scholarly journals Patents and Allied Rights: A Global Kaleidoscope

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Burk
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent System ◽  
Technical Innovation ◽  
Utility Models ◽  
Alternative Solutions ◽  
Theoretical Issues ◽  
Widespread Interest ◽  
Plant Breeders Rights

Patents, along with the related systems of utility models and plant breeders' rights, are the forms of intellectual property most closely associated with technological innovation. Currently some form of patent system is found in essentially all modern states, and patents have grown to be a ubiquitous feature of the global legal and technical environment. Patents and related rights are therefore highly dynamic areas of law, displaying constant evolution of doctrine simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions. The shifting diversity of national approaches offers an opportunity to consider how characteristic themes and problems of patent law have been approached from different perspectives, and lend a sense of better, worse, and alternative solutions to the problem of prompting technical innovation. Consequently, this chapter surveys particular doctrinal problems in patent law, using them to illustrate both broad theoretical issues endemic to the patent system, and tying those issues to ongoing controversies that have attracted widespread interest.

Patents and Related Rights

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan L. Burk
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent System ◽  
Technical Innovation ◽  
Utility Models ◽  
Alternative Solutions ◽  
Theoretical Issues ◽  
Widespread Interest ◽  
Plant Breeders Rights

Patents, along with the related systems of utility models and plant breeders’ rights, are the forms of intellectual property most closely associated with technological innovation. Some form of patent system is found in essentially all modern states, and patents have become a ubiquitous feature of the global legal and technical environment. Patents and related rights are therefore highly dynamic areas of law, displaying constant evolution of doctrine simultaneously in multiple jurisdictions. The shifting diversity of national approaches offers an opportunity to consider how characteristic themes and problems of patent law have been approached from different perspectives, and lend a sense of better, worse, and alternative solutions to the problem of prompting technical innovation. Consequently, this chapter surveys particular doctrinal problems in patent law and allied laws, uses them to illustrate both broad theoretical issues endemic to such laws, and ties those issues to ongoing controversies that have attracted widespread interest.

International Seminar – Contributions to the Development Agenda on Intellectual Property Rights

2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Celia Castro ◽  
Maria Beatriz Amorim Bohrer
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent System ◽  
International Seminar ◽  
Development Agenda

TRIPS as it stands is against the interests of developing countries, and needsreform. In developing their own patent law, developing countries need to recognizethat there is now near consensus among informed observers that patentlaw and practice have, in some cases, overshot, and need to be reformed. Thatis the burden of the recent NAS/NRC report on “A Patent System for the 21stCentury.

scholarly journals INDONESIAN PATENT SYSTEM: AN OVERVIEW

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Prabodh M. ◽  
Chaitanya Prasad K. ◽  
Ashish S. ◽  
Suthakaran R. ◽  
Abhijit K.
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Intellectual Property Protection ◽  
Patent System ◽  
Grace Period

Intellectual property protection is a one type of protection to the innovator from their creative efforts. On November 1, 1991, the Indonesian Parliament passed Law No. 6/1989 on Patents. The new law came into effect on August 1, 1991. The patenting system in Indonesia is discussed using some recent statistics and their fees, patent exclusivity, litigation, grace period. As of 1989, there have been over 13,000 applications for temporary patent registration, 96% of which were of foreign origins. None of the applications were denied, were ever granted because no patent Law existed. In this paper discussed brief introduction about Indonesia patent system.

