scholarly journals Out-of-hours palliative care provided by GP co-operatives in the Netherlands: A focus group study

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Schweitzer ◽  
Nettie Blankenstein ◽  
Luc Deliens ◽  
Henriëtte van der Horst
2021 ◽  
pp. 100070
Author(s):  
Marieke Torensma ◽  
Janneke Harting ◽  
Linda Boateng ◽  
Charles Agyemang ◽  
Yordi Lassooy Tekle ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem Meijler ◽  
Florien Van Heest ◽  
Renee Otter ◽  
Dirk Th. Sleijfer

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. e0246868
Author(s):  
Sandrella M. Morrison-Lanjouw ◽  
Roel A. Coutinho ◽  
Kwasi Boahene ◽  
Robert Pool

While there is a growing body of research documenting unregulated African wild meat imports into Europe from the Africa continent, the drivers of this demand are virtually unknown. This study employs focus group discussions and a survey questionnaire to examine the attitudes and practices related to African wild meat consumption in the city of Amsterdam, Netherlands. The Ghanaian community was selected as the object of this study, as it is the largest West African population in the Netherlands and represents an important part of Dutch society. We model our report on a recent US study of the Liberian community of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which allows for the comparison of results between two Western countries. The overall perceived health risk of consuming African wild meat in The Netherlands is low and unlikely to deter consumption. However, local prices for the meat may be prohibitive in some cases. Incentives include health benefits, cultural drivers and a strong preference for the taste of African wild meat over all local meat alternatives. The study calls for further research into the nature of the drivers of demand for African wild meat as well as its public health consequences, in the Netherlands and beyond.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 69-69
Author(s):  
Yvonne Engels ◽  
Marieke de Groot ◽  
Bregje Thoonsen ◽  
Stans Verhagen ◽  
Kris Vissers ◽  
...  

69 Background: In the Netherlands, many patients that might profit of palliative care don't receive it or don't receive it until the terminal phase. GPs in the Netherlands consider palliative care as an important task, but they don't feel confident to recognize the patients in need of palliative care and to provide it in a structured way. For that reason, we performed an RCT in which GPs in the intervention condition received training in recognozing the palliative patient and in early palliative care provision. Methods: Randomized controlled cluster trial (intention to treat) with GP as cluster. GPs in the intervention group received a 5-hours training in early recognition of the palliative patient, with the help of the RADPAC tool, and in proactive palliative care planning. They were invited to identify the patients in need of palliative care and provide the care as learned in the training. Primary outcome: number of out-of-hours contacts with the out-of-hours service, as measured retrospectively by analysing all patients that died during the intervention period of one year. Secondary outcomes: number of hospitalizations and place of death, also collected retrospectively. Results: Within one month, 159 GPs showed their interest to participate. Per responding GP, a mean number of 7 patients died during the intervention period. About 45% of the patients died at home, in both study groups. We did not find differences in out-of-hours contacts, hospitalizations and place of death between intervention and control group. Conclusions: We did not find differences between intervention and control group. As learning to identify the palliative patients was part of the intervention, we were not able to collect patient-related outcomes in the control group. This might explain why we did not find significant effects of early palliative care, in contrast to findings of Temel et al, and Zimmermann et al. and Bakitas et al. For that reason, we recommend to measure quality of life as primary outcome. Clinical trial information: NTR2815.


2019 ◽  
pp. 80-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ines Testoni ◽  
Marina Bottacin ◽  
Belinda Claudia Fortuna ◽  
Adriano Zamperini ◽  
Gaia Luisa Marinoni ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene A. Harmsen ◽  
Helien Bos ◽  
Robert A. C. Ruiter ◽  
Theo G. W. Paulussen ◽  
Gerjo Kok ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Carlos Seiça Cardoso ◽  
Filipe Prazeres ◽  
Beatriz Xavier ◽  
Bárbara Gomes

Background: Aggravated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the provision of palliative care for patients with palliative care needs emerges as a necessity more than ever. Most are managed in primary care by their family physicians (FP). This study aimed to understand the perspectives of specialist and trainee FPs about their role in palliative care. Methods: we conducted a double focus-group study consisting of two separate online focus-groups, one with FP specialists (n = 9) and one with FP trainees (n = 10). Results: FPs already gather two fundamental skills for the provision of palliative care: the capacity to identify patients’ needs beyond physical symptoms and the recognition that the patient belongs to a familiar, psychosocial, and even spiritual environment. They perceive their role in palliative care to be four-fold: early identification of patients with palliative care needs, initial treatment, symptom management, and patient advocacy. Participants recognized the need for palliative care training and provided suggestions for training programs. Conclusion: FPs share a holistic approach and identify multiple roles they can play in palliative care, from screening to care and advocacy. Organizational barriers must be addressed. Short training programs that combine theory, practice, and experiential learning may further the potential for FPs to contribute to palliative care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document