scholarly journals Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the skull base: results with an aggressive multidisciplinary approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Ramakrishna ◽  
Shaan M. Raza ◽  
Michael Kupferman ◽  
Ehab Hanna ◽  
Franco DeMonte

OBJECT Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a locally aggressive tumor of salivary gland origin. Little data exist to guide treatment when this tumor extends to involve the structures of the skull base. METHODS Fifty-one patients with a diagnosis of ACC affecting the skull base were identified from a prospective database at MD Anderson Cancer Center (from 1992 to 2010). RESULTS Median follow-up for study patients was 6.75 years. The 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rates were 78% and 50%, respectively. Sixty-six percent of patients had progression of their disease. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 46.7% and 21.0%, respectively. Gross-total resection was achieved in 75% of patients, with 49% having microscopically negative margins at the time of first operation. On univariate analysis, resections with microscopically negative margins were associated with a significant OS advantage (20.1 ± 3.3 years) compared with resections that left residual disease, even if microscopic (10.3 ± 1.6 years, p = 0.035). In patients who underwent reoperation, the effect persisted, with improved OS in those with negative margins (21.4 ± 0.0 vs 16.7 ± 4.0 years, p = 0.06). The use of adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with an OS advantage (16.2 ± 2.5 vs 5.5 ± 2.2 years, p = 0.03) at initial diagnosis and improved PFS (7.8 ± 1.0 vs 2.1 ± 0.62 years, p = 0.005), whereas repeat irradiation provided no benefit. The use of adjuvant chemotherapy at diagnosis or at recurrence was not associated with any significant advantage. Multivariate analysis revealed margin-negative resection at initial operation and at recurrence retained OS significance, even after controlling for age, radiation therapy, and T stage. CONCLUSIONS ACC of the skull base is best treated with a multidisciplinary approach aimed at maximal, safe resection. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be offered, whereas chemotherapy does not confer benefit.

Author(s):  
Ajlan Al Zaki ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Grace Watson ◽  
Sairah Ahmed ◽  
Haleigh Mistry ◽  
...  

About 70% of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) who achieve a partial response (PR) or a stable disease (SD) on day 30 (D30) PET-CT scan progress, but predictive factors of progression are unknown. This a retrospective study of patients with LBCL treated with axi-cel at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 01/2018 and 02/2021. Among 50 patients with D30 PR/SD, 13 (26%) converted to complete response (CR). Among 95 patients with D30 CR, 72 (76%) remained in CR. On univariate analysis, the only day -5 characteristic associated with conversion from D30 PR/SD to subsequent CR was a higher platelet count (p=0.05). The only D30 factor associated with conversion from D30 PR/SD to subsequent CR was lower D30 SUVmax (p<0.001), and all patients with and D30 SUVmax ≥10 progressed. After a median follow-up of 12 months, no significant difference in median progression-free survival was observed when comparing patients who converted from D30 PR/SD to subsequent CR to those who had been in CR since D30 (p=0.19). Novel predictive and prognostic markers based on tissue biopsy and non-invasive diagnostic assays are needed to more effectively identify these patients and characterize the biology of their residual disease.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15060-e15060
Author(s):  
Alexandre A Jacome ◽  
Bryan K. Kee ◽  
David R. Fogelman ◽  
Imad Shureiqi ◽  
Arvind Dasari ◽  
...  

