and the relationship between the audit committee and firm value.


Author(s):  
Apriana Rahmawati ◽  
Roekhudin Roekhudin ◽  
Arum Prastiwi

This research aims to investigate the effect of the role of good corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on firm value with profitability as a moderator variable. The object of this research is manufacturing companies listed in index SRIKEHATI period 2017 until 2019, while the subject is 10 companies. All variables from the research data were gathered through secondary data exactly from Indonesia Stock Exchange and the company’s website. Statistical Analysis of the research data used moderate regression analysis with significance in accordance with the output of SPSS 20. Findings indicated that managerial ownership has a positive significant effect on firm value, institutional ownership has a positive significant effect on firm value, board commissioners have a positive significant effect on firm value, and corporate social responsibility has a negative insignificant effect on firm value. Variable profitability moderates managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and corporate social responsibility on firm value but can’t moderate the board of commissioners on firm value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-70
Author(s):  
Farah Latifah Nurfauziah ◽  
Citra Kharisma Utami

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Good Corporate Governance on Firm Value in Various Industries Sector, Textile and Garment Sub-Sector Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2019 Period. This research method uses a descriptive method with a quantitative approach. The source of this research uses secondary data sourced from the annual report of various sector companies in the textile and garment sub-sector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The sample of this study were 9 companies using purposive sampling technique. The results of this study indicate that partially the Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure has a significant effect on Firm Value. Meanwhile, Good Corporate Governance with indicators (Managerial Ownership, Institutional Ownership, Independent Ownership and Audit Committee) Managerial Ownership and Audit Committee have a significant effect on Firm Value, while Institutinal Ownership and Independent Comissioner don’t have a significant effect on Firm Value.


JEMAP ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 265
Author(s):  
Rika Astrinika ◽  
H. Sri Sulistyanto

This study examines the influence of CSR and the mechanism of GCG on firm value. The main reasons are, first, disclosure of social responsibility is very important for the company's reputation. Second, CSR is no longer voluntary. Third, CSR disclosure can be linked to corporate governance. By using a sample of manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange in 2011-2015, this study provides results that (1) disclosure has a positive and significant influence on firm value, (2) managerial ownership has a positive and insignificant influence on the value of the company, ( 3) institutional ownership has a negative and insignificant effect on the value of the company, (4) an independent board of directors has a positive and significant influence on the value of the company, and (5) the audit committee has a positive influence and significant influence on the value of the company


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document