Association Between Carpal Tunnel Syndrome And Usage Of Computer Keyboard And Mouse In Young, Adult And Middle-Aged Female Information Technology Professionals – A Survey Based Analysis

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most commonly reported nerve entrapment syndromes. There are almost 10 million cases present in India alone. It was also found women were more commonly affected compared to men. Higher prevalence rates of CTS can be found in certain occupational groups, for example, the construction workers. The present study was a cross-sectional study conducted among IT professionals (primarily females). The questionnaire consisted of 7-10 questions and was given to IT professionals. Different populations can be covered online. The sample size of this survey was 100. People seem to have a sufficient amount of knowledge on CTS. However, there is more on CTS that they should be made aware. 70% of people are aware of the carpal tunnel syndrome, but only around 50 % are aware of more information on CTS. Thus more research and studies must be further continued on this topic as it is a prevalent problem and millions of people are affected by it, and many might still be unaware of the problem in the world.

Download Full-text

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in a Melorheostotic Limb

Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) ◽

10.1016/s0266-7681(85)80031-0 ◽

1985 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

pp. 101-102 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

O. M. BÖSTMAN ◽

G. E. BAKALIM

Keyword(s):

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Upper Limb ◽

Carpal Tunnel ◽

Middle Aged ◽

Soft Tissue Lesions ◽

Aged Woman ◽

Middle Aged Woman ◽

Tunnel Syndrome ◽

The Right

Melorheostosis can be associated with various soft tissue lesions of the affected limb. A case is presented in which a severe carpal tunnel syndrome developed in a middle-aged woman with melorheostosis of the right upper limb since childhood.

Download Full-text

Clinical Update: Assessing Maximum Medical Improvement in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2003.julaug02 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 8 (4) ◽

pp. 4-5

Author(s):

Christopher R. Brigham ◽

James B. Talmage

Keyword(s):

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽

Carpal Tunnel ◽

Proper Time ◽

Carpal Tunnel Release ◽

Hand Function ◽

Factors Affecting ◽

Early Results ◽

Medical Evaluation ◽

Nerve Recovery ◽

Tunnel Syndrome

Abstract Permanent impairment cannot be assessed until the patient is at maximum medical improvement (MMI), but the proper time to test following carpal tunnel release often is not clear. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides) states: “Factors affecting nerve recovery in compression lesions include nerve fiber pathology, level of injury, duration of injury, and status of end organs,” but age is not prognostic. The AMA Guides clarifies: “High axonotmesis lesions may take 1 to 2 years for maximum recovery, whereas even lesions at the wrist may take 6 to 9 months for maximal recovery of nerve function.” The authors review 3 studies that followed patients’ long-term recovery of hand function after open carpal tunnel release surgery and found that estimates of MMI ranged from 25 weeks to 24 months (for “significant improvement”) to 18 to 24 months. The authors suggest that if the early results of surgery suggest a patient's improvement in the activities of daily living (ADL) and an examination shows few or no symptoms, the result can be assessed early. If major symptoms and ADL problems persist, the examiner should wait at least 6 to 12 months, until symptoms appear to stop improving. A patient with carpal tunnel syndrome who declines a release can be rated for impairment, and, as appropriate, the physician may wish to make a written note of this in the medical evaluation report.

Download Full-text

Clinical Update: Understanding Causation: An Example Using Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2007.novdec02 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 12 (6) ◽

pp. 5-8 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

J. Mark Melhorn

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome ◽

Carpal Tunnel ◽

Legal Responsibility ◽

Medical Evidence ◽

Anatomic Structure ◽

Legal Professionals ◽

Compensation Systems ◽

Tunnel Syndrome ◽

Four Levels

Abstract Medical evidence is drawn from observation, is multifactorial, and relies on the laws of probability rather than a single cause, but, in law, finding causation between a wrongful act and harm is essential to the attribution of legal responsibility. These different perspectives often result in dissatisfaction for litigants, uncertainty for judges, and friction between health care and legal professionals. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) provides an example: Popular notions suggest that CTS results from occupational arm or hand use, but medical factors range from congenital or acquired anatomic structure, age, sex, and body mass index, and perhaps also involving hormonal disorders, diabetes, pregnancy, and others. The law separately considers two separate components of causation: cause in fact (a cause-and-effect relationship exists) and proximate or legal cause (two events are so closely related that liability can be attached to the first event). Workers’ compensation systems are a genuine, no-fault form of insurance, and evaluators should be aware of the relevant thresholds and legal definitions for the jurisdiction in which they provide an opinion. The AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment contains a large number of specific references and outlines the methodology to evaluate CTS, including both occupational and nonoccupational risk factors and assigning one of four levels of evidence that supports the conclusion.

Download Full-text