scholarly journals Single-fraction versus multifraction spinal stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases from renal cell carcinoma: secondary analysis of Phase I/II trials

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 829-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amol J. Ghia ◽  
Eric L. Chang ◽  
Andrew J. Bishop ◽  
Hubert Y. Pan ◽  
Nicholas S. Boehling ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare fractionation schemes and outcomes of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated in institutional prospective spinal stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) trials who did not previously undergo radiation treatment at the site of the SSRS. METHODS Patients enrolled in 2 separate institutional prospective protocols and treated with SSRS between 2002 and 2011 were included. A secondary analysis was performed on patients with previously nonirradiated RCC spinal metastases treated with either single-fraction (SF) or multifraction (MF) SSRS. RESULTS SSRS was performed in 47 spinal sites on 43 patients. The median age of the patients was 62 years (range 38–75 years). The most common histological subtype was clear cell (n = 30). Fifteen sites underwent surgery prior to the SSRS, with laminectomy the most common procedure performed (n = 10). All SF SSRS was delivered to a dose of 24 Gy (n = 21) while MF regiments were either 27 Gy in 3 fractions (n = 20) or 30 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 6). The median overall survival duration for the entire cohort was 22.8 months. The median local control (LC) for the entire cohort was 80.6 months with 1-year and 2-year actuarial LC rates of 82% and 68%, respectively. Single-fraction SSRS correlated with improved 1- and 2-year actuarial LC relative to MF SSRS (95% vs 71% and 86% vs 55%, respectively; p = 0.009). On competing risk analysis, SF SSRS showed superior LC to MF SSRS (subhazard ratio [SHR] 6.57, p = 0.014). On multivariate analysis for LC with tumor volume (p = 0.272), number of treated levels (p = 0.819), gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage (p = 0.225), and GTV minimum point dose (p = 0.97) as covariates, MF SSRS remained inferior to SF SSRS (SHR 5.26, p = 0.033) CONCLUSIONS SSRS offers durable LC for spinal metastases from RCC. Single-fraction SSRS is associated with improved LC over MF SSRS for previously nonirradiated RCC spinal metastases.

2005 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 288-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C. Gerszten ◽  
Steven A. Burton ◽  
Cihat Ozhasoglu ◽  
William J. Vogel ◽  
William C. Welch ◽  
...  

Object. The role of stereotactic radiosurgery in treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastases to the spine has previously been limited. In this study the authors evaluated the clinical outcome in patients with spinal RCC who underwent single-fraction radiosurgery. Methods. Forty-eight patients with 60 RCC metastases to the spine (six cervical, 26 thoracic, 18 lumbar, and 10 sacral) were treated with a single-fraction radiosurgery technique and were followed for a period of 14 to 48 months (median 37 months). All patients were successfully treated in an outpatient setting. The tumor volume ranged from 5.5 to 203 cm3 (mean 61.9 cm3). Forty-two of the total 60 lesions had been previously treated with external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT). The maximum tumor dose was maintained at 17.5 to 25 Gy (mean 20 Gy). The volume of the spinal cord exposed to greater than 8 Gy ranged from 0.01 to 3 cm3 (mean 0.64 cm3); the volume of the spinal canal at the cauda equina level exposed to greater than 8 Gy ranged from 0.01 to 2.2 cm3 (mean 0.65 cm3). No radiation-induced toxicity occurred during the follow-up period. Axial and radicular pain improved in 34 (89%) of 38 patients who were treated primarily for pain. Tumor control was demonstrated in seven of eight patients treated primarily for radiographically documented tumor progression. In time six patients required open surgical intervention for tumor progression that had caused neurological dysfunction after radiosurgery. Conclusions. Spinal radiosurgery can be a successful therapeutic modality for the delivery of large-dose single-fraction radiation to RCC spinal metastases that are often poorly controlled with conventional EBRT modalities.


Author(s):  
D. Boyce-Fappiano ◽  
E. Elibe ◽  
I.Y. Lee ◽  
J. Rock ◽  
M.S.U. Siddiqui ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanqing Ma ◽  
Weijun Ma ◽  
Xiren Xu ◽  
Zheng Guan ◽  
Peipei Pang

AbstractThis study aimed to construct convention-radiomics CT nomogram containing conventional CT characteristics and radiomics signature for distinguishing fat-poor angiomyolipoma (fp-AML) from clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). 29 fp-AML and 110 ccRCC patients were enrolled and underwent CT examinations in this study. The radiomics-only logistic model was constructed with selected radiomics features by the analysis of variance (ANOVA)/Mann–Whitney (MW), correlation analysis, and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and the radiomics score (rad-score) was computed. The convention-radiomics logistic model based on independent conventional CT risk factors and rad-score was constructed for differentiating. Then the relevant nomogram was developed. Receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated to quantify the accuracy for distinguishing. The rad-score of ccRCC was smaller than that of fp-AML. The convention-radioimics logistic model was constructed containing variables of enhancement pattern, VUP, and rad-score. To the entire cohort, the area under the curve (AUC) of convention-radiomics model (0.968 [95% CI 0.923–0.990]) was higher than that of radiomics-only model (0.958 [95% CI 0.910–0.985]). Our study indicated that convention-radiomics CT nomogram including conventional CT risk factors and radiomics signature exhibited better performance in distinguishing fp-AML from ccRCC.


