scholarly journals Narrow Specificity of Pessimistic Attribution Style and other Attribution Styles in Clinically Diagnosed Anxiety Disorders: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROSHAN LAL DEWANGAN
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Vulnerability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Attribution Style ◽  
International Classification Of Disease ◽  
Diagnostic And Statistical Manual ◽  
Attribution Biases ◽  
Attribution Styles ◽  
Attribution Bias

Objective: Research has established that cognitive vulnerability has a role in mood disorder. Researchers have taken a keen interest in exploring the role of pessimistic attribution style (PAS) found in depression, expecting that it can also explain comorbid disorders to depression. The objectives of this systematic review are to explore the narrow specificity of PAS, and to search for other attribution style, if any, in anxiety disorders. Method: PubMed, Research4Life and APA PsycArticles® databases were searched for relevant articles recorded up to May 18, 2021. All published empirical articles, systematic review or meta-analysis, which included at least any of the anxiety disorders diagnosed using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM, APA) or International Classification of Disease (ICD, WHO) in the context of attribution bias, were included. Title, abstract and methodology of the publications were screened for potential selection. Risk of bias in the reviewed articles was assessed using the GRADE system. Result: Total 628 records were screened, out of which 19 were found eligible for inclusion. Result suggests narrow specificity of PAS has limited evidence and studies lack a rigorous methodology to establish it. Conclusion: There is indication that various attribution biases can be present in different anxiety disorders including those reported in depression.

Two decades of digital interventions for anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Darin Pauley ◽  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
Davide Papola ◽  
Clara Miguel ◽  
Eirini Karyotaki
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bibliographic Databases ◽  
Wait List ◽  
Digital Interventions ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Digital interventions for anxiety disorders are a promising solution to address barriers to evidence-based treatment access. Precise and powerful estimates of digital intervention effectiveness for anxiety disorders are necessary for further adoption in practice. The present systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of digital interventions across all anxiety disorders and specific to each disorder v. wait-list and care-as-usual controls. Methods A systematic search of bibliographic databases identified 15 030 abstracts from inception to 1 January 2020. Forty-seven randomized controlled trials (53 comparisons; 4958 participants) contributed to the meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were conducted by an anxiety disorder, risk of bias, treatment support, recruitment, location and treatment adherence. Results A large, pooled effect size of g = 0.80 [95% Confidence Interval: 0.68–0.93] was found in favor of digital interventions. Moderate to large pooled effect sizes favoring digital interventions were found for generalized anxiety disorder (g = 0.62), mixed anxiety samples (g = 0.68), panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (g = 1.08) and social anxiety disorder (g = 0.76) subgroups. No subgroups were significantly different or related to the pooled effect size. Notably, the effects of guided interventions (g = 0.84) and unguided interventions (g = 0.64) were not significantly different. Supplemental analysis comparing digital and face-to-face interventions (9 comparisons; 683 participants) found no significant difference in effect [g = 0.14 favoring digital interventions; Confidence Interval: −0.01 to 0.30]. Conclusion The precise and powerful estimates found further justify the application of digital interventions for anxiety disorders in place of wait-list or usual care.

Cognitive-behavioural therapy for late-life anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2008 ◽  
Vol 117 (6) ◽  
pp. 403-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. J. Hendriks ◽  
R. C. Oude Voshaar ◽  
G. P. J. Keijsers ◽  
C. A. L. Hoogduin ◽  
A. J. L. M. van Balkom
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Late Life ◽  
Behavioural Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioural

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Anxiety and Depression in Youth With Epilepsy

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amelia J Scott ◽  
Louise Sharpe ◽  
Max Loomes ◽  
Milena Gandy
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Separation Anxiety Disorder ◽  
Anxiety And Depression ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Pooled Prevalence

Abstract Objective The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an estimate of the prevalence of anxiety and depressive disorders in youth with epilepsy (YWE). It also aimed to calculate the overall magnitude of observed differences in anxiety and depressive symptoms reported by YWE compared with healthy controls and investigate whether any factors moderated anxiety and depression outcomes in YWE. Methods Following prospective registration, electronic databases were searched up until October 2018. Studies were included if they reported on the rate of anxiety or depression in samples of YWE, and/or if they used valid measures of anxious or depressive symptomatology in YWE compared with a healthy control sample. Results Twenty-three studies met inclusion criteria. The overall pooled prevalence of anxiety disorders in YWE was 18.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 12.0%–28.5%), and for depression the pooled prevalence was 13.5% (95% CI 8.8%–20.2%). In samples of YWE compared with healthy controls, significantly higher anxiety (d = 0.57, 95% CI 0.32–0.83, p < .000) and depressive (d = 0.42, 95% CI 0.16–0.68, p < .000) symptomatology was reported. Conclusions YWE report anxiety and depressive disorders and symptoms to a significantly higher degree than youth without epilepsy. There is also evidence that certain anxiety disorders (e.g. generalized anxiety disorder, separation anxiety disorder) are particularly elevated, perhaps reflecting the unique impact of epilepsy on youth psychopathology. Research is needed to understand the risk factors associated with anxiety and depressive disorders in epilepsy, and better understand how these symptoms change across development.

scholarly journals Anxiety disorders and risk of stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Pérez-Piñar ◽  
L. Ayerbe ◽  
E. González ◽  
R. Mathur ◽  
Q. Foguet-Boreu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Explanatory Factors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Severe Anxiety

AbstractBackgroundAnxiety disorders are the most common mental health problem worldwide. However, the evidence on the association between anxiety disorders and risk of stroke is limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis presents a critical appraisal and summary of the available evidence on the association between anxiety disorders and risk of stroke.MethodsCohort studies reporting risk of stroke among patients with anxiety disorders were searched in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and the Web of Science, from database inception to June 2016. The quality of the studies was assessed using standard criteria. A meta-analysis was undertaken to obtain pooled estimates of the risk of stroke among patients with anxiety disorders.ResultsEight studies, including 950,759 patients, from the 11,764 references initially identified, were included in this review. A significantly increased risk of stroke for patients with anxiety disorders was observed, with an overall hazard ratio: 1.24 (1.09–1.41), P = 0.001. No significant heterogeneity between studies was detected and the funnel plot suggested that publication bias was unlikely. Limited evidence suggests that the risk of stroke is increased shortly after the diagnosis of anxiety and that risk of stroke may be higher for patients with severe anxiety.ConclusionsAnxiety disorders are a very prevalent modifiable condition associated with risk of stroke increased by 24%. This evidence could inform the development of interventions for the management of anxiety and the prevention of stroke. Further studies on the risk of stroke in patients with anxiety, and the explanatory factors for this association, are required.

scholarly journals Propranolol for the treatment of anxiety disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serge A Steenen ◽  
Arjen J van Wijk ◽  
Geert JMG van der Heijden ◽  
Roos van Westrhenen ◽  
Jan de Lange ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis

Anxiety disorders in postpartum women: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 203 ◽  
pp. 292-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janice H. Goodman ◽  
Grace R. Watson ◽  
Brendon Stubbs
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Postpartum Women
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document