12 The Intellectual Property–Competition Interface

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng Thomas K
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Competition Law ◽  
Process Innovation ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent System ◽  
Competition Rules ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The One ◽  
Competition Interface

This chapter focuses on the interface between intellectual property and competition laws. The interface is the most complex between competition law on the one hand and patent law on the other hand. Developing countries only engage in what can be called laggard innovation, which includes acquisition of tacit knowledge, imitation, and process innovation. This may call for a reconsideration of the appropriate approach to the patent–competition interface in developing countries because laggard innovations, with the exception of process innovation, are not the subject of protection of the patent system. If laggard innovations are not the subject matter of protection of the patent system, the patent-competition rules should have little relevance for the quest for innovations in developing countries. In fact, one can argue that the patent system is an impediment to one of the main sources of laggard innovation, imitation, and that the patent-competition rules should be adjusted in a way to facilitate it if one were serious about adopting a pro-growth approach to competition law enforcement in developing countries. This implies that for developing countries that do not produce patentable innovations, there is no need to balance between patent and competition policies. There is in fact no conflict between these two policy objectives. Intellectual property rights and Market-sharing and customer allocation Enforcement and procedure

Development of the intellectual property service in Ukraine on the example of the Institute of oilseed crops of the NAAS

2021 ◽  
pp. 137-145
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
World Intellectual Property Organization ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
Oilseed Crops ◽  
Utility Models ◽  
The Creation

The history of development of industrial property of Ukraine, objects of intellectual property and relations which arise at their creation and use are considered. The main results of scientific research on the creation of intellectual property of the Institute of Oilseed Crops of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine (hereinafter IOC NAAS) are highlighted and analyzed. The research was conducted as part of the ongoing monitoring of intellectual property legislation on the legal protection of research results of the IOC NAAS and as part of marketing and patent research to position the institution as an originator of oilseeds. The purpose of the research is to investigate changes in the legislation on industrial property of Ukraine, intellectual property objects and relations that arise during their creation and use, to analyze the main results of scientific research on the creation of intellectual property objects of IOC NAAS (2001–2020). In the process of research, for a detailed study of the stages of the formation of patent legislation, legislative and regulatory acts of Ukraine were used concerning the regulation of intellectual activity and intellectual property, materials from professional periodicals, articles and abstracts published in scientific collections and materials of scientific and practical conferences, Internet resources, monographs and printed works of scientists, manuals, patents and inventions for useful models of the IOC NAAS. Research methods – quantitative, qualitative and comparative analysis. Methodology – according to the algorithm of constant monitoring and conducting patent and marketing research. The term "intellectual property" was first used in the Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), adopted in Stockholm on July 14, 1967, and since then the term has been used in international conventions and legislation in many countries. The day of the adoption of the Law of Ukraine «On Property» in 1991 is considered to be the beginning of the formation of the legislation of Ukraine on intellectual property. This law for the first time recognized the results of intellectual activity as objects of property rights. At present, ensuring the implementation of state policy in the field of protection of rights to inventions and utility models in Ukraine is provided by the Ukrainian Institute of Intellectual Property (Ukrpatent) and belongs to the Ministry of Economic Development of Ukraine. IOC NAAS – a leading scientific institution in genetics, biotechnology, breeding and cultivation of basic and niche oilseeds, which focuses on the development of theoretical foundations of breeding, creation of modern breeding material, development of optimal agricultural techniques for its cultivation, organization of primary and industrial seed production, for the development and improvement of technical means and machines for separation, purification and waste-free processing of oilseeds. During the existence of the IOC NAAS, scientists have created 87 objects of patent law. The novelty and originality of scientific developments are confirmed by patents for inventions and utility models. At the time of writing, the Institute supports 23 patents.

scholarly journals Awarded with Economic Growth, from Weak to Strong Patent Legislation: Legal Study with Regard to China

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 6-15
Author(s):  
Shaghayegh Haji Bagher Naeeni
Keyword(s):  
Economic Growth ◽  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent System ◽  
International Standards ◽  
World Intellectual Property Organization ◽  
Critical Legal Study ◽  
Chinese Market ◽  
Legal Study ◽  
Chinese Patent