2007 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 334-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin S. Teh ◽  
Charles Bloch ◽  
Arnold C. Paulino ◽  
Steven Shen ◽  
Lisa Hinckley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuh Filizoglu ◽  
Ilknur Alsan Cetin ◽  
Tugba Nergiz Kissa ◽  
Khanim Niftaliyeva ◽  
Tunc Ones

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1504-1513 ◽  
Author(s):  
W J Hrushesky ◽  
R von Roemeling ◽  
R M Lanning ◽  
J T Rabatin

Sixty-eight unselected patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were treated between March 1985 and November 1988 with continuous infusion floxuridine (FUDR). Thirty-seven percent of these patients had previously received and failed systemic treatment. Using implantable pumps for automatic drug delivery, FUDR was continuously infused for 14 days at monthly intervals. The starting dose was 0.15 mg/kg/d (intravenous [IV]; n = 61) or 0.25 mg/kg/d (intraarterial [IA]; n = 7); IV doses were increased or decreased in increments of 0.025 mg/kg/d as permitted by toxicity. Diarrhea (with or without mild abdominal cramping) and nausea/vomiting limited the FUDR IV infusion, and hepatic function abnormalities limited FUDR IA infusion. The use of a circadian-modified infusion schedule permitted high FUDR doses to be safely given as compared with a constant rate infusion schedule. Of 63 patients assessable for response, 56 received systemic FUDR infusion. Four complete responses (CRs; 7.1%); and seven partial responses (PRs; 12.5%) were observed (objective response rate, CR plus PR, 19.6 +/- 5.1% [95% confidence limits] ). The median objective response duration was 10.8 months (range, 1 to 18 months; mean, 9.4 +/- 1.6). Four additional patients had minor tumor responses (MRs; 7.1%). In a subgroup of seven assessable patients receiving hepatic arterial FUDR, we observed one CR and three PRs (57.2 +/- 42.8%). Overall, objective response (CR plus PR) was seen in a quarter of assessable patients treated, 15 of 63, while only 15 of the 63 assessable patients (25.4%) have had objective tumor progression. The median follow-up time for all 68 patients was 28 months (range, 1 to 42), and their median survival duration is 15 months (range, 3 to 37 months). Continuous infusion FUDR is an effective outpatient treatment for progressive metastatic RCC, producing durable tumor response and causing little toxicity.


ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. e000445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Joseph Doherty ◽  
Deirdre Lynskey ◽  
Athena Matakidou ◽  
Kate Fife ◽  
Tim Eisen

IntroductionThe AXIS trial established axitinib as a standard of care treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) after failure of a prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Axitinib dosing begins at 5  mg twice daily, with escalation of doses to 7  and 10  mg after consecutive 2-week intervals if tolerated (as per the drug label). Given clinical concerns about drug-related toxicity, we have used a pragmatic strategy where dose escalations were made only after disease progression or where rapid responses were clinically required.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of electronic health records and radiology of all patients with mRCC treated with axitinib for >2 weeks at Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK, over a 37 -month period to determine the clinical and radiological effects of dose escalations made according to the above strategy.Results42 patients fitting these criteria were identified, 29 having ≥1  dose escalation event (DEE). 60 DEEs were identified (median of two per patient), and the objective radiological consequences of 53 DEEs could be evaluated. The disease control rate (partial response or stable disease) after the first DEE instituted for disease progression was similar to that after the second DEE (68.8% vs 70%). 56.6 % of all DEEs and 63.6 % of DEEs made as a result of disease progression resulted in disease control. The median OS from the commencement of axitinib for all dose-escalated patients was 19.9 months, and 16.5 months for the entire cohort. The mean dose (for all patients) at 90 days after starting axitinib was 5.92  mg.ConclusionThese data suggest that dose escalation of axitinib after disease progression may be an effective dosing strategy for patients with mRCC, and this may be a preferred option in patients in whom there are particular concerns about drug-related toxicity, quality of life optimisation or healthcare-associated costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document