scholarly journals Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in surgery of nephrolithiasis

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-52
Author(s):  
Аndriy Sahalevych ◽  
Roman Sergiychuk ◽  
Vladislav Ozhohin ◽  
Olexandr Vozianov ◽  
Andriy Khrapchuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Lower Complication Rate ◽  
Tract Infections ◽  
Free Rate

Abstract. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL) in comparison with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy (sPNL) for the treatment of complex nephrolithiasis. Methods. During the period from 2012 to 2020, 1021 patients with solitary (10.0-30.0 mm), staghorn and multiple renal calculi were retrospectively divided into two groups: sPNL (500 patients) and mPNL (521 patients). The groups were compared by the stone-free rate (%, SFR), the duration of the surgery, complications and hospital stay. Results. SPNL and mPNL were highly effective procedures for the treatment of nephrolithiasis. The mPNL group had longer operative times (81.0±15.5 vs 69.1±13.9 min, p<0.001) and higher frequency tubeless/totally tubeless procedures (41.1 vs 6.8%, p<0.001). mPNL showed a higher SFR (96.4 vs 91.8%, р=0.002 in patients with complete staghorn (90.1 vs 77.3%, p<0.05) and multiple kidney stones (89.5 vs 70.8%, p=0.03). Postoperative decrease in hemoglobin was lower in mPNL group 1.1±0.34 vs 2.1±0.26 g/dl (p<0.001). The incidence rate of urinary tract infections and postoperative hospital stay was lower in the mPNL group: 7.3 vs 13.2%, p=0.03 and 1.9±0.6 vs 4.3±2.4 days, р<0.001. Conclusions. MPNL is a safe and effective treatment for patients with complex renal stones with an improved stone-free rate and lower complication rate and shorter hospital stay. Smaller diameter tract in mPNL procedures was associated with a longer duration of surgery.

scholarly journals Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery for treatment of staghorn stones in pediatric patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed R. EL-Nahas ◽  
Ahmed A Shokeir ◽  
Ahmed M Shoma ◽  
Ibrahim Eraky ◽  
Osama M Sarhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Staghorn Stones

Introduction: We compare percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and open surgery in the treatment of staghorn stones in children.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic records of children who underwent treatment for staghorn stones between September 2000 and August 2013. They were divided between Group 1 (patients who underwent PCNL) and Group 2 (patients who underwent open surgery). We compared stone-free and complications rates, need for multiple procedures, and hospital stay.Results: The study included 41 patients (35 boys and 6 girls), with mean age 7.4 ± 3.1 years (range: 2–15). Of these 41 patients, 26 had unilateral renal stone and 15 had bilateral renal stones. The total number of treated renal units was 56: 28 underwent PCNL and 28 underwent open surgery. The complication rate was comparable for both groups (32% for open surgery vs. 28.6%, p = 0.771). Multiple procedures were more needed in PCNL group (60.7% vs. 32% in open surgery, p = 0.032). The stone-free rate was 71.4% after PCNL and 78.6% after open surgery (p = 0.537). A significant difference was observed in shorter hospital stay after PCNL (5 vs. 8.8 days, p < 0.001). Our study’s limitations include its retrospective design and relatively small sample size.Conclusions: For the treatment of staghorn stones in children, PCNL was comparable to open surgery in complication and stone-free rates. PCNL had the advantage of a shorter hospital stay and open surgery showed a decreased need for multiple procedures. 

scholarly journals Intraoperative flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An 8 years’ experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasir Masood ◽  
Nadeem Iqbal ◽  
Raja Mohsin Farooq ◽  
Sajid Iqbal ◽  
Faheemullah Khan
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Hounsfield Unit ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Stone Size ◽  
Group I ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Free Rate

Objectives: To see the effect of intra operative antegrade flexible nephroscopy during Percutaneous nephrolithotomy on stone free rate. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy from 2010 to 2017 for renal stones >2cm. Patients found eligible were divided in, Group-I who did not have intraoperative Flexible nephroscopy and Group-II who had flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. All procedures were done by senior consultants. Variables like Mean age, side, stone size, skin to stone distance and Hounsfield unit were compared. Outcomes like Stone free rate, hospital stay and operative time were compared between the groups. Results: The study included 248 patients, consisting 85 (34.3%) females and 163 (65.7%) males. Mean age ± SD was 45.8±13.8 years. Both group were similar in characteristics like mean age, stone size, skin to stone distance and Hounsfield units. The overall stone free rate was 71%. It was not significantly different between the groups, 76% in Group-II vs. 67% in Group-I. However stone free rate markedly improved with flexible nephroscopy in patients with staghorn calculi. Mean operative time and hospital stay were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Intraoperative flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy significantly increases stone free rate in patients with staghorn stones. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.3565 How to cite this:Masood Y, Iqbal N, Farooq RM, Iqbal S, Khan F. Intraoperative flexible nephroscopy during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An 8 years’ experience. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.3565 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-172
Author(s):  
Hussein M. Abdeldaeim ◽  
Omar El Gebaly ◽  
Mostafa Said ◽  
Abdel Rahman Zahran ◽  
Tamer Abouyoussif
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Hemoglobin Concentration ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Free Rate

