scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DI INDONESIA

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 766
Author(s):  
I Dewa Made Suartha
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Concept Analysis ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
The Subject

The acceptance of corporation as the subject of criminal act brings problem to criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility. There are 2 principle problems in this study : (1) How is the current criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility?. (2) How is criminal law policy upon the corporation criminal act responsibility in ius constituendum perspective? The research used normative law method with legislation, comparative and law concept analysis approaches. The result of the research : (1) Criminal code has not regulates corporation as the subject of criminal act that is accountable for criminal law, nevertheless it is partial but inconsistent, (2) Criminal Code Bill 1999-2000 has clearly and completely regulated corporation as subject of criminal act and is accountable for criminal law and accept unconditional criminal responsibility as well as substitute criminal responsibility, although with the exception to solve difficult problem in order to prove mistakes made by corporation. Diterimanya korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana, dapat menimbulkan permasalahan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua permasalahan pokok, yaitu (1) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana pada saat ini dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi?. (2) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi dalam perspektif ius constituendum ? Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan dan analisis konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian adalah : (1) KUHP tidak mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana sedangkan di beberapa perundang-undangan di luar KUHP telah mengatur korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana, namun masih bersifat parsial dan tidak konsisten, (2) Rancangan KUHP 2014-2015 telah mengatur secara lengkap dan tegas korporasi sebagai subjek tindak pidana dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan menerima pertanggungjawaban pidana mutlak serta pertanggungjawaban pidana pengganti, meskipun dengan pengecualian untuk memecahkan persoalan kesulitan dalam membuktikan adanya unsur kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh korporasi.

scholarly journals KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN TINDAK PIDANA KORPORASI DI INDONESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
I Dewa Agung Gede Mahardika Martha ◽  
I Dewa Made Suartha
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Concept Analysis ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Difficult Problem ◽  
The Subject

ABSTRAK Diterimanya korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana, sehingga menimbulkan permasalahan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat dua permasalahan pokok, yaitu (1) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana pada saat ini dalam pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi? (2) Bagaimanakah kebijakan hukum pidana terhadap pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana korporasi dalam perspektif ius constituendum ? Metode penelitian yang dipergunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan dan analisis konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian adalah : (1) KUHP tidak mengatur korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan beberapa perundang-undangan di luar KUHP telah mengatur korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana, namun masih bersifat parsial dan tidak konsisten, (2) Rancangan KUHP 2014-2015 telah mengatur secara lengkap dan tegas korporasi sebagai subyek tindak pidana dan dapat dipertanggungjawabkan dalam hukum pidana dan menerima pertanggungjawaban pidana mutlak serta pertanggungjawaban pidana pengganti, meskipun dengan pengecualian untuk memecahkan persoalan kesulitan dalam membuktikan adanya unsur kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh korporasi. Kata kunci : Kebijakan korporasi, Tindak pidana, dan Pertanggungjawaban. ABSTRACT The acceptance of corporation as the subject of criminal act brings problem to criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility. There are 2 principle problems in this study : (1) How is the current criminal law policy in corporation criminal act responsibility? (2) How is criminal law policy upon the corporation criminal act responsibility in ius constituendum perspective? The research used normative law method with legislation, comparative and law concept analysis approaches. The result of the research : (1) Criminal code has not regulates corporation as the subject of criminal act that is accountable for criminal law, nevertheless it is partial but inconsistent, (2) Criminal Code Bill 1999-2000 has clearly and completely regulated corporation as subject of criminal act and is accountable for criminal law and accept unconditional criminal responsibility as well as substitute criminal responsibility, although with the exception to solve difficult problem in order to prove mistakes made by corporation. Keywords: Policy on corporation, Criminal act, and Responsibility.

scholarly journals CRIMINAL AND LEGAL STUDY OF CONNIVANCE IN CRIME AS A SIGN CHARACTERIZING CONFLUENCE OF SEVERAL PERSONS IN ONE CRIME

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (72) (2) ◽  
pp. 236-241
Author(s):  
A. A. Kashkarov ◽  
D. A. Poshtaruk
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Analysis ◽  
Legal Study ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Objective Side ◽  
Made In

