ACR TI-RADS and ATA ultrasound classifications are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules located in the isthmus

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Jianhui Cao ◽  
Weiwei Huang ◽  
Pintong Huang ◽  
Yunlin Huang
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Management Recommendations ◽  
Diagnostic Capabilities

PURPOSE: To compare the application value of the American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS) and the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in the risk stratification of thyroid isthmic nodules. METHODS: A total of 315 patients with thyroid isthmic nodules (315 nodules) confirmed by surgical pathology or fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) were selected in this retrospective study. The nodules were evaluated and classified according to ACR TI-RADS and the ATA guidelines. Taking pathological results as the reference, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to evaluate the diagnostic capabilities of the ACR TI-RADS and the ATA guidelines for the risk stratification of thyroid isthmic nodules. The unnecessary biopsy rates and false-negative rates were compared. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis of ultrasonographic features of suspicious malignancies showed that an aspect ratio >  1 was not an independent risk factor for malignant thyroid nodules located in the isthmus (odds ratio: 3.193, 95%confidence interval: 0.882–11.552) (P = 0.077). The area under the ROC curves for diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules located in the isthmus in by the ACR TI-RADS and the ATA guidelines were 0.853 and 0.835, respectively. Under the management recommendations of the ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, the false-negative rates of malignant thyroid nodules were 66.2%(ATA intermediate suspicion), 62.3%(ACR TR 4), 81.8%(ATA high suspicion) and 86.5%(ACR TR 5). CONCLUSION: Both the ACR TI-RADS and the ATA guidelines have high diagnostic capabilities for the risk stratification of thyroid isthmic nodules. For ACR TR 4 and 5 and ATA intermediate- and high-suspicion thyroid isthmic nodules with a maximum diameter <  1 cm, the criteria for puncture should be lowered, and FNAB should be done to clarify their diagnosis.

scholarly journals Reducing the Number of Unnecessary Thyroid Biopsies While Improving Diagnostic Accuracy: Toward the “Right” TIRADS

2018 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Grani ◽  
Livia Lamartina ◽  
Valeria Ascoli ◽  
Daniela Bosco ◽  
Marco Biffoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
False Negative ◽  
False Negative Rate ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Classification Systems ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Korean Society ◽  
The Right

Abstract Context The prevalence of thyroid nodules in the general population is increasingly high, and at least half of those biopsied prove to be benign. Sonographic risk-stratification systems are being proposed as “rule-out” tests that can identify nodules that do not require fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology. Objective To comparatively assess the performances of five internationally endorsed sonographic classification systems [those of the American Thyroid Association, the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American College of Radiology (ACR), the European Thyroid Association, and the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology] in identifying nodules whose FNAs can be safely deferred and to estimate their negative predictive values (NPVs). Design Prospective study of thyroid nodules referred for FNA. Setting Single academic referral center. Patients Four hundred seventy-seven patients (358 females, 75.2%); mean (SD) age, 55.9 (13.9) years. Main Outcome Measures Number of biopsies classified as unnecessary, false-negative rate (FNR), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and diagnostic ORs for each system. Results Application of the systems’ FNA criteria would have reduced the number of biopsies performed by 17.1% to 53.4%. The ACR Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) allowed the largest reduction (268 of 502) with the lowest FNR (NPV, 97.8%; 95% CI, 95.2% to 99.2%). Except for the Korean Society of Thyroid Radiology TIRADS, all other systems exhibited significant discriminatory performance but produced significantly smaller reductions in the number of procedures. Conclusions Internationally endorsed sonographic risk stratification systems vary widely in their ability to reduce the number of unnecessary thyroid nodule FNAs. The ACR TIRADS outperformed the others, classifying more than half the biopsies as unnecessary with a FNR of 2.2%.

scholarly journals Ultrasonography and the American Thyroid Association Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Tool: Utility in Pediatric and Adolescent Thyroid Nodules

