Non-watertight dural reconstruction in meningioma surgery: results in 439 consecutive patients and a review of the literature

2011 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. 714-718 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burak Sade ◽  
Soichi Oya ◽  
Joung H. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Location ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Intracranial Meningioma ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Dural Graft ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Meningioma Surgery ◽  
Chemical Meningitis

Object There are various schools of thought when it comes to dural reconstruction following meningioma surgery, which are largely based on the personal experience of the individual surgeons. The authors' aim in this study was to review different dural reconstruction techniques, with an emphasis on their experience with the synthetic onlay dural graft technique. Methods The medical records of 439 consecutive patients who were surgically treated for an intracranial meningioma over a period of 7 years, and for whom dural reconstruction was performed using the onlay dural graft DuraGen (Integra Neurosciences) were reviewed retrospectively. The most common tumor location was the convexity (27.6%), and 12% of the patients had undergone previous surgery. Complications related to the closure technique and/or closure material, such as CSF leakage from the incision, rhinorrhea, or infectious or chemical meningitis were reviewed. Results A CSF leak was encountered in 2 patients (0.4%), and 10 patients (2.3%) experienced graft-related complications in the form of chemical meningitis, cerebritis, and accumulation of extraaxial fluid. Infectious complications were seen in 4 patients (0.9%; bacterial meningitis, osteomyelitis, epidural abscess). None of the patients had pseudomeningocele that required a second intervention. Conclusions In the authors' experience, the incidence of CSF leakage following non-watertight reconstruction of the dura mater in meningioma surgery performed using dural onlay graft was 0.4%. Graft-related complications occurred in 2.3%. These figures compare favorably to the majority of the series in which watertight dural closure is described and emphasized.

The incidence of complications in elective cranial neurosurgery associated with dural closure material

2014 ◽  
Vol 120 (1) ◽  
pp. 278-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian P. Walcott ◽  
Jonathan B. Neal ◽  
Sameer A. Sheth ◽  
Kristopher T. Kahle ◽  
Emad N. Eskandar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
Dural Graft ◽  
Synthetic Grafts

Object Dural closure with synthetic grafts has been suggested to contribute to the incidence of infection and CSF leak. The objective of this study was to assess the contribution of choice of dural closure material, as well as other factors, to the incidence of infection and CSF leak. Methods A retrospective, consecutive cohort study of adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy was established between April 2010 and March 2011 at a single center. Exclusion criteria consisted of trauma, bur hole placement alone, and temporary CSF fluid diversion. Results Three hundred ninety-nine patients were included (mean follow-up 396.6 days). Nonautologous (synthetic) dural substitute was more likely to be used (n = 106) in cases of reoperation (p = 0.001). Seventeen patients developed a surgical site infection and 12 patients developed a CSF leak. Multivariate logistic regression modeling identified estimated blood loss (OR 1.002, 95% CI 1.001–1.003; p < 0.001) and cigarette smoking (OR 2.198, 95% CI 1.109–4.238; p = 0.019) as significant predictors of infection. Synthetic dural graft was not a predictor of infection in multivariate analysis. Infratentorial surgery (OR 4.348, 95% CI 1.234–16.722; p = 0.024) and more than 8 days of postoperative corticosteroid treatment (OR 3.886, 95% CI 1.052–16.607; p = 0.048) were significant predictors for the development of CSF leak. Synthetic dural graft was associated with a lower likelihood of CSF leak (OR 0.072, 95% CI 0.003–0.552; p = 0.036). Conclusions The use of synthetic dural closure material is not associated with surgical site infection and is associated with a reduced incidence of CSF leak. Modifiable risk factors exist for craniotomy complications that warrant vigilance and further study.

Evaluation of complication rates of pediatric spinal procedures in which a polyethylene glycol sealant was used

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rory Goodwin ◽  
Pablo F. Recinos ◽  
Xin Zhou ◽  
Jesse X. Yang ◽  
George I. Jallo
Keyword(s):  
Polyethylene Glycol ◽  
Spinal Surgery ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Lumbar Region ◽  
Pediatric Spine ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Csf Leakage

