Evaluation of Perceived Technical Skill Development by Students During Instruction in Dental Extractions in Different Laboratory Settings—A Pilot Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 399-407
Author(s):  
Amy Thomson ◽  
Karen M. Young ◽  
Simon Lygo-Baker ◽  
Chad Lothamer ◽  
Christopher J. Snyder
Author(s):  
Jamie S. Switzer

Colleges and universities are adept at teaching students in the academic sense. Often what is lacking in a student’s education is a thorough grasp of the “real world”; how their chosen field actually functions and operates. One way for students to gain an understanding of a particular occupation is to interact with a mentor. Mentors can offer valuable intellectual resources to students (O’Neil & Gomez, 1996). Regardless of the quality of their education, students still need the practical information that can only be provided by a working professional who can present students an awareness of the real world (O’Neil, 2001). A mentor, however, is much, much more than a professional with unique expertise in a specific vocation. While mentors do provide career knowledge and the means for technical skill development, mentors can offer a myriad of services. They provide support, encouragement, and guidance. Mentors act as role models, teaching and nurturing students, demonstrating appropriate skills and behaviors. They are friends to students, providing them a means to network and find jobs.


2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Lustenberger ◽  
Anne-Laure Mouthon ◽  
Noemi Tesler ◽  
Salome Kurth ◽  
Maya Ringli ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjstel-2020-000812
Author(s):  
Rodrigo J Daly Guris ◽  
Christina R Miller ◽  
Adam Schiavi ◽  
Serkan Toy

IntroductionUnderstanding performance differences between learners may provide useful context for optimising medical education. This pilot study aimed to explore a technique to contextualise performance differences through retrospective secondary analyses of two randomised controlled simulation studies. One study focused on speaking up (non-technical skill); the other focused on oxygen desaturation management (technical skill).MethodsWe retrospectively analysed data from two independent simulation studies conducted in 2017 and 2018. We used multivariate hierarchical cluster analysis to explore whether participants in each study formed homogenous performance clusters. We then used mixed-design analyses of variance and χ2 analyses to examine whether reported task load differences or demographic variables were associated with cluster membership.ResultsIn both instances, a two-cluster solution emerged; one cluster represented trainees exhibiting higher performance relative to peers in the second cluster. Cluster membership was independent of experimental allocation in each of the original studies. There were no discernible demographic differences between cluster members. Performance differences between clusters persisted for at least 8 months for the non-technical skill but quickly disappeared following simulation training for the technical skill. High performers in speaking up initially reported lower task load than standard performers, a difference that disappeared over time. There was no association between performance and task load during desaturation management.ConclusionThis pilot study suggests that cluster analysis can be used to objectively identify high-performing trainees for both a technical and a non-technical skill as observed in a simulated clinical setting. Non-technical skills may be more difficult to teach and retain than purely technical ones, and there may be an association between task load and initial non-technical performance. Further study is needed to understand what factors may confer inherent performance advantages, whether these advantages translate to clinical performance and how curricula can best be designed to drive targeted improvement for individual trainees.


2010 ◽  
Vol 163 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne M. Carter ◽  
Brette M. Wilson ◽  
Erin Hall ◽  
M. Blair Marshall

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Salazar ◽  
Simon Erridge ◽  
Jasmine Winter Beatty ◽  
Ara Darzi ◽  
Sanjay Purkayastha ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Technical skill is associated with improved postoperative outcomes. Adoption of a formalised high-stakes assessment of surgical skill is technically challenging and limited by the financial and human resources available. We aimed to assess the ability to adopt gaze behaviour analysis as an assessment of surgical skill within live open inguinal herniorrhaphy. Methods Surgeons’ gaze was measured with Tobii Pro eye-tracking Glasses 2 (Tobii AB). All grades of surgeons were included. Primary outcomes were dwell time (%) and fixation frequency (count/s), as markers of cognition, on areas of interest correlated to mean Objective Skill Assessment of Technical Skill score. Secondary outcomes assessed effort and concentration levels through maximum pupil diameter (mm) and rate of pupil change (mm/s) correlated to perceived workload (SURG-TLX). Three operative segments underwent analysis: mesh preparation, fixation and muscle closure. Spearman’s and Pearson’s correlation were performed with significance set at p < 0.05. Results 5 cases were analysed, totalling 270 minutes of video footage. All participants were senior surgical trainees and right-hand-dominant. The median number of hernia operations performed was 160 (range:100-500). The median ASA score of each patient participant was 2 (range:1-2). The median operation length was 45 mins (range:40-90 mins). There were no statistically significant primary outcomes from this pilot data (p > 0.05). Conclusions This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of recording gaze behaviours for comparison against formal skills assessment to determine the role of eye tracking in live high stakes technical skills assessment. A full study will now commence based on formal power calculation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document