scholarly journals Aplikasi Berpikir Kritis dalam Asuhan Keperawatan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rizky fadilah hasibuan

ABSTRACTLatar belakang : berfikir merupakan suatu proses yang berjalan secara berkesinambungan mencakup interaksi dari suatu rangkaian pikiran dan persepsi. Berfikir kritis dalam keperawatan merupakan komponen dasar dalam pertanggunggugatan profesional dan kualitas asuhan keperawatan Tujuan : untuk mengetahui cara aplikasi berfikir kris dalam asuhan berfikir kritis Metode : debate, individual decision, group discussion, persuasi, propaganda, coercio, kombinasi beberapa metode. Hasil : berfikir kritis dalam pengkajian,berfikir kritis dalam perumusan diagnostik keperawatan, berfikir kritis dalam merancang intervensi keperawatan, keterampilan berfikir kritis dalam implementasi keperawatan. Pembahasan : berfikir kritis memiliki enam sub-skill yang terdiri dari interpretasi, analisis, kesimpulan, penjelasan, dan regulasi diri. Penutup : berfikir kritis adalah suatu proses berfikir secara sistematik yang penting bagi berfikir kritis adalah berfikir dengan tujuan dan mengarah kesasaran yang membantu individu membuat penilaian berdasarkan kata bukan pikiran. Kata kunci : Berfikir kritis, aplikasi berfikir kritis, asuhan keperawatan.

1981 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
pp. 368-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert H. Dorff ◽  
Jürg Steiner

This article presents a model of decision making and introduces a new theoretical variable to the literature, namely, the modes of decision making. The theoretical focus is on the face-to-face group, and the article also develops an innovative methodology for studying this type of decision-making behavior. Variation in the decision modes is explained as a function of the strategic considerations of individual decision makers. These considerations are affected by a set of four independent variables: structure of the decision group, substance of the conflict, context of the conflict, and the decision process. The data, drawn from observations of decision-making groups in Switzerland, are tested with discriminant analysis and a simulation. In both cases total correct classifications exceed 55 percent, indicating that there is a meaningful structure relating variation in the decision modes to the theoretical framework.


2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erinn Finke ◽  
Kathryn Drager ◽  
Elizabeth C. Serpentine

Purpose The purpose of this investigation was to understand the decision-making processes used by parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) related to communication-based interventions. Method Qualitative interview methodology was used. Data were gathered through interviews. Each parent had a child with ASD who was at least four-years-old; lived with their child with ASD; had a child with ASD without functional speech for communication; and used at least two different communication interventions. Results Parents considered several sources of information for learning about interventions and provided various reasons to initiate and discontinue a communication intervention. Parents also discussed challenges introduced once opinions of the school individualized education program (IEP) team had to be considered. Conclusions Parents of children with ASD primarily use individual decision-making processes to select interventions. This discrepancy speaks to the need for parents and professionals to share a common “language” about interventions and the decision-making process.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Dürr ◽  
Ute-Christine Klehe

Abstract. Faking has been a concern in selection research for many years. Many studies have examined faking in questionnaires while far less is known about faking in selection exercises with higher fidelity. This study applies the theory of planned behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 1991 ) to low- (interviews) and high-fidelity (role play, group discussion) exercises, testing whether the TPB predicts reported faking behavior. Data from a mock selection procedure suggests that candidates do report to fake in low- and high-fidelity exercises. Additionally, the TPB showed good predictive validity for faking in a low-fidelity exercise, yet not for faking in high-fidelity exercises.


1969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl J. Lange ◽  
Carl H. Rittenhouse ◽  
Richard C. Atkinson
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document