scholarly journals INCIDENCE OF PRIMARY LUNG CANCERS, TUMOR TYPES, AND DISTRIBUTION OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERİSTİCS IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS: A 10-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF A SINGLE CENTER

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-462
Author(s):  
Nesibe KAHRAMAN ÇETİN
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19033-e19033
Author(s):  
Phillip Martinez-Knouse ◽  
Christie Hancock ◽  
Edward Nabrinsky ◽  
Timothy M. Lestingi ◽  
Jacob D. Bitran

e19033 Background: Insurance status impacts access to cancer care and outcomes of cancer patients. Patients who are uninsured and those who are insured by Medicaid are less likely to receive cancer screening, more likely to present at later stages of disease, and more likely to die from cancer compared to those who are privately insured. It is unclear whether patients insured by Medicare have different outcomes than patients with private insurance. Methods: We undertook a retrospective analysis of patients treated in our practice from January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2019. Outcomes of solid tumor patients were tracked after treatment in the neoadjuvant or metastatic setting. Patients were stratified by their insurance status and we then compared treatment outcomes of patients with private insurance to those with Medicare. Results: We treated 86 patients from January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2019 including 63 women and 23 men with a median age of 62 years (range 22-88 years). Several types of malignancies were represented including 21 gynecologic cancers, 17 breast cancers, 11 lung cancers, 10 melanomas, 10 gastrointenstinal cancers, 7 lymphomas, 5 genitourinary cancers, and 5 other tumor types. Among our population, 48 patients had private insurance and 38 had Medicare. Thirty-four patients achieved either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), 24 with CR and 10 with PR. Of those who achieved a CR, 11 had Medicare and 14 had private insurance. Among those who achieved a PR, 5 had Medicare and 5 had private insurance. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, insurance type did not predict likelihood of achieving a complete or partial response to treatment. Other investigators have suggested that patients with Medicare have poorer outcomes than those with private insurance. One potential explanation for the discrepancy between their data and ours is that we have dedicated system designed to accelerate pre-certifications. Additional investigation is warranted to better understand these trends.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (34) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
hilal erinanç ◽  
özgül topal

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199431
Author(s):  
Jennifer P Booth ◽  
Julie M Kennerly-Shah ◽  
Amber D Hartman

Introduction To describe pharmacist interventions as a result of an independent double check during cognitive order verification of outpatient parenteral anti-cancer therapy. Methods A single-center, retrospective analysis of all individual orders for outpatient, parenteral anti-cancer agents within a hematology/oncology infusion center during a 30 day period was conducted. The primary endpoint was error identification rates during first and second verification. Secondary endpoints included the type, frequency, and severity of errors identified during second verification using a modified National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index. Results A total of 1970 anti-cancer parenteral orders were screened, from which 1645 received an independent double check and were included. The number of errors identified during first and second verification were 30 (1.8%) and 10 (0.6%) respectively; second verification resulted in a 33.3% increase in corrected errors. The 10 errors identified during second verification included: four rate transcriptions to optimize pump interoperability, three rate and/or volume modifications, two dosage adjustments, and one treatment deferral due to toxicity. The severity was classified as Category A for four (40%), Category C for three (30%), and Category D for three (30%) errors. This correlated to a low capacity for harm for seven (70%) and a serious capacity for three (30%) errors. Conclusions Second verification of outpatient, parenteral anti-cancer medication orders resulted in a 33.3% increase in corrected errors. Three errors detected during second verification were determined to have a serious capacity for harm, supporting the value of independent double checks during pharmacist cognitive order verification.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document