A criminal and legal analysis of the objective and subjective signs, characterizing the connivance to the crime is made in the publication. The study found that connivance in a crime may be characteristic of various criminal law institutions, such as implication in a crime and complicity in a crime. In addition, the presented arguments show that connivance as a criminally punishable act may be associated with non-interference with unlawful activities that do not constitute a crime. The analysis shows that connivance in a crime can have a selfish purpose. It is noted that connivance in a crime is significantly different from other forms of implication in a crime, namely concealment of a crime and failure to report a crime. The subject of connivance in a crime is a person endowed with special powers to prevent, document and register crimes or offences. The article discloses that there is no special penal provision in the current Act of Criminal Responsibility of the Russian Federation that criminalizes it. The exception is the disposition of Art. 290 of the Criminal Code of RF, which contains an indication of connivance as a sign characterizing the objective side of receiving a bribe.

scholarly journals Criminal law protection of certain principles of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation

2021 ◽  
pp. 60-69
Author(s):  
Artem Aleksandrovich Pastushenko ◽  
Elena Yuryevna Antonova
Keyword(s):  
National Security ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Inappropriate Use ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The subject of this research is the criminal law guarantees for the implementation of the principles of appropriate and targeted spending of budgetary resources as an element of ensuring national security of the Russian Federation. The author conducts the assessment of normative and law-enforcement material that determines the legal essence of the indicated principles of budgetary system of the Russian Federation. The article explores case law of implementation of certain norms of criminal legislation of the Russian Federation associated with contravention of the principle of appropriate use of budgetary allocations. This article is first to juxtapose the measures of criminal law protection of the principles of appropriate and targeted spending of budgetary resources. Based on the acquired results, the current position on the absence of penalties for the inappropriate use of budgetary allocations is being disputed. The conducted comparative analysis of the measures of criminal responsibility reveals large disparity with regards to protection of the two key principles of budgetary system of the Russian Federation. The author also established the presence of criminal elements that carry out preclusive function, which narrows down the capabilities of criminal law of the Russian Federation. The article offers an optimal and effective method for eliminating this problem and improving protective capabilities of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, including the tasks of ensuring national security.

scholarly journals Problem Questions of Subject of Syllables of Crimes are against Bases of National Safety of Ukraine

2019 ◽  
pp. 340-357
Author(s):  
Ruslan CHORNYI
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Military Service ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Issue Attention ◽  
The Subject

According to Part 1 of Art. 18 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine is the subject of the crime is a natural convicted person who has committed a crime at the age of criminal responsibility. The special subject of the crime is a natural convicted person who committed at the age of criminal responsibility, a crime that can be subject only to a certain person (Part 2 of Article 18 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine). Thus, the law defined a clear list of features that are mandatory when deciding whether to admit a person guilty of committing any crime, including those provided for in Article I of the Special Part of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. At the same time, the addition of the General part of the Criminal Code to Section XIV–1 «Measures of Criminal Law on Legal Entities» necessitates the harmonization of these provisions with the definitions of the subject of crime, guilt, criminal liability, punishment, complicity in crime and other institutions of criminal law. . In this regard, it is justified that the subject of the crimes, provided by Art. 109–1141 is an exclusively physical, condemned (restrictedly convicted) person who committed the crime at the age specified in sections 1 and 2 of Art. 22 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. It has been found out that the subjects of some crimes may in fact be persons who, before committing crimes, have been 18 years old (treason committed by a serviceman), 21 years (committing acts of the People's Deputy aimed at violent change or overthrow of the constitutional order or seizure of the state authorities), 35 years (committing a crime under Article 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine by the President of Ukraine), etc. However, in such cases, it is not a matter of increased age of responsibility, but of the possibility of acquiring a person of the appropriate legal status, which presupposes intellectual (to exercise certain powers) and physical (to pass military service) fitness for a certain type of activity. The questions of special subjects of crimes against the bases of national security of Ukraine, which can be divided into the following groups, are investigated: 1) a citizen of Ukraine (Article 111); 2) foreign citizen or stateless person (Article 114); 3) a representative of the authorities (Part 3 of Article 109 and Part 2 of Article 110). It is proved that the actions of a person who acquired the citizenship of another country should be qualified under Art. 111 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, as this fact is only a reason for the loss of citizenship of Ukraine and the issuing of a relevant decree of the President of Ukraine on this issue. Attention is drawn to the need to clarify the provisions of Art. 109 and other norms of the Criminal Code of Ukraine (Part 1 of Article 294, Part 3 of Article 296, Part 1 of Article 342, Article 349 and Part 2 of Article 4361 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) in terms of predicting the liability of public authorities in them for taking appropriate action. Considering the possibility of interfering with the lawful activity of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations (Article 1141 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) by means of socially dangerous inactivity of officials, which may impede the conduct of mobilization activities, the necessity of making appropriate changes to Part 2 of the above is justified article.

