scholarly journals Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI) Essential Open Source Software for Science, Cycle 2 Center for Open Science (COS) Proposal - Advancing Sustainability and Innovation of Open Manuscript Services

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Schroeder ◽  
Nicole Pfeiffer ◽  
Brian A. Nosek ◽  
Dasapta Erwin Irawan ◽  
Khaled Moustafa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Cost Model ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Scholarly Publishing ◽  
Open Model ◽  
New Business ◽  
Open Review ◽  
Peer Community

Preprints (early, complete versions of manuscripts made available online before journal-organized peer review) are shifting the scholarly publishing model by accelerating open access and, potentially, open review. Making these tools interoperable with preprint infrastructure will increase the confidence of the scientific community in preprints. In addition, it will influence commercial publishing services to embrace new business models to innovate towards openness.OSF Preprints is open-source software maintained by the Center for Open Science (COS). OSF Preprints hosts 26 community-run services, providing the ideal conditions to integrate with open review platforms such as Peer Community In (PCI), PREreview, and Hypothes.is and to assess whether a fully open model can compete with and disrupt scholarly publishing across disciplines. We integrated hypothes.is and now propose to add the other platforms.With support from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, we are investigating how to improve trust in preprints with signals of credibility to improve chances that an open model can innovate scholarly publishing. Making those signals standard, interoperable, and machine-readable with validation will facilitate adoption and impact. We propose to build open-source open science badges for preprints to be interoperable with other scholarly publishing platforms.In 2020, COS advanced its sustainability plan for the preprints infrastructure with a distributed cost model for the shared infrastructure. Six of the services primarily serve under-resourced scholarly communities in the developing world. We request the costs for maintenance of those services for 2020 to extend their opportunity to develop institutional support for sustaining their services.

Business Models in Open Source Software Value Creation

2011 ◽  
pp. 1103-1114
Author(s):  
Marko Seppänen ◽  
Nina Helander ◽  
Saku Mäkinen
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Business Model ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
New Business ◽  
General Business

This chapter explores how the use of a business model enables value creation in the open source software (OSS) environment. We argue that this value can be attained by analyzing the value creation logic and the elements of potential business models emerging in the OSS environment, since profitable business is all about creating value and capturing it properly. Open source (OS) offers one possibility for firms that are continuously finding new opportunities to organize their business activities and increase the amount of value they appropriate according to their capabilities. Furthermore, the concept of a business model is considered a tool for exploring new business ideas and capturing the essential elements of each alternative. We propose that a general business model is also applicable in the context of OSS, and we provide a list of questions that may help managers deal with OSS in their businesses.

scholarly journals Open Principles in New Business Models for Information Systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Müller ◽  
Wolfgang Vorraber ◽  
Wolfgang Slany
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Open Systems ◽  
Shared Vision ◽  
Software Projects ◽  
New Business ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
New Business Models ◽  
Potential Representation

Open source software and open innovation are an important resource for today’s industries. Communities collaboratively create different kind of publicly available value, boosting innovation and also technology. However, whereas this value is generated and captured by various involved parties, the outcomes are, in many cases, commercialized by companies who build their business models on this openness. Thus, current business model representations used for these open systems mainly focus on the commercial side of companies, not directly regarding the value creation and distribution by the underlying communities. This results in a lack of potential representation of alternative value created by individuals and communities that are not necessarily aiming for direct monetary compensation. In this work, we show, by the example of open source projects, how communities create value and their potential to be represented by the upcoming domain of new business models. The emerging idea of new business models, based on sharing, collaboration, and the circular economy, not only considers economical viewpoints, but also social and ecological. New trends in research are intensively starting to investigate these models and how they can be brought to practice. The co-creation of value, collaboration of various actors, and following a shared vision are just some of the identified overlaps that are also essential for a potential representation of open communities. This first review unveils that new business models and open source software projects have a variety of aspects in common. We highlight the potential of open communities to be seen as new business models themselves, instead of just being a pure enabler for firms’ business models. This approach is leaving room to explore new organizational and economical aspects of open ecosystems, enhancing the understanding of co-creative communities and the definition of collaborative value.

Business Models in Open Source Software Value Creation

2011 ◽  
pp. 578-589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marko Seppänen
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Business Model ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Essential Elements ◽  
New Business ◽  
General Business

This chapter explores how the use of a business model enables value creation in the open source software (OSS) environment. We argue that this value can be attained by analyzing the value creation logic and the elements of potential business models emerging in the OSS environment, since profitable business is all about creating value and capturing it properly. Open source (OS) offers one possibility for firms that are continuously finding new opportunities to organize their business activities and increase the amount of value they appropriate according to their capabilities. Furthermore, the concept of a business model is considered a tool for exploring new business ideas and capturing the essential elements of each alternative. We propose that a general business model is also applicable in the context of OSS, and we provide a list of questions that may help managers deal with OSS in their businesses.

scholarly journals FREE OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE: SOCIAL PHENOMENON, NEW MANAGEMENT, NEW BUSINESS MODELS / ATVIROSIOS PROGRAMOS: SOCIALINIS REIŠKINYS, NAUJA VADYBA,NAUJI VERSLO MODELIAI

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Žilvinas Jančoras
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Social Phenomenon ◽  
Free Open Source Software ◽  
The Social ◽  
New Business ◽  
Managerial Innovation ◽  
Free Open Source ◽  
New Business Models

In the paper assumptions of free open source software existence, development, financing and competition models are presented. The free software as a social phenomenon and the open source software as the technological and managerial innovation environment are revealed. The social and business interaction processes are analyzed.

