scholarly journals Bijective model of time and J.T. Fraser’s Nowless Universe

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrit S. Sorli

In bijective modelling, the physical reality is represented by the set X, the model of physical reality by the set Y. Every element in the set X has exactly one correspondent element in the set Y. Set X and set X are related by the bijective function f:X→Y. Bijective modelling is confirming that time is the duration of given system entropy increasing in time-invariant space. Time-invariant space is the fundamental arena of the Nowless Universe.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amrit S. Sorli

Carlo Rovelli’s research on time suggests that time has no physical existence, that it is an illusion. Bijective research confirms Rovelli is right. Time is what we measure with clocks. We measure with clocks the numerical sequential order of material change, i.e. the motion running in time-invariant space. Time as the duration of change enters existence only when measured by the observer. The change runs only in time-invariant universal space. Humans are experiencing a run of changes in time-invariant space in the frame of the linear psychological time “past-present-future” that has its basis in the neurological activity of the brain. In the universe, there is neither a physical past nor physical future. There exists only what we can observe with our senses and measure with apparatuses.


1975 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-104
Author(s):  
F. S. Klotz

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deep Bhattacharjee ◽  
Sanjeevan Singha Roy

Higher dimensions are impossible to visualize as the size of dimension varies inversely proportional to its level. The more the dimension ranges, the least its size. We are a set of points living in a particular point of space and a particular frame of time. i.e, we live in space-time. The space has more dimensions that meets the human eye. We are living in a world of hyper-space. Our world being a smaller dimension is floating in higher dimensions. The quest for the visually of higher dimensions has been a fantasy to mankind but this aspect of nature is completely locked. We can transform dimensions i.e., from higher to lower dimensions, or from lower to higher dimensions, but only through mathematics. The relative notion of mathematics helps us to do the thing, which is perhaps impossible in the experimental part of physical reality. Humans being an element of 3 Dimensions – length, breath, height can only perceive one higher dimensions, that is space-time. but beyond that the notion of dimension itself changes. The dimensions got curled up in every intersection of the coordinates of space in such a way that the higher dimensions remain stable to us. But in reality it is highly unstable. In the higher dimensions, above 4, the space is tearing apart and joining again spontaneously, but the tearing portion itself covered by 2 dimensional Branes which acts as a stabilizer for the unstable dimensions. Dimensions will get smaller and smaller with the space-time interwoven in it. But at Planks length that is 10^-33 meter, the notion of space-time itself breaks down thereby making impossible for the higher dimensions to coexist along with space. Without space, there will be no identity of any dimension. The space itself is the fabric for the milestone of residing higher dimensions. Imagine our room, which is 3 dimensional. But what is there inside the room. The space and of course the time. Space-time being a totally separate entity is not quite separate when compared with other dimensions because it makes the residing place for the higher dimensions or the hyperspace itself. We all are confined within a lower dimensional world within a randomness of higher dimensions. Time being alike like space is an arrow which has the capability of slicing space into different forms. Thereby taking a snapshot of our every nano-second we vibrate within space-time. As each slice of time represents each slice of space, similarly each slice of space represents each slice of time. The nature of space-time is beyond human consciousness. It is the identity by which we breathe, we play, we survive. It is the whole localization of species that encompasses itself with space thereby making space-time a relative quantity depending upon the reference frame. The only thing that can encompass space-time or even change the relative definition of space-time is the speed, the speed far beyond the speed of light. The more the speed, the less the array of time flows. Space-time being an invisible entity makes the other dimensions visible residing in it only into the level of 3, that is l, b, h. After that there is a infamous structure formed by the curling of higher dimensions called CALABI-YAU manifold. This manifold depicts the usual nature of the dimensional quadrants of the higher order by containing a number of small spherical spheres inside it. The mathematics of string theory is still unable to solve the genus and the containing spheres of the manifold which can be the ultimate quest for the hidden dimensions. Hidden, as, the higher dimensions are hidden from human perspective of macro level but if we probe deeper into the fabric of the space-time of General Relativity then we will find the 5th dimension according to the Kaluza-Klein theory. And if we probe even deeper into it at the perspective of string theory we will be amazed to see the real nature of quantum world. They are so marvelously beautiful, they contain so many forms of higher dimensions ranging from 6 to 10. And even many more of that, but we are still not sure about it where they may exist in a ghost state. After all, the quantum nature is far more beautiful that one can even imagine with a full faze of weirdness.


Author(s):  
Ian Stewart

‘Historical views of infinity’ focuses on historical attitudes to infinity in philosophy, religion, and mathematics, including Zeno’s famous paradoxes. Infinity is not a thing, but a concept, related to the default workings of the human mind. Zeno’s paradoxes appear to be about physical reality, but they mainly address how we think about space, time, and motion. A central (but possibly dated) contribution was Aristotle’s distinction between actual and potential infinity. Theologians, from Origen to Aquinas, sharpened the debate, and philosophers such as Immanuel Kant took up the challenge. Mathematicians made radical advances, often against resistance from philosophers.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 583-586
Author(s):  
Amrit S. Šorli ◽  
Štefan Čelan

Since the beginning of physics, time is the duration of material changes. We measure time with clocks. The notion of time in Newton physics, Einstein’s relativity, and quantum physics are different despite we always measure the same time with the same apparatuses that are clocks. We showed in this article that the act of the measurement done by the observer is generating duration. Time as duration is the result of the interaction between the observer and physical reality via clocks. In the universe, only changes exist. Changes have no duration on their own. Time as duration is born with the measurement done by the observer. Duration is relative and depends on the variable energy density of time-invariant superfluid quantum space that is the carrier of EPR-type entanglement.


Author(s):  
Srečko Šorli ◽  
Štefan Čelan

Can physical objects be in time-symmetry? Physical objects can only exist in a medium that has physical attributes, which means this medium is a type of energy. Is time energy? This article will show that time is not energy and there is no possibility that physical objects could be in time-symmetry. Physical objects only can be in symmetry in the time-invariant space in which they exist. In this perspective time measured with clocks is the result of the observer’s measurement in the time-invariant space. The time-symmetry model is flawed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 99 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murat Yessenov ◽  
Basanta Bhaduri ◽  
H. Esat Kondakci ◽  
Ayman F. Abouraddy

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document