Objectives: To report our single center experience in comparing mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy for management of renal stones up to 2 cm in anomalous kidneys. Materials and methods: Records of the last 30 patients with stones less than 2 cm in anomalous kidney treated by mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy were reviewed and compared to last 30 patients treated by flexible ureterorenoscopy. Results: Mean stone size was significantly higher in the minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy group (17.90 mm) than in flexible ureterorenoscopy group (14.97mm) (p < 0.001). Mean operative time (80.33 min vs 56.43 min) and fluoroscopy exposure time (4.49 min vs 0.84 min) were significantly higher in the mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group than in the flexible ureterorenoscopy group (p < 0.001). The mean post-operative drop in hemoglobin concentration was significantly higher in the mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy group (0.47 gm versus 0.2 gm) (p < 0.001). Stone free rate after 12 weeks follow up was not statistically significant between the 2 groups (90% in minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy vs 80% in flexible ureterorenoscopy) (FEp = 0.472).Conclusions: Both modalities were found to be safe and effective for treatment of stones less than 2 cm in anomalous kidneys.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of large renal stones: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 030006052098313
Author(s):  
Tie Mao ◽  
Na Wei ◽  
Jing Yu ◽  
Yinghui Lu
Keyword(s):  
Blood Transfusion ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Complementary Treatment ◽  
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Background We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LPL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for treating renal stones larger than 2 cm. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, SinoMed, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for studies that compared the surgical outcomes of LPL and PCNL. We conducted a meta-analysis of the retrieved studies, expressed as weighted mean difference or risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results We included 25 studies (1831 patients). LPL was associated with a significantly higher stone-free rate, lower rates of blood loss, complementary treatment, blood transfusion, and complications, and less reduction in hemoglobin level compared with PCNL. LPL and PCNL were similar in terms of duration of hospital stay, conversion rate, changes in glomerular filtration rate and creatinine level, and mean time of postoperative analgesia. However, LPL was associated with a longer operation time than PCNL. Conclusion LPL appears to be more effective and safer than PCNL in patients with large renal stones, by increasing the stone-free rate and reducing blood loss, complementary treatment, blood transfusion, and complications compared with PCNL. LPL may thus be a useful modality for treating patients with large renal stones.

Comparison of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of large renal pelvic stone

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehmet Cagatay Cicek ◽  
Tariq Asi ◽  
Kadir Omur Gunseren ◽  
Hakan Kilicarslan
Keyword(s):  
Operation Time ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Median Hospital Stay ◽  
Efficient Procedure ◽  
Laparoscopic Pyelolithotomy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Lower Complication ◽  
Lower Complication Rate ◽  
Median Hospital ◽  
Free Rate

Abstract Background To compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (LP) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in the management of large renal pelvic stones. Methods This study included patients who presented with a single renal pelvic stone sized ≥20 mm and who were treated primarily by laparoscopic pyelolithotomy or retrograde intrarenal surgery. The patients were grouped based on the surgical procedure they underwent. We retrospectively examined and compared the age, the longest axis and the surface area of the stone, operation time, hospitalization time, complications and stone-free rates of the two groups. Results Of the 156 patients included in the study, 44 had laparoscopic pyelolithotomy, and 112 had retrograde intrarenal surgery. Patients who received laparoscopic pyelolithotomy (13 males, 31 females) had a median age of 54 (18-79) years, while those who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (46 males, 66 females) had a median age of 54.5 (18-79). Patients who received laparoscopic pyelolithotomy were found to have larger median stone size (30 mm vs 24 mm, p=0.003), longer operation time (100 minutes vs 70 minutes, p=0.007), lower complication rate (2% vs 8.9%, p=0.063), longer median hospital stay (3 days vs 1 day, p<0.001) and better stone-free rate at the third month (90.9% vs 67.9%, p<0.001). Conclusion LP is a safe and efficient procedure that could be used as an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery in managing large renal pelvic stones.

scholarly journals Predictors of Success after Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) for Renal Calculi Between 20—30 mm: A Multivariate Analysis Model

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 2388-2395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed El-Assmy ◽  
Ahmed R. El-Nahas ◽  
Mohamed E. Abo-Elghar ◽  
Ibrahim Eraky ◽  
Mahmoud R. El-Kenawy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Stone Surface ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Renal Anomalies ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Free Rate

