scholarly journals Kaitan antara Gaya Belajar, Kemandirian Belajar, dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP dalam Pelajaran Matematika

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rostina Sundayana

ABSTRAKPada umumnya kemandirian belajar dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP masih rendah. Guru sebagai pelaksana kegiatan belajar mengajar, menjadi faktor utama yang menjadi penyebab masalah tersebut terjadi. Salah satu upaya yang dapat dilakukan guru adalah menciptakan suasana belajar yang cocok dengan jenis gaya belajar siswa (auditorial, visual, ataupun kinestetik), sehingga diharapkan tujuan pembelajaran dapat dicapai secara efektif. Penelitian ini dilakukan di SMP Negeri 2 Tarogong Kidul kelas IX pada tahun ajaran 2015-2016 semester ganjil. Metode penelitian yang digunakan berupa penelitian eksplanatif komparatif-asosatif. Dari hasil penelitian terungkap bahwa: 1) Tidak terdapat perbedaan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik, antar siswa ditinjau dari jenis gaya belajarnya. 2) Tidak terdapat perbedaan tingkat kemandirian belajar matematika antar siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajarnya. 3) Kemandirian belajar siswa mempengaruhi tingkat kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Dari hasil penelitian tersebut menunjukkan bahwa setiap siswa, baik yang mempunyai gaya belajar auditorial, visual, ataupun kinestetik mempunyai tingkat kemandirian belajar dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematik yang sama. Selain itu, diketahui pula bahwa semakin tinggi tingkat kemandirian belajar siswa, maka semakin tinggi pula kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa.ABSTRACTIn general, independent learning and problem solving ability mathematics junior high school students is still low. Teachers practice teaching and learning activities, the main factor that causes the problem from happening. One of the efforts that teachers can do is to create a learning environment that matches the kind of student learning styles (auditory, visual, or kinesthetic), so hopefully learning objectives can be achieved effectively. This research was conducted in Tarogong South Junior High School 2 class IX in odd semester of school year 2015-2016. The method used in the form of comparative research explanation-associative. From the results of the study revealed that: 1) There is no difference in mathematical problem solving skills, among students in terms of the type of learning style. 2) There is no difference in the level of independence of learning mathematics among students in terms of learning styles. 3) Independence of student learning affects the level of students' mathematical problem solving ability. From the results of these studies indicate that each student, both of which have auditory learning style, visual, or kinesthetic have this level of independent learning and problem solving skills the same mathematical. In addition, it is also known that the higher the level of independence of student learning, the higher the students' mathematical problem solving ability.

Author(s):  
Niswatul Mufarihah ◽  
Rita Yuliastuti ◽  
Edy Nurfalah

Research on profiles of mathematical problem solving ability in junior high school students on the opportunities material in terms of learning styles aimed to obtain a description of the mathematical problem solving skills based learning styles of students, that learning styles were visual, auditory, and kinesthetic. This type of research was a qualitative descriptive. The subject of research were nine students, each type of learning style consisted of 3 students. The results showed that mathematical problem solving ability of students with the type of visual learning style was superior than the students with the type of auditory and kinesthetic.


Author(s):  
Dwi Noviani Sulisawati ◽  
Lutfiyah Lutfiyah ◽  
Frida Murtinasari

Mathematics is one of the important subjects in realizing the goals of education in Indonesia. However, in reality there are many students who have different problem solving abilities between one and the other and many students make mistakes when solving problems. The mistakes that are often carried out by students can also be influenced by differences in learning styles possessed. Therefore this article aims to describe differences in errors made by reflective-impulsive students in solving mathematical problems. This research is a qualitative descriptive that involving 2 research subjects with each subject having a different learning style. This research was conducted in class VII Pakusari Jember 1 Junior High School in the academic year of 2018/2019. The results of data analysis showed that differences in mistakes made by junior high school students with reflective-impulsive learning styles in solving mathematical problems were located at the stage of determining mathematical models and at the stage of completing mathematical models that had been made with the percentage of impulsive learning styles when compared to a subject that is reflective learning style.


Author(s):  
Dwi Ardy Dermawan ◽  
Pargaulan Siagian ◽  
Bornok Sinaga

This study aims to analyze and determine: (1) the level of mathematical problem solving ability in terms of learning styles after implementing problem-based learning; (2) errors and difficultiesexperienced by students in solving math problem solving abilities in terms of learning styles after implementing problem-based learning. This research is a descriptive qualitative research. The subjects of this study were 32 students of SMA Negeri 1 Rantau Selatan class X MIPA 1, who were then appointed to interview subjects based on the Kolb & Kolb learning style, namely accommodation, divergent, assimilation, and convergent based on the level obtained based on indicators and aspects of difficulty. The research results are as follows: (1) there are 8 students (25%) has a learning style accommodation with the level of mathematical problem solving ability medium category amounted to 3 students, and low category amounted to 5 students; there are 11 students(34.37%) have a divergent learning style with a level of mathematical problem solving ability 1 student in high category, 4 students in medium category, 6 students in low category; exist 9 students (28.13%) have an assimilating learning style with a level of mathematical problem solving ability medium category amounted to 2 students, and low category amounted to 7 people; exist4 students (12.5%) have a convergent learning style with a level of mathematical problem solving ability medium category amounted to 3 students, with the low category amounted to 1 student;(2) for students' difficulties with accommodation learning styles, students have difficulty on principle indicators; for the difficulties of students with divergent learning styles, students have difficulty on indicators of concepts and principles; for the difficulties of students with assimilation learning styles, students have difficulty in the concept indicators and indicators of verbal problems; for the difficulty of students with convergent learning styles, students have difficulty on principle indicators.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erva Erviana ◽  
Yunika Lestaria Ningsih ◽  
Putri Fitriasari