2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Creo ◽  
Fares Alahdab ◽  
Alaa Al Nofal ◽  
Kristen Thomas ◽  
Amy Kolbe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Multiple Features ◽  
Pediatric Malignancy ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Risk Stratification Tool ◽  
Increased Blood Flow

Background: Pediatric thyroid nodules are more likely to be malignant compared to those in adults and may have different concerning ultrasound (US) features. Recent adult guidelines stratify malignancy risk by US features. Our aim is to (1) describe and confirm US features that predict pediatric malignancy, and (2) apply the Adult American Thyroid Association (ATA) Risk Stratification Guidelines to a large pediatric cohort. Methods: We identified 112 children with 145 thyroid nodules from 1996 to 2015. Two blinded pediatric radiologists independently read all US images, described multiple features, and reported their overall impression: benign, indeterminate, or malignant. Each nodule was assigned an ATA risk stratification category. Radiologists’ impressions and ATA risk stratification were compared to histology and cytology results. Results: Multiple US features including a solid composition, presence of microcalcifications, irregular margins, increased blood flow, and hypoechogenicity were associated with increased odds of malignancy. ATA risk stratification correlated with the radiologists’ overall impression (p < 0.001). The sensitivity for detecting malignancy was comparable between both ATA stratification (91%) and the radiologists’ overall impression (90%). The specificity of the radiologists’ malignant overall impression (80%) was better compared to the ATA high risk stratification (54%). Conclusions: At our institution, pediatric radiologists’ overall impressions had similar sensitivity but better specificity for detecting malignancy than the ATA risk stratification tool by our convention. However, neither US-based methods perfectly discriminated benign from malignant nodules, supporting the continued need for fine needle aspiration for suspicious nodules. Further work is needed to develop an US-based scoring system specific to pediatric patients.

COMPARISON OF DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE BETWEEN THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY THYROID IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM AND AMERICAN THYROID ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 552-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qing Zhang ◽  
Jian Ma ◽  
Weijing Sun ◽  
Lanlan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Data System ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Thyroid Imaging ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Receiver Operating

Objective: We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the American College of Radiology Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR TI-RADS) with the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines in risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Methods: We performed a computerized search of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify eligible articles published before July 31, 2019. We included studies providing head-to-head comparison between ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines, with fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology results or pathology results as the reference standard. Quality assessment of included studies was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies–2 tool. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic modeling. We also performed multiple subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results: Twelve original articles with 13,000 patients were included, involving a total of 14,867 thyroid nodules. The pooled sensitivity of ACR TI-RADS and ATA guidelines was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–0.89) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80–0.95), with specificity of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56–0.76) and 0.46 (95% CI, 0.29–0.63), respectively. There were no significant differences between the two classification criteria in terms of both sensitivity ( P = .26) and specificity ( P = .05). For five studies providing direct comparison of ACR TI-RADS, ATA guidelines, and Korean TI-RADS, our analyses showed that the Korean TI-RADS yielded the highest sensitivity (0.89; 95% CI, 0.82–0.94), but at the cost of a significant decline in specificity (0.23; 95% CI, 0.17–0.30). Conclusion: Both classification criteria demonstrated favorable sensitivity and moderate specificity in the stratification of thyroid nodules. However, use of ACR TI-RADS could avoid a large number of biopsies at the cost of only a slight decrease in sensitivity. Abbreviations: ACR = American College of Radiology; ATA = American Thyroid Association; FNAB = fine-needle aspiration biopsy; HSROC = hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic; SROC = summary receiver operating characteristic; TI-RADS = Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; US = ultrasonography

Risk Stratification of Thyroid Nodules With Atypia of Undetermined Significance/Follicular Lesion of Undetermined Significance (AUS/FLUS) Cytology Using Ultrasonography Patterns Defined by the 2015 ATA Guidelines

