scholarly journals PEMBERIAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP AHLI WARIS BEDA AGAMA (Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Antara Hukum Islam dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 368.K/AG/1995)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rinaldi Arif
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

According to Islamic law, one of the obstacles to get inheritance is the religious difference between joint heirs and testator. The condition for the joint heirs of different religions felt unfair, so the problem is then brought to the realm of law. The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K/AG/1995 provides a way for the joint heirs of different religions to obtain the inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. This study is a descriptive analysis that leads to normative legal research, with a research of legal approach. Data collection is obtained from secondary data by library study. The data obtained is then analyzed using qualitative analysis. Based on the results of the research according to the Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K/AG/1995, the concept of wills is not only for adopted children or adoptive parents, but also for non-Muslim heirs by giving Part or portion of the heirs of different religions based on the heirs of different religions based when he/she is Muslim. Analysis of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 368.K/AG/1995, about the provision of wasiat wajibah to the heirs of different religions is that the provision of wasiat wajibah to the heirs of non-Muslims actually is not in accordance with the rules of Islamic law.

Analisis Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 331 K/Ag/2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Alip Pamungkas Raharjo ◽  
Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Republic ◽  
A Share

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance. 

Analisis Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah terhadap Ahli Waris Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 331 K/Ag/2018

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Alip Pamungkas Raharjo ◽  
Elok Fauzia Dwi Putri
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Republic ◽  
A Share

In Article 171 letter (c) Instruction of the President of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law affirms that the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs do not obtain inheritance from the inheritor's inheritance. However, in its development because it felt unfair, the Supreme Court through The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K / AG / 1995 provided a way for joint cooperation of different inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. But in its development, this provision was changed again by a landmark decision from the Supreme Court, namely through the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018 because there was a change in the value of justice in the community. The research method used normative research with constitutional approach, conceptual approach and case approach. This study aims to explain the rights of non muslim heirs to the inheritance of Islamic heirs before and after the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018. The results showed that prior to the Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018, heirs of non muslim religions were given a share of inheritance in the form of a wasiat wajibah for ¾ of the inheritance inheritance. Post the Decision of the Supreme Court Number 331 K / AG / 2018, the amount of wasiat wajibah will change to ¼ from the inheritor's inheritance.Keywords: Non Moslem Heir, Legacy, Moslem Heir, The Supreme Court Decision Number 331 K / AG / 2018

scholarly journals Jurisdiction Analysis of The Distribution of Integrity Children Out of Marriage as Substitute Heritages (Study of The Supreme Court Decision Number: 784 K/Pdt/2014)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (01) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Gagah Hotma Parulian Siregar ◽  
Widhi Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Main Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Research Problems

 Many problems regarding inheritance law occur due to distribution that is not in accordance with applicable regulations. In the Supreme Court Decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014, the main research problems are: (1) How is the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs based on the Civil Code study of the Supreme Court's decision number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 . (2) Is the content of the Supreme Court's order Number: 784/Pdt/2014 concerning the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs appropriate or not according to the Civil Code. This type of research is normative juridical. The data used are secondary data, library study data collection and qualitative data analysis and deductive method conclusions. The conclusion of this decision study states that (1) the heirs to the inheritance of the Supreme Court decision study number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 are Dewina Tjandra, Trisnani Tjandra, Patty Tjandra, Sarina Tjandra, Arifin Tjandra, Ony Tjandra, and Fitri Tjandra . (2) The Supreme Court's decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014 regarding the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as substitute heirs is not in accordance with Article 842 of the Civil Code.   

scholarly journals PENERAPAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP NON MUSLIM DITINJAU DARI KOMPILASI HUKUM ISLAM (KHI) STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 331/K/AG/2018/MA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 267
Author(s):  
Liana Noviyanti ◽  
Mulati Mulati
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Ruling ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Supreme Court Ruling ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court

Islamic law has stated that every person of different religion cannot inherit each other, both Muslims inherit for non-Muslims and from non-Muslims inherit for Muslims, but in practice, Judges at the Supreme Court level implement mandatory wills, this is required which has been decided in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This study aims to examine how to implement the mandatory non-Muslim wills in the Supreme Court ruling Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA based on the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI), and what the Supreme Court Judges consider in implementing mandatory testaments against non-Muslims in the Supreme Court Decision Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA. This research is a normative legal research with the nature of qualitative research with the type of library research. Based on the studies that have been carried out, the Decision of the Supreme Court Number. 331 / K / AG / 2018 / MA does not include legal considerations in force in Indonesia concerning inheritance provisions and concerning the granting of an approved mandatory will set out in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). The application of mandatory wills in the Supreme Court Decision is contrary to the provisions of Islamic Law and the provisions of the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). Article 209 paragraphs (1) and (2) concerning mandatory wills.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis terhadap Kasus Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum atas Ketidakabsahan Peralihan Hak Milik Benda Bergerak (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1081/K/PDT/2018)