scholarly journals Conclusions of the Supreme Court on the subject of trading in influence (Part 2 of Article 369-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine): a critical theoretical analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (15) ◽  
pp. 162-190
Author(s):  
Vasyl Mykolaiovych Kyrychko
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Public Services ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Court ◽  
Correct Definition ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Subject ◽  
New Interpretation

The article analyzes the conclusion of the Joint Chamber of the Criminal Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court (cited in the decision of March 29, 2021) on the recognition of the subject of trading in influence (Part 2 of Article 369-2 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) of any natural person who has reached the age of criminal responsibility. It has been established that such an interpretation of the characteristics of the subject of this crime may cause negative legal consequences of a systemic nature. In particular, such an interpretation may lead to a violation of the system of criminal law on corruption bribery, which is already provided for in the Criminal Code of Ukraine, and according to which the trading in influence by officials or persons providing public services qualifies under Article 369-2. As a result of the new interpretation of the signs of the subject of trading in influence, certain types of such a crime will be qualified under Article 368 of the Criminal code of Ukraine, and Article 369-2 will cease to be such that in all cases has signs of corruption. Such a decision does not comply with the provisions of the UN Convention against Corruption, in which the trading in influence under Article 18 of the Convention is recognized as an independent type of corruption crimes. Expanding the range of subjects of crime under Part 2 of Article 369-2 of the Criminal code of Ukraine will also lead to competition of this article with other articles of this Code about non-corruption crimes. Article 369-2 will have an advantage in application and provide for stricter liability, but there is no legal basis for such an increase in liability. Similarly, Article 369-2 may unreasonably apply to actions that are not socially dangerous. It is substantiated that the provisions of Part 3 of the note to Article 354 of the Criminal code of Ukraine have direct value for correct definition of the subject of trading in influence (Part 2 of Article 369-2 of the Criminal Code). According to them, as well as taking into account the systemic links of this criminal law, the subjects of this crime should be recognized as an official or a person who provides public services. This article of the Code should be criminally liable for bribery to trading in influence (opportunities) associated with the official (in a broad sense) powers of such persons.

CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR LEGALIZATION OF CRIMINAL INCOME: TO THE QUESTION OF THE SUBJECT OF CRIMINAL INFRINGEMENT

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 102-107
Author(s):  
Yu. S. ZHARIKOV ◽  
◽  
MAHIR BAYRAM OGLU AHMEDOV ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Subject

The article focuses on the characteristics of the subject of crimes under Art. 174.1 of the Criminal Code. Based on the analysis of applicable international, domestic and foreign legislation, as well as materials of judicial practice, the author determines the essential features of property acquired by a person as a result of a crime.

scholarly journals The Establishment of Criminal Responsibility for Retail Sale of Alcoholic Products to Minors: An Analysis of the Feasibility

Lex Russica ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 150-158
Author(s):  
K. V. Dyadyun
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Integrated Approach ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Retail Trade ◽  
Retail Sale ◽  
Existing Problems ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation

The paper analyzes the objective and subjective features of article 151.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The problems of interpretation and application of this norm are investigated, taking into account the goals and objectives underlying its creation. Special legislation regulating the sphere under study is considered. The studied imperfections of regulation of the subject of the crime (the relationship between the concepts of alcoholic and alcohol-containing products), problems of distinguishing acts from related compounds (article 151 of the Criminal Code), the complexity of the classification. The analysis of crime-forming features is presented: "repeatability", "retail", and "sale". Imperfections of the legislative and law enforcement approach in this aspect are revealed. In particular, the key features and correlation of the concepts of wholesale and retail trade are analyzed; the problems of assessing what was done with remote methods of selling alcohol; the content aspects of the categories "duplicity and repetition" in the context under study. The question of the expediency of replacing the term "sale" with "illegal sale" in the disposition of article 151.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is studied. The regulation of features of the subject of the studied elements is considered, and existing problems are identified. The question of the expediency of norms with administrative prejudice in the criminal law was raised. Some problematic aspects of sentencing for retail sale of alcoholic products to minors are identified; and issues of establishing the subjective side of the elements. The paper analyzes the opinions of various authors regarding the possibility of improving the norm of article 151.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, taking into account the study of statistical data and materials of judicial practice. The author indicates the need for an integrated approach in the fight against alcohol abuse among young people. The conclusion is presented regarding the validity of the existence of the studied norm in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in the current version.