2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (9) ◽  
pp. 625-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Lee ◽  
Kyunghwa Han ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
Hee Jung Moon ◽  
Jung Hyun Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Malignancy Rate ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of ultrasonography (US) patterns based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines for malignancy in atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) nodules. Methods: From January 2014 to August 2015, 133 thyroid nodules that were initially diagnosed as AUS/FLUS on fine needle aspiration (FNA) were included in this study. Each nodule was assigned a category with US patterns defined by the ATA guidelines. Clinical characteristics and US patterns were compared between the benign and malignant nodules, and malignancy rates were calculated according to the ATA guidelines. Results: The malignancy rate in the very low suspicion group was 0.0% in AUS/FLUS nodules. When applying the ATA guidelines, significant differences existed for US patterns between the benign and malignant nodules in the AUS group ( P = .032) but not the FLUS group ( P = .168). Conclusions: Ultrasonography patterns by the 2015 ATA guidelines can provide risk stratification for nodules with AUS cytology but not for ones with FLUS cytology. For nodules with AUS/FLUS cytology with the very low suspicion pattern of the ATA guidelines, follow-up US might be recommended instead of repeat FNA.

Improving the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules using an algorithm with combination of BRAFV600E mutation analysis and ultrasound pattern-based risk stratification

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-13
Author(s):  
Ya-Fang Zhou ◽  
Yi-Feng Zhang ◽  
Hui-Jun Fu ◽  
Wei-Ping Yang ◽  
Chong-Ke Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Mutation Analysis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Algorithm ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Brafv600e Mutation ◽  
Undetermined Significance

Purpose: To propose a diagnostic algorithm for improving the diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) thyroid nodules. Methods: This study retrospectively enrolled 77 consecutive patients with 81 AUS/FLUS nodules who underwent preoperative BRAFV600E mutation analysis. A new diagnostic algorithm was proposed that BRAFV600E mutation analysis for the Fine-needle aspiration cytology specimen was firstly carried out, in which positive BRAFV600E mutation indicated malignancy and classification of the nodules with negative BRAFV600E mutation was further performed based on ultrasound pattern-based risk stratification of American Thyroid Association Guidelines. The diagnostic performance of the new diagnostic algorithm was evaluated. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of new diagnostic algorithm were 94.6%, 84.0%, 91.4%, 86.9%, 90.1%, and 0.893, respectively. The proposed diagnostic algorithm significantly increased the diagnostic performances (AUROC: 0.893 vs. 0.837 and 0.795), sensitivity (94.6% vs. 71.4% and 75.0%), and accuracy (90.1% vs. 79.0% and 77.8%) compared with BRAFV600E mutation analysis alone and ultrasound pattern-based risk stratification alone (all P <  0.05). Conclusion: The proposed diagnostic algorithm is helpful for improving the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS nodules, which might be as a routine approach.

scholarly journals Validation of TIRADS ACR Risk Assessment of Thyroid Nodules in Comparison to the ATA Guidelines

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Goni Merhav ◽  
Sagit Zolotov ◽  
Ahmad Mahagneh ◽  
Leonid Malchin ◽  
Michal Mekel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Benign Nodules

Objectives: The prevalence of thyroid nodules in adults, detected by ultrasound (US), is reported as high as 68%. US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) is the test of choice used to determine the nature of the nodules. However, not more than 15% are found to be malignant. Reducing the number of unnecessary FNAB while identifying clinically significant malignant nodules is imperative. There are several guidelines suggested for risk stratification of thyroid nodules by US. The aim of our study was to validate and compare Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) American College of Radiology (ACR) and American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk stratification, specifically pertaining to reduction of unnecessary biopsies. Material and Methods: The study included 281 nodules in 245 patients who underwent FNAB between May 2018 and June 2019. Statistical analysis was performed only on 235 nodules that according to the TIRADS ACR and/ or ATA guidelines were eligible for FNAB. Data collected included nodule characteristics with corresponding TIRADS and ATA grading and cytological results using Bethesda scoring. Results: An agreement was found between the two criteria methods in 58.2% (137/235) of the cases. In 35.3% (83/235), ATA recommended FNAB while TIRADS did not. The specificity for ATA criteria was 7% (15/221) and for TIRADS was 37% (81/221). The sensitivity was 100% (14/14) for ATA and 86% (12/14) for TIRADS. Conclusion: Application of ACR TIRADS criteria can reduce the number of US-guided FNAB performed on benign nodules compared to ATA criteria, by 35%, with a cost of only two missed carcinomas that remained on further follow-up.

