Volumetric changes of intracranial metastases during the course of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery and significance of adaptive planning

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Ho Lee ◽  
Kyung Hwan Kim ◽  
Kyung Rae Cho ◽  
Jung Won Choi ◽  
Doo-Sik Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Target Area ◽  
Volume Changes ◽  
Adaptive Planning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intracranial Metastases

OBJECTIVEFractionated Gamma Knife surgery (FGKS) has recently been used to treat large brain metastases. However, little is known about specific volume changes of lesions during the course of treatment. The authors investigated short-term volume changes of metastatic lesions during FGKS.METHODSThe authors analyzed 33 patients with 40 lesions who underwent FGKS for intracranial metastases of non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC; 25 patients with 32 lesions) and breast cancer (8 patients with 8 lesions). FGKS was performed in 3–5 fractions. Baseline MRI was performed before the first fraction. MRI was repeated after 1 or 2 fractions. Adaptive planning was executed based on new images. The median prescription dose was 8 Gy (range 6–10 Gy) with a 50% isodose line.RESULTSOn follow-up MRI, 18 of 40 lesions (45.0%) showed decreased tumor volumes (TVs). A significant difference was observed between baseline (median 15.8 cm3) and follow-up (median 14.2 cm3) volumes (p < 0.001). A conformity index was significantly decreased when it was assumed that adaptive planning was not implemented, from baseline (mean 0.96) to follow-up (mean 0.90, p < 0.001). The average reduction rate was 1.5% per day. The median follow-up duration was 29.5 weeks (range 9–94 weeks). During the follow-up period, local recurrence occurred in 5 lesions.CONCLUSIONSThe TV showed changes with a high dose of radiation during the course of FGKS. Volumetric change caused a significant difference in the clinical parameters. It is expected that adaptive planning would be helpful in the case of radiosensitive tumors such as NSCLCs or breast cancer to ensure an adequate dose to the target area and reduce unnecessary exposure of normal tissue to radiation.

scholarly journals Breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery – persistent pain and quality of life 1–8 years after breast reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Honkanen ◽  
Laura Mustonen ◽  
Eija Kalso ◽  
Tuomo Meretoja ◽  
Hanna Harno
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Breast Reconstruction ◽  
Perforator Flap ◽  
Persistent Pain ◽  
Rectus Abdominis ◽  
Preoperative Pain ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objectives To assess the long-term outcome of breast reconstructions with special focus on chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) in a larger cohort of breast cancer survivors. Methods A cross-sectional study on 121 women with mastectomy and breast reconstruction after mean 2 years 4 months follow up. The mean time from breast reconstruction to the follow-up visit was 4 years 2 months. We studied surveys on pain (Brief Pain Inventory, BPI and Douleur Neuropathique 4, DN4), quality of life (RAND-36 health survey), sleep (insomnia severity questionnaire, ISI), mood (Beck’s Depression Index, BDI; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS), and a detailed clinical sensory status. Patients were divided into three groups: abdominal flap (Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap, DIEP; Free transverse rectus abdominis flap, fTRAM, and Pedicled transverse rectus abdominis flap, pTRAM), dorsal flap (Latissimus dorsi flap, LD and Thoracodorsal artery perforator flap, TDAP), and other (Transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap, TMG; implant). Clinically meaningful pain was defined ≥ 4/10 on a numeric rating scale (NRS). We used patients’ pain drawings to localize the pain. We assessed preoperative pain NRS from previous data. Results 106 (87.6%) of the patients did not have clinically meaningful persistent pain. We found no statistically significant difference between different reconstruction types with regards to persistent pain (p=0.40), mood (BDI-II, p=0.41 and HADS A, p=0.54) or sleep (p=0.14), respectively. Preoperative pain prior to breast reconstruction surgery correlated strongly with moderate or severe CPSP. Conclusions Moderate to severe CPSP intensity was present in 14% of patients. We found no significant difference in the prevalence of pain across different reconstruction types. Preoperative pain associated significantly with postoperative persistent pain.

scholarly journals Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes: the advantage of dosimetric data and safety of toxicities

2020 ◽  
Vol 61 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-754
Author(s):  
Yoshiko Doi ◽  
Minoru Nakao ◽  
Hideharu Miura ◽  
Shuichi Ozawa ◽  
Masahiro Kenjo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Irradiation Dose ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Regional Lymph Nodes ◽  
Dosimetric Data ◽  
Arc Therapy

