Consciousness, Metacognition, & Perceptual Reality Monitoring

Author(s):  
Hakwan Lau

I introduce an empirically-grounded version of a higher-order theory of conscious perception. Traditionally, theories of consciousness either focus on the global availability of conscious information, or take conscious phenomenology as a brute fact due to some biological or basic representational properties. Here I argue instead that the key to characterizing the consciousness lies in its connections to belief formation and epistemic justification on a subjective level.

Author(s):  
J. Christopher Maloney

Carruthers proposes a subtle dispositionalist rendition of higher order theory regarding phenomenal character. The theory would distinguish unconscious movement management from conscious attitude management as perceptual processes. Each process takes perceptual representations as inputs. A representation subject to attitude management is apt to induce a higher order representation of itself that secures a self-referential aspect of its content supposedly determinative of phenomenal character. Unfortunately, the account requires a problematic cognitive ambiguity while failing to explain why attitude, but not movement, management, determines character. Moreover, normal variation in attitudinal management conflicts with the constancy typical of phenomenal character. And although an agent denied perceptual access to a scene about which she is otherwise well informed would suffer no phenomenal character, dispositionalist theory entails otherwise. Such problems, together with the results of the previous chapters, suggest that, whether cloaked under intentionalism or higher order theory, representationalism mistakes content for character.


Author(s):  
J. Christopher Maloney

Rosenthal's rendition of representationalism denies intentionalism. His higher order theory instead asserts that a perceptual state's phenomenal character is set by that state's being related to, because represented by, another, but higher order, cognitive state. The theory arises from the doubtful supposition of unconscious perception and mistakenly construes intrinsic phenomenal character extrinsically, as one state's serving as the content of another. Yet it remains mysterious how and why a higher order state might be so potent as to determine phenomenal character at all. Better to resist higher order theory’s embrace of dubious unconscious perceptual states and account for states so-called simply in terms of humdrum mnemonic malfeasance. Moreover, since the suspect theory allows higher order misrepresentation, it implies sufferance of impossible phenomenal character. Equally problematic, representationalism pitched at the higher order entails the existence of bogus phenomenal character when upstairs states represent downstairs nonperceptual states.


Author(s):  
David Rosenthal

Dennett’s account of consciousness starts from third-person considerations. I argue this is wise, since beginning with first-person access precludes accommodating the third-person access we have to others’ mental states. But Dennett’s first-person operationalism, which seeks to save the first person in third-person, operationalist terms, denies the occurrence of folk-psychological states that one doesn’t believe oneself to be in, and so the occurrence of folk-psychological states that aren’t conscious. This conflicts with Dennett’s intentional-stance approach to the mental, on which we discern others’ mental states independently of those states’ being conscious. We can avoid this conflict with a higher-order theory of consciousness, which saves the spirit of Dennett’s approach, but enables us to distinguish conscious folk-psychological states from nonconscious ones. The intentional stance by itself can’t do this, since it can’t discern a higher-order awareness of a psychological state. But we can supplement the intentional stance with the higher-order theoretical apparatus.


2017 ◽  
pp. 172-224
Author(s):  
O.E. Barndorff-Nielsen ◽  
D.R. Cox

2017 ◽  
pp. 119-142
Author(s):  
O.E. Barndorff-Nielsen ◽  
D.R. Cox

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 1950024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Tian ◽  
Renchuan Ye ◽  
Peng Ren ◽  
Pengming Jiang ◽  
Zengtao Chen ◽  
...  

Two higher-order analytical models based on a new higher-order theory for sandwich plates with flexible cores are developed considering the effect of the core material density and skin-to-core-stiffness-ratio (SCSR). The main difference between the two models is the role of the flexible core in the dynamic response of sandwich plates with cores of different stiffnesses. Firstly, the governing equations of a simply supported sandwich plate with a flexible core are derived based on the two models, and the analytical solutions are determined by using Navier’s approach. Then, the free vibration, static, dynamic bending and stress field characteristics of the sandwich plates with different SCSRs are investigated. The results obtained by the proposed method are compared with other published results. In particular, an accuracy assessment of the present dynamic models is conducted for different SCSRs. Finally, conclusions on the applicability of the proposed method and other theories on sandwich plates with different SCSRs are drawn.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document