Implications of FLOSS for Public Organizations

2011 ◽  
pp. 1011-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Koch
Keyword(s):  
Operating System ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Programming Languages ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Public Organizations ◽  
Economic Implications ◽  
New Business ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Libre Software

In the last years, free and open source software (also sometimes termed libre software) has gathered increasing interest, both from the business and academic worlds. As some projects in different application domains like most notably the operating system Linux together with the suite of GNU utilities, the office suites GNOME and KDE, Apache, sendmail, bind, and several programming languages have achieved huge success in their respective markets, both the adoption by commercial companies, and also the development of new business models by corporations both small and large like Netscape or IBM have increased. Given this situation, it did not take a long time for the discussion surrounding this new phenomenon to reach public organizations. Especially the most prominent example, the choice between a free operating system like GNU/Linux or a commercial system like Microsoft Windows has sparked interest in this new form of software, its legal and economic implications, and its new model of software development. In this article, these implications will be explored, explicitly not focusing solely on the Linux vs. Microsoft debate. To this end, an introduction to free/libre/open source software (FLOSS) and its concepts will be given, then different aspects of the relationship between FLOSS and public organizations, especially e-government, together with future trends will be discussed.

scholarly journals Integrated open-source software for multiscale electrophysiology

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Nasiotis ◽  
Martin Cousineau ◽  
François Tadel ◽  
Adrien Peyrache ◽  
Richard M. Leahy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Open Source ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Dense Array ◽  
Unrestricted Access ◽  
Research Transparency ◽  
Programming Skills ◽  
User Friendly

Abstract The methods for electrophysiology in neuroscience have evolved tremendously over the recent years with a growing emphasis on dense-array signal recordings. Such increased complexity and augmented wealth in the volume of data recorded, have not been accompanied by efforts to streamline and facilitate access to processing methods, which too are susceptible to grow in sophistication. Moreover, unsuccessful attempts to reproduce peer-reviewed publications indicate a problem of transparency in science. This growing problem could be tackled by unrestricted access to methods that promote research transparency and data sharing, ensuring the reproducibility of published results. Here, we provide a free, extensive, open-source software that provides data-analysis, data-management and multi-modality integration solutions for invasive neurophysiology. Users can perform their entire analysis through a user-friendly environment without the need of programming skills, in a tractable (logged) way. This work contributes to open-science, analysis standardization, transparency and reproducibility in invasive neurophysiology.

How do Open Source software companies respond to institutional pressures? A business model perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 534-554
Author(s):  
Khaireddine Mouakhar ◽  
Albéric Tellier
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Business Model ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Institutional Pressures ◽  
Strategic Choices ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Software Companies ◽  
Key Resources

Purpose Open Source software companies (OSSCs) are confronted with institutional pressures from Open Source software (OSS) communities. They must find an acceptable balance between the expectations of these communities and their own business model. However, there are still few studies that try to analyse the OSSC business models. The purpose of this paper is to highlight OSSC typical business models by using rich empirical data. Design/methodology/approach The methodology is based on a combination of quantitative analysis of a sample of 66 OSSCs and qualitative analysis of three typical situations resulting from that sample. Findings The quantitative study enables the authors to highlight three typical business models. The in-depth study of three typical cases enables the authors to specify these OSSC business models. The authors can distinguish four key dimensions: the relationship developed with the OSS communities, the strategic manoeuvres made, the key resources and competitive positioning. Research limitations/implications The results indicate that it is possible for firms to accommodate both profit and non-profit logics using different strategic manoeuvres to position themselves with regard to the Open Source institutional environment. Such accommodation requires the development of key resources and the adoption of suitable competitive positioning. Practical implications This study allows the authors to highlight two main practical contributions for OSSCs’ directors. First, the different manoeuvres identified may help them to ensure coherence between their strategic choices and the business model chosen. Second, the results can help OSSC founders identify value creation mechanisms more clearly by analysing four key variables. Originality/value This paper provides new insight about OSSCs business models. It aggregates four dimensions that provide a more “fine-grained” analysis of business models, while other studies often emphasise one dimension (usually the regime of appropriability).

scholarly journals The Economics of Open Source Software: A Survey of the Early Literature

2002 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron Schiff
Keyword(s):  
Open Source ◽  
Open Source Software ◽  
Business Models ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Research Directions ◽  
Early Literature ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Closed Source

This paper reviews the recent literature on the economics of open source software. Two different sets of issues are addressed. The first looks at the incentives of programmers to participate in open source projects. The second considers the business models used by profit-making firms in the open source industry, and the effects on existing closed source firms. Some possible future research directions are also given.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document