scholarly journals Frameless robotic stereotactic biopsies: a consecutive series of 100 cases

2015 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 342-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Lefranc ◽  
Cyrille Capel ◽  
Anne-Sophie Pruvot-Occean ◽  
Anthony Fichten ◽  
Christine Desenclos ◽  
...  

OBJECT Stereotactic biopsy procedures are an everyday part of neurosurgery. The procedure provides an accurate histological diagnosis with the least possible morbidity. Robotic stereotactic biopsy needs to be an accurate, safe, frameless, and rapid technique. This article reports the clinical results of a series of 100 frameless robotic biopsies using a Medtech ROSA device. METHODS The authors retrospectively analyzed their first 100 frameless stereotactic biopsies performed with the robotic ROSA device: 84 biopsies were performed by frameless robotic surface registration, 7 were performed by robotic bone fiducial marker registration, and 9 were performed by scalp fiducial marker registration. Intraoperative flat-panel CT scanning was performed concomitantly in 25 cases. The operative details of the robotic biopsies, the diagnostic yield, and mortality and morbidity data observed in this series are reported. RESULTS A histological diagnosis was established in 97 patients. No deaths or permanent morbidity related to surgery were observed. Six patients experienced transient neurological worsening. Six cases of bleeding within the lesion or along the biopsy trajectory were observed on postoperative CT scans but were associated with transient clinical symptoms in only 2 cases. Stereotactic surgery was performed with patients in the supine position in 93 cases and in the prone position in 7 cases. The use of fiducial markers was reserved for posterior fossa biopsy via a transcerebellar approach, via an occipital approach, or for pediatric biopsy. CONCLUSIONS ROSA frameless stereotactic biopsies appear to be accurate and safe robotized frameless procedures.

Neurosurgery ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 830-837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theophilos S. Paleologos ◽  
Neil L. Dorward ◽  
John P. Wadley ◽  
David G.T. Thomas

Abstract OBJECTIVE A lockable guide device, adjustable for positioning, was used to obtain samples for tissue analysis during brain biopsy procedures performed using an interactive image guidance system. Clinical validation of this technique, which was developed for true frameless stereotactic biopsies, and analyses of the histological yield, complication rate, and patient demographic characteristics for a large series of frameless stereotactic biopsies were the purposes of this study. METHODS Demographic, radiological, surgical, and clinical data were prospectively collected for a series of 125 frameless stereotactic biopsies performed using the technique described in detail previously. RESULTS Eighty-six procedures were magnetic resonance imaging-directed and 39 were computed tomography-directed. The mean diameter of the biopsied lesions was 36 mm, and the mean distance from the skin was 35.8 mm. Sixteen percent of the patients harbored multiple lesions, and 5.6% of the biopsied lesions were infratentorial. The mean operative time (including the entire anesthetic time) was 1.5 hours. The smear examination findings were corroborated by conclusive histological results in 96% of the cases, and definitive positive diagnoses were obtained in 122 cases (97.6%). Ten patients experienced surgical complications, but the sustained morbidity rate was 2.4% (including the death of a patient who was in critical clinical condition preoperatively and who died 2 mo later as a result of a chest infection; mortality rate, 0.8%). CONCLUSION This true frameless stereotactic biopsy technique was associated with low morbidity and mortality rates and an excellent diagnostic yield, with overall results at least as good as those observed for frame-based stereotaxy. The excellent accuracy results demonstrated previously and statistically significant reductions in operative time, as well as improved image presentation, target selection, and simplicity, support the use of this frameless stereotactic technique in preference to frame-based biopsy techniques.


Author(s):  
Amer Jaradat ◽  
Andreas Nowacki ◽  
Jens Fichtner ◽  
Janine-Ai Schlaeppi ◽  
Claudio Pollo