Kosmik Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Fathalya Laksana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Analytical Research ◽  
The Law

The legal requirements are regulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). If the valid conditions of the promise are not fulfilled, then the law that results is that the agreement can be canceled or null and void. In the Court's practice contained in the Supreme Decision Number 1081K / PDT / 2018, there was a sale and purchase agreement between the Plaintiff's husband and the Defendant, the sale and purchase agreement was made by the Plaintiff's partner without the consent of the Plaintiff as his legal wife. Supreme Court Decision No. 1081K / PDT / 2018 stated that the sale and purchase agreement was invalid and null and void. Apart from that, in its decision, the Defendant's UN Supreme Court had committed an illegal act. The research method used is a normative juridical approach using secondary data obtained from literature studies, namely statutory regulations, legal theories, and the opinions of leading legal scholars. This research uses descriptive analytical research specifications that describe the regulations that are in accordance with legal theories that oversee the implementation practices of the problems under study. The data analysis method used is qualitative normative method. Based on the research results, it can be denied that the sale and purchase agreement in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1081K / PDT / 2018 is not legally valid. The agreement does not fulfill the validity requirements of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely halal skills and causes because it violates Article 36 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 resulting in the sale and purchase agreement to be null and void.Keywords: Buying and Selling, Acts against the Law, Agreement, Marriage, Collective Property

scholarly journals RESPONSIBILITIES OF DEED LAND BUILDERS OFFICERS (PPAT) BUY SELL IN MAKING DEED LAND DISPUTE (Analysis of Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018)

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Mugiyatno Mugiyatno ◽  
Amin Purnawan ◽  
Achmad Sulchan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Legal Consequences

The purpose of this study was to analyze 1) Liability Land Deed Official (PPAT) in the manufacture of the deed of sale of land. 2) .Menganalisis the validity of the deed of sale made by PPAT.3). Analyzing the legal consequences Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018 against the Land Deed Official (PPAT) who manufacture a deed of sale of land disputes.The approach method in this research is the empirical jurisdiction. Specifications of this research is descriptive analysis. The source of the data used is primary and secondary data. The primary source is the Supreme Court decision number 826K / Pdt / 2018, while secondary data sources are taken from books and other related iteratorr, obtained through interviews and literature, while data analysis is a descriptive analytic. The method of data collection is the engineering library (library research).Results of the research results can be concluded: 1) Obligation PPAT is a deed as evidence has implemented a legal act of buying and selling, and registered under the name of the office to Pertanahan.2) Validity of PPAT Deed governed and determined by the current Minister of National Land Agency, it is affirmed in Article 21 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 which states that the PPAT deed made in the prescribed form of the National Land Agency. 3). The legal consequences Supreme Court Decision No. 826 K / Pdt / 2018 is the Deed of Sale and Purchase of Land Disputes number 186/2015 and certificate of land with 1394 numbers became invalid / void and not legally binding and PPAT and Land Agency may be penalized for committed an unlawful act.Keywords : offense, purchase agreement, land deed official

scholarly journals Property toward Husband Doesn't Provide Children and Wife in the Overview of the Compilation of Islamic Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-235
Author(s):  
Suenta Karina Siregar ◽  
Utary Maharani Barus ◽  
Yezrizawati ◽  
Idha Aprilyana Sembiring
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The One ◽  
Joint Property

The study was conducted to find out Compilation of Islamic Law governing the distribution of joint property, the application of the principle of partnership and the legal considerations of judges in the Supreme Court Decision of the Republic of Indonesia on Case Number 266K/AG/2010 in terms of the Compilation of Islamic Law against husband doesn’t provide for his children and his wife. This research uses normative juridical research methods that use secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials with descriptive analysis and data collection tools are carried out by library research supported by data obtained through field research at Bantul Religious Courts. The results of this research is known that the regulation regarding the distribution of joint property to husbands who do not provide for their children and wives is not detailed in the Compilation of Islamic Law. This partnership causes the position of husband and wife to be the same in some respects, in other respects to be different, the husband becomes the head of the family, the wife becomes the head in charge of household regulation, each has a role, position, rights, obligations, and responsibilities, all of which complement and perfect each other, every role has rights and every position has obligations, whoever has more obligations or who bears greater obligations, he is the one who has more rights than the others. The judge to resolve the conflict must be able to resolve it objectively based on the applicable law, determine the facts in the trial including the relevant facts and the choice of which legal rules will be used as the basis for resolving the case.