Performance of Five Ultrasound Risk Stratification Systems in Selecting Thyroid Nodules for FNA

2019 ◽  
Vol 105 (5) ◽  
pp. 1659-1669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Castellana ◽  
Carlo Castellana ◽  
Giorgio Treglia ◽  
Francesco Giorgino ◽  
Luca Giovanella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
True Negative

Abstract Context Ultrasound (US) risk stratification systems (RSSs) have been developed to reduce the number of unnecessary fine-needle aspiration procedures (FNA) in patients with thyroid nodules. Objective We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the ability of the 5 most common US RSSs for the appropriate selection of thyroid nodules for FNA. Data sources This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019131771). PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until March 2019. Study selection Original articles reporting data on the performance of AACE/ACE/AME, ACR TI-RADS, ATA, EU-TIRADS, and K-TIRADS were included. Data extraction The number of nodules classified as true negative, true positive, false negative, and false positive was extracted. Summary operating points were estimated using a random-effects model. Interobserver agreement was also assessed. Data synthesis Twelve studies evaluating 18 750 thyroid nodules were included. Participants were adult outpatients with thyroid nodules submitted to either FNA or core-needle biopsy or surgery and with available US images. The final diagnosis for malignant nodules was generally based on histology, while cytology was used for benign nodules. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) ranged from 2.2 to 4.9. A head-to-head comparison showed a higher relative DOR for ACR-TIRADS versus ATA (P = .002) or K-TIRADS (P = .002), due to a higher relative likelihood ratio for positive results. Conclusions The present meta-analysis found a higher performance of ACR TI-RADS in selecting thyroid nodules for FNA. However, the comparison across the most common US RSSs was limited by the data available. Further studies are needed to confirm this finding.

scholarly journals Malignancy Analyses of Thyroid Nodules in Patients Subjected to Surgery with Cytological- and Ultrasound-Based Risk Stratification Systems

Endocrines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-118
Author(s):  
Stefania Giuliano ◽  
Maria Mirabelli ◽  
Eusebio Chiefari ◽  
Margherita Vergine ◽  
Rita Gervasi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Surgery ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Indeterminate Cytology

The fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is the gold standard for the preoperative diagnosis of thyroid cancer. However, up to 30% of FNA examinations yield nondiagnostic or indeterminate results and this complicates patient management. Clinical features and ultrasound (US) patterns, including US risk stratification systems, could be useful in the preoperative diagnostic workup and prediction of malignancy, but the evidences are not univocal. Methods: 400 consecutive patients subjected to thyroid surgery were retrospectively enrolled at our institution in Calabria, Southern Italy. Preoperative US and FNA cytological descriptions, formulated according to the “Italian consensus for reporting thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology” (ICCRTC) classification and three US risk stratification systems (those developed by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, American College of Endocrinology and Associazione Medici Endocrinologi (AACE/ACE/AME), American Thyroid Association (ATA), and American College of Radiology (ACR-TIRADS)), were collected, along with histological results. Results: 147 thyroid cancer cases, in large majority papillary carcinomas, were detected on final histological examination. Almost two-thirds of patients subjected to thyroid surgery for either benign or malignant lesions were female. Patient’s age ≤20 years and between 21–30 years were clinical features associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer in logistic regression analyses. US features associated with thyroid cancer included irregular margins, solid composition, microcalcifications, and marked hypoechogenicity. The AACE/ACE/AME, ATA, and ACR-TIRADS risk categories, corresponding to specific US patterns, were strong predictors of malignancy in both genders, but not in nodules with indeterminate cytology. A measured difference between the longitudinal (L) and the anteroposterior (AP) diameter >5 mm, a proxy for a parallel-oriented oval shape of a nodule, emerged as a robust protective factor against thyroid cancer (OR 0.288 (95%CI 0.817–0.443); p < 0.001), regardless of cytological risk. Conclusions: Some, but not all, well-established predictors of TC have been confirmed in this study. Controversy surrounds the diagnostic performance of US risk stratification systems for the detection of thyroid cancer in the subgroup of nodules with indeterminate cytology, suggesting their use only to set the thresholds for FNA. A measured difference between L and AP diameters >5 mm may represent an additional and practical tool for ruling out malignancy in thyroid nodules, with the potential to reduce unnecessary surgical procedures.