Abstract Background Stereotactic biopsies for brainstem lesions are frequently performed to yield an accurate diagnosis and help guide subsequent management. In this study, we summarize our experience with different stereotactic approaches to brainstem lesions of different locations and discuss possible implications for safety and diagnostic yield. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 23 adult patients who underwent a stereotactic biopsy for brainstem lesions between October 2011 and December 2019. Depending on the location supra- or infratentorial, trajectories were planned. We assessed the postoperative complications during the hospital stay as well as the diagnostic yield. Results A supratentorial transfrontal approach was used in 16 (70%) cases, predominantly for lesions in the midbrain, upper pons, and medulla oblongata. An infratentorial, transcerebellar-transpeduncular approach was used in 7 (30%) cases mainly for lesions within the lower pons. All biopsies were confirmed to represent pathological tissue and a definitive diagnosis was achieved in 21 cases (91%). Three patients (13%) had transient weakness in the contralateral part of the body in the immediate postoperative period, which improved spontaneously. There was no permanent morbidity or mortality in this series of patients. Conclusion Lesions of various locations within the brainstem can be successfully targeted via either a supratentorial transfrontal or an infratentorial transcerebellar transpeduncular approach. Our high diagnostic yield of over 90% and the low rate of complications underlines the diagnostic importance of this procedure in order to guide the medical management of these patients.


1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 839-844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok Ranjan ◽  
Vedantam Rajshekhar ◽  
Thomas Joseph ◽  
Mathew J. Chandy ◽  
Sushil M. Chandi

Nondiagnostic biopsies were analyzed in a consecutive series of 407 patients undergoing computerized tomography (CT)-guided stereotactic biopsies. These were categorized as either negative biopsies, when normal tissue or nonspecific pathology was found, or inconclusive, when a definitive diagnosis could not be made although representative tissue was obtained. Nineteen biopsies (4.7%) were negative and 10 (2.4%) were inconclusive, giving an overall nondiagnostic biopsy rate of 7.1% (29 of the 407 cases). Suspected neoplastic masses (390 cases) were classified on the basis of their CT morphology into four groups: Group 1 included purely hypodense nonenhancing masses; Group 2 included isodense nonenhancing masses; Group 3 included ring-enhancing masses; and Group 4 included mixed-density enhancing masses. Although a higher proportion of hypodense nonenhancing masses (six of 56, or 10.7%) yielded a negative result, there was no statistically significant difference in the negative biopsy rates for the different CT categories (p = 0.06). The negative biopsy rates for the 6 years of the study, 1987 to 1992 (1987 being an incomplete year) were as follows: 13.3%, 6%, 3.2%, 3%, 5.8%, and 2.7%. There was no significant decrease in the negative biopsy rate as experience with this procedure increased (p = 0.20). A total of eight surgeons independently performed the biopsies. There was no significant difference (p = 0.24) in the negative biopsy rate of the surgeon with the most experience (124 biopsies, 2.4% negative biopsy rate) compared with that of the seven other surgeons combined (283 biopsies; 5.7% negative biopsy rate). These findings suggest that the yield in a stereotactic biopsy is independent of the CT appearance of the mass. Adherence to certain basic principles in patient and target selection will ensure a reasonable percentage of positive yield with stereotactic biopsy procedures even if the surgeon is relatively inexperienced. There does not appear to be a learning curve in the performance of CT-guided stereotactic biopsies. The management of patients with nondiagnostic biopsies is discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii293-iii294
Author(s):  
Jacques Grill ◽  
Gwenael Le Teuff ◽  
Karsten Nysom ◽  
Klas Blomgren ◽  
Darren Hargrave ◽  
...  

Abstract Despite 50 years of clinical trials, no improvement of survival has been observed in DIPG and most children die within 2 years of diagnosis. Only radiotherapy transiently controls disease progression. The study was conceived as a randomized multi-arm multi-stage program. It started with an open-label phase-II trial comparing three drugs (everolimus, dasatinib, erlotinib) combined with irradiation, allocated according to the presence of their specific targets (PTEN-loss, EGFR-overexpression) defined with a stereotactic biopsy after central confirmation of the diagnosis (presence of histone H3K27M mutation or loss of K27 trimethylation). Targeted therapies were started concomitantly with radiotherapy and were continued until disease progression. No biopsy-related death was reported and diagnostic yield was excellent, with only 5 non-informative biopsies. Biopsy excluded the diagnosisof DIPG in 8% of the cases. At the 3rd interim analysis, based on 193 randomized patients, the IDMC concluded that the study was unlikely to show a difference of OS between the 3 drugs even if 250 patients would be randomized. The median OS from the time of diagnosis was 11.9, 10.5 and 10 months for everolimus, dasatinib and erlotinib. Treatment was discontinued due to toxicity in 2%, 13%, and 15%, respectively. BIOMEDE shows the feasibility of biologically-driven treatment in DIPG on a large international scale. Based on the better toxicity profile and the slightly better efficacy, although not statistically significant, the steering committee proposed that everolimus should be used as the control arm for the next BIOMEDE 2.0 trial.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Blackabey ◽  
Olivia Kenyon ◽  
Rishi Talwar