scholarly journals THE SUBJECT OF CRIME: THE PROBLEM OF ESTABLISHING AGE LIMITS OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 809-812
Author(s):  
Natalia Yu. Zhilina ◽  
Esita E.Ganaeva ◽  
Marina L. Prokhorova ◽  
Denis N. Rudov ◽  
Irina V. Savelieva
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Political Rights ◽  
Legal Concept ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Age Limits ◽  
Civil And Political Rights ◽  
Criminal Legislation

Purpose: This article presents the authors’ analysis of the problem of determining the subject of a crime as a legal concept, and defining the legal characteristics of a person who has committed a crime by features that are necessary for criminal responsibility (individual, age, and responsibility). Methodology: The present study was based on a dialectic approach to the disclosure of legal phenomena using general scientific and private scientific methods. Considered the Convention on Rights of the Child1989; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights "in 1966; and UN Standard Minimum Rules for Administration of Juvenile Justice. Result: It is noted that the theory of criminal law and criminal legislation of various legal systems, including Russia, associate criminal responsibility with the age of the subject of the crime. Based on the requirements of criminal law, the subject of a crime may not be any imputed person, but only having reached a certain age. Applications: This research can be used for universities and students in law. Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of establishing age limits of criminal responsibility is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.

scholarly journals Mistake of fact and endangering actions as circumstances which can affect differentiation of criminal responsibility for unfinished crime

2020 ◽  
pp. 286-290
Author(s):  
Natalia Antoniuk
Keyword(s):  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Human Life ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Special Part ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Severe Punishment ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Legal Consequences

 Most of the aspects of differentiation of criminal responsibility for unfinished crime though being discussional, are duly researched in the criminal scientific studies. However, the sphere of unresearched institutes exists enabling us to speak about its influence on differentiation of criminal responsibility. This institutes are the mistake of fact and so called “delicts of endangering” The purpose of this research is to analyze the differentiated influence on criminal responsibility of crimes committed with the feature of mistake of fact and of delicts of endangering. It is planned to illustrate, basing on certain examples, the importance of these institutes for differentiation of criminal responsibility. By the way, the task of this article is to reveal the shortcomings of criminal law in force and to make propositions on their removing. Up to date, taking into consideration the provisions of part 3, 4 of Article 68 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the court can`t impose punishment on person, guilty of committing a crime under effect of mistake of fact, qualified as attempt, higher than 2/3 of the maximal severe punishment (envisaged in article of special part of the Criminal Code). The court, as well, can`t (in most cases) impose life imprisonment even when the damage totally equals the damage caused by finished crime. For instance, planning to kill with mercenary motives a minor, the guilty person kills an adult. This action can’t be qualified as finished crime, as the mistake of victim occurs. Nevertheless, object of human life is objectively damaged. So, the crucial necessity to make equal between each other finished crime and crime, committed under influence of mistake of fact, is evident. Differentiating criminal responsibility in situations when damage is desired by the guilty person, the legislator in fact hasn’t bothered to duly differentiate criminal-legal consequences in case of endangering without the desire of such damage. That`s why it is of great importance to regulate by norms criminal actions which are endangering social relations with social dangerous damages, but don’t have the features of criminal aim, motive and desire of guilty person. This step can provide differentiated approach towards socially dangerous behavior, delimiting the estimation of act and consequence. It can concentrate the attention on subjective evaluation of potential consequences by guilty person, notwithstanding the factors, which often exist besides mental estimation of the subject.

scholarly journals CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN INDONESIA ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPARISON

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-154
Author(s):  
Muchammad Chasani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Criminal Offense ◽  
Criminal Legislation ◽  
Corporate Criminal Liability ◽  
Responsibility System

The regulation of corporate criminal liability in Indonesia's criminal justice system is basically a new and still debatable issue. It is said that because in the Criminal Code is not recognized and regulated explicitly about the corporation as a subject of criminal law. This is a natural thing since the WvS Criminal Code still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere non potest" or "non-potest university delinquere", that is, a legal entity can not commit a crime. Thus, if in a society there is a criminal offense, then the criminal act is deemed to be done by the board of the corporation concerned. Regarding the corporate criminal responsibility system in Indonesia, in the corruption law Article 20 paragraph (1), if the corporation committed a criminal act of corruption, then those responsible for the criminal act shall be the corporation only, the management only, or the corporation and its management. Thus, it can be said that the regulation of corporate criminal liability in the legal system in Indonesia is expressly only regulated in special criminal legislation, because the Criminal Code of WvS still adheres to the principle of "societas delinquere nonpotest" so it is not possible to enforce corporate criminal liability in it.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document