Articulation Therapy for Children with Speech Distortion Caused by Functional Posterior Crossbite

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-104
Author(s):  
Sangkyung Lee
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Speech Distortion

scholarly journals Analysis of Tongue Function from the Orthodontist’s Point of View: Not Only a Matter of Deglutition

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2520
Author(s):  
Andrea Deregibus ◽  
Simone Parrini ◽  
Maria Chiara Domini ◽  
Jacopo Colombini ◽  
Tommaso Castroflorio
Keyword(s):  
Point Of View ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Maxillary Hypoplasia ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Rest Position ◽  
Functional Aspects ◽  
Angle Class Iii Malocclusion

Many studies report that maxillofacial growth is influenced by genetic and environmental elements and that incorrect breathing, chewing, sucking, and swallowing are promoting factors of malocclusion. This study aims to evaluate the function and the influence of the tongue positions in patients with Angle class III malocclusion, maxillary hypoplasia, and posterior crossbite. One hundred patients, aged between 6 and 12 years old, were enrolled for the study. In the first group, patients with a diagnosis of class III malocclusion, affected by maxillary hypoplasia, skeletal class III, and posterior dental crossbite were recruited. In the control group, not treated patients with no malocclusion, skeletal class I, and without posterior dental crossbite were selected. Regarding atypical deglutition, no statistical differences were reported between the two groups, and 14% of patients reported ankyloglossia. Statistical differences were found in tongue rest position and during the execution of “hold and pull” and “chuck” exercises. Results obtained in this observational study showed that the clinician (orthodontist or general dentist) should analyze the presence/absence of atypical swallowing, the anatomical and functional aspects, and the tongue behavior in the rest position.

scholarly journals Condylar Changes in Children with Posterior Crossbite after Maxillary Expansion: Tridimensional Evaluation

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Rosamaria Fastuca ◽  
Helga Turiaco ◽  
Fausto Assandri ◽  
Piero A. Zecca ◽  
Luca Levrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
3D Slicer ◽  
Palatal Expansion ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Rapid Palatal Expansion ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Condylar Position ◽  
Caucasian Patients

(1) Background: To investigate condylar position in subjects with functional posterior crossbite comparing findings before and after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) treatment through 3D analysis; (2) Methods: Thirty-two Caucasian patients (14 males, mean age 8 y 8 m ± 1 y 2 m; 18 females mean age 8 y 2 m ± 1 y 4 m) with functional posterior crossbite (FPXB) diagnosis underwent rapid palatal expansion with a Haas appliance banded on second deciduous upper molars. Patients’ underwent CBCT scans before rapid palatal expansion (T0) and after 12 months (T1). The images were processed through 3D slicer software; (3) Results: The condylar position changes between T1 and T0 among the crossbite and non-crossbite sides were not statistically significant, except for the transversal axis. At T1, the condyles moved forward (y axis) and laterally (x axis), they also moved downward (z axis) but not significantly; (4) Conclusions: Condilar position in growing patients with functional posterior crossbite did not change significantly after rapid maxillary expansion.

scholarly journals Characteristics of masticatory muscles in children with unilateral posterior crossbite

2010 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annicele da Silva Andrade ◽  
Maria Beatriz Duarte Gavião ◽  
Gustavo Hauber Gameiro ◽  
Moara De Rossi
Keyword(s):  
Masticatory Muscles ◽  
Posterior Crossbite

Orthodontic management of compromised first permanent molars with bilateral posterior crossbite, severe crowding and impacted maxillary canines.

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 926-929
Author(s):  
Haytham Jamil Alswairki ◽  
Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Medical Science ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Clinical Challenge ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Permanent Molars ◽  
First Permanent Molars

Background: A unique clinical challenge presents when dealing with a compromised first permanent molars with bilateral posterior crossbite, severe crowding and impacted maxillary canines with skeletal class II base malocclusion patient. Case presentation: 14-year-old female patient had dental Class II skeletally, complicated with increase overjet, badly destructed permanent mandibular 1st molars constricted maxillary arch. Extraction of 1st molars followed by expansion have been planned to relieve crowding. Extraction of 1st molars in this time (furcation of 3rd molars start to develop) help in replacement by 2nd molars. In the progression of treatment, Conclusion: A well-balanced and esthetic occlusion by edge wise orthodontic treatment has been archived in this case. Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science Vol.20(4) 2021 p.926-929

Abordagem precoce da má oclusão de Classe II esquelética com atresia maxilar e mordida aberta anterior e o uso de alinhadores ClearCorrect – relato de caso

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (53) ◽  
pp. 97-106
Author(s):  
Roberto Hideo Shimizu ◽  
Isabela Almeida Shimizu ◽  
Ana Cláudia M. Melo Toyoffuku ◽  
Rebecca Marquesini ◽  
Tatiane Travizan Lima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Low Complexity ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Open Bite ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Anterior Open Bite ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
High Predictability

Adequate planning and early treatment of Angle Class II malocclusion with maxillary atresia and anterior open bite provides harmonization of maxillomandibular bone bases in the three planes of space. Orthodontic aligners have emerged as an alternative treatment having the following advantages: being more aesthetic and more comfortable for the patient, less treatment time when they are correctly indicated, less chairside time, less complications, possibility of remote monitoring, easier feeding, and dental hygiene. On the other hand, they offer difficulties to treat adults with severe skeletal Class II malocclusions, posterior crossbite and anterior open bite. Therefore, the objective of this clinical case report is to early correct skeletal Class II malocclusion with maxillary atresia through the use of mechanical orthopedics and devices that help eliminate habits and close the anterior open bite, and later the use of orthodontic aligners to finish the treatment. It was concluded that the early interceptive treatment of malocclusion was efficient to harmonize the bone bases in the anteroposterior, vertical, and transversal directions, changing this malocclusion from high to low complexity and, consequently, highly predictable and with an excellent prognosis for treatment with orthodontic aligners. The treatment with ClearCorrect aligners corrected the occlusion in a shorter period of time when compared to corrective orthodontics and with a high predictability in relation to the virtual setup.

scholarly journals Prevalence of Cross Bite Among the Orthodontic Patients in Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-12
Author(s):  
Naznin Sultana ◽  
Gazi Shamim Hassan ◽  
Digamber Jha ◽  
Towhida Nashrin ◽  
Lutfun Nahar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class I ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Posterior Crossbite ◽  
Orthodontic Patients ◽  
Medical University ◽  
Functional Components ◽  
Congenitally Missing

Crossbite is one of the most prevalent malocclusion, posterior crossbite occurs in 8% to 22% of orthodontic cases and anterior crossbite has been seen in Class III cases, which accounts for 3.4% of orthodontic cases. The etiology of posterior crossbite can include any combination of dental, skeletal, and neuro muscular functional components, but the most frequent cause is reduction in width of the maxillary dental arch. Patients/cases seeking comprehensive orthodontic treatment in between 5 to 35 years were diagnosed for crossbite with diagnostic model and care record file. Out of 300 cases 163(54.3%) had crossbite, 90(30%) had anterior crossbite and 109(36.3%) had posterior cross bite. Among posterior crossbite 60(20%) had unilateral and 49(16.3%) had bilateral crossbite. Posterior crossbite was more prevalent than anterior crossbite. Cases with Class I molar relation showed more crossbite. Crossbite was more prevalent in cases with congenitally missing teeth.Bangladesh J Medicine Jan 2015; 26 (1) : 9-12

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document