Abstract Background Sinonasal melanoma is a rare head and neck tumour. It is associated with a poor prognosis, high rates of loco-regional recurrence and distant metastasis. Treatment of the disease is therefore complicated, and because of limited data regarding the cancer, management is frequently tailored to the individual patient. We describe an unusual presentation of sinonasal melanoma with relevant histology, radiology and clinical photography. Case presentation The case report describes the presentation of a 64-year-old man to the Ear, Nose and Throat department with progressive right-sided hearing loss. A thorough history highlighted other clinical symptoms including unilateral nasal obstruction and epistaxis. Clinical examination showed a right middle ear effusion with a polypoidal lesion in the right nasal cavity. Relevant imaging demonstrated a destructive process that required further assessment. An endoscopic sinus procedure was performed to obtain histological diagnosis as well as providing symptomatic relief. Histology confirmed malignant mucosal melanoma. The patient underwent maxillectomy and orbital exenteration (due to further progression of disease) at a tertiary centre with a plan for subsequent immunotherapy. This however has been delayed due to further surgery to excise a metastatic lesion to the right femur. Conclusions This case report highlights the importance of a thorough clinical history and examination. An unusual presentation of a sinonasal tumour can easily be missed leading to a significant delay in treatment. The case report also describes the use of functional endoscopic sinus surgery in order to obtain histological diagnosis and to debulk the tumour, providing symptomatic relief. The current literature regarding management will be discussed as well as current developments guiding future treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue-song Wen ◽  
Dan Jiang ◽  
Lei Gao ◽  
Jian-zhong Zhou ◽  
Jun Xiao ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In December 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, Hubei, China. Moreover, it has become a global pandemic. This is of great value in describing the clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients in detail and looking for markers which are significant to predict the prognosis of COVID-19 patients. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective study, 476 patients with COVID-19 were enrolled from a consecutive series. After screening, a total of 395 patients were included in this study. All-cause death was the primary endpoint. All patients were followed up from admission till discharge or death. Results The main symptoms observed in the study included fever on admission, cough, fatigue, and shortness of breath. The most common comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Patients with lower CD4+T cell level were older and more often male compared to those with higher CD4+T cell level. Reduced CD8+T cell level was an indicator of the severity of COVID-19. Both decreased CD4+T [HR:13.659; 95%CI: 3.235–57.671] and CD8+T [HR: 10.883; 95%CI: 3.277–36.145] cell levels were associated with in-hospital death in COVID-19 patients, but only the decrease of CD4+T cell level was an independent predictor of in-hospital death in COVID-19 patients. Conclusions Reductions in lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets were common in COVID-19 patients, especially in severe cases of COVID-19. It was the CD8+T cell level, not the CD4+T cell level, that reflected the severity of the patient’s disease. Only reduced CD4+T cell level was independently associated with increased in-hospital death in COVID-19 patients. Trial registration Prognostic Factors of Patients With COVID-19, NCT04292964. Registered 03 March 2020. Retrospectively registered.


Neurosurgery ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Kelly

Abstract In this study of 72 patients who had histologically verified thalamic astrocytomas, 44 patients underwent stereotactic serial biopsy, 22 underwent stereotactic resection of the neoplasm, and an additional 6 patients underwent stereotactic biopsy followed by stereotactic resection of the tumor at a later date. Of the 50 patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy, 3 were neurologically worse after the procedure (morbidity, 6%), and 3 additional patients with Grade 4 astrocytomas who preoperatively were rapidly deteriorating neurologically, died within 30 days of the procedure. Of the 28 patients who underwent stereotactic resection, 14 were neurologically improved after the procedure, 10 were unchanged, and 4 were worse. One additional patient died 10 days postoperatively. Thirty-four patients had Grade 4 astrocytomas: 27 underwent stereotactic biopsies. The mean survival after biopsy and irradiation for patients with Grade 4 astrocytomas was 21.4 weeks. The mean survival was 62 weeks in 7 patients with Grade 4 astrocytomas who underwent stereotactic resection and radiation therapy. The mean survival time after biopsy and radiation therapy for patients who had Grade 3 and Grade 2 lesions was 54.4 weeks and 91 weeks, respectively. Twenty-three patients had pilocytic astrocytomas; 8 underwent stereotactic biopsies, and 19 underwent stereotactic resection of the tumor (4 of these underwent biopsy prior to resection). There was no neurological morbidity, but one patient died after resection. Many of those who underwent resection were deteriorating due to an enlarging tumor mass or recurring cyst, and had undergone more conservative therapies such as biopsy and radiation. Even though stereotactic biopsy is appropriate in many patients harboring thalamic astrocytomas, selected patients with significant mass effect from solid tumor or recurring cyst can benefit from stereotactic resection.