e15060 Background: Microsatellite stable (MSI-S) RS mCRC patients (pts) have a worse prognosis relative to left sided tumors for overall survival (OS). The present analysis aims to test the hypothesis that a triplet-regimen is superior compared to doublet-regimens (DR; FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) for OS. Methods: Pts with treatment-naive RS mCRC at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January/2011 to December/2018 were selected. We compared the progression-free survival (PFS) and OS of mCRC pts treated with FOLFOXIRI versus DR. Pts treated with anti-EGFR therapy were excluded. Results: A total of 37 pts were treated with FOLFOXIRI and 111 pts with DR. There were no statistical difference between groups regarding gender, KRAS and BRAF mutations, peritoneal metastasis and bevacizumab use. There were statistical difference in age (median: 46y vs 59y) and metastasectomy rates (14% vs 32%) (p < 0.001). KRAS mutation was found in 65% of the population. Median follow-up was 55.3m. Median PFS was 6.5m vs 11.2m (HR: 1.30 95% CI 0.85 – 1.99) and median OS was 17.0m vs 26.3m (HR: 1.01 95% CI 0.60 – 1.68). By univariate analysis, pts who have undergone metastasectomy had superior PFS (14.9m vs 9.2m; p<0.001) and OS (32.4m vs 22.9m; p=0.003). By multivariate analysis adjusted for age, BRAF mutation, metastasectomy, bevacizumab use and, treatment regimen, only age and metastasectomy had prognostic influence for PFS (p=0.039 and p=0.026, respectively). Conclusions: Despite RS having a poor prognosis for OS, our study does not suggest that RS mCRC pts benefit from intensive treatment. Randomized clinical trials may suggest more individualized therapies.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaan M. Raza ◽  
Paul W. Gidley ◽  
Jeanne M. Meis ◽  
David R. Grosshans ◽  
Diana Bell ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND: Limited data exist to guide the multimodality management of chondrosarcomas (CSAs) arising in the skull base. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of histological subtype/grade on progression-free survival (PFS) and the indications for surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy based on histology. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 37 patients (conventional type: 81%, mesenchymal: 16.2%, dedifferentiated: 2.7%) treated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Of the conventional subtype, 23% were grade 1, 63% were grade 2, and 14% were grade 3. In addition to surgery, mesenchymal/dedifferentiated CSAs (18% of the cohort) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 48.6% of the overall cohort received adjuvant radiotherapy. Histological grade/subtype and treatment factors were assessed for impact on median PFS (primary outcome). RESULTS: Conventional subtype vs mesenchymal/dedifferentiated was positively associated with median PFS (166 vs 24 months, P &lt; .05). Increasing conventional grade inversely correlated with median PFS (P &lt; .05). Gross total resection positively impacted PFS in conventional CSAs (111.8 vs 42.9 months, P = .201) and mesenchymal/dedifferentiated CSAs (58.2 vs 1.0 month, P &lt; .05). Adjuvant radiotherapy significantly impacted PFS in conventional grades 2 and 3 (182 vs 79 months, P &lt; .05) and a positive trend with mesenchymal/dedifferentiated CSAs (43.5 vs 22.0 months). Chemotherapy improved PFS for mesenchymal/dedifferentiated CSAs (50 vs 9 months, P = .089). CONCLUSION: There is a potential need for histological subtype/grade specific treatment protocols. For conventional CSAs, surgery alone provides optimal results grade 1 CSAs, while resection with adjuvant radiotherapy yields the best outcome for grade 2 and 3 CSAs. Improvements in PFS seen with neoadjuvant therapy in mesenchymal/dedifferentiated CSAs indicate a potential role for systemic therapies. Larger studies are necessary to confirm the proposed treatment protocols.


2015 ◽  
Vol 76 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohan Ramakrishna ◽  
Shaan Raza ◽  
Michael Kupferman ◽  
Ehab Hanna ◽  
Franco DeMonte

2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Mehta ◽  
Samuel Spear ◽  
Yu-Lan Mary Ying ◽  
Moises Arriaga ◽  
Daniel Nuss

Skull Base ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 18 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Chan ◽  
Paul Busse ◽  
Urmila Kamat ◽  
Derrick Lin ◽  
Norbert Liebsch

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aynur Sari-Rieger ◽  
Stefan Hassfeld ◽  
Klaus Junker ◽  
Jan Rustemeyer

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 202-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimasa Mori ◽  
Tatsuya Kobayashi ◽  
Yoshihisa Kida ◽  
Kyota Oda ◽  
Yuta Shibamoto ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document