Object Cerebrospinal fluid leakage following durotomy in spinal surgery can lead to significant patient morbidity and mortality, including meningitis and even death. Usage of a polyethylene glycol (PEG) sealant in combination with standard closure techniques has been shown to be effective in preventing CSF leaks in animal models and adult patients, but the results of its use have not been reported in the pediatric population. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of pediatric neurosurgery patients (0–18 years of age) treated at The Johns Hopkins Hospital from 2003 to 2010. There were 93 spinal surgery patients identified in whom PEG was applied. The incidence of CSF leakage, meningitis, and neurological injury was recorded. There were 54 males and 39 females in this study with an average age of 8.7 years. Of the identified patients, 16.1%, 28%, and 55.9% underwent surgery in the cervical region, thoracic region, and lumbar region, respectively. Results At 90-day follow-up, 5 patients (5.4%) had a CSF leak, 4 patients (4.3%) required a reoperation, and 1 patient (1.1%) had meningitis within this time period. No deaths or associated neurological deficits were observed. Conclusions The use of a PEG sealant to augment dural closure in pediatric spine surgery appears to be a safe adjunct to standard dural closure in pediatric spine patients.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study between Autologous Dural Closure versus Collagen Matrix (DuraGen) Closure in Decompressive Craniectomy for Trauma

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (01) ◽  
pp. 46-49
Author(s):  
Rajesh Kumar Barooah ◽  
Basanta Kumar Baishya ◽  
Hriday Haloi ◽  
Mrinal Bhuyan ◽  
Asman Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wound Infection ◽  
Decompressive Craniectomy ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Collagen Matrix ◽  
Dural Defect ◽  
Temporalis Fascia ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Fascia Graft ◽  
Dural Graft ◽  
Csf Leakage

Abstract Introduction Neurosurgeons often deal with the problem of a complete and watertight dural closure after cerebral operative procedures. In decompressive craniectomy done for trauma, autologous grafts such as galea, temporalis fascia can be time consuming. Hence this study was undertaken to look into the outcome using collagen matrix graft for dural closure. Aims and Objectives To study the difference between autologous dural graft closure and collagen matrix graft with respect to the time taken for closure, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, and wound infection. Methods This prospective study includes 30 patients who underwent decompressive craniectomy for trauma. Duraplasty with temporalis fascia graft and nonautologous collagen matrix dural patch was done by randomization. Specific time points during craniectomy and cranioplasty was calculated. Total time for the procedures and the time for dural repair and separation was calculated. Results The use of collagen matrix in decompressive craniectomy resulted in decrease in mean operative time during the first surgery by average 45 minutes (p< 0.5) as compared to the use of autologous graft. There is reduction in the operating time during second surgery (cranioplasty) by 35 minutes (p< 0.5). The patients using collagen matrix graft did not record any CSF leakage or wound infection. Excellent uptake of the collagen by the duramater was seen. Conclusion The use of collagen to cover the dural defect for decompressive craniectomy for trauma results in significant reduction in the operating time during the first surgery and also in cranioplasty. There is reduction in CSF leakage and hence duration of hospital stay and cost.

Preventing cerebrospinal fluid leak following transection of a tight filum terminale

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua J. Chern ◽  
R. Shane Tubbs ◽  
Akash J. Patel ◽  
Amber S. Gordon ◽  
S. Kathleen Bandt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Tethered Cord ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Filum Terminale ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
Tight Filum Terminale ◽  
The Individual

Object Tethered cord release for a tight filum terminale is a common pediatric operation associated with low morbidity and mortality rates. While almost all would agree that keeping patients lying flat after the operation will prevent a CSF leak, the optimal period of doing so has not been determined. In this study, the authors examined whether a longer length of stay in the hospital for the sole purpose of maintaining patients flat correlates with a decreased rate of CSF leakage. Methods Intraoperative and postoperative data were retrospectively collected in 222 cases of simple tethered cord release at 3 large children's hospitals. Risk factors for postoperative CSF leakage were identified. Results Thirty-eight patients were maintained lying flat for 24 hours, 86 for 48 hours, and 98 for 72 hours at the individual surgeon's discretion. A CSF leak occurred in 13 patients (5.9%) and pseudomeningocele developed in 9 patients (4.1%). In the univariate analysis, operating time, use of the microscope, use of dural sealant, and duration of remaining flat after surgery failed to correlate with the occurrence of complications. Conclusions A longer hospital stay for maintaining patients flat after a simple tethered cord release appears not to prevent CSF leakage. However, a larger patient cohort will be needed to detect small differences in complication rates.

Reconstruction After Posterior Cranial Fossa Surgery—Case Report of Application of a Synthetic Tissue Sealant to Augment Dural Closure

US Neurology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Nicholas D Coppa ◽  
Johnny B Delashaw Jr ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Posterior Cranial Fossa ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Wound Breakdown ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
Tissue Sealant ◽  
Cranial Fossa ◽  
Csf Leaks

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage following cranial surgery is a well-described and potentially devastating complication, particularly in posteriorcranial fossa surgery. If untreated, a persistent CSF leak can evolve into wound breakdown, a surgical-site infection, and meningitis. Themorbidity of a complication following a cranial operation is harmful to the patient. Additionally, complications are a source of elevated medicalcosts. Numerous reconstruction strategies have been developed to thwart the ill effects of CSF leaks on patient outcomes and healthcarefinances. This case report illustrates the method employed at our institution to repair posterior fossa defects following surgery in thecerebellopontine angle.