2006 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graeme F. Woodworth ◽  
Matthew J. McGirt ◽  
Amer Samdani ◽  
Ira Garonzik ◽  
Alessandro Olivi ◽  
...  

Object The gold standard for stereotactic brain biopsy target localization has been frame-based stereotaxy. Recently, frameless stereotactic techniques have become increasingly utilized. Few authors have evaluated this procedure, analyzed preoperative predictors of diagnostic yield, or explored the differences in diagnostic yield and morbidity rate between the frameless and frame-based techniques. Methods A consecutive series of 110 frameless and 160 frame-based image-guided stereotactic biopsy procedures was reviewed. Associated variables for both techniques were reviewed and compared. All stereotactic biopsy procedures were included in a risk factor analysis of nondiagnostic biopsy sampling. Frameless stereotaxy led to a diagnostic yield of 89%, with a total permanent morbidity rate of 6% and a mortality rate of 1%. Larger lesions were fivefold more likely to yield diagnostic tissues. Deep-seated lesions were 2.7-fold less likely to yield diagnostic tissues compared with cortical lesions. Frameless compared with frame-based stereotactic biopsy procedures showed no significant differences in diagnostic yield or transient or permanent morbidity. For cortical lesions, more than one needle trajectory was required more frequently to obtain diagnostic tissues with frame-based as opposed to frameless stereotaxy, although this factor was not associated with morbidity. Conclusions With regard to diagnostic yield and complication rate, the frameless stereotactic biopsy procedure was found to be comparable to or better than the frame-based method. Smaller and deep-seated lesions together were risk factors for a nondiagnostic tissue yield. Frameless stereotaxy may represent a more efficient means of obtaining biopsy specimens of cortical lesions but is otherwise similar to the frame-based technique.


1998 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhaya V. Kulkarni ◽  
Abhijit Guha ◽  
Andres Lozano ◽  
Mark Bernstein

Object. Many neurosurgeons routinely obtain computerized tomography (CT) scans to rule out hemorrhage in patients after stereotactic procedures. In the present prospective study, the authors investigated the rate of silent hemorrhage and delayed deterioration after stereotactic biopsy sampling and the role of postbiopsy CT scanning. Methods. A subset of patients (the last 102 of approximately 800 patients) who underwent stereotactic brain biopsies at the Toronto Hospital prospectively underwent routine postoperative CT scanning within hours of the biopsy procedure. Their medical charts and CT scans were then reviewed. A postoperative CT scan was obtained in 102 patients (aged 17–87 years) who underwent stereotactic biopsy between June 1994 and September 1996. Sixty-one patients (59.8%) exhibited hemorrhages, mostly intracerebral (54.9%), on the immediate postoperative scan. Only six of these patients were clinically suspected to have suffered a hemorrhage based on immediate postoperative neurological deficit; in the remaining 55 (53.9%) of 102 patients, the hemorrhage was clinically silent and unsuspected. Among the clinically silent intracerebral hemorrhages, 22 measured less than 5 mm, 20 between 5 and 10 mm, five between 10 and 30 mm, and four between 30 and 40 mm. Of the 55 patients with clinically silent hemorrhages, only three demonstrated a delayed neurological deficit (one case of seizure and two cases of progressive loss of consciousness) and these all occurred within the first 2 postoperative days. Of the neurologically well patients in whom no hemorrhage was demonstrated on initial postoperative CT scan, none experienced delayed deterioration. Conclusions. Clinically silent hemorrhage after stereotactic biopsy is very common. However, the authors did not find that knowledge of its existence ultimately affected individual patient management or outcome. The authors, therefore, suggest that the most important role of postoperative CT scanning is to screen for those neurologically well patients with no hemorrhage. These patients could safely be discharged on the same day they underwent biopsy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document