scholarly journals Sonographic Risk Stratification Systems for Thyroid Nodules as Rule-Out Tests in Older Adults

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2458
Author(s):  
Giorgio Grani ◽  
Gabriela Brenta ◽  
Pierpaolo Trimboli ◽  
Rosa Falcone ◽  
Valeria Ramundo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
American Thyroid Association ◽  
Data Systems ◽  
Discriminative Performance ◽  
Sizable Number ◽  
Rule Out

Ultrasonographic risk-stratification systems (RSS), including various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS), were proposed to improve reporting and reduce the number of fine-needle aspiration biopsies. However, age might be a confounder since some suspicious ultrasonographic features lack specificity in elderly patients. We aimed to investigate whether the diagnostic performance of the RSS varied between age groups. All patients consecutively referred for thyroid biopsy between November 1, 2015, and March 10, 2020, were included. The malignancy risk of each nodule was estimated according to five RSS: the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology/Associazione Medici Endocrinologi guidelines, the American College of Radiology (ACR) TIRADS, the American Thyroid Association guidelines, the European TIRADS, and the Korean TIRADS. Overall, 818 nodules (57 malignant) were evaluated. The malignancy rate was higher in patients ≤ 65 years (8.1%) than in patients > 65 years (3.8%; p = 0.02). All RSS confirmed a significant discriminative performance in both age groups, with a negative predictive value of 100% in patients > 65 years, although specificity was lower in older patients. The ACR TIRADS was the best performing in both age groups. RSS could avoid a sizable number of biopsies when applied as rule-out tests in elderly patients.

The incidentaloma of the thyroid

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (05) ◽  
pp. 213-224
Author(s):  
C. Kobe ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
H. Schicha ◽  
M. Dietlein
Keyword(s):  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Thyroid Nodules ◽  
Outcome Measurement ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Small Cancer ◽  
The Family ◽  
Wait And See

Summary:The incidentally detected thyroid nodule using sonography is described as incidentaloma; the most nodules have a diameter up to 1.5 cm. Sonography will detect thyroid nodules in more than 20% of the population in Germany. Epidemiological studies investigating the prevalence of malignancy in such incidentalomas are missing. The incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer is about 3 per 100,000 people and year. However, several monocentric studies have shown a prevalence of malignancy of up to 10% of the thyroid nodules in selected patients’ group. The histology did not found microcarcinomas only, but also small cancer with infiltration of the thyroid capsule, lymph node metastasis or multifocal spread. The studies were not designed for outcome measurement after early and incidental detection of small thyroid cancers. Hypoechogenity, ill defined borders, central hypervascularization or microcalcifications were used as combined criteria for risk stratification. The second method for risk stratification is scintigraphy and further tests are warranted for hypofunctioning nodule ≥1 cm. Additionally, the family history, patient’s age <20 years, former radiation of the neck, and measurement of calcitonin should be regarded. Without such a risk stratification selection for fine needle aspiration is impossible. Fine needle aspiration of non-palpable incidentalomas led to non-representative or unequivocal cytological findings in up to 40%. Because better outcome of incidentally detected small thyroid carcinomas is not proved and because sonography, scintigraphy and fine needle aspiration remain imprecise regarding dignity of incidentalomas, fine needle aspiration is not the standard for small, non-palpable thyroid nodules. Conclusion: For management of incidentaloma, sonographically unsuspicious, scintigraphically indifferent (nodules ≥1 cm) and without any risk factors in patients’ history, wait and see is justified when patient is informed about the problem.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document