Use of a Novel Absorbable Hydrogel for Augmentation of Dural Repair: Results of a Preliminary Clinical Study

2005 ◽  
Vol 57 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 146-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen D. Boogaarts ◽  
J. André Grotenhuis ◽  
Ronald H.M.A. Bartels ◽  
Tjemme Beems
Keyword(s):  
Valsalva Maneuver ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Standard Laboratory ◽  
Dural Repair ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Csf Leaks ◽  
Repair Techniques

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and performance of a synthetic dural sealant as an adjunct to standard surgical dural repair techniques to prevent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. METHODS: This study was designed as a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center clinical trial. The dural sealant is a synthetic absorbable hydrogel. Consecutive series of patients scheduled for elective cranial and intradural spinal surgery were included until a total of 50 applications were achieved. It was used primarily as an adjunct to ensure watertight dural closure. The end point was defined as no leak with the Valsalva maneuver after dural sealant application. The patients were followed up for 3 months after surgery to check for CSF leakage, standard laboratory and neurological examinations, and possible adverse advents. RESULTS: Of the 49 patients, 46 were included and treated with the dural sealant because of spontaneous leak (n = 34; 69%) or leak after the Valsalva maneuver (n = 12; 25%). There was no leak in the other patients (n = 3; 6%). After application of the dural sealant, there was no leak in all 46 patients (100%). Of the 46 patients included, there was one case of overt CSF leak. One patient had a pseudomeningocele. There were no adverse events other than those related to the disease or to the surgical procedure itself. CONCLUSION: The dural sealant, a synthetic absorbable hydrogel, is a useful adjunct to achieve watertight dural closure. Application resulted in 100% closure of intraoperative CSF leaks. There are no evident adverse effects.

scholarly journals Repair of the sellar floor using bioresorbable polydioxanone foils after endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. E16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-Philip Zeden ◽  
Jörg Baldauf ◽  
Henry W. S. Schroeder
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Pituitary Surgery ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Endoscopic Endonasal ◽  
Csf Rhinorrhea ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Sellar Reconstruction ◽  
Sellar Floor

OBJECTIVEPostoperative CSF leakage is the most common unwanted sequela of transnasal pituitary surgery. The individual anatomy, the extent of the sellar opening, and the occurrence of an intraoperative CSF leak add to the risk of postoperative rhinorrhea. Despite the current sophistication and recent developments in pituitary surgery, watertight closure of the sellar floor remains a matter of concern. Improvements and additions to the technical armamentarium of sellar reconstruction are therefore still desirable.METHODSThe authors present a closure technique of the sellar floor using a bioresorbable polydioxanone foil, which is placed between the dura and the bony margins of the open sellar floor to keep the intrasellar implants in place and to withstand the pressure arising from the intracranial compartment.RESULTSThe technique was used in a technical case series of 30 patients, and in all patients the floor could be sufficiently reconstructed. CSF flow intraoperatively was documented in 10 cases (33.3%). Postoperative CSF rhinorrhea was detected in one patient (3.3%). No complications could be attributed to the technique or the material during a mean follow-up period of 477 days. The foils can easily be identified on MR images and CT scans and therefore do not affect the postoperative radiological assessment.CONCLUSIONSThe described technique is an easy, inexpensive, and reliable method for sellar floor reconstruction and has a low CSF leakage rate. It is recommended when the risk of a postoperative CSF leak is high and there is still enough bony margin of the sellar floor left that enables a sufficient fixation of the foil.

scholarly journals Dural Closure in Chiari I Malformation. Technique Description and Analysis of Results

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger Schmidt Brock ◽  
João Gustavo Rocha Peixoto Dos Santos ◽  
Mario Augusto Taricco ◽  
Matheus Fernandes De Oliveira ◽  
Marcelo De Lima Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Posterior Fossa ◽  
Chiari I Malformation ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Posterior Fossa Decompression ◽  
Suboccipital Craniectomy ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
Analysis Of Results ◽  
Chiari I ◽  
The University