This paper provides a critical legal study on evaluation of patent system in China from the year1980, which is known as the beginning of Chinese modern intellectual property law including patent law till 2016 that China achieved third place in Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) internationally for the highest patent applications according to World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).  Moreover, researcher will go through few important push factors for Chinese patent legislator who developed stronger Patent law to attract more national and international inventors for investing in Chinese market without hesitation of their patent rights being infringed due to weak legislation. In other words, how China realized that being in the era of globalization for improving economic growth, it should consider at least minimum international standards in its own patent legislation. Hence, the method used in this paper will be purely a doctrine method, because the researcher will be conducting the critical legal study on mentioned aspects, which involves collecting of data from primary and secondary sources. The process involved in this research is a collative process. However, still there is room for improvement in current Chinese patent system, which will be discussed in this paper. All in all, the researcher concluded that concept of globalization is undeniable in national as well as the international market in order to have a reasonable economic growth for the same reason China had considered having stronger patent legislation in order to save its position in the market and also to increase its own rate of economic growth. On the other hand, the paper concludes by putting forward suggestions for modifying Chinese patent system.  

scholarly journals The Patent Crisis and How Courts Can Solve It

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Lemley
Keyword(s):  
Technological Innovation ◽  
Prescription Drugs ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent System ◽  
University Of Chicago ◽  
The University ◽  
University Of Chicago Press

Patent law is crucial to encourage technological innovation. But as thepatent system currently stands, diverse industries from pharmaceuticals tosoftware to semiconductors are all governed by the same rules even thoughthey innovate very differently. The result is a crisis in the patentsystem, where patents calibrated to the needs of prescription drugs wreakhavoc on information technologies and vice versa. According to Dan L. Burkand Mark A. Lemley in this book from the University of Chicago Press,courts should use the tools the patent system already gives them to treatpatents in different industries differently. Industry tailoring is the onlyway to provide an appropriate level of incentive for each industry.

scholarly journals United patent court of the EC: organizational and economic-legal basis of functioning

2019 ◽  
pp. 34-43
Author(s):  
H.O. Androshchuk ◽  
L.I. Rabotiahova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Economic Factor ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent System ◽  
European Patent ◽  
Association Agreement ◽  
Unified Patent Court ◽  
The Eu

The EU’s system for dealing with patent law disputes provides that disputes concerning the same European patent may be considered in parallel in different EU member states. To prevent such shortcomings from adversely affecting the transparency and functioning of the market, it was decided to introduce a Unified Patent Court in the EU patent system. The required package of documents (“patent package”) is intended to make the most valuable changes in the legal regulation of the protection and protection of inventions in the EU over the past 40 years. The article discusses the role and place of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) in the EU patent system. The organizational and economic-legal aspects of the creation and operation of a specialized patent court with exclusive jurisdiction for court proceedings related to European and unified EU patents: structure of the court, composition of judges, language of processes are analyzed. financial activities, organizational and procedural provisions, litigation costs and fees. It is emphasized that the economic factor is the key issue of the effective existence of the EU patent system. The experience of creating the Unified Patent Court will be interesting for Ukraine, which has chosen the path to create a specialized court in the field of intellectual property, because approximately one fifth of the Association Agreement with the EU concerns the unification of the legislation of Ukraine and the EU in the field of intellectual property

PROTECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXPLORATION OF OUTER SPACE

2019 ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
A.V. Bagrov
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
Outer Space ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Patent Holder ◽  
Space Flights ◽  
Innovative Solutions ◽  
Space Law ◽  
Uncertain Time

Patent law, which arose at the beginning of the industrial revolution and protects the rights of the patent holder solely on the territory of patenting, does not apply to inventions used in outer space. Space is not included in any patenting territory. It is necessary on a new basis to form the space law on the protection of innovative solutions, which will take into account the uncertain time between the filing of an application for an invention and its first use in space. Now it often exceeds the generally accepted period of validity of patents. For space patents, it is advisable to establish their validity for at least 50 years from the date of first use. All outer space, including all objects located in it, is proposed to be declared a single patent territory. It is necessary to exclude duties on the maintenance of patents used in space flights, if they are used only by the developer or are transferred to them for free leasing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document