ABSTRACT To improve the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes, we planned Hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), which combines conventional tangential field mainly for the chest area and VMAT mainly for the supraclavicular area and marginal zone. In this study, we compared the dosimetric impact between traditional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and Hybrid VMAT and observed toxicities following Hybrid VMAT. A total of 70 patients indicated between October 2016 and December 2017 were included. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy/25 fractions. For the dosimetric impact, 3DCRT and Hybrid VMAT plans were compared in each patient with respect to the dosimetric parameters. Toxicities were followed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. The median follow-up duration was 319 days. For the dosimetric impact, the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI) of PTV were significantly improved in the Hybrid VMAT plan compared with that in the 3DCRT plan (HI, 0.15 ± 0.07 in Hybrid VMAT vs 0.41 ± 0.19 in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.001; CI, 1.61 ± 0.44 in Hybrid VMAT vs 2.10 ± 0.56 in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.001). The mean irradiated ipsilateral lung dose was not significantly different in both plans (12.0 ± 2.4 Gy in Hybrid VMAT vs 11.8 ± 2.8 Gy in 3DCRT, P &lt; 0.533). Regarding toxicity, there were no patients who developed ≥grade 3 acute toxicity and ≥grade 2 pneumonitis during the follow-up. Hybrid VMAT for postoperative breast cancer including regional lymph nodes was a reasonable technique that improved the homogeneity and conformity of the irradiation dose to the planning target volume while keeping the irradiation dose to organs at risk to a minimum.

scholarly journals Quantitative and dosimetric analysis for treating synchronous bilateral breast cancer using two radiotherapy planning techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 201-206
Author(s):  
Özlem Mermut ◽  
Aysun Ozsoy Ata ◽  
Didem Can Trabulus
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Organs At Risk ◽  
Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiotherapy Planning ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Treatment Unit ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer ◽  
The Right

Abstract Objective: We compared mono-isocenter and dual-isocenter plans in synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC), which is defined as tumours occurring simultaneously in both breasts, and evaluated the effects of these differences in plans on organs-at-risk (OARs). Materials and methods: We evaluated 10 women with early stage, nod negative (Tis-2N0M0) SBBC. The treatment dose was determined to be 50 Gy. We used mean dose and VXGy to evaluate the OARs. To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment plans, Homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI) and sigma index (SI) and monitor units (MU) of monoisocenter (MIT) and dual-isocenter (DIT) plans were compared. During bilateral breast planning, for the single-centre plan, the isocenter was placed at the center of both breasts at a depth of 3-4 cm. For the two-center plan, dual-isocenters were placed on the right and left breasts. Results: No significant difference between the techniques in terms of the scope of the target volume was observed. Statistically significant results were not achieved in MIT and DIT plans for OARs. Upon comparing MIT and DIT, the right-side monitor unit (MU) value in DIT (p = 0.011) was statistically significantly lower than that in MIT. Upon comparing right-left side MIT and DIT, the MU value (p = 0.028) was significantly lower in DIT than MIT. Conclusion: SBBC irradiation is more complex than unilateral breast radiotherapy. No significant difference between both techniques and OARs was observed. However, we recommend MIT as a priority technique due to the ability to protect OARs, ease of administration during treatment, and the fact that the patient stays in the treatment unit for a shorter period of time.

Multicenter study for brain metastasis from breast cancer in Korea: The significance of molecular subtype (Korean Radiation Oncology Group 1612).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14008-e14008
Author(s):  
In Ah Kim ◽  
Jae Sik Kim ◽  
Kyubo Kim ◽  
Wonguen Jung ◽  
Kyung Hwan Shin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Molecular Subtype ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Time Interval