This research aims to describe the mathematical problem solving skills of junior high school students in relationship materials and functions with Polya strategy. The method used in research is a qualitative descriptive method. This research was conducted at SMP Negeri 35 Palembang with a class XI.6 research sample of 30 people. The research subjects were taken by 6 students, who were grouped into three categories, namely high, medium and low who were taken 2 people each from each category.. The data collection techniques in this study are tests, interviews and documentation. The results of the data obtained are then analyzed using data reduction analysis techniques, data presentation and verification. So the results of the study show that: 1) students who have high category problem solving skills are able to carry out all stages of problem solving, 2) students who have problem solving skills category are able to carry out the problem solving stages of the problem, but at the stage of carrying out planning and problem solving students make mistakes in operation and are not able to perform the stage of planning the answer correctly, 3) students who have low category problem solving skills are only able to carry out one stage that is understanding the problem and not being able to carry out the stage of planning the solving strategy planning and troubleshooting and re-examining the answers obtained correctly.


Author(s):  
M Imamuddin

One of the goals of mathematics learning according to the content standards of mathematics is that students have the ability to solve problems that include the ability to understand problems, design mathematical models, complete models and interpret solutions obtained. So that students from elementary school to university level have been trained in mathematical problem solving questions. However, there are still many weak students in achievement in the field of mathematics such as problem solving skills. One of the factors that influence the weakness of problem solving skills is the learning style. The purpose of this study was to analyze students' mathematical problem solving abilities based on learning styles. The type of this research is descriptive quantitative, with the research subject being students of class VIII MTsN totaling 38 students. The instrument used is Questionnaire and Test the ability to solve mathematical problems. Questionnaires are used to classify student learning styles, while problem solving ability tests are used to analyze students' problem solving abilities. The results of the study concluded that mathematical problem solving abilities of students who had a visual learning style were higher than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who had audiotorial and kinesthetic learning styles. And the ability of problem solving students who have audiotorial learning styles is higher than students who have kinesthetic learning styles.


Author(s):  
Hasnah HP

This research aimed for the mathematical problem-solving ability of comparative materials reviewed from visual learning styles in classroom students. This research was descriptive research, which seeked to find out and describe the mathematical problem-solving skills of comparative materials in terms of learning styles in classroom students. Processed data was the ability to solve mathematical problems in terms of uditory and visual learning styles. The data collection technique used was in the form of giving questionnaires, writing testers and interviews. The questionnaire used was a statement-shaped questionnaire to analyze each student's learning style, namely visual and auditory, problems used in the test of problem-solving skills in the form of comparative materials, which amount to 2 numbers, and interviews aimed to find out the learning skills of students in solving comparative problems. The validity of the data used was triangulation method. Data analysis techniques are by using data reduction, data presentation, and verification. Based on the processing of the data, it was obtained that subjects with mathematical problem-solving skills based on visual learning styles on SV1 subjects were able to meet all four indicators of problem-solving ability according to Polya's steps, namely understanding problems, drawing plans, implementing plans, and reevaluating.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 487
Author(s):  
Sutiana Ferica Resilona ◽  
Wahyu Hidayat ◽  
Heris Hendriana

This research is motivated by the results of previous research which shows that students' mathematical problem-solving ability is not as expected. One of the learning to improve the problem-solving ability of mathematics is problem-based learning. The purpose of this study is to determine the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving skills as a result of problem-based learning. This study is a quasi-experiment that implements two lessons: problem-based learning and conventional learning. Population in this research is a student of the junior high school in Regency of West Bandung. Sampling was done by purposive sampling and obtained two classes as research sample. The research instrument used is the test of mathematical problem-solving ability. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be concluded that the improvement of the problem-solving ability of mathematical students who get problem-based learning is better than the students who get conventional learning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 910-932
Author(s):  
M. Rais Ridwan ◽  
Heri Retnawati ◽  
Samsul Hadi ◽  
Jailani Jailani

Learning problem-solving skills emphasizes reasoning abilities to determine conclusions based on-premises, determining alternative solutions in decision making, thinking creatively in building alternatives to get keys, and critical thinking to evaluate the best solutions in answering problems. This study aims to identify biased publications using the trim and fill method in determining the effectiveness of learning on the problem-solving abilities of junior high school students. This research is a quantitative study with a meta-analysis approach. Data collection based on quantifiable variable numerical information analysis results from mathematical problem-solving abilities in two different learning groups. The data analysis technique uses bias publication analysis with the trim and fills method with the analysis procedure of calculating the effect size, heterogeneity test, calculating the summary effect using the random-effect model, and forest-plot analysis and biased publication analysis. The results showed no publication bias. The validity of differences in innovative and conventional learning effectiveness was valid on junior high school students' mathematics problem-solving skills. This shows that innovative learning effectively improves the mathematical problem-solving ability of junior high school students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document