Behavioral decision research is not a Linda problem: Comment on Regenwetter, Robinson, and Wang (in press)
Keyword(s):
Regenwetter, Robinson, and Wang (in press) argue that research on decision making is plagued with conjunction fallacies or “Linda Effects”. As a case study, they provide a critical analysis of Kahneman and Tversky’s seminal paper on Prospect Theory and its 1992 sequel. This commentary evaluates their criticisms and ultimately finds them to be predicated on a number of misconceptions. As argued below, a reliance on stylized effects at the aggregate level is perfectly legitimate when dismissing a received view and first proposing a new account that organizes said effects in theoretically-meaningful ways.
2018 ◽
Vol 232
(6)
◽
pp. 710-724
◽
2017 ◽
Vol 35
(2)
◽
pp. 160-183
◽
2013 ◽
Vol 12
(03)
◽
pp. 619-645
◽
2013 ◽
Vol 12
(04)
◽
pp. 711-727
◽
Keyword(s):
2013 ◽
Vol 8
(2)
◽
Keyword(s):