e14008 Background: We analyzed the treatment outcome of breast cancer patients with brain metastases (BM) in Korea to identify the prognostic factors and the role of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Methods: Seven hundred thirty patients of breast cancer with BM treated at 17 institutions in Korea from 2000 to 2014 were analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 12 months. The analysis consisted of three cohorts: in cohort A, a total of 730 patients were included; in cohort B, 538 patients with available follow-up imaging after initial brain-directed treatment; and in cohort C, 54 patients receiving salvage WBRT due to recurrent BM after initial Stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT. Overall survival (OS) was calculated from BM diagnosis in cohort A or from the last day of salvage WBRT in cohort C. Results: Median OS of cohort A was 15 months. In multivariate analysis, histologic grade 3, extracranial metastasis, number of BM > 4, hormone receptor (HR) or HER2 negativity, and shorter time interval to diagnosis of BM were associated with inferior OS. Among 538 patients in cohort B, 201 showed subsequent development of new BM at a median of 11 months after stereotactic radiosurgery or WBRT for the management of initial BM (at 1 year, HR+/HER2- 51.9%, HER2+ 44.0%, and TNBC 69.6%, respectively; p = 0.008). Upfront WBRT reduced subsequent development of new BM, which showed the significant difference among molecular subtypes (HR+/HER2-, 42% reduction at 1 year, p < 0.001; HER2+, 18.5%, p = 0.004; TNBC, 16.9%, p = 0.071). Multivariate analysis showed that shorter time interval to BM, TNBC subtype, extracranial systemic disease, number of BM > 4, and involvement of both tentoria increased subsequent development of new BM. Anti-HER2 therapy for HER2+ patients and upfront WBRT significantly reduced risk of new BM. In cohort C, upfront WBRT prolonged the salvage WBRT-free duration (median 6.9 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.058). Median OS was 6.8 months after salvage WBRT. Longer interval to salvage WBRT, controlled primary tumor, high dose of salvage WBRT (BED10 > 37.5 Gy), and systemic treatment after salvage WBRT showed better OS. Uncontrolled extracranial systemic disease and salvage WBRT due to local progression without distant intracranial failure showed worse OS. Conclusions: The rates of new BM showed the significant differences among molecular subtypes. Upfront WBRT decreased subsequent development of new BM and this effect was dependent on the molecular subtype as well. Anti-HER2 therapy for HER2+ patients significantly decreased the subsequent development of new BM. On salvage WBRT setting, the patients having high dose of salvage WBRT, stable extracranial systemic disease and subsequent systemic therapy showed better OS.

scholarly journals Is quality of life after mastectomy comparable to that after breast conservation surgery? A 5-year follow up study from Mumbai, India

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 683-692
Author(s):  
K. V. Deepa ◽  
A. Gadgil ◽  
Jenny Löfgren ◽  
S. Mehare ◽  
Prashant Bhandarkar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Radical Mastectomy ◽  
Breast Conservation Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Domain Scores

Abstract Purpose Breast cancer is the commonest cancer in women worldwide. Surgery is a central part of the treatment. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is often replaced by breast conserving therapy (BCT) in high-income countries. MRM is still the standard choice, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) as radiotherapy, a mandatory component of BCT is not widely available. It is important to understand whether quality of life (QOL) after MRM is comparable to that after BCT. This has not been studied well in LMICs. We present, 5-year follow-up of QOL scores in breast cancer patients from India. Methods We interviewed women undergoing breast cancer surgery preoperatively, at 6 months after surgery, and at 1 year and 5 years, postoperatively. QOL scores were evaluated using FACT B questionnaire. Average QOL scores of women undergoing BCT were compared with those undergoing MRM. Total scores, domain scores and trends of scores over time were analyzed. Results We interviewed 54 women with a mean age of 53 years (SD 9 ± years). QOL scores in all the women, dipped during the treatment period, in all subscales but improved thereafter and even surpassed the baseline in physical, emotional and breast-specific domains (p < 0.05) at 5 years. At the end of 5 years, there was no statistically significant difference between the MRM and BCT groups in any of the total or domain scores. Conclusion QOL scores in Indian women did not differ significantly between MRM and BCT in the long term. Both options are acceptable in the study setting.

