scholarly journals Analisis Tingkat Kognitif Pretes Fisiologi Kedokteran UNS 2018/2019 Ditinjau dari Ranah Kognitif Taksonomi Bloom Revisi

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Febby Gunawan Siswanto

High level of cognitive, as an important part of medical education, can be trained by appropriate higher order thinking exams. A taxonomy called Bloom’s Taxonomy fits to be the standard of creating test for medical student and analyzing cognitive level of medical exams. The purpose of study is to analyze cognitive levels of physiology pretests of first year medicine in Sebelas Maret University 2018/2019. This is a qualitative descriptive research. The data are gained from documentation of six exams and analyzed by Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. There were 106 multiple choice questions in the pretest (51%=remember; 15%=understand; 12%=apply; 17%=analyze; 3%=evaluate; 2%=create). A half of the questions showed the lowest levels of lower order thinking skills. On the other hand, the highest level of higher order thinking skills’ questions came from package D and E. Therefore, reconstruction of physiology pretest of Medicine Sebelas Maret University 2018/2019 is needed for creating questions that equal to cognitive level’s demand of medical students.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zainal Abidin ◽  
Mohammad Tohir

The research aims to describe the level of higher-order thinking skills ability of students in solving generalization patterns in two-dimensional arithmetic series based on revised Bloom's taxonomy. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive approach. The subjects were students of the Master Program of Mathematics Education at Jember University. The data was collected by giving open problem-solving tasks and documentation studies to students to develop patterns of one-dimensional arithmetic series. Then, students are given the task of solving the next problem to draw up a generalization pattern of two-dimensional arithmetic series. The data analysis technique used is qualitative descriptive data analysis. The results showed that the percentage of higher-order thinking skills aspects included analyze (C4) reached 88.89%, evaluate (C5) reached 83.33%, and create (C6) reached 66.67%. The results of this achievement are influenced by several factors, including accuracy in compiling numbers and expanding existing data, mastery of arithmetic series permutation concepts and their application, the tendency of graduate students to rely on memorization and imitations of existing examples.


Author(s):  
Intan Permata Sari And Indra Hartoyo

This study is aimed at (1) analyzing reading exercises based Bloom’s taxonomy for VIII grade in English on Sky textbook. (2) Found the distribution of the lower and higher order thinking skill in reading exercises. (3) To reason for level reading exercises. After analyzed the data, the result of the data analysis also infers that the six levels of Bloom’s taxonomy in reading exercises weren’t applied totally. The creating skill doesn’t have distribution in reading exercise, and the understanding – remembering level more dominant than another levels. The distribution of the higher order thinking level was lower than the lower order thinking level and the six levels are not appropriate with the proportion for each level of education based Bloom’s taxonomy, such as the distribution of the creating level in the reading exercise must be a concern because no question that belong to the creating level. It was concluded that reading exercises in English on Sky textbook cannot improve students' critical thinking skills for VIII grade.


Author(s):  
J. K. Stringer ◽  
Sally A. Santen ◽  
Eun Lee ◽  
Meagan Rawls ◽  
Jean Bailey ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Analytic thinking skills are important to the development of physicians. Therefore, educators and licensing boards utilize multiple-choice questions (MCQs) to assess these knowledge and skills. MCQs are written under two assumptions: that they can be written as higher or lower order according to Bloom’s taxonomy, and students will perceive questions to be the same taxonomical level as intended. This study seeks to understand the students’ approach to questions by analyzing differences in students’ perception of the Bloom’s level of MCQs in relation to their knowledge and confidence. Methods A total of 137 students responded to practice endocrine MCQs. Participants indicated the answer to the question, their interpretation of it as higher or lower order, and the degree of confidence in their response to the question. Results Although there was no significant association between students’ average performance on the content and their question classification (higher or lower), individual students who were less confident in their answer were more than five times as likely (OR = 5.49) to identify a question as higher order than their more confident peers. Students who responded incorrectly to the MCQ were 4 times as likely to identify a question as higher order than their peers who responded correctly. Conclusions The results suggest that higher performing, more confident students rely on identifying patterns (even if the question was intended to be higher order). In contrast, less confident students engage in higher-order, analytic thinking even if the question is intended to be lower order. Better understanding of the processes through which students interpret MCQs will help us to better understand the development of clinical reasoning skills.


