scholarly journals Deep xenolith of platinum-bearing websterite from paleoproterozoic Volchetundra gabbro-anorthosite massif in the Kola region

2019 ◽  
Vol 486 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-82
Author(s):  
V. V. Chashchin ◽  
Y. E. Savchenko ◽  
M. S. Lyulko

The results of studies of the deep platinum-bearing xenolith found in the Volchetundra gabbro-anorthosite massif of the Kola region are presented. It is shown that xenolith with a size of 8.5 × 4 m is composed of websterite in the central part and plagiowebsterite in the marginal. The chemical and mineral composition of xenolith rocks was studied. Information is given on the contents of noble and chalcophile elements in them, as well as the composition of platinum group minerals.

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1453-1484
Author(s):  
Eduardo Mansur ◽  
Sarah-Jane Barnes ◽  
Cesar F. Ferreira Filho

ABSTRACT Most of the World's platinum-group element ore deposits occur as thin stratiform layers within layered intrusions. These layers generally contain disseminated base-metal sulfides or chromite. However, cryptic platinum-group element deposits also occur without chromite or base-metal sulfides in what are known as low-S-high platinum-group element deposits. The origin of these deposits is not clearly understood. The Luanga Complex hosts the largest platinum-group elements resource in South America (i.e., 142 Mt at 1.24 ppm Pt + Pd + Au and 0.11% Ni) and hosts both a platinum-group element deposit containing disseminated base-metal sulfides (style 1) and a low-S-high platinum-group element deposit (style 2). It therefore offers the opportunity to compare the two deposit types in the same overall geological setting and consider how the low-S-high platinum-group element deposit could have formed. The first deposit style is termed the Sulfide zone and consists of a 10–50 meter-thick interval with disseminated base metal sulfides, whereas the second style is named low-S-high-Pt-Pd zone and consists of 2–10 meter-thick discontinuous lenses of 1–5 meter-thick sulfide- and oxide-free harzburgite and orthopyroxenite with discrete platinum-group minerals. Secondary assemblages commonly replace primary igneous minerals to a variable extent throughout the deposit, and thus allow for investigating the effects of post-cumulus alteration on the distribution of a wide range of chalcophile elements in a magmatic sulfide deposit at both whole-rock and mineral scale. This study presents the whole-rock distribution of S, platinum-group elements, and Te, As, Bi, Sb, and Se in both mineralization styles and the concentration of trace elements in base-metal sulfides from the Sulfide zone. The Sulfide zone has Pt/Pd ratios around 0.5 and high concentrations of Te, As, Bi, Sb, and Se, whereas the low-S-high-platinum-group element zone has Pt/Pd ratios greater than 1 and much lower Se, Te, and Bi concentrations, but comparable As and Sb contents. This is reflected in the platinum-group element assemblage, comprising bismuthotellurides in the Sulfide zone and mostly arsenides and antimonides in the low-S, high platinum-group elements zone. Moreover, the base-metal sulfides from the Sulfide zone have anomalously high As contents (50–500 ppm), which suggest that the sulfide liquid segregated from a very As-rich silicate magma, possibly illustrated by an average komatiitic basalt that assimilated a mixture of upper continental crust and black shales. We interpret the low-S-high platinum-group elements zone as a product of S loss from magmatic sulfides during post-cumulus alteration of the Luanga Complex. Selenium, Te, Bi, and Pd were also lost together with S, whereas As and Sb were expelled from base-metal sulfide structures and combined with platinum-group elements to form platinum-group minerals, suggesting they may play a role fixating platinum-group elements during alteration. The remobilization of chalcophile elements from magmatic sulfide deposits located in the Carajás Mineral Province may represent a potential source for hydrothermal deposits found in the region.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 545
Author(s):  
Andrei Y. Barkov ◽  
Nadezhda D. Tolstykh ◽  
Robert F. Martin ◽  
Andrew M. McDonald

