scholarly journals How to write ‘method’ in scientific journal article

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Jay N Shah

Not available.Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences. 2015 Dec;2(2):1-2

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay N Shah

Not available.Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences. 2015 Jun;2(1):1-2


2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Jay N Shah

Not available.Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2016, page: 1-3


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 230-233
Author(s):  
Veronica Phillips ◽  
Eleanor Barker

This article provides an overview of writing for publication in peer-reviewed journals. While the main focus is on writing a research article, it also provides guidance on factors influencing journal selection, including journal scope, intended audience for the findings, open access requirements, and journal citation metrics. Finally, it covers the standard content of a scientific journal article, providing general advice and guidance regarding the information researchers would typically include in their published papers.


10.28945/3435 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samie Li Shang Ly ◽  
Raafat George Saadé

In this study we combine an immersive learning environment, an evidence based management method and the knowledge management SECI mindset to investigate students’ learning from scientific journal articles. The study entailed the use of a web-based peer to peer system (P2PS) that, gives an identified subject matter, engages students in extracting knowledge from a source, processes that knowledge to create new knowledge, assesses each other’s works, and then creates a test on the subject matter. We found that the immersive learning environment engaged students and improved their examination performance. However, comparing two groups, exposed versus not exposed to scientific journal article, both focused on keywords alone for the knowledge processing. This was not a desirable outcome from the knowledge management process and the tool. We believe this outcome is a result of engrained traditional learning and driven by our wish to make a change in educational practice, we propose our e-pedagogy methodology as a learning foundation for knowledge processing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Jay N Shah

 Abstract is the ‘mini article’. It provides the background, the context, the purpose of the study. Briefly it describes the methods- where, how the participants were recruited, study design, variables studied, analytical methods and ethical issues. The findings are in line with the objectives and methods and its significance to draw the conclusions. The key words are listed at the end, in the journal style. Abstract is indexed and freely available. Thus, the information must confer to text. There is a word limit, usually of 250 words. Thus it requires time and skill to include important information with logical flow to ‘capture’ the essence of full article. The ‘copy-paste’ of sections from the main content should not be done because there is word limit. For example, there are only two to three lines of 20-30 words space for the ‘background’ in the abstract, unlike the 150 to 200 words for introduction section in the main article. Majority of readers, as much as three quarters, read only abstract after scanning for the title, and do not proceed to read full article due to unavailability of free-full-text or simply too many articles available on the net. Thus, abstract should contain as much information as possible in a concise form. Many non-English language journals publish abstract in English, which are indexed on various repository. Thus it is important to give time to write abstract, to ‘hook’ the readers and peers as well as increase visibility of the article. Even though, abstract appears at the beginning of the manuscript, it should be written when the article writing is completed. This allows elaborating upon key aspects of the paper, yet being concise, to help readers ‘want’ to read the rest of the paper. There is often a question, especially for the beginners, to decide how much information is enough in the abstract. This is not that difficult to comprehend; a simple logic is consider- ‘if the abstract is the only part of the paper accessible’, it the story complete? As a reader or peer, are you happy with the amount of information, and if the answer is "no" then it has to be revised. The information in the abstract must make sense of the full article.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung Hee Joung ◽  
Jennifer Rowley ◽  
Laura Sbaffi

This article seeks to extend the knowledge of the behaviour and attitudes towards open access publishing through a survey that focusses on the attitudes and behaviours of academic researchers in Korea working in medicine and healthcare. Issues covered include: use of and intentions regarding OAP, and perceptions regarding advantages and disadvantages of OAP, journal article publication services, peer review, and re-use. A significant proportion of the articles (mean 58%) published by this group are published gold open access, consistent with the push in Korea towards international impact for their research. Researchers were more positive about the benefits of OAP than they were negative about its disadvantages. Analysis of responses on the basis of gender, and experience in publishing, showed some significant differences in attitudes to some statements.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document