scholarly journals GROWING URBAN HOUSING CONSUMPTION AND HOUSING POLICY DEVELOPMENT TRENDS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efa Tadesse Debele ◽  
Taye Negussie

Housing study and housing research has been developing. Different scholars contributed their own expertise. So far housing study has not been theoretically well built. The motive behind this paper is to capitalize on gap knowledge. In view of that this article was organized to enhance knowledge organization of housing in both theoretical and substantive sense. Hopefully, this paper will be treated with good face by your esteemed organization. Researcher pledged to accommodate your feedback expecting that it promotes quality and acceptance of the paper at both local and international readers. Thus, the publication of this paper will add novel ideas to existing housing knowledge. Thank you in advance for your consideration.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Efa Tadesse Debele ◽  
Taye Negussie

Housing study and housing research has been developing. Different scholars contributed their own expertise. So far housing study has not been theoretically well built. The motive behind this paper is to capitalize on gap knowledge. In view of that this article was organized to enhance knowledge organization of housing in both theoretical and substantive sense. Hopefully, this paper will be treated with good face by your esteemed organization. Researcher pledged to accommodate your feedback expecting that it promotes quality and acceptance of the paper at both local and international readers. Thus, the publication of this paper will add novel ideas to existing housing knowledge. Thank you in advance for your consideration.


2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-132
Author(s):  
SUTAPA DAS ◽  
MOUSUMI GUPTA ◽  
SHIVASHISH BOSE

Due to population ageing, today’s high-rise apartments in Indian cities, which are currently mainly owned by young professionals, will turn into naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs) in near future. Though many urban housing complexes of 1970s and 1980s are already serving as NORCs, the term is comparatively new to Indian housing research. This huge existing housing stock is inadequate for special gerontological needs of the elderly, who are fragile and socially vulnerable. Informal opinion of common people revealed that holistic requirement for elderly in housing is still grossly confused with vertical transport, i.e., elevators, and little attention is paid to other architectural features. As part of an ongoing doctoral study, a detailed literature review was undertaken on the vulnerability profile of Indian urban elderly in the context of special requirements of barrier-free housing. This article aims to establish the urgent need to assess the adaptive potential of existing housing communities serving as NORCs in Indian cities, such that new housing in the future can be planned with flexible approach.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 65-73
Author(s):  
S. A. Edwards ◽  
J. Robertson ◽  
M. Kelly

AbstractThe design and management of housing play a major rôle in the welfare of most farm animal species and are implicated in all of the ‘five freedoms’. Housing has always been an aspect of livestock production systems which is readily amenable to legislation and the majority of current UK (and EU) welfare legislation relates generally or specifically to housing. An area of concern in current legislation is the tendency to legislate on housing systems rather than animal state, which leads to disagreements in interpretation and anomalies in implementation. Housing legislation is furthest advanced in the simple-stomached species, rather than in ruminant species which have traditionally been farmed more extensively. However, issues of housing and welfare certainly require to be addressed in other species. Whilst scientific research does underlie many of the existing housing regulations, it has not always been correctly interpreted or sensibly applied. Many dilemmas exist when overviewing the balance of scientific evidence relating to contentious housing systems in all species. In many areas, requirements of quality assurance schemes are now more rigorous and wide reaching than legislation but these are not always based on scientific evidence. However, many component-specific recommendations have been scientifically established and animal welfare could be significantly improved by their application. In the future, advances in fundamental science are needed to better establish legislative criteria. Applied scientists should continue to be used as independent advisers in consideration of future legislation and should be more proactive in information transfer outwith the normal scientific media.


2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-221
Author(s):  
António Duarte Santos ◽  
Nelson Tavares da Silva ◽  
Guilherme Castela

Summary The latest global economic and financial crisis has had adverse social consequences in many areas, including income and the social situation of households and their living conditions, especially when the housing phenomenon is addressed. The reality of this uncertainty has made the study of the housing phenomenon even more relevant, in particular from the perspective of an analysis of its evolution. In this context, we revisit EUROSTAT’s databases. This analysis was done for twelve Euro Area countries over five years, using the HJ-BIPLOT method developed by Galindo (1986). This multidimensional approach identified and represented twelve Eurozone sample countries in latent constructs of reduced dimensionality related to the housing policy problem. The simultaneous factorial representation identified (a) the most relevant variables to characterize these countries, (b) their trajectories during the period in analysis, and (c) the relations between variables, between countries, and between variables and countries. This approach also identified the most significant factors contributing to the countries' performance. This methodological approach can be useful in housing research, when studying data of a multivariate nature, and is also, by its visual interpretation, a potential tool for producing richer information not only for academia but also for policy makers.


1972 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 160-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Brueggeman ◽  
Ronald L Racster ◽  
Halbert C. Smith

Author(s):  
Kristin M. Szylvian

Federal housing policy has been primarily devoted to maintaining the economic stability and profitability of the private sector real estate, household finance, and home-building and supply industries since the administration of President Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933–1945). Until the 1970s, federal policy encouraged speculative residential development in suburban areas and extended segregation by race and class. The National Association of Home Builders, the National Association of Realtors, and other allied organizations strenuously opposed federal programs seeking to assist low- and middle-income households and the homeless by forcing recalcitrant suburbs to permit the construction of open-access, affordable dwellings and encouraging the rehabilitation of urban housing. During the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan, a Republican from California, argued it was the government, not the private sector, that was responsible for the gross inequities in social and economic indicators between residents of city, inner ring, and outlying suburban communities. The civic, religious, consumer, labor, and other community-based organizations that tried to mitigate the adverse effects of the “Reagan Revolution” on the affordable housing market lacked a single coherent view or voice. Since that time, housing has become increasingly unaffordable in many metropolitan areas, and segregation by race, income, and ethnicity is on the rise once again. If the home mortgage crisis that began in 2007 is any indication, housing will continue to be a divisive political, economic, and social issue in the foreseeable future. The national housing goal of a “decent home in a suitable living environment for every American family” not only has yet to be realized, but many law makers now favor eliminating or further restricting federal commitment to its realization.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (8) ◽  
pp. 1622-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cody Hochstenbach ◽  
Richard Ronald

Over the last decade, private rental sectors have been in rapid ascendance across developed societies, especially in economically liberal, English-speaking contexts. The Netherlands, and Amsterdam in particular, has also more recently experienced the reversal of a century-long decline in private renting. More unusually, the expansion of private renting in Amsterdam has been explicitly promoted by the municipal and national government, and in cooperation with social housing providers, in response to decreasing accessibility to, and affordability of, social rental and owner-occupied housing. This paper explores how and why this state-initiated revival has come about, highlighting how new growth in rent-liberalized private renting is a partial outcome of the restructuring of the urban housing market around owner occupation since the 1990s. More critically, our analysis asserts that restructuring of Amsterdam’s housing stock can be conceptualized as regulated marketization. Market forces are not being simply unleashed, but given more leeway in some regards and matched by new regulations. We also demonstrate various tensions present in this process of regulated marketization; between national and local politics, between existing housing and new construction, and between policies implemented in different time periods.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document