Jörg Schulte: Eine Poetik der Offenbarung. Isaak Babel’, Bruno Schulz, Danilo Kiš (Jüdische Kultur. Studien zur Geistesgeschichte, Religion und Literatur, Bd. 12). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2004. 238 S.

POETICA ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 38 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 206-210
Author(s):  
Tatjana Petzer
Keyword(s):  
Fluminensia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-93
Author(s):  
Miranda Levanat-Peričić

Književni opus Daše Drndić pripada zasebnom kanonu književnih tekstova koji autorica sama afirmira svojim pisanjem u potrazi za vlastitom interpretativnom zajednicom odmaknutom od kanona kojim vladaju hijerarhije utemeljene na nacionalnim i ideološkim kategorijama. Njezin se kanon oblikuje iz autobiografske diskurzivne pozicije, odnosno iz pozicije autorice koja centripetalno „uvlači“ u svoj narativni prostor pripovjedačke glasove drugih autora/ica, najčešće onih koji su pisali o Holokaustu ili su bili žrtve Holokausta. Nadopisujući svoj tekst na njihovo svjedočenje ili traumu, ona stvara polifonijske prozne kompozicije u kojima se, pored autorice Daše Drndić, koja istodobno postaje i objekt reprezentiranja i subjekt posredovanja, pripovijedanju priključuju Danilo Kiš, Bruno Schulz, Aharon Appelfeld, Paul Celan, Primo Levi, Wisława Szymborska, Witold Gombrowicz, Walter Benjamin i drugi. Tretirajući biografije autora/ica i njihove književne tekstove kao podjednako (ne)pouzdane dokumente, izabrani se autori/ice njezinom tekstu priključuju ponekad posredstvom svojih književnih tekstova, a ponekad izravno, kao sudionici naracije. U radu se analiziraju tri postupka u funkciji oblikovanja zasebnog kanona književnih tekstova: postupak fikcionalizacije biografija autora, postupak multipliciranja implicitnih autora i postupak fikcionalizacije autobiografskog subjekta. Dok se fikcionalizacijom autora kao stvarnih povijesnih osoba, multipliciraju književni likovi, multipliciranjem implicitnih autora, osnažuje se i podupire autobiografska pozicija pripovjednog subjekta, da bi se postupkom fikcionalizacije autobiografskog subjekta, oslabila prethodno stečena autorska pripovjedačka pozicija.


Schulz/Forum ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 101-116
Author(s):  
Jerzy Kandziora

The topic of the paper are descriptions of apartments pccupied by Bruno Schulz and his two friends, Emanuel Pilpel and Stanisław Weingarten, included in the letters written by eye-witnesses to Jerzy Ficowski. The perception of those interiors was ambivalent – some accounts stress the dark and unhealthy atmosphere of the house. Even though they come from Schulz’s friends, they prove that his otherness was not fully accepted by them. There are also descriptions made by open-minded young observers, mainly schoolboys, for whom Schulz’s den is a temple of goodness and art. The accounts of the apartments of Pilpel and Weingarten also show problems with accepting otherness. The analysis presented makes the reader realize the distance separating Schulz and his friends from the stereotypical bourgeois culture.


2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-116
Author(s):  
David Soto Carrasco
Keyword(s):  

Reseña de la obra de A. Fernández López, El archivo y la ficción. Historia, identidad y literatura en Danilo Kiš, Madrid, Guillermo Escolar Editor, 2020, 232, pp.


Author(s):  
Tokimasa Sekiguchi

The major works by Bruno Schulz and Witold Gombrowicz were translated into Japanese in the 1960s, mainly by Yukio Kudō. I was enchanted by those Japanese texts to such an extent that I decided to abandon French literature and switch to Polish contemporary literature. In 1974, I came to Poland on a post-graduate fellowship of the Polish government, and I began studies in literature and the Polish language at the Jagiellonian University. During that two-year stay in Krakow, my view of Polish literature changed several times. The phase well established in the Japanese translations I had known ended quickly. Then I began to “hunt” for promising Polish authors not yet present in world literature. I thus discovered the prolific, esoteric and difficult Teodor Parnicki (1908–1988). This essay is my description of my “penetrating” the world of the Polish language at that time.


AJS Review ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-20
Author(s):  
Claire E. Sufrin

This article suggests that bringing Jewish literature and Jewish thought into conversation can deepen our understanding of each. As an illustration of this interdisciplinary methodology, I offer a reading of Cynthia Ozick's 1987 Messiah of Stockholm. I claim that Ozick has embedded an argument about the relationship of post-Holocaust Jewry to the past into the literary features of her novel. Her argument draws in particular upon Leo Baeck's account of Judaism as focused on the present and future in contrast to the worshipful approach to the past characteristic of other religions. At the same time, I offer a more nuanced take on the fear of idolatry so often noted in analyses of Ozick's work and situate that fear in relationship to the literary theories of her predecessor Bruno Schulz, who plays a key role in the novel, and her contemporary Harold Bloom.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document