Shoulder girdle impairment in breast cancer survivors: the role of range of motion as predictive factor for dose distribution and clinical outcome

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabio Marazzi ◽  
Valeria Masiello ◽  
Domenico Marchesano ◽  
Luca Boldrini ◽  
Stefano Luzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Predictive Factor ◽  
Late Complication ◽  
Shoulder Girdle ◽  
Dash Score ◽  
Observational Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference

Background:Pain and functional impairment of the ipsilateral shoulder girdle in patients who underwent surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer (BC) is a late complication reported in the literature. We analyze a correlation with dosimetric parameters and propose an algorithm for sparing strategies.Methods:A total of 111 patients treated for BC were included in this observational analysis during follow-up protocol visits. Exclusion criteria were the presence of moderate or severe arthrosis history and/or rheumatologic diseases. All the patients had complete physical and multidimensional examinations during joint (physiatrist and radiotherapy oncology) follow-up visits. A scapula–humeral articulation (SHA) standardized contouring was performed retrospectively on Eclipse® treatment plans. A possible correlation between patients’ characteristics, radiotherapy, and dosimetry analysis and functional impairment was investigated at statistical analysis. Results of analysis were summarized into a proposal of algorithm for sparing SHA.Results:A total of 111 patients were selected during follow-up visits. Mean age of patients was 60 years (range 41–85 years). A total of 103 patients (93%) underwent conservative surgery, with 110 patients (99%) undergoing axilla surgery as well. Fifty-two patients (46.8%) presented a reduction of range of motion (ROM) abduction on the treated side at the observational analysis. Mean ROM abduction reduction was 13°06’ (range 0°–100°). Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) score results were excellent in 79 patients (71.2%), discrete in 15 patients (13.5%), good in 15 patients (13.5%), and sufficient in 2 patients (1.8%). Median EQD2Dmaxat SHA was 18 Gy (range 0.22–51.9 Gy) and median EQD2mean dose at SHA was 2 Gy (range 0.04–24.32 Gy). Univariate analysis showed a linear correlation between DASH score and ROM of abduction of treated side (ρ=−0.7), ROM of abduction and ROM of flexion in ipsilateral arm (ρ=0.8), or ROM of abduction and ROM of flexion in contralateral arm (ρ=0.8). A statistically significant difference in ROM abduction between the 2 arms was found at χ2test ( P<0.05 at χ2confidence interval = 95%). Cox linear regression analysis showed ROM abduction on treated arm as a predictive factor of DASH score ( P<0.0001). Age ( P<0.05), DASH score ( P=0.006), and ROM abduction on treated arm ( P=0.005) were found as independent predictive factors of mean dose at multivariate analysis. A mean dose higher than 7 Gy and ROM abduction reduction more than 30° were related to DASH score level reduction.Conclusions:This hypothesis-generating study introduces an algorithm to be validated for management of sparing SHA and improving quality of survivorship. ROM evaluation after surgery, early physiotherapy, standard contouring, and planning adaptation represent possible indications to preserve shoulder impairment. Further prospective studies are needed to discriminate impairment of surgery and radiotherapy in order to personalized therapeutic plan programs.

scholarly journals Dosimetric Comparison of Three Radiotherapy Techniques in Irradiation of Left-Sided Breast Cancer Patients after Radical Mastectomy

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Jian Hu ◽  
Guang Han ◽  
Yu Lei ◽  
Ximing Xu ◽  
Wei Ge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radical Mastectomy ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Conformity Index ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Ipsilateral Lung ◽  
Significant Difference

Introduction. This study is aimed at evaluating the dosimetric differences among target segmented planning (TSP), conventional 9-field intensity modulated radiation therapy (9FIMRT) planning, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning for postmastectomy radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer patients. Material and Methods. Fifteen left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent radical mastectomy were enrolled. In TSP, the planning target volume (PTV) was divided into four regions (supra/infraclavicular, chest wall, external mammary region, and internal mammary region), and each individual PTV region was treated with respective fixed fields. Results. The VMAT plans showed superior to PTV dose conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), protection of the ipsilateral lung, monitor units (MUs), and maximum dose (Dmax) to the contralateral breast compared with TSP and 9FIMRT plans. The TSP provided better protection for Dmean of the heart and left ventricle (p<0.05). A dose for left anterior descending artery from the three techniques had no significant difference. Compared with the 9FIMRT plans, the V5Gy (%) and V10Gy (%) for the ipsilateral lung were significantly reduced with TSP and VMAT (p<0.05). The V5Gy (%) and V10Gy (%) for the ipsilateral lung turned out to be similar between VMAT and TSP techniques. Conclusions. Our study indicates that VMAT should be a better choice of radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer patients after radical mastectomy. If VMAT is unavailable, 9FIMRT can achieve better CI and HI values and be more MU-efficient compared with TSP; however, TSP can effectively reduce the low dose volume of the ipsilateral lungs and heart.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document