Introduction. Surgical posterior fossa decompression of Chiari malformation type 1 (CM-I) is recommended in symptomatic patients. The classic surgery is a suboccipital craniectomy and C-1 laminectomy, with duroplasty. However, a range of complications associated with surgical management of CM-I includes pseudomeningocele, CSF leakage, aseptic meningitis, and wound infections, making dural closure and reconstruction one important step to determine morbidity. Our objective is to present a technique of pericranium harvest and dural closure and describe our experience. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted based on records of patients treated in Hospital das Clínicas of the University of São Paulo, diagnosed with CM-I and submitted to posterior fossa decompression from January 2008 until May 2015. We evaluated the occurrence of post-operative complications of symptomatic pseudomeningocele or incisional CSF leak. The occurrence of meningitis, surgical site infection or other complications were also available. Results. A total of 22 patients were evaluated in this study. Sixteen (72.7%) were female patients. Overall, the mean age at the time of surgery was 49 ± 13.6 years-old. Four patients (18%) presented complications: 3 CSF leakages (13.5%) and 1 pseudomeningocele (4.5%). Discussion. Postoperative complications of CM-I are still frequent and determinants of surgical success. We propose a new surgical technique with autologous pericranium graft and duraplasty. Additionally to dural closure, we propose another modality of muscular fascia closure, allowing increased tight closure. Our data corroborate with current literature. Conclusion. Our technique of dural closure using pericranium autologous graft in CM-I is safe and feasible.

The Use of Methylene Blue Staining Test in Determining the CSF Leaks Location of the Anterior Skull Base

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1376-1377
Author(s):  
Razvan Hainarosie ◽  
Teodora Ghindea ◽  
Irina Gabriela Ionita ◽  
Mura Hainarosie ◽  
Cristian Dragos Stefanescu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Methylene Blue ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Intrathecal Injection ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Blue Staining ◽  
Csf Leak ◽  
Glucose Content ◽  
Csf Rhinorrhea ◽  
Cerebrospinal Fluid Rhinorrhea ◽  
Csf Leakage

Cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea represents drainage of cerebrospinal fluid into the nasal cavity. The first steps in diagnosing CSF rhinorrhea are a thorough history and physical examination of the patient. Other diagnostic procedures are the double ring sign, glucose content of the nasal fluid, Beta-trace protein test or beta 2-transferrin. To establish the exact location of the defect imagistic examinations are necessary. However, the gold standard CSF leakage diagnostic method is an intrathecal injection of fluorescein with the endoscopic identification of the defect. In this paper we analyze a staining test, using Methylene Blue solution, to identify the CSF leak�s location.

scholarly journals Single-arm, open-label, multicentre first in human study to evaluate the safety and performance of dural sealant patch in reducing CSF leakage following elective cranial surgery: the ENCASE trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e049098
Author(s):  
Tristan Van Doormaal ◽  
Menno R Germans ◽  
Mariska Sie ◽  
Bart Brouwers ◽  
Andrew Carlson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
User Satisfaction ◽  
Neurosurgical Procedures ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Cranial Surgery ◽  
Dural Closure ◽  
Handling Characteristics ◽  
Csf Leakage ◽  
And Performance

ObjectiveThe dural sealant patch (DSP) is designed for watertight dural closure after cranial surgery. The goal of this study is to assess, for the first time, safety and performance of the DSP as a means of reducing cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage in patients undergoing elective cranial intradural surgery with a dural closure procedure.DesignFirst in human, open-label, single-arm, multicentre study with 360-day (12 months) follow-up.SettingThree large tertiary reference neurosurgical centres, two in the Netherlands and one in Switzerland.ParticipantsForty patients undergoing elective cranial neurosurgical procedures, stratified into 34 supratentorial and six infratentorial trepanations.InterventionEach patient received one DSP after cranial surgery and closure of the dura mater with sutures.Outcome measuresPrimary composite endpoint was occurrence of one of the following events: postoperative percutaneous CSF leakage, intraoperative leakage at 20 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure or postoperative wound infection. Overall success was defined as achieving the primary endpoint in no more than two patients. Secondary endpoints were device-related serious adverse events or adverse events (AEs), pseudomeningocele and thickness of dura+DSP. Additional endpoints were reoperation in 30 days and user satisfaction.ResultsNo patients met the primary endpoint. No device-related (serious) AEs were observed. There were two incidences of self-limiting pseudomeningocele as confirmed on MRI. Thickness of dura and DSP were (mean±SD) 3.5 mm±2.0 at day 7 and 2.1 mm±1.2 at day 90. No patients were reoperated within 30 days. Users reported a satisfactory design and intuitive application.ConclusionsDSP, later officially named Liqoseal, is a safe and potentially efficacious device for reducing CSF leakage after intracranial surgery, with favourable clinical handling characteristics. A randomised controlled trial is needed to assess Liqoseal efficacy against the best current practice for reducing postoperative CSF leakage.Trial registration numberNCT03566602.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document