Organisation des Luzerner Forstdienstes – konsequente Entflechtung von hoheitlichen und betrieblichen Aufgaben | Organisation of the forestry services in Lucerne – differentiating between sovereign and management tasks

2001 ◽  
Vol 152 (11) ◽  
pp. 453-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Iselin ◽  
Albin Schmidhauser

During the past ten years most cantonal forest services have undergone re-organisations. Lucerne's cantonal forest administration initiated a fundamentally new way of providing forestry services by differentiating between sovereign tasks and management tasks. By examining the individual steps of the process we demonstrate how starting with the mandate,goals were developed and implemented over several years. Product managers assumed responsibility for products, as defined in the New Public Management Project, on a cantonal-wide basis. Work within a matrix organisation has led to significant changes. Territorial responsibilities are increasingly assumed by district foresters, who have modern infrastructures at their disposal in the new forestry centres. The re-organisation has led to forest districts being re-drawn and to a reduction in the number of forest regions. To provide greater efficiency,state forest management has been consolidated into a single management unit. The new forest reserve plan removes almost half of the state forest from regular forest management,resulting in a reduction in the volume of work and in the work force. We show how effective the differentiation of sovereignty tasks and management tasks has been in coping with the effects of hurricane Lothar.

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Rana ◽  
Dessalegn Getie Mihret ◽  
Tesfaye T. Lemma

Purpose This paper aims to interpret the role and professional issues of public sector performance auditing (PA) as a mechanism of neoliberal governmentality in the New Public Management (NPM) era by drawing on a Foucauldian conceptual lens to chart directions for future research. Design/methodology/approach The study uses the Foucauldian concepts of visibility and identity to interpret PA against the background of neoliberal imperatives of public sector management. Findings As the growing emphasis on PA in recent decades can be understood as driven by the concurrent development of neoliberal and NPM rationalities, the relatively underexploited concepts of visibility and identity allow further inquiry into important PA issues. This paper identifies avenues for future research under the following three themes: the issue of visibility in neoliberal governmentality and potential for auditors-general to expand the domain of influence of National Audit Offices through the PA role; the potential for PA as a unified distinct specialisation; and the neoliberal idea of professional identity as the individual expert and its interplay with the potential emergence of PA as a distinct function within the accounting profession. Research limitations/implications This conceptual paper is anticipated to stimulate future PA research. Key areas in this respect include the position and authority afforded to PA and the possibility of transformation in auditors’ conception of their professional worldview. Originality/value This paper charts direction for future research by interpreting PA using Foucauldian concepts of visibility and identity that remain to be exploited in PA research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 221258682110672
Author(s):  
Maeda Kazuyuki

Used as a method of university reform, new public management (NPM) involves an ideology of managerialism that conflicts with collegiality and causes ‘hybridisation’. In management organisations, when organisational goals are not shared at the individual level, this adjustment mechanism shifts to the organisational level. This study aimed to examine whether there are coordination mechanisms at the organisational level in universities by focussing on those in Japan, particularly private universities that require autonomous management. Multi-level analysis results revealed that although there is hybridisation associated with increased managerial pressure, there are no organisational-level mechanisms to reduce conflict. In conclusion, the authors point out the difficulty of organising private universities based on managerialism and suggests that university reform in Japan may be ‘hollowing out’ in the public sector as well. Further, the study emphasises the importance of undertaking a comparative study of governance arrangements in China’s private universities in the future.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e2381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nanna Mik-Meyer

This article examines how social workers and managers perceive meaningful work and expertise in six care and treatment facilities in Denmark. Based on 29 interviews with social workers (n=22) and managers (n=7), the article shows how New Public Management-inspired tools such as scoring schemas align with social work values such as “client-centeredness” and working with the individual welfare recipient face-to-face. The article finds that fitting social work into organizational schemas changes the work practices of social workers and also the way members of this profession define meaningful work and expertise. In addition, the article also finds that scoring schemas cause conflicts among social workers regarding the character of expertise when values of social work (to meet a welfare recipient’s need) must be aligned with NPM-inspired values of organizations (to meet managers’ demand for documentation).