Tamuraite, ideally Ir5Fe10S16, occurs as discrete phases (≤20 μm) in composite inclusions hosted by grains of osmium (≤0.5 mm across) rich in Ir, in association with other platinum-group minerals in the River Ko deposit of the Sisim Placer Zone, southern Krasnoyarskiy Kray, Russia. In droplet-like inclusions, tamuraite is typically intergrown with Rh-rich pentlandite and Ir-bearing members of the laurite–erlichmanite series (up to ~20 mol.% “IrS2”). Tamuraite is gray to brownish gray in reflected light. It is opaque, with a metallic luster. Its bireflectance is very weak to absent. It is nonpleochroic to slightly pleochroic (grayish to light brown tints). It appears to be very weakly anisotropic. The calculated density is 6.30 g·cm−3. The results of six WDS analyses are Ir 29.30 (27.75–30.68), Rh 9.57 (8.46–10.71), Pt 1.85 (1.43–2.10), Ru 0.05 (0.02–0.07), Os 0.06 (0.03–0.13), Fe 13.09 (12.38–13.74), Ni 12.18 (11.78–13.12), Cu 6.30 (6.06–6.56), Co 0.06 (0.04–0.07), S 27.23 (26.14–27.89), for a total of 99.69 wt %. This composition corresponds to (Ir2.87Rh1.75Pt0.18Ru0.01Os0.01)Σ4.82(Fe4.41Ni3.90Cu1.87Co0.02)Σ10.20S15.98, calculated based on a total of 31 atoms per formula unit. The general formula is (Ir,Rh)5(Fe,Ni,Cu)10S16. Results of synchrotron micro-Laue diffraction studies indicate that tamuraite is trigonal. Its probable space group is R–3m (#166), and the unit-cell parameters are a = 7.073(1) Å, c = 34.277(8) Å, V = 1485(1) Å3, and Z = 3. The c:a ratio is 4.8462. The strongest eight peaks in the X-ray diffraction pattern [d in Å(hkl)(I)] are: 3.0106(26)(100), 1.7699(40)(71), 1.7583(2016)(65), 2.7994(205)(56), 2.9963(1010)(50), 5.7740(10)(45), 3.0534(20)(43) and 2.4948(208)(38). The crystal structure is derivative of pentlandite and related to that of oberthürite and torryweiserite. Tamuraite crystallized from a residual melt enriched in S, Fe, Ni, Cu, and Rh; these elements were incompatible in the Os–Ir alloy that nucleated in lode zones of chromitites in the Lysanskiy layered complex, Eastern Sayans, Russia. The name honors Nobumichi Tamura, senior scientist at the Advanced Light Source of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California.


2004 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 563-582 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Oberthur ◽  
F. Melcher ◽  
L. Gast ◽  
C. Wohrl ◽  
J. Lodziak

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1339-1362
Author(s):  
Malose M. Langa ◽  
Pedro J. Jugo ◽  
Matthew I. Leybourne ◽  
Danie F. Grobler

ABSTRACT The UG-2 chromitite layer, with its elevated platinum-group element content, is a key marker horizon in the eastern and western limbs of the Bushveld Igneous Complex and the largest platinum-group element chromite-hosted resource of its kind in the world. In contrast, much less is known about its stratigraphic equivalent in the northern limb, the “UG-2 equivalent” (UG-2E) chromitite. Recent studies on chromite mineral chemistry show similarities between the UG-2 and sections of the UG-2E, but also that the UG-2E was partially contaminated by assimilation of local metasedimentary rocks. Here, we provide a detailed characterization of sulfide minerals and platinum-group minerals in a suite of samples from the UG-2E and compare the results with data obtained from a reference suite of samples from the UG-2. Results from petrographic observations, electron probe microanalysis, laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, quantitative evaluation of materials by scanning electron microscopy, and δ34S isotopes show that: (1) sulfide minerals in the UG-2E and UG-2 consist mainly of pentlandite-chalcopyrite-pyrrhotite, but pyrrhotite is significantly more abundant in the UG-2E and almost absent in the UG-2; (2) iron contents in pentlandite from the UG-2E are significantly higher than in the UG-2; (3) platinum-group element contents within sulfide minerals are different between the two chromitites; (4) UG-2E platinum-group minerals are dominated by arsenides and bismuthotellurides, and by alloys and platinum-group element-sulfide minerals in the UG-2; (5) sulfide mineral chemistry and δ34S values indicate some crustal contamination of the UG-2E; and (6) sulfide mineral and secondary silicate mineral textures in both the UG-2E and UG-2 are indicative of minor, millimeter- to centimeter-scale, hydrothermal alteration. From our observations and results, we consider the UG-2E chromitite in the northern limb to be the equivalent to the UG-2 in the eastern and western limbs that has been contaminated by assimilation of Transvaal Supergroup footwall rocks during emplacement. The contamination resulted in UG-2E sulfide mineral elemental contents and platinum-group mineral types and abundances that are distinct from those of the UG-2 in the rest of the Bushveld.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Kiseleva ◽  
Yuriy Ochirov ◽  
Sergey Zhmodik ◽  
Brian Nharara