scholarly journals THE DUALISM OF THE SUPREME COURT’S DECISIONS ON THE POSITION OF NON-MARITAL CHILD

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
Nurhadi Nurhadi
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Pros And Cons ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
Unmarried Child

Since the birth of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010, the legal experts have discussed the positions of marriage children through articles, papers, books and seminars, pros and cons when interpreting the non-marital child, judges also gave birth to many interpretations. The Supreme Court (MA) has two views in adjudicating the marriage case, Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 states that the ratification of an unmarried child is not a jurisdiction of the Religious Courts, whereas in Decision of Supreme Court Number 597 K/AG/2015 states that the non-marital children are legitimate even though the marriage of their parents only carries out marriage under Islamic law. The formulation of the problem is how the criteria of marital legitimacy in Indonesia? How is the outsider interpretation of the two Supreme Court decisions? The research method used is literature study, with the type of normative legal research, which is descriptive analytical. The conclusion is that in Supreme Court Decision Number 329 K/AG/2014 considered the marriage to be legitimately religious, but because it is not recorded so that the marriage does not get the certainty and protection of the law, consequently the child born from the marriage is not a legal child, whereas in Decision Number 597 K/AG/2015 The Supreme Court considers that although the marriage is not recorded, the child born from the marriage must still have legal certainty and protection so that the child is considered a legal child.

scholarly journals KEABSAHAN PEMBUKTIAN AKTA NOTARIS DI PENGADILAN SEBAGAI AKTA OTENTIK (Kajian Putusan No. 3591K/PDT/2018 )

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Hazar Kusmayanti ◽  
Yuda Anrova
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Documentary Evidence ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

The evidentiary process requires evidence which is regulated under the civil procedure law in Article 164 HIR. Supreme Court decision number 3591K/Pdt/2018, discusses documentary evidence in the form of an agreement to transfer and transfer land rights. Mahakamah Agung’s decision number 3591K/Pdt/2018 states that the deed has no legal force because the land object of the dispute has been issued a legally valid right to build (HGB) certifi cate. The purpose of this paper is to fi nd out the legal considerations of the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia regarding the validity related to positive law in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative juridical approach with research specifi cations in the form of descriptive analytical through secondary data obtained from literature studies. The data analysis method used is qualitative normative method. The conclusion was obtained that the deed of agreement of transfer and transfer of land rights as outlined in deed number 255 is legally valid because the agreement was made by fulfi lling the validity requirements of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, however the judge did not provide further explanation in the judge’s consideration regarding the validity of the letter.

scholarly journals Analysis on Non Muslim Heir Position Towards the Inheritance of Muslim Testator in Indonesia

Yuridika ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 389
Author(s):  
Tonic Tangkau ◽  
Daniel Julian Tangkau ◽  
Prawitra Thalib ◽  
Xavier Nugraha ◽  
Windy Agustin
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Many ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Article 171 section c the Compilation of Islamic Law which was ratified through the Presidential Instruction of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 1991 stressed that one of the conditions for heirs in Islamic inheritance law is Mulsim. In its development, the requirement of the Islamic religious obligation is deemed not to provide justice, this can be seen from the many complaints filed by the community to the court. Based on this background, the formulation of the problem in this study is Firstly position of Non-Muslim Inheritance of Islamic Inheritance Inheritance according to positive law in Indonesia Secondly, to find out the position of Non-Muslim Inheritance Against Islamic Inheritance Inheritance from various court decisions in Indonesia. This research is a juridical research, with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of this study indicate, that First, according to positive law in Indonesia, Non-Muslim Heirs are not entitled to Islamic Inheritance. Secondly, in its development, to fulfill the sense of justice in the community, the judge in Indonesia, decided that the Non-Muslim heirs, although not entitled to become heirs, were still entitled to the inheritance of the Islamic heirs through the obligatory wills. This can be seen from the various court decisions that exist, such as Supreme Court Decision Number 368 K/AG/1995, Supreme Court Decision Number 51 K/AG/1999, Supreme Court Decision Number 16 K/AG/2010, and Supreme Court Decision No. 331 K/Ag/2018

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document