Author(s):  
Tamarinde Haven ◽  
René van Woudenberg

AbstractIn this paper, we explore different possible explanations for research misconduct (especially falsification and fabrication), and investigate whether they are compatible. We suggest that to explain research misconduct, we should pay attention to three factors: (1) the beliefs and desires of the misconductor, (2) contextual affordances, (3) and unconscious biases or influences. We draw on the three different narratives (individual, institutional, system of science) of research misconduct as proposed by Sovacool to review six different explanations. Four theories start from the individual: Rational Choice theory, Bad Apple theory, General Strain Theory and Prospect Theory. Organizational Justice Theory focuses on institutional factors, while New Public Management targets the system of science. For each theory, we illustrate the kinds of facts that must be known in order for explanations based on them to have minimal plausibility. We suggest that none can constitute a full explanation. Finally, we explore how the different possible explanations interrelate. We find that they are compatible, with the exception of explanations based on Rational Choice Theory and Prospect Theory respectively, which are incompatible with one another. For illustrative purposes we examine the case of Diederik Stapel.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 1501
Author(s):  
Bekir Tavas ◽  
Yılmaz Serdaroğlu

Along with the process of transition into information society, fundamental changes in the field of public administration have come to the fore. This new concept of understanding emerges from the viewpoint of the New Public Administration which stems from the standpoint of the individual state with comparison to the classical public administration. The change in the position given to the individual by the concept of public administration led to the change in public institutions at the same time. In this model, called the New Public Management, public institutions have been managed in accordance with the provisions of the social state, on the one hand have been managed similar to private enterprises in terms of performance. It has been a reflection of this change on Administrative Law such as on public administration and public institutions. Today there is not enough study on the new public administration which is evaluated in terms of administrative law. For this reason, in this study, administrative law is included in the comparison of the new public management model and the classical public administration approaches. In this study, a literature is reviewed and related resources were searched and conceptual analysis of New Public Management in the theoretical sense was made and a compared with the public administration approaches. According to the results of the study, the model of new public management is the most useful model for the information society and the globalized public sphere. On the other hand, the administrative law which is developed on the basis of classical public administration approach cannot give effective and satisfactory answers to the emerging new public administration and management structure. For this reason, it is suggested that the new public management should be reshaped in accordance with the dynamically evolving and publicly structured interest. ÖzetBilgi toplumuna geçiş süreci ile birlikte, kamu yönetimi alanında da köklü değişiklikler meydana gelmiştir. Ortaya çıkan bu yeni anlayışın adı Yeni Kamu Yönetimi anlayışı olup, klasik kamu yönetimi anlayışına göre bireyi devletten önceleyen bir bakış açısına sahiptir. Kamu yönetimi anlayışının bireye verdiği konumun zaman içinde değişmesi, aynı zamanda kamu kurumlarının da değişikliğini elzem kılmıştır. Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği adı verilen modelde, kamu kurumları bir yandan sosyal devlet anlayışına uygun yönetilirken, diğer yandan performans açısından özel işletmelere benzer bir yönetime sahip olmuştur. İdare hukukunda da, kamu yönetiminde ve kamu kurumlarında meydana gelen bu değişimin yansımaları kaçınılmazdır. Günümüzde yeni kamu işletmeciliğinin idare hukuku açısından değerlendirildiği yeterince çalışma bulunmamaktadır. Bu nedenle bu araştırmada idare hukukunda yeni kamu işletmeciliği modeli ve klasik kamu yönetimi yaklaşımlarının kıyaslanmasına yer verilmiştir. Bu çalışmada literatür tarama modelinden yararlanılmış ve ilgili kaynaklar taranarak teorik anlamda Yeni Kamu İşletmeciliği’nin kavramsal analizi yapılmış, yeni kamu işletmeciliği ile kamu yönetimi yaklaşımları arasında bir karşılaştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre yeni kamu işletmeciliği modeli, bilgi toplumu ve küresel kamuya en uygun olan modeldir. Öte yandan klasik kamu yönetimi yaklaşımına dayalı olarak geliştirilen idare hukuku, ortaya çıkan bu yeni kamu yönetimi ve işletmeciliği yapısına yeterince etkili ve tatmin edici cevaplar verememektedir. Bu nedenle yeni kamu işletmeciliğinin dinamik sürekli gelişen ve kamuya göre şekillenen, kamu yararına ön plana alan yapısına uygun olarak yeniden şekillenmesi gerektiği ileri sürülmektedir.


2007 ◽  
Vol 37 (148) ◽  
pp. 369-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang Ludwig-Mayerhofer ◽  
Ariadne Sondermann ◽  
Olaf Behrend

The recent reform of the Bundesagentur fijr Arbeit, Germany's Public Employment Service (PES), has introduced elements of New Public Management, including internal controlling and attempts at standardizing assessments ('profiling' of unemployed people) and procedures. Based on qualitative interviews with PES staff, we show that standardization and controlling are perceived as contradicting the 'case-oriented approach' used by PES staff in dealing with unemployed people. It is therefore not surprising that staff members use considerable discretion when (re-)assigning unemployed people to one of the categories pre-defined by PES headquarters. All in all, the new procedures lead to numerous contradictions, which often result in bewilderment and puzzlement on the part of the unemployed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document