<p>The studied area is in the southeastern region of Eastern Sayan. Several tectonically dissected ophiolite complexes were exposed along the margin of the Gargan block and tectonically thrust over this block. Placer nuggets of PGE alloys from the Kitoy river were examined using a scanning electron microscope. Platinum-group minerals (PGM's) in placer deposits provide vital information about the types of their primary source rocks and ores as well as the conditions of formation and alteration. The primary PGM's are Os-Ir-Ru alloys, (Os, Ru)S<sub>2</sub>, and (Os, Ir, Ru)AsS. (Os, Ru)S<sub>2</sub> form overgrowth around the Os-Ir-Ru alloys. The secondary, remobilized PGM's are native osmium, (Ir-Ru) alloys, garutite (Ir, Ni, Fe), zaccarinite (RhNiAs), selenides, tellurides (Os, Ir, Ru), and non-stoichiometric (Pd, Pt, Fe, Te, Bi) phases (Fig.1). Secondary PGM's (garutite and RhNiAs) form rims around Os-Ir-Ru alloys, intergrowth with them, or form polyphase aggregates. Such PGM's (identical in composition and microstructure) are also found in chromitites from Neoproterozoic ophiolite massifs of Eastern Sayan (Kiseleva et al., 2014; 2020). Platinum-metal minerals, exotic for ophiolites, are found among secondary PGM's such as selenides and tellurides (Os, Ir, Ru), (Pt, Pd)<sub>3</sub>Fe, Pd<sub>3</sub>(Te, Bi), (Au, Ag), and non-stoichiometric (Pd, Pt, Fe, Te, Bi) phases. They occur as inclusions in the Os-Ir-Ru alloys or fill cracks in crushed grains of primary PGM's. PGM's in placer deposits of the Kitoy river are similar to the mineral composition of PGE in chromitites of the Ospa-Kitoy ophiolitic massif, which contain Pt-Pd minerals and Pt impurities in Os-Ir-Ru alloys (Kiseleva et al., 2014). Selenides (Os-Ir-Ru) are rare within PGM's from ophiolite chromitites (Barkov et al., 2017; Airiyants et al., 2020) and also occur in chromitites of the Dunzhugur ophiolite massif (Kiseleva et al., 2016). Features of selenides and tellurides (Os, Ir, Ru) indicate their late formation as a result of the influence of magmatic and metamorphic fluids on primary PGE alloys. The filling of cracks in crushed (Os-Ir-Ru) alloys indicates that selenides and tellurides formed during tectonic deformation processes. The source of platinum-group minerals from the Kitoy river placer is the Ospa-Kitoy ophiolite massif, and primarily chromitites.</p><p><img src="https://contentmanager.copernicus.org/fileStorageProxy.php?f=gepj.eb9553e3c70065361211161/sdaolpUECMynit/12UGE&app=m&a=0&c=f3ccc1c7cf7d06094d2afaa34fe9d9a1&ct=x&pn=gepj.elif&d=1" alt=""></p><p>Figure 1. BSE microphotographs of PGM from from alluvial placers of the Kitoy river</p><p>Mineral chemistry was determined at the Analytical Centre for multi-elemental and isotope research SB RAS. This work supported by RFBR grants: No. 16-05-00737a,  19-05-00764а, 19-05-00464a and the Russian Ministry of Education and Science</p><p>References</p><p>Airiyants E.V., Belyanin D.K., Zhmodik S.M., Agafonov L.V., Romashkin P.A.  // Ore Geology Reviews. 2020. V. 120. P.  103453</p><p>Barkov A.Y., Nikiforov A.A., Tolstykh N.D., Shvedov G.I., Korolyuk V.N. // European J. Mineralogy. 2017. V.29(9). P.613-621.</p><p>Kiseleva O.N., Zhmodik S.M., Damdinov B.B., Agafonov L.V., Belyanin D.K. // Russian Geology and Geophysics. <strong>2014</strong>. V. 55. P. 259-272.</p><p>Kiseleva O.N., Airiyants E.V., Belyanin D.K., Zhmodik S.M., Ashchepkov I.V., Kovalev S.A. // Minerals. 2020. V. 10. N 141. P. 1-30.</p><p>Kiseleva O.N., Airiyants E.V., Zhmodik S.M., Belyanin D.K / Russian and international conference proceedings “The problems of geology and exploitation of platinum metal deposits” – St.Petersburg: Publishing house of St.Petersburg State University. 2016. 184 P.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document