The first-line management of renal stones between 20—30 mm remains controversial. The Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) stone-free rates for such patient groups vary widely. The purpose of this study was to define factors that have a significant impact on the stone-free rate after ESWL in such controversial groups. Between January 1990 and January 2004, 594 patients with renal stones 20—30 mm in length underwent ESWL monotherapy. Stone surface area was measured for all stones. The results of treatment were evaluated after 3 months of follow-up. The stone-free rate was correlated with stone and patient characteristics using the Chi-square test; factors found to be significant were further analyzed using multivariate analysis.Repeat ESWL was needed in 56.9% of cases. Post-ESWL complications occurred in 5% of cases and post-ESWL secondary procedures were required in 5.9%. At 3-month follow-up, the overall stone-free rate was 77.2%. Using the Chi-square test, stone surface area, location, number, radiological renal picture, and congenital renal anomalies had a significant impact on the stone-free rate. Multivariate analysis excluded radiological renal picture from the logistic regression model while other factors maintained their statistically significant effect on success rate, indicating that they were independent predictors. A regression analysis model was designed to estimate the probability of stone-free status after ESWL. The sensitivity of the model was 97.4%, the specificity 90%, and the overall accuracy 95.6%.Stone surface area, location, number, and congenital renal anomalies are prognostic predictors determining stone clearance after ESWL of renal calculi of 20—30 mm. High probability of stone clearance is obtained with single stone ≤400 mm2 located in renal pelvis with no congenital anomalies. Our regression model can predict the probability of the success of ESWL in such controversial groups and can define patients who would need other treatment modality.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of staghorn renal stones in pediatric patients using adult-sized instrument

2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-215
Author(s):  
Akbar Nouralizadeh ◽  
Hamid Pakmanesh ◽  
Abbas Basiri ◽  
Mohammad Hadi Radfar ◽  
Behzad Narouie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Adult Size ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double J Stent ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Free Rate ◽  
Free Status

Introduction: In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedure performed with adult-sized instruments in pediatric cases with staghorn kidney stone. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of 94 percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures performed during 15 years in a single center for 82 pediatric patients with staghorn calculi using adult-sized instruments (24-Fr nephroscope). Stone free status was defined as complete clearance of the stones or the presence of insignificant residual stones of <3 mm in diameter. Results: The mean age was 108 ± 53 months (range, 14–180 months). There were 39 patients (48%) with complete staghorn stones and 43 cases (52%) with partial staghorn. We fulfilled 91.4% of operations through a single access. The stone free rate was 86.6% after one percutaneous nephrolithotomy session. In total, seven patients referred for shock wave lithotripsy and four cases were scheduled for the second percutaneous nephrolithotomy session. Fever occurred in 18 patients (21%) and bleeding requiring transfusion in four children (5%). Prolonged leakage from nephrostomy site requiring anesthesia for double J stent placement occurred in one patient. No grade IV or V Clavien complication occurred. Conclusion: The success rate and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with adult-size instruments in pediatric patients are acceptable.

scholarly journals Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiaqiao Zhang ◽  
Chuou Xu ◽  
Deng He ◽  
Yuchao Lu ◽  
Henglong Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Stone ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Renal Stones ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Flexible Ureteroscopy ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Ureteral Stenting ◽  
Free Rate

Purpose To clarify the outcome of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) for management of renal calculi without preoperative stenting. Methods A total of 171 patients who received 176 fURS procedures for unilateral renal stones were reviewed. All procedures were divided into two groups depending on whether they received ureteral stenting preoperatively. Baseline characteristics of patients, stone burden, operation time, stone-free rates, and complications were compared between both groups. Results Successful primary access to the renal pelvis was achieved in 104 of 114 (91.2%) patients without preoperative stenting, while all procedures with preoperative stenting (n = 62) were successfully performed. A total of 156 procedures were included for further data analysis (56 procedures in stenting group and 100 in non-stenting group). No significant differences was found regardless of a preoperative stent placement in terms of stone-free rate (73.2% with stenting vs. 71.0% without, P = 0.854), operative time (70.4 ± 32.8 with stenting vs. 70.2 ± 32.1 without, P = 0.969). Conclusions fURS for management of renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting are associated with well outcome in short term follow-up. Our study may help patients and doctors to decide if an optional stent is placed or not.

scholarly journals Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 231
Author(s):  
Ponco Birowo ◽  
William Tendi ◽  
Indah S. Widyahening ◽  
Nur Rasyid ◽  
Widi Atmoko
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Prone Position ◽  
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Stone Free Rate ◽  
Major Complication Rate ◽  
Free Rate

Background: The decision for using supine or prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is still debatable. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety profile of the supine and prone position when performing PCNL. Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed using the database from MEDLINE, Cochrane library and Google Scholar from January 2009 to November 2019. The outcomes assessed were stone free rate, major complication rate, length of hospital stay and mean operation time. Results: A total of 11 articles were included in qualitative and quantitative analysis. The efficacy of PCNL in supine position as determined by stone free rate is significantly lower than in prone position (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.66 – 0.83; p<0.00001), However, major complication rate is also lower in the supine group compared with the prone group (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51 – 0.96; p=0.03). There is no statistically significant difference in the length of hospital stay and mean operation time between both groups. Conclusion: Prone position leads to a higher stone free rate, but also a higher rate of major complication. Thus, the decision of using which position during PCNL should be based on the surgeon’s experience and clinical aspects of the patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document