Author(s):  
Rakhmania Wulandari ◽  
Febi Ariani Saragih

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas isi buku ajar Marugoto: Bahasa dan Kebudayaan Jepang A1 ditinjau dari ranah kognitif taksonomi Bloom.  Kualitas buku ajar menjadi pertimbangan pengajar dalam menentukan buku ajar yang baik untuk digunakan. Menelaah kualitas buku ajar dapat dilakukan dengan menggunakan teori belajar taksonomi Bloom. Taksonomi Bloom adalah pengelompokan belajar berdasarkan tingkatan belajar. Yaitu belajar tingkat rendah yang terdiri dari kualifikasi C1 (mengingat), C2 (memahami), dan C3 (mengaplikasikan), serta belajar tingkat tinggi yang terdiri dari kualifikasi  C4 (menganalisis), C5 (mengevaluasi), dan C6 (mencipta).Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Sumber data utama adalah buku ajar Marugoto rikai dan katsudou. Analisis dilakukan dengan menganalisis bahan ajar menggunakan kualifikasi kognitif pada taksonomi Bloom. Hasil Analisis menunjukkan bahwa buku Marugoto A1 mencapai hasil yang sangat baik pada kualifikasi C1, C2, C3, C4; hasil analisis baik pada C5, dan  hasil analisis sangat kurang pada C6. Materi yang disajikan mewakili kata kerja operasioanal dalam memenuhi kebutuhan belajar tingkat rendah dengan sangat baik, namun hanya cukup mewakili kata kerja operasional dalam memenuhi kebutuhan belajar tingkat tinggi.   This research is aimed to find out the quality of Marugoto's textbook content: Japanese Language and Culture A1 from the cognitive aspects of Bloom's taxonomy. The quality of textbooks becomes the teacher's consideration in determining which textbooks are best used. Reviewing the quality of textbooks can be done using Bloom's theory of taxonomic learning. Bloom's Taxonomy is a learning grouping based on the level of learning. That is a low level study consisting of qualifications C1 (remembering), C2 (understanding), and C3 (applying), as well as a high-level learning consisting of C4 qualifying (analyzing), C5 (evaluating), and C6 (creating). is a qualitative descriptive research. The main data sources are Marugoto rikai and katsudou textbooks. The analysis was done by analyzing the teaching materials using cognitive qualifications on Bloom's taxonomy. The analysis shows that Marugoto: Language and Culture of Japan A1 achieved excellent results on qualification C1, C2, C3, C4, good analytical results on C5, and the result of analysis is very less on C6. The material presented represents operational verbs in meeting low-level learning needs very well, but only enough to represent operational verbs in meeting high-level learning needs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatine Merieme BELARBI ◽  
Abdelkader BENSAFA

The Algerian English foreign language (EFL) baccalaureate is a high stake exam that assesses both students’ learning and their critical thinking skills. Thus, devising appropriate and effective exam questions may be a problematic issue for tests designers. Under the requirements of the current Algerian English curriculum, the exam questions must cover the lower and higher-order thinking skills of Bloom’s taxonomy. On this basis, this research paper seeks to investigate the effectiveness of the EFL baccalaureate exam papers, and aims to answer the research question: ‘To what extent does the Algerian EFL Baccalaureate exam paper cover the lower and higher-order thinking skills of Bloom’s taxonomy?’ This research is a descriptive content analysis; the researcher analyzed the exam questions of the Algerian EFL Baccalaureate under the cognitive domains of Bloom’s taxonomy. This study is significant as it helps tests’ designers to design practical EFL exams that develop students’ thinking skills and language competencies. The findings of this study revealed that the EFL baccalaureate exam does not establish the students’ higher-order thinking skills and does not assess their communicative abilities. Accordingly, some recommendations are suggested to hopefully help test designers to improve the quality of the EFL Baccalaureate questions.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hajar Istiqomah ◽  
Titik Sugiarti ◽  
Lioni Anka Monalisa ◽  
Toto’ Bara Setiawan ◽  
Erfan Yudianto

Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) is an ability that can create students in critical and creative individuals. The ways that can be used to reveal students' high-level thinking skills by using contextual problems in learning. The purpose of this study was to describe the profile of high order thinking of 8th-grade students in solving contextual problems regarding slerek boat. This research is a type of descriptive research with a qualitative approach. The research subjects were 8thH grade students of  SMPN 1 Muncar, which amounted to 28 students. Data retrieval using test questions and interview activities. From the results of data collection, the results show that the ability of 8thH grade students tends to be able to solve questions at the evaluation level. This can be seen from the results of the test questions where there is 1 student who can solve the question of creation level (C6), 22 students can solve the question of the level of evaluation (C5) and 5 students can solve the level of analysis (C4). Based on the results of interviews, students who can solve the question level C5 have good ability in analyzing problems can explain the settlement process both orally and in writing, besides that it’s also able to make a hypothesis and test the hypothesis made previously


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
Ganda Hijrah Selaras ◽  
Yuni Ahda ◽  
Heffi Alberida ◽  
Tri Putri Wahyuni

High Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) requires students to connect, analyze, and also transform their knowledges and experiences. To determine students' high-level thinking skills, we can use assessment instruments. A good instrument should be valid and reliable so it is feasible to measure and assess what it wants to be measured and assessed. Therefore it is necessary to know the level of validity and reliability of the higher order thinking assessment instruments. The instrument used in this study in the scope of biology material. This type of research is descriptive research. The subjects of this study were students of grade X MIPA 5 SMA 5 Padang. Based on the results of data analysis, the assessment instrument of high order thinking skill on biological scope material is logically valid, empirical valid and reliable.


Ta dib ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Iqlas Sari AS ◽  
Ade Dewi Maharani ◽  
Yosmed Hidayat

This study aims to produce instruments that can measure the level of students' higher order thinking skills that are valid and practical for students of class XI SMA. The developed instrument contains 40 multiple choice questions, and 10 essay questions consisting Taxonomy Levels C4, C5, and C6 with indicators of high-level thinking critical thinking, decision making, problem solving and creative thinking. This  research used the Research and Development (R&D) type of Tessmer's modified formative evaluation with the stages of self-evaluation, prototyping (expert review, one-to-one, and small group). The result of tis research indicates that the instrument for measuring higher order thinking skills in class XI Biology SMA students developed is categorized as very valid and very practical with the validity value of expert rivew very valid (89.9%), one-to-one is very valid (87, 5%)). And the practical value of teachers is very practical (91.33%), and students are very practical (87.15%).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document